Audi R15..
#1
Posted 28 November 2008 - 17:02
Awesome news cant wait to see it... Audi Has totally Dominated LeMans now for years. IMO they were quite lucky this year - as the 908 was very very competitive. I'm not surprised that they are going to build a new car glad it's an open top.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 28 November 2008 - 17:10
#3
Posted 28 November 2008 - 17:15
#4
Posted 28 November 2008 - 17:15
#5
Posted 28 November 2008 - 18:49
#6
Posted 28 November 2008 - 21:19
Originally posted by Knowlesy
Yes, this is both exciting and upsetting at the same time!
It's pretty amazing how Audi has been dominant for so long. I mean longer than Ferrari has been Dominant in F1...
In Fairness Audi has had less competition - until recently...
#7
Posted 28 November 2008 - 22:30
#8
Posted 28 November 2008 - 22:39
Originally posted by patgaw
I think, if not rain, that domination could be stopped in 2008 race.
I think the 2008 race may well be the work driver behind the R15 TDi
#9
Posted 28 November 2008 - 23:02
Originally posted by Mika Mika
http://www.autosport...rt.php/id/72280
Awesome news cant wait to see it... Audi Has totally Dominated LeMans now for years. IMO they were quite lucky this year - as the 908 was very very competitive. I'm not surprised that they are going to build a new car glad it's an open top.
A great pity IMO that it will be open top.
To me F1 is open cockpit while sportscars is closed. Closed cockpit sportscars look much better IMo.
Something like this would have been nice: http://www.fourtitud...010_r15_tdi.jpg
Quite an odd decision too. While the ACO now will allow open top LMP1 cars in 2010, isn't it still their intention to ban them for either 2011 or 2012. Surely Audi aren't developing a brand new car for just two years ?
#10
Posted 28 November 2008 - 23:07
#11
Posted 28 November 2008 - 23:14
Originally posted by Mika Mika
The Speed 8 was nice, I dont really like the 908 though....
Yeah, that nose thing they have going on isn't great.
Of late there hasn't been many closed cockpit Sportscars of note.
Toyota GT-One
Porsche GT1
The Mercedes CLR-GTR wasn't too good looking and as we know, hadn't got great aero either.
#12
Posted 29 November 2008 - 01:23
Neil
#13
Posted 29 November 2008 - 01:37
wonder if the current r10s will be sold to privateers?
#14
Posted 29 November 2008 - 02:24
Originally posted by pingu666
i prefer closed top, but im happy either way
wonder if the current r10s will be sold to privateers?
It was reported on various websites that Peter van Merksteijn wanted to purchase an Audi R10 for the 2009 Le Mans 24h, but also that Audi made it clear this was currently impossible.
#15
Posted 29 November 2008 - 08:23
#16
Posted 29 November 2008 - 09:57
Originally posted by muramasa
why there are open and closed cockpit for sportscar now? what are the advantages and disadvantages of each? i remember that when i was small, there were only closed cockpit sportscar.
I know visibility in the closed tops is not so good. There will be the Aero different but im not sure if the Open tops have more or less drag...
Both look good to me depending on the car. I hope the R15 TDi looks as good as the R10 TDi does...
#17
Posted 29 November 2008 - 09:59
#18
Posted 29 November 2008 - 11:55
#19
Posted 29 November 2008 - 12:22
Advertisement
#20
Posted 29 November 2008 - 12:30
http://www.seriouswh...ng-1280x960.htm
Neil
#21
Posted 29 November 2008 - 12:34
#22
Posted 29 November 2008 - 14:41
The 908 was a much better car than the R10. It was much quicker, about 3 seconds a lap in clear conditions. And quite reliable, the #7 car only had a small overheating problem for the entire 24 hours. Only because of better drivers (especially Villeneuve was costly to the #7 Pug) and much better pitwork did the Audi manage to win in a close one. But given how much Peugout improved in 2008, there was just noway the R10 would competetive next year. Very good news that Audi has a new car, so we hopefully will have another legendary race next year. I kind of feared 2008 would be a Concorde year for Le Mans, thankfully it looks like both Audi and Peugout are there to stay in the near future.
