
Questions regarding F1's popularity
#1
Posted 01 May 2009 - 17:59
I remember I have read somewhere that F1 was the most popular at the end of the 1990s that's when the figures were the highest but I would like to know a little more about it.
I also would like to know more about how F1's media coverage developed. When was the first live coverage of a race? How did it develope into a "mainstream" sport taken up by more and more TV channels. When did this transition happened? Is there anything available on this?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 01 May 2009 - 18:06
Sadly the mag has closed down but you should keep trying eBay
#3
Posted 01 May 2009 - 18:14
My question is if there's data available on when F1 in its history produced the biggest viewing figures and what were the viewing figures in certain seasons?
I remember I have read somewhere that F1 was the most popular at the end of the 1990s that's when the figures were the highest but I would like to know a little more about it.
I also would like to know more about how F1's media coverage developed. When was the first live coverage of a race? How did it develope into a "mainstream" sport taken up by more and more TV channels. When did this transition happened? Is there anything available on this?
In Australia it started when someone noticed Alan Jones had won his first GP in the Shadow in '77

When Jones starting having success in the Williams we started to get some telecasts in '78 I think and got coverage in 79 usually at 2 am in the morning if there wasn't tennis on

Channel 9 was quite taken back by the viewer support and ratings but the owner of the station was not a big F1 fan so we suffered for years as nightowls until the Australian GP came to us in 1985 and 9 did a live telecast and the ratings were massive for the whole weekend so they had no choice but to up their game after that.
Edited by cheapracer, 01 May 2009 - 18:17.
#4
Posted 01 May 2009 - 20:56
I suppose that F1 became more of a "mainstream" TV sport in the 1980s with the battles involving Prost, Senna, Piquet and Mansell, and this continued into the Hill/Hakkinen/Schumacher era.
There will be more information in books dealing with the business side of F1.
#5
Posted 01 May 2009 - 21:09
Looking at the ratings, some of the European races in '05 and '06 rated badly, some under 2m.
2002 had a decent fanbase but 2000 and 2001...... I'll go back to 1996 in fact (thanks to EmilioLargo for this - note; not 100% accurate as we do not have every single figure; but is a good estimation) :
1996: 5.28m
1997: 4.51m (down 15% on previous year)
1998: 4.81m (up 7% on previous year)
1999: 4.43m (down 8%)
2000: 3.93m (down 11%)
2001: 3.83m (down 3%)
2002: 3.50m (down 9%)
2003: 3.44m (down 2%)
2004: 3.00m (down 13%)
2005: 2.83m (down 6%)
2006: 2.51m (down 11%)
2007: 3.47m (up 38%)
2008: 3.86m (up 11%)
2009: 4.66m (up 21% so far; likely to go down if a few European races only get 3m)
So figures, from 1998 onwards went down and down. This isn't due to the length of ITV1's programme, its always been ~3 hours on race day since 1997. The only reason ratings went down is because fans were dissatisfied with the product and Schumacher's dominance in 2002 and 2004. Alonso winning also appeared to change nothing regarding ratings, it was only when Hamilton came in that ratings picked up.
#6
Posted 01 May 2009 - 22:28
I recently posted the following in the BBC F1 Coverage Thread. Its the UK ratings for BBC and ITV. BBC for 1996 and 2009, ITV for 1997 to 2008:
Thanks, but I'm more interested in the overall international ratings than just national ones. The national ratings are usually in correlation with how successful that nations' drivers are. Here you can see that pattern as well: best ratings in 1996 - Hill's championship year. Then it goes down and picks up again when Hamilton appears. Least popular were 2005 and 2006, but I'm sure we would get a totally different picture about that in Spain.

#7
Posted 02 May 2009 - 07:20
Thanks, but I'm more interested in the overall international ratings than just national ones. The national ratings are usually in correlation with how successful that nations' drivers are. Here you can see that pattern as well: best ratings in 1996 - Hill's championship year. Then it goes down and picks up again when Hamilton appears. Least popular were 2005 and 2006, but I'm sure we would get a totally different picture about that in Spain.
Having looked round the FIA website, I've found the following, which is the Total Viewers from some of the years:
1999 - 57.75 billion
1998 - 55.24 billion
1997 - 50.73 billion
1996 - 40.99 billion
1995 - 45.05 billion
1994 - 45.22 billion
#8
Posted 02 May 2009 - 07:29
Finding worldwide totals is incredibly difficult because the figures arent always released and everyone uses a different measurement system, and it's a relatively new industry. You'll be lucky to find consistent data that is 10 years old. 20 years ago, no way.
#9
Posted 02 May 2009 - 11:00
We beaming it to the rest of the universe then?Having looked round the FIA website, I've found the following, which is the Total Viewers from some of the years:
1999 - 57.75 billion
1998 - 55.24 billion
1997 - 50.73 billion
1996 - 40.99 billion
1995 - 45.05 billion
1994 - 45.22 billion
#10
Posted 02 May 2009 - 12:14
We beaming it to the rest of the universe then?
Technically, yes

