Jump to content


Photo

Barcelona Grand Prix Free Practice Thread


  • Please log in to reply
140 replies to this topic

#101 Joe Bosworth

Joe Bosworth
  • Member

  • 687 posts
  • Joined: May 05

Posted 08 May 2009 - 15:59


Let's see now

Wms Toyota 1/2 Toyota T 18/19

McL Merc 13/14 Brawn Merc 4/6 F India Merc 12/untimed

Ferarri F 10/15 Toro R F 9/12

The only factory team getting it done so far is:
Renault Renault 3/8 Red Bull Renault 5/7



Advertisement

#102 Craven Morehead

Craven Morehead
  • Member

  • 6,287 posts
  • Joined: February 06

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:05

F. Alonso 1.21.781
N. Piquet 1.22.349

Yup, nearly six-tenths behind his team mate. :p



Sorry!


there it is again..

#103 MinT

MinT
  • Member

  • 2,280 posts
  • Joined: February 09

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:06

Times a lot slower than in testing.

Ferrari nowhere seen in the speedtrap. You do know what that means. :up:



They are really slow ?

#104 Menace

Menace
  • Member

  • 12,799 posts
  • Joined: November 01

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:10

They are really slow ?



Looking at the full stint times, the Ferrari's are anything but slow. Very comparable to Red Bull, and definately more consistent then the Brawn's.

Looks like Ferrari's update is indeed quite the step forward. :)

#105 rodlamas

rodlamas
  • Member

  • 12,360 posts
  • Joined: February 04

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:25

Looking at the full stint times, the Ferrari's are anything but slow. Very comparable to Red Bull, and definately more consistent then the Brawn's.

Looks like Ferrari's update is indeed quite the step forward. :)


Ferrari definitely looks like a top 8, maybe top 6 car.

But then won't do an Alonso run on Q3 and on ultimate pace Brawn is still faster and the RBR drivers are just too good for one lap.

Maybe they will get a top-5 finish, but they are still away from fighting for a podium.

#106 D.M.N.

D.M.N.
  • RC Forum Host

  • 7,492 posts
  • Joined: May 08

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:25

Ferrari could and I hope, get a handful of points this weekend. Podium possible?

#107 Cenotaph

Cenotaph
  • Member

  • 2,390 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:26

there it is again..

:rotfl:

#108 Menace

Menace
  • Member

  • 12,799 posts
  • Joined: November 01

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:28

Kimi Raikkonen: “We have definitely made a step forward in performance terms on the car: you can feel a greater level of aerodynamic downforce and that’s what we needed. Sure, it’s Friday and it’s always difficult to draw conclusions, but the feeling is that we have closed the gap to the top cars. Here, just as at the last race, the harder tyre is a bit difficult, while on the softer one, we’re reasonably good. Tomorrow morning, we’ll work on qualifying, given that today we concentrated on race preparation. All in all, I am happy with how things went today.”

#109 Man of the race

Man of the race
  • Member

  • 1,571 posts
  • Joined: September 06

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:29

F. Alonso 1.21.781
N. Piquet 1.22.349
Yup, nearly six-tenths behind his team mate. :p


It was a good time because Nelsinho was less than six tenths behind Fernando. Also, good and important work from Nelsinho all along because he obviously was doing some dedicated preparation for race. That is, checking the gravel conditions and training how to get back when being there.

Edited by Man of the race, 08 May 2009 - 16:35.