I wonder what Audi will do about hybrid technology. Peugout has a hybrid 908 running and Toyota are being rumoured. The hybrids will be allow to run next year, outside of the classification, so ACO can get an evaluation on them. If Peugout are the only hybrid, i fear it will sandbag so bad it will get a huge advantage for 2010, when it will be allowed to win the race. Hopefully we will see other hybrids so there will be some competitions amongst the hybrids which will reduce sandbagging.
#23
Posted 29 November 2008 - 15:14
The ACO has given favourable rules to open top LMP cars since the mid 90's so its nice to see it swing the other way again.
#24
Posted 29 November 2008 - 18:32
Originally posted by Ali_G Quite an odd decision too. While the ACO now will allow open top LMP1 cars in 2010, isn't it still their intention to ban them for either 2011 or 2012. Surely Audi aren't developing a brand new car for just two years ?
The plan was for P1 to be closed from 2010 but thats now been abandoned, they aren't going to be changing the cars themselves much beyond the narrow rear wing for next year. Come 2011, all they will have to do will be to put a different engine in the back (a 3.7l twinturbo diesel or a 2l turbo [max 6 cylinders] or a 3.4l V8).
The way I read it, the rules themselves are very favourable towards a closed cockpit LMP and there's the point that Audi going for an open cockpit car might be an inheritently bad choice.
It was the open car that won Audi the race this year, it saved them time in the pitstops due to quicker driver changes and not needing to clean a front window. In addition the car being open it was cooler for the driver allowing them to run more stints for longer.
#25
Posted 30 November 2008 - 09:25
#27
Posted 30 November 2008 - 12:10
Originally posted by MrAerodynamicist
Was he?
Yes he was. The first time he was in the car, he got out again after something like 7 laps. Because Peugout was slow on their driver changes, such a short stint is not good. Then in the rain, he lost 2 minutes to Kristensen when the Audi got ahead. And in his final stint sunday morning, he was not able to gain much ground. Only when Gene got in the car did the gap start to come down significantly, but it was too late.
I am not saying Villeneuve is crap, but he most certainly was the weakest driver on that car. And that car in turn was weaker than the other Peugouts. I have no doubt that if Kristensen/McNish/Capello had a Peugout that would only be delayed about 3 minutes, they would have destroyd any Audi.
#29
Posted 30 November 2008 - 16:51
Originally posted by Option1
Personally, I thought the R8 was much better looking than the R10. Those cone-head appendages on the R10 did nothing for its beauty.
http://www.seriouswh...ng-1280x960.htm
Neil
While I far prefer the closed cockpit LMP's to open cockpit, both the R8 and the BMW V12 LMR were beautiful cars.
The BMW in particular look very well. Very clean. The low slung rear wing set it off very nicely.
#30
Posted 01 December 2008 - 10:45
Originally posted by dabbo
Yes he was, absolutely abysmal. In my opinion, single handedly cost Peugeot the win.
I think it wasnāt quite as simple as that.
There was a very good article in the post race journal here that analysed the 6 cars and their performance over the race.
In a nutshell it was suggested that If you had to pick the top 3 drivers from each of the 9 that Audi and Peugeot brought, Audiās 3 were all in the car that won and Peugeot had 1 in each car. Also it was accepted that JV was the slowest of the 3 in the lead Peugeot for much of the time but that during the crucial hours in the heaviest rain he was the quickest of the 3 Peugeots circulating,
To lay Peugeots defeat purely at JV door, I think deflects the fact that Peugeot could have put Nicolas Minassian, Stephane Sarrazin and Franck Montagny in 1 car if they wanted. It could have won, it could also have been 1 of the 2 Peugeots that had a fair share of technical problems during the race. They could have also struggled during the rain.
