
Hawthorn/ Walters D-type Sebring 1955
#1
Posted 07 August 2008 - 22:01
Your expertise would be greatly appreciated.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 07 August 2008 - 22:19
If you don't have these pictures, I'll post them here if there's no problem with copyright issues.
Carles.
#3
Posted 07 August 2008 - 22:33
#4
Posted 08 August 2008 - 03:47
#6
Posted 11 August 2008 - 08:02
#7
Posted 11 August 2008 - 10:04
DCN
#8
Posted 11 August 2008 - 11:49
#9
Posted 11 August 2008 - 14:17
#10
Posted 11 August 2008 - 14:19
Originally posted by Jean L
The winner of Sebring 1955,if we consider it is the Jaguar #19 and not the Ferrari #25,is sometimes describe as black,but this factory car,XKD406,was very dark green at the TT54 and at Silverstone/mai 55.
The car was black when run on Daytona Beach and when tested at Sebring...
As for any resemblance to the Alfa DV - have the lenses misted up again Michael?

DCN
#11
Posted 11 August 2008 - 15:21
#12
Posted 11 August 2008 - 16:24
I think you may have been misinformed. The works Jaguars raced in a 'normal' shade of 'British Racing Green' - fairly dark but certainly not nearly black.Originally posted by Jean L
I have read somewhere that William Lyons hated the green colour and wanted his cars as less green as possible (and so almost black),is this correct or a legend ?
I think the dark green almost black story originated when Masten Gregory drove a works Cooper. He held the [typically American] superstition about green cars being unlucky so Cooper painted his car as dark a green as they could. This effectively meant all the works cars became this very dark green as Coopers weren't prepared to repaint the cars between races depending on who the driver would be, nor did they want to enter a team of cars of differing colours.
#13
Posted 11 August 2008 - 20:01
DCN
#14
Posted 11 August 2008 - 20:13
Sorry to breach your insular sensitivity ;), but there's definitely a resemblance!Originally posted by Doug Nye
As for any resemblance to the Alfa DV - have the lenses misted up again Michael?![]()
DCN
#15
Posted 11 August 2008 - 20:21

DCN
#16
Posted 11 August 2008 - 21:51
The only reference to colour I could find was in Lord Montagu's book 'Jaguar' ( Cassell 1961). On page 141 he states " The works Jaguars were absent too, but Briggs Cunningham was pinning his principal hope on his newly acquired D-type which ran, incidentally, in British Racing Green, and not in the American national colours of blue and white which it was to wear at Le Mans in the summer." Chris Nixon, while not making any reference to the colour scheme, states in Mon Ami Mate that "the Coventry firm loaned a D-type to the American millionaire sportsman Briggs Cunningham, who entered it for the Sebring 12-hour race in mid March and invited Hawthorn to drive it with Phil Walters." thus I assumed (always a dangerous thing to do) that, given the LAT photo, it was painted BRG. Clearly this may not have been the case. But why black?
It does seem that JMH has left us something of a legacy of driving cars in unconfirmed colours e.g the green Ferrari in Argentina in 1953.
#17
Posted 11 August 2008 - 22:15
As for the Jaguar.... I haven't got a black one in my collection, but I just might have soon.

