
James Allen 2009
#1
Posted 19 November 2008 - 15:45
Advertisement
#2
Posted 19 November 2008 - 15:47
and will write alonso the best driver of 09 in a year time.
#3
Posted 19 November 2008 - 17:13
He was informed, he knew the sport inside out, he knew all the latest news, all the inside 'gossip', rarely made mistakes. Ok his outbursts and bias did sometimes get annoying but he was clearly passionate about the sport. People took a dislike to him because he replaced Murrary Walker and immediately started comparing the two. Look at it objectively and he was a pretty damn good commentator.
#4
Posted 19 November 2008 - 20:25
#5
Posted 19 November 2008 - 20:53
#6
Posted 19 November 2008 - 20:55
Post of the year.Originally posted by Ferrari_F1_fan_2001
I thought he was pretty good. I don't see why anyone is bothered by him. I personally liked him.
He was informed, he knew the sport inside out, he knew all the latest news, all the inside 'gossip', rarely made mistakes. Ok his outbursts and bias did sometimes get annoying but he was clearly passionate about the sport. People took a dislike to him because he replaced Murrary Walker and immediately started comparing the two. Look at it objectively and he was a pretty damn good commentator.

#7
Posted 19 November 2008 - 21:01
Originally posted by craftverk
Post of the year.![]()
Originally posted by MichaelPM
I find it funny how only now we see the back of him people start to defend him.
+1 to MichaelPM
CC
#8
Posted 19 November 2008 - 21:16
#9
Posted 19 November 2008 - 21:21
#10
Posted 19 November 2008 - 21:38
maybe he'll become a writer as he does have a wealth of knowledge to share.
#11
Posted 19 November 2008 - 21:59
I don't know, but I do know you'll never break him.Originally posted by Dunc
Anyone know what he's planning on doing now since the BBC don't want him?
#12
Posted 19 November 2008 - 22:19
Originally posted by Ferrari_F1_fan_2001
I thought he was pretty good. I don't see why anyone is bothered by him. I personally liked him.
He was informed, he knew the sport inside out, he knew all the latest news, all the inside 'gossip', rarely made mistakes. Ok his outbursts and bias did sometimes get annoying but he was clearly passionate about the sport. People took a dislike to him because he replaced Murrary Walker and immediately started comparing the two. Look at it objectively and he was a pretty damn good commentator.


#13
Posted 19 November 2008 - 23:01
Originally posted by Gareth
I don't know, but I do know you'll never break him.
haha, if that's a reference to that song, very funny.
#14
Posted 19 November 2008 - 23:08
Originally posted by Gareth
I don't know, but I do know you'll never break him.
I knew that was coming!

But lets not revise history just yet.
Towards the end of his time at ITV, I found a new perspective on James.
He's always been a very analytical commentator, who could read complicated races very well, and was always armed with plenty of good facts. There's no doubt he loves his racing, which is great.
I think the problem was his tendancy to become quite unnatural in moments of high excitement, like the start, Button winning in Hungary etc.
That's what started the Stop the Cock campaign on sniffpetrol.com
But in the past six months of this year he seemed to iron out those qualities and become quite acceptable to me.
Sadly for James, his reputation was already set in stone.
It's a shame he's lost his F1 gig though, as a passionate fan lucky enough to work in the sport it must be very hard for him to accept.
Lets hope he finds a new job which keeps him close to the action.
#15
Posted 19 November 2008 - 23:11
Murray Walker is a nice old coot but his pronouncements and opinions can be a bit predictable and jingoistic. In fairness though he doesn't mouth off like JYS for example. And in todays yoof-obsessed world it's AMAZINg that a WWII vetern is still quite an active part of the F1 fabric...
#16
Posted 19 November 2008 - 23:53
#17
Posted 20 November 2008 - 00:03
Originally posted by Ferrari_F1_fan_2001
I thought he was pretty good. I don't see why anyone is bothered by him. I personally liked him.
He was informed, he knew the sport inside out, he knew all the latest news, all the inside 'gossip', rarely made mistakes. Ok his outbursts and bias did sometimes get annoying but he was clearly passionate about the sport. People took a dislike to him because he replaced Murrary Walker and immediately started comparing the two. Look at it objectively and he was a pretty damn good commentator.
Agreed. He was a good commentator, who could get annoying in large doses. But, then again, one could say the same thing about Murray.
#18
Posted 20 November 2008 - 00:04

#19
Posted 20 November 2008 - 00:11
Advertisement
#20
Posted 20 November 2008 - 03:19