Also to blame defeat on JV I think does huge disservice to McNish Cappello Kristenssen and Audi.
#31
Posted 01 December 2008 - 11:04
#32
Posted 01 December 2008 - 13:04
Originally posted by lustigson
I thought closed-cockpit cars would be mandatory come 2009?
Yes but they backtracked on that decision after all.
Henri
#33
Posted 01 December 2008 - 13:10
Originally posted by Ali_G
While I far prefer the closed cockpit LMP's to open cockpit, both the R8 and the BMW V12 LMR were beautiful cars.
The BMW in particular look very well. Very clean. The low slung rear wing set it off very nicely.
And given the manner of head protection the BMW and Audi R8 offered: Absolutely confirm the rules that sportscars are bzasicly twoseaters and should be able to accomodate a passenger and offer him a safe ride if necessary ;)
I never liked open cars compared with coupƩs but when BMW and Audi introduced those asymmetric single rollhoops they became F1's with coachwork and out of center seats. Yargh....
Now had the current open toppers also the old style bars over the full width of the cockpit...
Henri
#34
Posted 01 December 2008 - 16:03
Originally posted by Ali_G
Closed cockpit cars have better aero. I think this is offset with less power as they are forced to run airconditioning in the cars.
Are you sure about that.
If it were the case surely Audi would have said the R15 will be a coupe? The new rear wing regs is for a shorter chord and a narrower overall width (1600mm) meaning that the Coupe actually may be blocking the wing more.
Acura's new LMP1 is open and the Porsche RS spyder spanked the Lola coupe in LMP2 this season.
The coupe's having better aero is a myth IMO
Ben
#35
Posted 01 December 2008 - 16:05
Originally posted by Ali_G
The way I read it, the rules themselves are very favourable towards a closed cockpit LMP and there's the point that Audi going for an open cockpit car might be an inheritently bad choice.
The ACO has given favourable rules to open top LMP cars since the mid 90's so its nice to see it swing the other way again.
Like I said the rules as they are don't favour a coupe...
Ben
#36
Posted 01 December 2008 - 23:30
Originally posted by Ben
Are you sure about that.
If it were the case surely Audi would have said the R15 will be a coupe? The new rear wing regs is for a shorter chord and a narrower overall width (1600mm) meaning that the Coupe actually may be blocking the wing more.
Acura's new LMP1 is open and the Porsche RS spyder spanked the Lola coupe in LMP2 this season.
The coupe's having better aero is a myth IMO
Ben
I'm sure I remember reading that the Coupes had better aero. I was guessing it had to do with the fact that the air flow over the driver cockpit would be so much smoother than with an open cockpit.
As you say though, there is less obstruction to airflow with the open tops.
#37
Posted 02 December 2008 - 07:19
coupe might give you a better car, but less user friendly
#38
Posted 15 March 2010 - 16:16
#39
Posted 15 March 2010 - 16:39
Advertisement
#40
Posted 15 March 2010 - 18:31
#41
Posted 15 March 2010 - 18:36
#42
Posted 15 March 2010 - 18:39
#43
Posted 15 March 2010 - 18:47
#46
Posted 30 March 2010 - 03:27
I hope the money and effort they've put into this R15 plus will pay off this year. They cannot use it next year. Tough spot to be in.
#47
Posted 30 March 2010 - 12:03
#48
Posted 30 March 2010 - 12:35
Awww shucks... but that ran that R8 for years. It sucks... but the new rules will be stable for X years, transition rules are tough on the bank balance, but not like Audi can't afford it.I hope the money and effort they've put into this R15 plus will pay off this year. They cannot use it next year. Tough spot to be in.
#49
Posted 30 March 2010 - 13:24
if you want to find news or photos about dindo and audi when you can sometimes check here:
www.twitter.com/dindocapellofc
www.twitpic.com/dindocapellofc
let me know what do yuou think..
ciao!
#50
Posted 01 April 2010 - 15:09