#110 Menace

Menace
  • Member

  • 12,799 posts
  • Joined: November 01

Posted 08 May 2009 - 16:36

4 K. RAIKKONEN
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:06:12
2 1:27.781
3 1:25.528
4 1:25.148
5 1:24.807
6 1:24.671
7 P 1:33.757
8 P 2:14.790
9 8:42.966
10 1:24.365
11 1:24.108
12 1:24.093
13 1:24.885
14 1:27.426
15 1:25.123
16 1:23.875
17 1:27.083
18 1:23.843
19 1:25.579
20 1:23.967
21 1:23.432
22 P 1:31.954
23 P 2:17.870
24 14:27.140
25 1:23.393
26 1:23.212
27 1:28.271
28 1:22.829
29 1:22.994
30 1:22.767
31 1:22.672
32 1:29.566
33 1:22.883
34 1:22.707
35 P 1:32.946
36 9:22.060
37 1:22.599
38 1:22.773
39 1:25.896
40 P 1:38.808
7 F. ALONSO
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:03:17
2 1:27.146
3 1:30.656
4 1:27.680
5 1:24.275
6 1:24.088
7 P 1:32.954
8 6:32.755
9 1:23.735
10 1:23.685
11 1:23.693
12 1:23.866
13 1:23.928
14 P 1:29.692
15 18:37.488
16 1:24.804
17 1:24.206
18 1:26.966
19 1:24.107
20 1:24.181
21 P 1:29.199
22 9:59.201
23 1:21.875
24 1:23.772
25 1:21.977
26 1:21.921
27 1:22.304
28 P 1:28.134
29 10:13.339
30 1:22.043
31 1:28.810
32 1:21.781
33 1:26.182
34 1:24.515
35 1:21.881
36 P 1:51.430
15 S. VETTEL
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:01:43
2 1:26.109
3 1:27.433
4 1:28.505
5 1:24.522
6 1:27.476
7 1:24.379
8 1:23.827
9 1:23.469
10 P 1:35.517
11 12:36.645
12 1:22.703
13 1:22.400
14 1:25.991
15 1:27.853
16 1:22.612
17 1:33.482
18 1:22.685
19 1:22.851
20 1:22.576
21 1:26.722
22 1:22.082
23 1:31.395
24 1:22.638
25 P 1:28.866
26 8:54.056
27 1:23.698
28 1:22.959
29 1:22.806
30 1:26.592
31 1:22.915
32 1:22.942
33 1:22.942
34 1:23.063
35 P 1:29.728
36 10:50.327
37 1:22.460
38 1:22.484
39 1:22.646
40 1:30.307
41 1:22.361
42 1:22.657
43 1:31.189
44 1:22.446
45 P 1:48.760
22 J. BUTTON
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:13:24
2 1:26.423
3 1:23.533
4 1:23.057
5 P 1:32.340
6 11:05.440
7 1:23.268
8 1:26.252
9 1:23.441
10 1:23.158
11 1:23.277
12 P 1:33.312
13 8:36.950
14 1:23.548
15 1:24.406
16 1:22.814
17 1:25.607
18 1:22.804
19 1:27.989
20 1:22.843
21 1:22.565
22 P 1:30.418
23 14:15.987
24 1:25.210
25 1:22.332
26 1:27.324
27 1:22.324
28 P 1:34.433
29 2:09.759
30 1:26.399
31 1:22.338
32 1:25.590
33 1:29.617
34 1:22.052
35 P 1:44.319

Edited by Menace, 08 May 2009 - 16:37.


#111 MinT

MinT
  • Member

  • 2,280 posts
  • Joined: February 09

Posted 08 May 2009 - 18:39

Buttons times all over the place compared to the others - whats that all about ??

#112 Menace

Menace
  • Member

  • 12,799 posts
  • Joined: November 01

Posted 08 May 2009 - 18:52

Buttons times all over the place compared to the others - whats that all about ??


Ross Brawn said this during the friday Press Conference:

"We have brought a new package here which seems to be working very well with Rubens but we have got a problem with it with Jenson (Button) and we have to understand what is going on."



#113 dabrasco

dabrasco
  • Member

  • 2,170 posts
  • Joined: February 09

Posted 08 May 2009 - 19:28

lol readin the last 3 posts made me smile.... cos after the post with the times, i had the thoughts ..."Buttons laptimes allover the place", just like the 2nd post, and then the 3rdpost explaining it all :)


anyways its still hard to say how qualifying will go ... a couple of teams do seem to have stepped up. Mclaren will likely struggle....I predict some tweaks in the status quo, nothing too massive

Edited by dabrasco, 08 May 2009 - 19:30.