#21
Posted 20 November 2008 - 03:40
Originally posted by MichaelPM
I find it funny how only now we see the back of him people start to defend him.
Quoted for truth.
#22
Posted 20 November 2008 - 05:31
Originally posted by pjabyrne
He wasn't a bad guy, just not suited to the job. His bias towards Button was nausiating (as was the way he dumped him for new BF Hamilton!)
Murray Walker is a nice old coot but his pronouncements and opinions can be a bit predictable and jingoistic. In fairness though he doesn't mouth off like JYS for example. And in todays yoof-obsessed world it's AMAZINg that a WWII vetern is still quite an active part of the F1 fabric...
Agreed, BBC should hire him as a pitlane reporter. He was pretty good in that role for ITV AFAIK
#23
Posted 20 November 2008 - 05:38
Originally posted by Dunc
Anyone know what he's planning on doing now since the BBC don't want him?
Still wetting himself over LH's title win!!
#24
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:55
Originally posted by KiwiF1
Still wetting himself over LH's title win!!
Anyone here think the BBC's replacement will be more reserved and objective? Really?
At least Allen had a brain and understood the sport. More than can be said for some countries presenters from what I hear. I wish the guy well - I'm sure his writing career will blossom.
#25
Posted 20 November 2008 - 08:21
#26
Posted 20 November 2008 - 08:55
Originally posted by RedBaron
Also calling the new Imola pitlane sexy wasn't his finest moment.
Combine that with his frankly vulgar comments regarding Kubica, and it's rather funny.
Hopefully he'll go away and right books.
He's tone, his artificiality, his outbursts, and whilst I'm sure he loves F1, a feeling of insincerity about the whole Allen experience. The whole experience was just not as pleasant as it could have been. And - truthfully - he missed things and made mistakes just like Murrary did.
#27
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:13
#28
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:30
#29
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:32

#30
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:51

#31
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:52
Originally posted by MichaelPM
I find it funny how only now we see the back of him people start to defend him.
I've always defended James Allen. I always thought the criticism was unfounded.
#32
Posted 20 November 2008 - 10:09
(I'm hoping it'll be "Unbreakable - the James Allen story")
My guess is it'll be worth reading once published. His writing is quite accomplished, and following the circus around for ten years or so is going to turn up some interesting background.
#33
Posted 20 November 2008 - 21:08
#34
Posted 20 November 2008 - 21:09
Originally posted by Dunc
Anyone know what he's planning on doing now since the BBC don't want him?
Why don't Autosport.com hire him as a web reporter?
#35
Posted 20 November 2008 - 21:48
#36
Posted 20 November 2008 - 21:55
Originally posted by D.M.N.
Why don't Autosport.com hire him as a web reporter?
He did write some good articles and stories in his pre-television days.
#37
Posted 20 November 2008 - 22:03
When he gets 'microphone withdrawal symptoms', I feel sure he will turn up as compere for F1 car launches (like Peter Windsor), Paddock Club driver interviews (like Murray Walker or Marc Surer) and motorsports awards dinners (like Steve Rider).
Probably not a bad life for an F1 enthusiast then, all in all.
#38
Posted 20 November 2008 - 23:09
I'm sure there where some out there who liked him but I honestly can't remember anyone defending him before.Originally posted by Ferrari_F1_fan_2001
I've always defended James Allen. I always thought the criticism was unfounded.
#39
Posted 21 November 2008 - 06:33
Originally posted by I_hate_chicanes
Agreed, BBC should hire him as a pitlane reporter. He was pretty good in that role for ITV AFAIK
I thought he was excellent in that role.He was on the ball as far as fuel loads and being at the right pit for the most important stops and said what needed to be said .When he had to pad out two hours as host he lost it.
I almost felt sorry for the poor guy as the final few laps of Brazil played out and he said to Brundle how good it had been working with him etc.There was a silent moment and then Brundle commented about something in the race without giving Allen a similar compliment.I'm sure it was unintentional but ,ouch.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 21 November 2008 - 14:59
Originally posted by Scotracer
He'll get his kids to dress up like Jenson and Lewis and have some 'playtime'![]()
Are you saying he is a pedo?

#41
Posted 21 November 2008 - 19:06
If new viewers are simply faced with a wall of technical jargon they will not return, no viewers no revenue no racing.
It does seem fashionable to bash him, unfortunately all that sticks in some peoples minds are a few bad or annoying pieces.
Anyway, if you want to know a little more about him here is a link to his profile.
http://www.jamesalle...com/f1diary.htm
Think he will be ok even if he's not on the beeb.
#42
Posted 21 November 2008 - 19:39
Originally posted by potmotr
Towards the end of his time at ITV, I found a new perspective on James.
He's always been a very analytical commentator, who could read complicated races very well, and was always armed with plenty of good facts. There's no doubt he loves his racing, which is great.
I think the problem was his tendancy to become quite unnatural in moments of high excitement, like the start, Button winning in Hungary etc.
That's what started the Stop the Cock campaign on sniffpetrol.com
But in the past six months of this year he seemed to iron out those qualities and become quite acceptable to me.
Sadly for James, his reputation was already set in stone.
It's a shame he's lost his F1 gig though, as a passionate fan lucky enough to work in the sport it must be very hard for him to accept.
Lets hope he finds a new job which keeps him close to the action.
Well said.

