data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7af5/e7af598c6e63046169c52864b11d2bb58aaf5743" alt="Photo"
Weight of an F1 wheel (including tyre)
#1
Posted 26 September 2000 - 14:34
Advertisement
#2
Posted 02 May 2001 - 14:52
#3
Posted 02 May 2001 - 15:54
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc4ab/dc4ab909b6d59f9095741e9a7ca37a606e706a47" alt=":lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc4ab/dc4ab909b6d59f9095741e9a7ca37a606e706a47" alt=":lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc4ab/dc4ab909b6d59f9095741e9a7ca37a606e706a47" alt=":lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc4ab/dc4ab909b6d59f9095741e9a7ca37a606e706a47" alt=":lol:"
Just kidding!
#4
Posted 02 May 2001 - 19:03
wheel+tyre (front) = 10kg
wheel+tyre (back) = 12kg
In the ballpark or not? Anyone know?
If anyone does have accurate weights for the 2 above, do they also have (typical) weights that represent the Total Unsprung Weight for each corner of an F1 car - that is the weight of the Hub+Disk+Caliper+Pads+Upright? (Also + wheel-tether weight?).
The only weight I'm sure of is the weight of a carbon disk is about 1.4kgs as opposed to the weight of a steel disk being 3kgs.
TN
#5
Posted 03 May 2001 - 07:36
About the 8 months: I just noticed yesterday that there was this thread which I started 8 months ago. If I didn't see it by pure chance, I wouldn't have brought it back to the surface
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d598/7d598922e7727208f06905c4673c6dad6eb25002" alt=":)"
#6
Posted 05 May 2001 - 00:51
#7
Posted 05 May 2001 - 00:55
#8
Posted 05 May 2001 - 08:43
#9
Posted 05 May 2001 - 10:00
Now I'm more confused than before, with estimates going from 4 to 15 Kgs, but who am I to complain???
Again, thanks to all who replied
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d598/7d598922e7727208f06905c4673c6dad6eb25002" alt=":)"
#10
Posted 05 May 2001 - 10:53
I have a question, would there be much of an advantage for bridgestonemichelin in making their tires lighter? Surely if they made the compound a little bit lighter, rotational intertia would be lowered, giving them more acceleration. What about the rims? Or do they not bother with developing them?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5d4d/e5d4d60bae5d27e44f478a89701b5db936995696" alt=":stoned:"
#12
Posted 05 May 2001 - 22:34
Theres a photo in F1 Magazine of a gorl holding one above her head - they must be dead light ;)Originally posted by diosh
The mechanics usually lug them around, rather than pick them up easily with one hand, makes 10kg seem more likely.
#13
Posted 12 May 2001 - 06:40
Bjørn
#14
Posted 12 May 2001 - 13:13
Thanks so much
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d598/7d598922e7727208f06905c4673c6dad6eb25002" alt=":)"
#15
Posted 12 May 2001 - 15:17
#16
Posted 12 May 2001 - 16:51
Originally posted by rough_wood
How many Pounds are in a KG?
1 lb = 454 g
1 kg = 1000g = 2.2 lb
#17
Posted 16 May 2001 - 13:16
The weight is 11,5 kg for a front OZ frontwheel with raintyre from a Williams, i think it is a 94 or 95 wheel.
Bjørn
#18
Posted 16 May 2001 - 13:23
Thanks a lot for the info!!!
Care to swap your coffee table for mine?;)
#19
Posted 16 May 2001 - 15:59
Bjørn
#21
Posted 17 May 2001 - 16:13
#22
Posted 18 May 2001 - 08:18
Excellent info, many thanks!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d598/7d598922e7727208f06905c4673c6dad6eb25002" alt=":)"
So, we roughly have the weight of mid 90ies tires as being:
32.4 lbs = 14.7 Kg for a slick rear, and
25.3 lbs = 11.5 Kg for a rain front
Is/was there much difference in weight between slick and rain?
What about the huge mid 70ies tires? How much would they weight, considering the larger size, different compounds and different materials?