#114 Fatality

Fatality
  • Member

  • 618 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 08 May 2009 - 23:31

Hamiltons comments were very pessimistic, it sounds like hes given up. I wonder when he will ever win a race again?

#115 jesee

jesee
  • Member

  • 1,906 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 08 May 2009 - 23:46

Hamiltons comments were very pessimistic, it sounds like hes given up. I wonder when he will ever win a race again?


Doesn't sound good from the interview. This years car is a dud for sure. Mclaren are even lucky to be where they are at the moment. If it was by the standards of one Kovasloowalainen, they would be ranking among the force indias of this world or worse ):

#116 raiseyourfistfor

raiseyourfistfor
  • Member

  • 2,177 posts
  • Joined: October 08

Posted 09 May 2009 - 02:47

Hamiltons comments were very pessimistic, it sounds like hes given up. I wonder when he will ever win a race again?


LOL I think you're confusing him with raikonen hes the one who doesn't give a **** anymore

#117 Kelateboy

Kelateboy
  • Member

  • 7,032 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 09 May 2009 - 04:48

Ferrari could and I hope, get a handful of points this weekend. Podium possible?

A podium for Ferrari is possible, but highly unlikely. Looking at Free Practice 1 and 2, and I am sure a lot of people will point out that the time is not an indication of things to come in Qualy and Race, I am still of the opinion that Brawn GP, RBR and Toyota are still faster than Ferrari. I was looking forward to McLaren bringing in their DDD for this race, but that was not the case. Renault seemed to be very fast in Free Practice 2 and they clocked in good times on heavy fuels.

My take so far based on FP1 and 2 is that Brawn, RBR, Toyota are still the teams to beat, followed by Renault, Williams, Ferrari,McLaren, BMW, Torro Rosso and Force India.

-KB


#118 roadrunner89

roadrunner89
  • Member

  • 130 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 09 May 2009 - 08:53

Is there a site which shows the FP3 live?

#119 femi

femi
  • Member

  • 8,288 posts
  • Joined: March 04

Posted 09 May 2009 - 09:16

FP3 here

Is there a site which shows the FP3 live?



Advertisement

#120 rdebourbon

rdebourbon
  • Member

  • 1,628 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 09 May 2009 - 09:39

A podium for Ferrari is possible, but highly unlikely. Looking at Free Practice 1 and 2, and I am sure a lot of people will point out that the time is not an indication of things to come in Qualy and Race, I am still of the opinion that Brawn GP, RBR and Toyota are still faster than Ferrari. I was looking forward to McLaren bringing in their DDD for this race, but that was not the case. Renault seemed to be very fast in Free Practice 2 and they clocked in good times on heavy fuels.

My take so far based on FP1 and 2 is that Brawn, RBR, Toyota are still the teams to beat, followed by Renault, Williams, Ferrari,McLaren, BMW, Torro Rosso and Force India.

-KB


I tend to disagree. The longer stints on the soft tyre, which is meant to be the better race stint were comparable to the RedBull times.. Ferrari like Mclaren did the bulk of their running on the harder tyre, so their times are skewed somewhat.

A podium is on the hgh end of the expectation IMO.

#121 grunge

grunge
  • Member

  • 5,393 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 09 May 2009 - 09:45

massa`s up 0.4 from 2nd placed barachello.....things definitely look on the up


#122 RedBaron

RedBaron
  • Member

  • 8,584 posts
  • Joined: March 01

Posted 09 May 2009 - 09:46

OT: Does anyone know what happened to the atlas chatroom? Do we have to get to it via mIRC now? If so, what's the channel/room/server... Thanks

Oh it's linked top right now... I see I see.

Edited by RedBaron, 09 May 2009 - 09:48.


