smallest v6 or v8?
#1
Posted 08 September 2008 - 08:50
anyone know what the smallest v6 or v8 used in a production car is? its just a curious thought, nothing more than that.
is there much point in having a small v6 or v8 anyway?
ta for your time,
minigeff
Advertisement
#2
Posted 08 September 2008 - 09:25
#3
Posted 08 September 2008 - 10:33
The original Lancia V6 was less than 1800cc, I think. Again, I'm sure there were smaller engines.
#4
Posted 08 September 2008 - 12:09
#5
Posted 08 September 2008 - 12:10
#6
Posted 08 September 2008 - 12:12
Smallest V6 engine (gasoline) - 1,597 cc (97 cu in) - 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer 6A1
Honorable mention: - 1,000 cc (61 cu in) - 1960s DKW F102 (a two-stroke V6) (about 100 produced for testing, 13 fitted to road cars)[1]
Smallest V6 engine (Diesel) - 2,496 cc (152 cu in) - 1996 Audi/VW 2.5 TDI (in multiple cars)
Largest V6 engine (gasoline) - 7,800 cc (476 cu in) - 1966 GMC 1000-3500 series 478E 60° V6
Largest V6 engine (Diesel automobiles) - 4,304 cc (263 cu in) - 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, Supreme Brougham, Calais GM LT6
Smallest road car V8 engine (gasoline) - 1,990 cc (121 cu in) - 1975 Ferrari 208 GT4
Honorable mention - 1,600cc (98 cu in) - 1998 Suzuki C2 (concept car)
Smallest V8 engine (Diesel) - 3,328 cc (203 cu in) - 2000 Audi A8 3.3 TDI
Largest V8 engine (gasoline) - 8,194 cc (500 cu in) - 1970 Cadillac Eldorado 500
Honorable mention: 12,782 cc (780 cu in) - 2006 Weineck Cobra 780 (limited edition tuner car)
Largest V8 engine (Diesel) - 7,275 cc (444 cu in) - 1997 Ford F250 Power Stroke
http://en.wikipedia....tives#V6_engine
#7
Posted 08 September 2008 - 12:18
so if the smallest v6 was a 1.6 and the smallest v8 was a 2.0 ltr, is there actually any point?
just for curiousities sake, whats the advantage of having a 2.0l v8 as opposed to a 2.0l straight 4?
#8
Posted 08 September 2008 - 14:01
http://www.breganzan...6/v6eng_800.jpg
#9
Posted 08 September 2008 - 14:19
Originally posted by minigeff
cool, thanks for your replies guys.
so if the smallest v6 was a 1.6 and the smallest v8 was a 2.0 ltr, is there actually any point?
just for curiousities sake, whats the advantage of having a 2.0l v8 as opposed to a 2.0l straight 4?
smoother power delivery to the crank
#10
Posted 08 September 2008 - 15:31
Originally posted by OfficeLinebacker
smoother power delivery to the crank
Much more important in terms of power is valve area and RPM potential.
Mazda made a small V-6 for a couple year in the mid-90's. I think it was about 2 liters.
#11
Posted 08 September 2008 - 15:31
Originally posted by minigeff
is there actually any point?
just for curiousities sake, whats the advantage of having a 2.0l v8 as opposed to a 2.0l straight 4?
A few pretty obvious advantages:
Better mechanical balance
Higher rpm for given stress levels therefore
More power for given stress levels
Lower c.g. relative to crankshaft
smoother power delivery (as mentioned above)
#12
Posted 08 September 2008 - 15:35
i apologise for my lack of mechanical knowledge, but i'm always willing to learn.
cheers for your time.
minigeff
#13
Posted 08 September 2008 - 17:07
1.8Originally posted by Fat Boy
Much more important in terms of power is valve area and RPM potential.
Mazda made a small V-6 for a couple year in the mid-90's. I think it was about 2 liters.
#14
Posted 08 September 2008 - 17:44
Originally posted by Fat Boy
Much more important in terms of power is valve area and RPM potential.
Mazda made a small V-6 for a couple year in the mid-90's. I think it was about 2 liters.
1800, and I wonder if anyone put one into an MX-5 instead of the 'four'? Might've been interesting.
#15
Posted 08 September 2008 - 17:58
Originally posted by petefenelon
1800, and I wonder if anyone put one into an MX-5 instead of the 'four'? Might've been interesting.
Interesting, if a bit pointless. I mean the sound would be more pleasant with a V6, but there was nothing wrong with the old inline 4. Relatively unsophisticated as it was it still had a higher specific power output than the replacement engines in the 3rd generation mx5.
Now if they were going to put a 3 litre v6 and some fatter rear tyres on it, then we'd have something
#16
Posted 08 September 2008 - 18:12
Originally posted by petefenelon
1800, and I wonder if anyone put one into an MX-5 instead of the 'four'? Might've been interesting.
Why stop at Chicago on your way to New York?
#17
Posted 09 September 2008 - 01:36
#18
Posted 09 September 2008 - 10:16
The smallest V8 I know is the Drysdale 750cc bike that is in limited production in Australia - there is a 1000cc version now. It uses many components from Yamaha FZR 400cc bike engines.
http://home.mira.net/~iwd/
#19
Posted 09 September 2008 - 16:36
Originally posted by petefenelon
1800, and I wonder if anyone put one into an MX-5 instead of the 'four'? Might've been interesting.