I also noticed the change in James Allen over this past season and found it refreshing. Like you, I hope he can find a job in F1 that keeps him close to the action.
#43
Posted 21 November 2008 - 19:43
Originally posted by christoff
I've always respected JA's knowledge and passion and as mentioned previously his ability to read acomplex race and also his ability to translate technical issues to lesser informed viewers.
If new viewers are simply faced with a wall of technical jargon they will not return, no viewers no revenue no racing.
It does seem fashionable to bash him, unfortunately all that sticks in some peoples minds are a few bad or annoying pieces.
Anyway, if you want to know a little more about him here is a link to his profile.
http://www.jamesalle...com/f1diary.htm
Think he will be ok even if he's not on the beeb.
Well i dont think he couldv sunk any lower than at say Canada. I bet he got a lot of stick for that and i bet ITV also received lots of complaints. Its one thing to be patriotic and supporting the brits. Its another to broadcast a lewis lovefest. Allens comments where of an idiot. I wont miss him. Or the entire of the ITV crew.
#44
Posted 21 November 2008 - 20:13
Originally posted by equality
Well i dont think he couldv sunk any lower than at say Canada. I bet he got a lot of stick for that and i bet ITV also received lots of complaints. Its one thing to be patriotic and supporting the brits. Its another to broadcast a lewis lovefest. Allens comments where of an idiot. I wont miss him. Or the entire of the ITV crew.
Each to their own, however he may have had an editorial steer to follow who knows, but as the saying goes 'You can please some of them all the time . . . . . '
;)
#45
Posted 21 November 2008 - 20:44
When he's writing he's so much more natural and although he does still overreach himself, in print he's given more time to consider what he's trying to say, and b) doesn't have to 'fill in the time'.
That's why I think he's much better writing than he is speaking.
#46
Posted 21 November 2008 - 21:01
Originally posted by mursuka80
Are you saying he is a pedo?![]()
No I'm suggesting he is THAT obsessed with Jense and Lewis.

#47
Posted 22 November 2008 - 02:13
Originally posted by MichaelPM
I find it funny how only now we see the back of him people start to defend him.
EH? I have been doing tit for years. he shits all over Murray Walker.
#48
Posted 22 November 2008 - 18:59
I can't say I've enjoyed all the criticism and I can't say it exactly hurt either. But it would be a shame if people thought that all the criticism I've had is the view of the majority, because it isn't. It simply isn't.
Which is probably the case. But I don't know how sure he is unless he's done a straw-poll of all ITV's F1 viewers.
I'm more surprised that nobody asked him what he had planned for next year really.
#49
Posted 22 November 2008 - 21:52
Originally posted by dank
Anybody else read James Allen's 'You Ask the Questions' feature in this month's F1-Racing magazine? He speaks about all the criticism he and ITV received over the years. The bloke doesn't appear to be a big fan of the Sniff Petrol website and their 'Stop The Cock' t-shirts!
Which is probably the case. But I don't know how sure he is unless he's done a straw-poll of all ITV's F1 viewers.
I'm more surprised that nobody asked him what he had planned for next year really.
He does state on his aforementioned blog/website that he will remain in "F1 media" and will announce his plans soon.
Personally, I've stated on another forum before that I never had a problem with him as commentator, certainly didn't see the point of any of these campaigns and for that matter, wouldn't have minded at all if he was selected for the BBC role. I do agree with the justification suggested earlier that the Button/Hamilton obsession over the years was almost certainly more of an ITV editorial thing as much as anything specific to him (everyone else at ITV bar Brundle seemed to suffer from the same syndrome, as have, as we have already seen, a few of their opposite numbers at the BBC).
Back to Allen though, an Autosport website or magazine return anyone? I'm not as seasoned with his writing as some are, but with regard to that I have seen, I agree with many of the other positive sentiments expressed. The ITV-F1 website is apparently set to run through '09, so I can only presume he's not exactly headed straight from Brazil to the Job Centre yet?
#50
Posted 23 November 2008 - 10:38
A view from his years in the sport as an insider would be VERY revealing I'd wager