Duncan, I know the term British Racing Green encompasses numerous shades, but I think the version used on the factory D-types was very very dark; much darker than, say, what Vanwall, Connaught and Lotus used. As you said yourself, the factory Coopers were pretty dark - and I would have put the Jaguars in that area, colour-wise.
#18
Posted 11 August 2008 - 23:16
#19
Posted 13 August 2008 - 15:31
Ed Rahal remembers the D-type well. It appeared in practice only during the Fort Pierce National in Florida on February 27, 1955, where it was tested by Phil Walters in preparation for Sebring.
Ed Rahal says the D-type, the first one ever seen in the U.S., was dark BRG.
above as told to Willem Oosthoek.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 13 August 2008 - 16:42
#21
Posted 13 August 2008 - 17:00
#22
Posted 13 August 2008 - 20:16
As for the Jaguar.... I haven't got a black one in my collection, but I just might have soon.
I've read the thread on the green Ferrari, Barry, and am planning to add one to my collection. The Jag is currently dark green but the aerosol of black paint is on standby! Slightly off thread we have a couple of 'what if' models on the stocks, a '62 sharknose in Rob Walker colours, while a friend has a '68 Ferrari with a Scottish blue top as promised to Jackie Stewart by the Old Man.
In the light of Doug's colour photograph I remain curious as to why the Sebring D-type should have been repainted green instead of white and blue.
#23
Posted 13 August 2008 - 20:30
Sorry to get O.T.
#24
Posted 13 August 2008 - 21:14
#25
Posted 14 August 2008 - 11:03
You ARE a wonder.

#26
Posted 14 August 2008 - 22:08

#27
Posted 15 August 2008 - 12:43
Was there generally so little thought give to cosmetics? Was the standard of overall preparation as correspondingly casual?
When Penske first showed up at the IMS, there was a collective deep breath taken at the cleanliness and obviously high standards of preparation of his cars.
But when I see pics of a rasty D-Jag driven by Mr Hawthorn, adhesive-tape flapping in the breeze, it gives pause to ask: what was important to the teams back then in terms of race prep? Apparently tidyness was not high on the list.
#28
Posted 15 August 2008 - 12:54
These days the important thing is keeping the sponsor.
#29
Posted 15 August 2008 - 13:53
This may account for it's cosmetically 'tatty' condition? Nevertheless, it must have been in pretty good nick!
Given another week, my guess is it would have been painted white with blue stripes.........Thus obviating the need for this interesting discussion!
I only have B&W photos of it , like everyone else

WRONG!
It arrived in the USA during the week before the Daytona race meeting, a month before Sebring.
The remainder of the post (above) still stands. Phil Walters drove it at Daytona intwo races, including the Paul Whitman trophy. 20-21 February.
Walters won both races in it, so surely there are some photos out there?
#30
Posted 15 August 2008 - 13:54
Originally posted by lanciaman
It always surprises me when I see photos of Famous Cars driven by Famous People, and the machines appear so tatty.
Was there generally so little thought give to cosmetics? Was the standard of overall preparation as correspondingly casual?
When Penske first showed up at the IMS, there was a collective deep breath taken at the cleanliness and obviously high standards of preparation of his cars.
But when I see pics of a rasty D-Jag driven by Mr Hawthorn, adhesive-tape flapping in the breeze, it gives pause to ask: what was important to the teams back then in terms of race prep? Apparently tidyness was not high on the list.
The overall preparation of most of the cars was often better than the appearance of those cars. However, the cars looked tatty because they were tatty, the sports machinery more so than the monopostos for some reason. Or so it seemed at the time, perhaps simply because it was more obvious, particularly since some of the Hero Machines were rather scruffy once you looked more closely.
One of the revelations for most Europeans was the AAA/USAC emphasis on appearance of both cars and crew personnel. Many of the reports on the "Monzanapolis" races raise this point time and again, commenting on how well-turned out the American machinery and their crews looked. SCI (or maybe it was C/D by then) did a light-hearted look at the contrasts between the American (Championship Trail) and European participants, their machinery and attire. In retrospect, it was really quite on the nose.
When Penske got the "collective deep breath taken at the cleanliness and obviously high standards of preparation of his cars," it was not at the IMS, but when he began to field cars in the Can-Am, USRRC, Trans-Am, and Continental series races. Others had led the way, Cunningham and Hall to mention only two of many, but Penske took it to a different level.
Returning to the mid-Fifties and earlier, preparation work tended to be focused on the mechanical bits with the appearance being far down the worklist. It was not ignored, simply not as important a priority.