twin engined racing cars
#1
Posted 15 August 2008 - 19:58
http://forums.autosp...y=&pagenumber=1
It is worth a look for the Mannic special alone ( helcopter engine driving a centrifugal compressor feeding a ford engine etc. etc.)
Traditionally twin engined cars have failed due to engine synchronisation problems as well as the architectural issues like weight. John Cooper had a very serious road accident in a twin mini cooper.
What strikes me is that with modern engine ECU technology maintaining synchronisation ought to be easier now and with suitable torque sensing sensors on the drive shafts would it not bne possible to get rid of complex mechanical links and just rely on the ECU to do all the matching for gear changes and wheelspin control left/right or front/rear.
Is this part of what FADEC does in a multi enigned aircraft?
So four superbike engines ( one per wheel) equals 700 bhp for under 400kg of total engine/gearbox/differential weight.........
Advertisement
#2
Posted 15 August 2008 - 23:46
Originally posted by mariner
Is this part of what FADEC does in a multi enigned aircraft?
No, FADEC just looks after it's own engine - Limits the EGT, RPM, acceleration/deceleration rates, and auto-ignition, etc.
#3
Posted 16 August 2008 - 05:23
Originally posted by mariner
Traditionally twin engined cars have failed due to engine synchronisation problems as well as the architectural issues like weight. John Cooper had a very serious road accident in a twin mini cooper.
So four superbike engines ( one per wheel) equals 700 bhp for under 400kg of total engine/gearbox/differential weight.........
I am investigating this (casualy) now and trying to keep it simple, I am limited by what I can buy and my best option is 2x 120hp 1600cc FWD units. The threads not so old in this forum.
http://forums.autosp...&highlight=twin
John Cooper's Mini had nothing to do with it being a twinny, it broke (or a bolt came out of) a rear suspension link sending the car suddenly out of control.
I think 2 is enough but I like your thinking, wish I knew more about electronics to do it myself but not so hard to find a Chinese nurd around somewhere I think.
#4
Posted 16 August 2008 - 06:46
http://www.motortren...1046/index.html
http://www.autoblogg...ans-crankshaft/
#5
Posted 17 August 2008 - 03:41
#6
Posted 17 August 2008 - 09:56
#7
Posted 18 August 2008 - 13:30
Originally posted by Catalina Park
I . Phil Irving
That's spelt G-O-D isn't it
#8
Posted 05 September 2008 - 00:18
Originally posted by desmo
I found some examples of similar-sounding crankshaftless engines in one of our old oddball engine threads here. I think they were radial aircraft engines but I can't remember who built them.
Fairchild-Caminez: not strictly sans crankshaft, but interesting, none the less...
#9
Posted 05 September 2008 - 01:45
#10
Posted 05 September 2008 - 03:32
#11
Posted 06 September 2008 - 11:44
Originally posted by Bill Sherwood
Here's a twin-engined burn-out car with a fine pedigree and high engineering standards.
In the 1940s there were big Ford trucks and road tractors with twin side-by-side flathead V8s. Used for logging and mountain work etc. Had two clutches and transmissions as well, so they should have been fun to drive.
#12
Posted 13 September 2008 - 16:31
Out of interest, would it be possible to make a four wheel drive car using an average FWD transverse drivetrain, turned through 90 degrees and mid mounted, using some long driveshafts and some modified diffs at the front and back?
#13
Posted 13 September 2008 - 17:15
Originally posted by robroy
Out of interest, would it be possible to make a four wheel drive car using an average FWD transverse drivetrain, turned through 90 degrees and mid mounted, using some long driveshafts and some modified diffs at the front and back?
Robroy, 1 word....
Peugeot205T16GroupBWorldChampionshipwinningrallycar
or
Peugeot205T16ParisDakarwinners
or
Peugeot405T16PikesPeakwinner
Google 'em.
#15
Posted 28 September 2008 - 08:34
Originally posted by cheapracer
Robroy, 1 word....
