
The effects of world recession on motor sport
#401
Posted 04 February 2009 - 15:04
Advertisement
#402
Posted 04 February 2009 - 15:05
#403
Posted 04 February 2009 - 15:09
#404
Posted 04 February 2009 - 15:15
I reckon it's fairly close to break even for them, even though they'd prefer to have an engine war going. Honda USA seems to survive on it's own regardless of what the rest of the company is doing globally.
#405
Posted 04 February 2009 - 15:43
Honda USA seems to survive on it's own regardless of what the rest of the company is doing globally.
Indeed it does. Honda should have got it to fund the F1 team....
#406
Posted 05 February 2009 - 11:10
http://www.pitpass.c...es_art_id=36974
#407
Posted 05 February 2009 - 11:29
How true.Originally posted by Andrew Kitson
Love the 'strapped for cash' line!

(I'm worried, though, by the thought of the poor drivers possibly being called upon to "excavate their bowels".)
#408
Posted 11 February 2009 - 09:58
#409
Posted 11 February 2009 - 12:54
#411
Posted 11 February 2009 - 13:07
Originally posted by simon drabble
a friendly fiver says that all ends in tears....
Was it ever a serious runner???
#412
Posted 11 February 2009 - 13:12
Much more interestingly will be a look at BRDC accounts next year.. Moto GP is a poor consolation prize and with Silverstone losing money I bet they wish they had looked more seriously at Wilkinshaw's real estate offer back then.
#413
Posted 11 February 2009 - 13:29
The recovery might just be L shaped Simon. I see house prices going a lot lower yet especially in London and the South-East and until they find a resting place activity generally is likely to be very nervous, could all take a long time.
Gordon's financial adviser Ed Balls , this week told a Labour party meeting ,the recession will be the worst for 100 years and likely go on for 15 years !!
Motor sport generally needs to wake up to the new situation and drastically cut everyone's costs, not least the spectator.Lavish facilities are not needed by the paying public, it's more about organiser's egos.
Silverstone have saddled themselves with a venue that costs a great deal just to open. They need to return to more voluntary manning and minimal basics.
#414
Posted 11 February 2009 - 13:30
#415
Posted 11 February 2009 - 13:52
#416
Posted 11 February 2009 - 14:06
#417
Posted 11 February 2009 - 14:52
#418
Posted 11 February 2009 - 15:05
#419
Posted 11 February 2009 - 16:12
Advertisement
#420
Posted 12 February 2009 - 15:32
#421
Posted 12 February 2009 - 15:38
Originally posted by RTH
Extensively reported over on ten-tenths that Grand Prix Racewear have gone out of business and all their shops are now closed.
Martin Hines has acquired the assets.
#422
Posted 12 February 2009 - 17:00
#423
Posted 12 February 2009 - 23:07
I hated the idea that Button may be without a drive and though I do not think for one minute that the package is going to be competitive, being there is so much better than not being there.
I just hope it all comes together.
(Good to see a Senna back in F.1 too,)
#424
Posted 13 February 2009 - 08:26
Originally posted by Barry Boor
Speaking only for myself but to me this is GREAT NEWS!
I hated the idea that Button may be without a drive and though I do not think for one minute that the package is going to be competitive, being there is so much better than not being there.
I just hope it all comes together.
(Good to see a Senna back in F.1 too,)
There is also to be an announcement of Feb 24th about the proposed USF1 Grand Prix team that is planning to enter F1 in 2010. They plan to operate from a base in Charlotte. Peter Windsor is one of the guys behind it who will reveal the plans on Speed TV on the 24th. Now the US needs a race back, if they are to have their own team!
Maybe these proposed cost cutting measures are working?
#425
Posted 16 February 2009 - 15:34
Reality will dawn on many and perhaps whipping boy is correct in his view of future.
#426
Posted 16 February 2009 - 15:47
Originally posted by john ruston
Reality will dawn on many and perhaps whipping boy is correct in his view of future.
Ah, but there are a few reasons to be optimistic. I read a survey in one of last week's papers, the article explained that the results were set out in a way, "That had been broken down by age and sex". Not sure why, but that phrase conjured up images of Bernie and Max, and in that order. Surely this suggests that they can't be staying around indefinitely to screw up the sport.
#427
Posted 16 February 2009 - 15:53
Williams can wave goodbye to RBS cash after today's Express article
Not seen an article in today's paper but the following one, which mentioned F1 (and Williams) was on the cover of yesterday's Express:
http://www.express.c...n-bail-out-cash
#428
Posted 16 February 2009 - 16:01
http://business.time...icle5734138.ece
#429
Posted 16 February 2009 - 16:04
Since they aren't nationalised I think both bonuses and sponsorships will continue. "We have contracts" afterall...
Definitely not one I would bet on. ING is pulling out and its losses were far less than RBS and it isn't at all in public hands. RBS' F1 sponsorship is now getting front cover newspaper coverage so I'd say that the pressure is likely to get so great that it will have no choice but to cancel. It may also end up nationalised leading to the same conclusion.
#430
Posted 16 February 2009 - 16:23
#431
Posted 16 February 2009 - 17:29
And RBS seem much more belligerent.
Let's see how long they can keep it up as the pressure grows