Worth considering for the sound alone! A KLZE powered Miata...
http://videos.street...Miata_72908.htm
Advertisement
#20
Posted 09 September 2008 - 19:01
http://www.guzzi-day...es/usinemg5.jpg
#21
Posted 09 September 2008 - 19:08
http://en.wikipedia...._Prix_500_cc_V8
oops looks like our fearless leader beat me to the Moto Guzzi
#22
Posted 09 September 2008 - 21:46
Originally posted by desmo
If we're getting into racing bikes there's always the Moto Guzzi V-8 at 500cc.
http://www.guzzi-day...es/usinemg5.jpg
#23
Posted 09 September 2008 - 21:58
It was also 500cc.
#25
Posted 10 September 2008 - 06:28
Originally posted by desmo
If we're getting into racing bikes there's always the Moto Guzzi V-8 at 500cc.
http://www.guzzi-day...es/usinemg5.jpg
No the Drysdale can be used on the road.
#26
Posted 10 September 2008 - 06:39
http://www.connaughtmotorco.com/
#27
Posted 11 September 2008 - 06:37
#28
Posted 11 September 2008 - 09:54
#29
Posted 12 September 2008 - 11:35
i have seen a scale rolls royce merlin made by a guy called barry hares. its made from over 7000 parts, is perfectly in scale and operates in exactly the same way except for fact its only got one oil pump. its in 1:5 scale it think, and it runs and sounds like a merlin. its amazing.
thats a v12 with a displacement of 11.31 cu in!
http://www.enginehis...g/merlin_xx.htm
mental skills!
ta for now, minigeff
ps, don't think it would power a car though!
#30
Posted 12 September 2008 - 20:24
Originally posted by minigeff
nice!
i have seen a scale rolls royce merlin made by a guy called barry hares. its made from over 7000 parts, is perfectly in scale and operates in exactly the same way except for fact its only got one oil pump. its in 1:5 scale it think, and it runs and sounds like a merlin. its amazing.
thats a v12 with a displacement of 11.31 cu in!
http://www.enginehis...g/merlin_xx.htm
mental skills!
ta for now, minigeff
ps, don't think it would power a car though!
I've seen a similar engine running, although I'm not certain to what scale that engine was built (the scale was based on the size of the gears he had availible). It was made by a former Saab engineer, and he had a lot of these small engines; Merlin, Miller-Offenhauser, Saab two stroke and lots of others. He was also making one for some boss at VAG I believe, don't remember what engine it was, could have been the Veyron engine, but I'n not sure.
He also pointed out that the Merlin supercharger wasn't functional due to scaling, and I would assume that's also the case for this engine. He didn't know how much power they produced, but the sound was very realistic.
#31
Posted 14 September 2008 - 05:19
#32
Posted 14 September 2008 - 21:34
Originally posted by desmo
If we're getting into racing bikes there's always the Moto Guzzi V-8 at 500cc.
http://www.guzzi-day...es/usinemg5.jpg
And as far as 6 cylinders are concerned there was of course the mid-60s 250cc Honda six: http://www.vf750fd.c...ekaas/1966.html
#33
Posted 15 September 2008 - 14:28
#34
Posted 17 September 2008 - 05:26
#35
Posted 17 September 2008 - 07:21
I remember Cosworth built a 500cc GP engine based on DFV components, but that was a parallel twin.Originally posted by Ray Bell
Somebody once built a bike with a scaled down DFV...
It was also 500cc.
Jim.
#36
Posted 20 September 2008 - 11:57
Or was that the bike that raced in AMA series? Parallel twin with the engine being a full stress member?Originally posted by jatwarks
I remember Cosworth built a 500cc GP engine based on DFV components, but that was a parallel twin.
Jim.
#37
Posted 20 September 2008 - 13:27
There have been quarter-scale versions, but to me this is far more impressive since it is 1:6, and is a more accurate replica to boot. Be sure to check out the videos.
#38
Posted 23 September 2008 - 20:48
#39
Posted 24 September 2008 - 10:35
I believe it was built for GP racing, but I don't think the backing was raised to go far beyond building a prototype, let alone to race it. I doubt that it would have been able to compete with the 2-strokes anyway.Originally posted by Powersteer
Or was that the bike that raced in AMA series? Parallel twin with the engine being a full stress member?
I don't know its fate; it might well have ended up in the USA.
Jim.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 24 September 2008 - 11:52
Originally posted by jatwarks
I remember Cosworth built a 500cc GP engine based on DFV components, but that was a parallel twin.
Jim.
Probably the engine they developed for Norton, for both a production bike and a race version. Neither version was a success.
#41
Posted 24 September 2008 - 13:22
Originally posted by jatwarks
I remember Cosworth built a 500cc GP engine based on DFV components, but that was a parallel twin.
Jim.
They did and it was a flop. They also built a lot more 750cc twins for a spec race series.
Although common for motorcycles, there is a not so common production 600cc 4 cyclinder car engine in China.