I wonder how you go about polling aliens.
#11
Posted 02 May 2009 - 12:26
I'm amazed at how the move from BBC to ITV in 1997 affected viewing figures so much. I'm guessing this was the primary reason (although Hill in an Arrow mightn't have helped).
The stats are much like what I would have expected for British audience anyways (long term fans). However, global audiences have prob risen year on year due to F1's move into the likes of China, the Middle East and more of Asia.
#12
Posted 02 May 2009 - 14:50
DMN, in regards to your British viewing figures.
I'm amazed at how the move from BBC to ITV in 1997 affected viewing figures so much. I'm guessing this was the primary reason (although Hill in an Arrow mightn't have helped).
ITV dedicated more time on race day to Formula One. I'd say BBC went on air about 25 minutes before the race began and came off air straight after the press conference, whereas ITV had a full hour buildup and post-race analysis, which could explain why the viewership average went down as the figures above are for the whole programme, not the race itself.
They had approx. an hour buildup right up until the coverage ended, so it does not in my view explain the continuous downfall between 1999 and 2006, had Hamilton not come in to F1, well I dread to think how much further the figures could have gone down. Even a "non-Schumacher" champion in 2005 and '06 did nothing to help ratings.
#13
Posted 02 May 2009 - 15:46
^ On the british figures, perfect explanation for what I've called the poser fickle driver/personality fanboys.
With Ferrari out of F1, just imagine the impact on ratings when Alonso (Spain), Hamilton (Britain), Kubica (Poland) and Vettel (Germany) will retire.
Without manufacturer fans like the tifosi, F1 has no backbone whatsoever. It could very well be called Formula Poser.
#14
Posted 02 May 2009 - 15:48
#15
Posted 02 May 2009 - 16:04
#16
Posted 02 May 2009 - 22:41
So the numbers are available somewhere, but it'd probably cost you a significant amount to get them.
#17
Posted 03 May 2009 - 06:56
Having looked round the FIA website, I've found the following, which is the Total Viewers from some of the years:
1999 - 57.75 billion
1998 - 55.24 billion
1997 - 50.73 billion
1996 - 40.99 billion
1995 - 45.05 billion
1994 - 45.22 billion
Thanks for the effort.
Now, what was the start of F1's "media age" when it became a mainstream media event? I guess somewhere in the 80s.
#18
Posted 03 May 2009 - 07:29

#19
Posted 03 May 2009 - 07:31
it was only when Hamilton came in that ratings picked up.
How can you know if it was Hamilton who caused the ratings to go up

Advertisement
#20
Posted 03 May 2009 - 07:34
#21
Posted 03 May 2009 - 07:37
How can you know if it was Hamilton who caused the ratings to go up
In Britain it is pretty likely that it was he who caused the ratings go up.
#22
Posted 03 May 2009 - 07:40
How can you know if it was Hamilton who caused the ratings to go up
2006: 2.51m (down 11%)
2007: 3.47m (up 38%) The year that Hamilton joined the F1 circus
2008: 3.86m (up a further 11%) The year that Hamilton won the WDC
I think it is plainly obvious.

#23
Posted 03 May 2009 - 14:53
#24
Posted 03 May 2009 - 15:05
Having looked round the FIA website, I've found the following, which is the Total Viewers from some of the years:
1999 - 57.75 billion
1998 - 55.24 billion
1997 - 50.73 billion
1996 - 40.99 billion
1995 - 45.05 billion
1994 - 45.22 billion
Mika was a great draw

#25
Posted 09 May 2009 - 13:42
I'd like to think we weren;t so blindly nationalist that we'd tune in to watch a violent lying thug like Hamilton simply because he's British. but you never know. Certainly the ITV presenters assumed it was down to that judging by their concentration on the once-expelled driver.In Britain it is pretty likely that it was he who caused the ratings go up.
#26
Posted 09 May 2009 - 13:45
I'd like to think we weren;t so blindly nationalist that we'd tune in to watch a violent lying thug like Hamilton simply because he's British. but you never know. Certainly the ITV presenters assumed it was down to that judging by their concentration on the once-expelled driver.
Put the bottle away.