#432
Posted 16 February 2009 - 20:17
#433
Posted 16 February 2009 - 20:47
It has just been announced that Renault are having redundancy talks with 65 employees in their test team and Aero departments.Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
I think ING are pulling out at the end of their contract? And RBS seem much more belligerent.
#434
Posted 16 February 2009 - 20:52
If they're considering 65 redundancies, it's a graphic illustration of how overstaffed (or overstuffed) F1 teams are these days.Originally posted by ianselva
It has just been announced that Renault are having redundancy talks with 65 employees in their test team and Aero departments.
Remind me how many people designed, built and ran the Connew? Fewer than five IIRC ....;)
#435
Posted 16 February 2009 - 21:43
It has just been announced that Renault are having redundancy talks with 65 employees in their test team and Aero departments.
This could well come as a huge shock for some people here. On another thread it was remarked (with seeming surprise) that all teams, except for Force India, are overstaffed. My view (which is now supported by the imminent redundancies...) was that being overstaffed is fine if it goes unnoticed. It gets noticed when the company gets into difficulty and it starts to struggle with its costs. Clearly this is exactly what is likely to happen due to the departure of ING.
#436
Posted 16 February 2009 - 21:50
#437
Posted 16 February 2009 - 22:16
Its not that they are overstaffed , its that they have a windtunnel running 24 x 7 and so need more aero engineers to keep thinking of new aero bits to test.Originally posted by Vitesse2
If they're considering 65 redundancies, it's a graphic illustration of how overstaffed (or overstuffed) F1 teams are these days.
Remind me how many people designed, built and ran the Connew? Fewer than five IIRC ....;)
#438
Posted 16 February 2009 - 22:25
Remind me how many people designed, built and ran the Connew?
Well, to be fair, there were probably around 8-10 all told. Including Pinky & Perky! But only three full-time......
But then, look where we didn't get to...

#439
Posted 16 February 2009 - 22:51
Roger Lund
Advertisement
#440
Posted 17 February 2009 - 00:07
DCN
#441
Posted 17 February 2009 - 05:56
#442
Posted 17 February 2009 - 09:22
http://www.grandprix...ns/ns21187.html
#443
Posted 17 February 2009 - 09:25
#444
Posted 17 February 2009 - 09:58
Originally posted by fines
Pretty soon we historians will suffer, too - they are going to declare all odd years to be redundant...
Great idea, so that's 1939 and 1945 dealt with. (Don't mention the... !!!)
#445
Posted 17 February 2009 - 16:54
Since they aren't nationalised I think both bonuses and sponsorships will continue. "We have contracts" afterall...
RBS' bonuses have hit the wall after the media pressure. What next?
http://news.bbc.co.u...ess/7895235.stm
#446
Posted 17 February 2009 - 17:11
Originally posted by Ocelot
RBS' bonuses have hit the wall after the media pressure. What next?
http://news.bbc.co.u...ess/7895235.stm
The item that interested me most in those RBS sponsorship disclosures, was the fact that Sir Jackie was being paid around four million £££ per annum, no doubt 'plus expenses' for what appears to be some not terribly demanding PR duties, the fact that he's apparently best mates with the disgraced Sir Fred is probably not coincidental. Two blokes who actually won races last year probably didn't earn anywhere near that much. No doubt that he's a good ambassador for the sport, but that's certainly a nice little earner for him.
#447
Posted 17 February 2009 - 19:18
#448
Posted 17 February 2009 - 19:51
Originally posted by kayemod
Great idea, so that's 1939 and 1945 dealt with. (Don't mention the... !!!)
..........European Championship points system?
;)
Paul M
#449
Posted 17 February 2009 - 20:26
Originally posted by Ocelot
RBS' bonuses have hit the wall after the media pressure. What next?
http://news.bbc.co.u...ess/7895235.stm
Well, the F1 sponsorships have been mentioned sporadically in the recent adverse media coverage of RBS. Now that the issue of bonuses has been dealt with, I wonder whether the media will back off, or will they dig deeper into other examples of extravagance?