Peugeot205T16GroupBWorldChampionshipwinningrallycar
or
Peugeot205T16ParisDakarwinners
or
Peugeot405T16PikesPeakwinner
Google 'em.
The 205T16 used a citroen longitudinal transaxle mated to the Pug engine and mounted transversely with the rear diff in a housing that mated to the original box casing and a propshaft running forward...this place the engine directly behind the passenger and gave access to the belts etc on the front of the engine.
#16
Posted 04 October 2008 - 10:22
#17
Posted 04 October 2008 - 20:01
Let's not forget the Chaparral 2F while we're here, though.
#18
Posted 14 October 2008 - 15:51
.
#19
Posted 14 October 2008 - 16:23
Twin engined and even 4 engined dtop fuel cars as well as Miceky Thompson's 4 engined Pontiac Challenger at Bonneville in addition to THe Summer's Brothers Goldenrod which did hold the LSR briefly
Advertisement
#20
Posted 14 October 2008 - 19:43
Originally posted by GeorgeTheCar
there have been many multiple engined cars in drag racing and lakes events in the US
Twin engined and even 4 engined dtop fuel cars as well as Miceky Thompson's 4 engined Pontiac Challenger at Bonneville in addition to THe Summer's Brothers Goldenrod which did hold the LSR briefly
Briefly? Three decades if you don't count crippled airplanes.
#21
Posted 14 October 2008 - 23:01
#22
Posted 15 October 2008 - 00:45
Originally posted by Engineguy
On eBay... Two flat four engines; Subaru in the front, VW in the rear. Are Subaru transaxle gear ratios identical to those in the VW transaxle? OOPS!
.
No and they don't have to be, the drivetrains aren't linked leaving the engines to operate at different RPM.
#23
Posted 16 October 2008 - 14:46
z cars have done a lot with twin engines, they do the twin engined Tiger. I think they originally started with grasstrack cars.
#24
Posted 14 February 2009 - 22:22
1957 Citroen 2CV Safari 4x4... not a one-off, it was a production vehicle with dual drivetrains.
ENGINES
Two, one at the front and one at the rear
Number of cylinders per engine - 2
Cubic capacity 425 cc per engine
Fiscal power 5 CV
TRANSMISSION
The two clutches are controlled hydraulically
The two gearboxes each with four forward speeds are controlled simultaneously by the same floor mounted gearlever
A lever permitted the rear gearbox to be run in neutral thereby allowing the car to be driven in normal front wheel drive mode
The vehicle can also be driven by the rear engine only.
Front and rear quadruple universal joints are fitted
WHEELS AND TYRES
155 x 380 (155 x 400 on early models)
ELECTRICS
One 6 volt 60 Ah battery
2 dynamos
FUEL TANKS
Two - one per engine, located under front seats
PERFORMANCE
Top speed 100 kph
Fuel consumption with both engines - 9 litres/100 km on tarmac and between 10 and 12 litres/100 km off road
MORE at http://www.citroenet...2cv/2cv-06.html
.
#25
Posted 16 February 2009 - 09:41
the "Twinnie" - Warren Creagh
#26
Posted 18 February 2009 - 02:12
Looks rather ugly but seems to be quite functional and probably fun [and hairy] to drive.Originally posted by 275 GTB-4
NSW Hill Climb Championship - Fairbairn Park 2009
the "Twinnie" - Warren Creagh
#27
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:12
Hmmm no steering rack on that rear - front mini subframe - maybe next year. Suggestion - automatic transmissions front and rear - would sound hilarious.Originally posted by Lee Nicolle
Looks rather ugly but seems to be quite functional and probably fun [and hairy] to drive.
#28
Posted 23 February 2009 - 14:22
http://www.youtube.c...re=channel_page
Look on the rightside for more links of it actually driving, nice job.
#29
Posted 27 February 2009 - 22:15
I used to have a brochure of the twin-engined one, it showed the car climbing a very steep embankment of loose rocks.