
Running alternators off rear transaxle output shafts?
#1
Posted 17 November 2008 - 19:35
Advertisement
#2
Posted 17 November 2008 - 20:42
Average rear axle rpm's are probably about 1000, so maybe gear up slightly from that.
Regards, Ian
#3
Posted 17 November 2008 - 21:34
And naturally you will find that production cars typically drive their alternators at ratios in the range of 3:1. Of course, running the alternator from the final drive is sort of interesting in that charge rate will be roughly proportional to road speed, rather than engine speed. I remember an ancient and charming Voisin race car with a wind-driven generator.
#4
Posted 18 November 2008 - 00:58
#5
Posted 18 November 2008 - 02:31
Originally posted by McGuire
Of course, running the alternator from the final drive is sort of interesting in that charge rate will be roughly proportional to road speed, rather than engine speed.
I'd think a good rule of thumb would be... if you don't have a fan on the radiator, an axle-driven alternator should be fine (i.e. the car cannot/will not be running much while standing still), given a reasonable belt ratio.
Being that a Hewland FTR was mentioned, presumably not a street-driven car.
.
#6
Posted 18 November 2008 - 02:56
#7
Posted 18 November 2008 - 03:08
That was an option in the old days, but with EFI, current ignitions, and electric fuel pumps, it's not now. Clue... even F1 and most drag cars run alternators. An alternator is probably less weight than a bigger battery...Originally posted by Greg Locock
Never tried it, but how long would a car run on battery alone, ie with no charger? I'd guess hours.
#8
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:01
Originally posted by Engineguy
I'd think a good rule of thumb would be... if you don't have a fan on the radiator, an axle-driven alternator should be fine (i.e. the car cannot/will not be running much while standing still), given a reasonable belt ratio.
Being that a Hewland FTR was mentioned, presumably not a street-driven car.
.
Oh, I agree it would not be a problem except on a road or endurance car. Just interesting to contemplate the issues. If this is the increasingly ubiquitous small-bore sprint class racer/track day car, I wonder if maybe a small PM alternator would be more than sufficient.
#9
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:18
Originally posted by Greg Locock
Never tried it, but how long would a car run on battery alone, ie with no charger? I'd guess hours.
It's not a problem on some sprint races. The trick is good mechanics that are religious about putting the car on charge. 1 hour is about the max, though. After that, battery size starts to out-weigh alternator size/drag.
#10
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:20
Originally posted by McGuire
Oh, I agree it would not be a problem except on a road or endurance car. Just interesting to contemplate the issues. If this is the increasingly ubiquitous small-bore sprint class racer/track day car, I wonder if maybe a small PM alternator would be more than sufficient.
They are. The belt is not much bigger than a rubber band, but it's enough for a 25 amp draw or so.
#11
Posted 18 November 2008 - 10:47
#12
Posted 19 November 2008 - 03:09
Originally posted by Greg Locock
Never tried it, but how long would a car run on battery alone, ie with no charger? I'd guess hours.
Yep.
I run my carby-fed racer on battery alone and although the races are quite short - less than 20 minutes or so - there's no problem at all with battery power only.
I've also run one of my road cars on battery only (alternator **** itself) for over an hour with no problems - EFI engine and some headlight time in that as well. The battery was just a regular size & type for an AE-86.
#13
Posted 19 November 2008 - 04:09
I've been working on a big GT car with all the EFI and full spec PI datalogger and a big v8 in it with an alternator like you suggest. Never had a single problem.
The thing is to be carefull to charge your battery and during long systems check up plug in an extarnal one on top of that and everything will be fine.
The only thing is just try not to spin/stall 4 times per lap or won't do

#14
Posted 21 November 2008 - 22:15
Same as an aircon clutch which disengages at WOT in a road car. Battery would still charge at less than WOT and take up the load at WOT.
Regards, Ian
#15
Posted 21 November 2008 - 23:03
On modern alternators with solid-state voltage regulators, often employing pulse-width modulation from inside the CPU itself, this feature is written in. At somewhere near WOT the field excitation is cut back to nothing or very close to it. With some recent alternators this is necessary due to their excess of high-speed output. Engineered to produce high current at low speeds, at prolonged high speeds they can overrrun the battery.
#16
Posted 22 November 2008 - 13:38
So to interface with the rotor winding what would work: lowside driver, highside driver, solidstate relay, good old mechanical relay?
PWMing the cut-off to blend charge current on and off sounds better than just switching it off, but would that be OK on an alternator not designed for it?
Thanks, Ian
#17
Posted 22 November 2008 - 18:14
#18
Posted 22 November 2008 - 20:29
Originally posted by murpia
Thanks for the info.
So to interface with the rotor winding what would work: lowside driver, highside driver, solidstate relay, good old mechanical relay?
PWMing the cut-off to blend charge current on and off sounds better than just switching it off, but would that be OK on an alternator not designed for it?
Thanks, Ian
All the above but depending on the alternator's output, field current can be up to 8A so plan accordingly. PWM is very elegant but since you are not load dumping to the B+ you are not going to hurt anything in any event.
Back in the Day it was typically done with a kickdown switch for a GM THM 400 automatic transmission (bolts right to the throttle linkage) in series with the coil circuit of a SPST mechanical relay like the ubiquitous Bosch or whatever else is in the junk drawer; field circuit in series with the switching side A pin. The switch closes on throttle application (adjustable) so when the relay's coil is energized the rotor circuit opens. Recalling this now makes me laugh. As simple and dumb as it comes, but at one time this was trick stuff.
#19
Posted 22 November 2008 - 23:08
Thanks, very helpful. To quote thisOriginally posted by J. Edlund
Go to http://www.mclarenel...ternators&id=70 they offer a few current output vs. alternator speed graphs aswell as some additional info about alternators that can be good to know.
The excitation coils in the rotor draw current from the vehicle battery via the Ignition (IG) connection. IG should be disconnected when the engine is not running, otherwise it will slowly drain the battery.
When IG is disconnected, the excitation coils are not magnetised and the alternator does not deliver any current. IG may be disconnected while the alternator is being driven: the alternator will not be damaged and the load on the engine is decreased.
A little more Googling suggests an IG pin is present on most modern alternators - so job done!
Regards, Ian
Advertisement
#20
Posted 23 November 2008 - 01:19