#123 PassWind

PassWind
  • Member

  • 7,539 posts
  • Joined: February 05

Posted 09 May 2009 - 10:13

massa`s up 0.4 from 2nd placed barachello.....things definitely look on the up



Mmm, what was the fastest winter testing time?

in the 18's

#124 primer

primer
  • Member

  • 6,664 posts
  • Joined: April 06

Posted 09 May 2009 - 10:18

Mmm, what was the fastest winter testing time?

in the 18's


Yes but, in winter testing they were cheating. Posted Image

#125 fololo

fololo
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: August 08

Posted 09 May 2009 - 10:19

Mmm, what was the fastest winter testing time?

in the 18's


Yes but there was more Grip.

Look at other Teams they too cant driv 18s.

#126 sreevishnu

sreevishnu
  • Member

  • 1,514 posts
  • Joined: November 08

Posted 09 May 2009 - 10:19

Mmm, what was the fastest winter testing time?

in the 18's

that was with super softer compounds which B'stone brought to test
this weekend only soft!
More over that was set on last day when the track was run for almost 5 days of testing
and also temp was low back then

#127 J2NH

J2NH
  • Member

  • 1,950 posts
  • Joined: March 02

Posted 09 May 2009 - 10:22

Did Red Bull make a run on the option tire?
I don't think they did and wonder if they are saving them for Q and the race.

#128 fololo

fololo
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: August 08

Posted 09 May 2009 - 10:25

Did Red Bull make a run on the option tire?
I don't think they did and wonder if they are saving them for Q and the race.

yes Vettel make a run

#129 f1rules

f1rules
  • Member

  • 8,464 posts
  • Joined: May 03

Posted 09 May 2009 - 10:29

Did Red Bull make a run on the option tire?
I don't think they did and wonder if they are saving them for Q and the race.


i exspect to see both redbull in top 6 without any problems, this is a track made for them, and vettel on 1 or 2

Edited by f1rules, 09 May 2009 - 10:29.


#130 TickTickBooom

TickTickBooom
  • Member

  • 1,043 posts
  • Joined: February 06

Posted 09 May 2009 - 11:07

massa`s up 0.4 from 2nd placed barachello.....things definitely look on the up

On an empty tank and the preferred tyres!

As much as I want to see Kimi do well this year, I do not believe that Ferrari can sustain that pace in quali or the race. But they've definitely improved.

#131 rdebourbon

rdebourbon
  • Member

  • 1,628 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 09 May 2009 - 11:09

On an empty tank and the preferred tyres!

As much as I want to see Kimi do well this year, I do not believe that Ferrari can sustain that pace in quali or the race. But they've definitely improved.


Yup they have improved, Qualifying will be very interesting. BTW Rubens was also on soft tyres.

#132 Phucaigh

Phucaigh
  • Member

  • 2,839 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 09 May 2009 - 11:21

Who knows what fuel they were carrying, if they were doing a Q2 or a Q3 simulation...et cetera....

Edited by Phucaigh, 09 May 2009 - 11:21.


#133 Kelateboy

Kelateboy
  • Member

  • 7,032 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 09 May 2009 - 11:37

On an empty tank and the preferred tyres!

As much as I want to see Kimi do well this year, I do not believe that Ferrari can sustain that pace in quali or the race. But they've definitely improved.

No question whatsoever, Ferrari have definitely improved compared to their 1st four races.

20mins to Qualifying.

-KB


#134 Madras

Madras
  • Member

  • 3,911 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 09 May 2009 - 11:40

No question whatsoever, Ferrari have definitely improved compared to their 1st four races.

20mins to Qualifying.

-KB


Ferrari have improved but not as much as some think. They're not going to be in the top 5 unless they run very light in Q3.

#135 grunge

grunge
  • Member

  • 5,393 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 09 May 2009 - 11:40

On an empty tank and the preferred tyres!

As much as I want to see Kimi do well this year, I do not believe that Ferrari can sustain that pace in quali or the race. But they've definitely improved.

nobody has any idea about the fuel loads right now...its all speculation...its a popular that massa was lighter than the brawns but BY WHAT AMOUNT is important...
i think kimi was heavier than his team mate...consistantly dropping 0.3,0.4 secs in S3 all session...but again that could be due to other issues as well(new chasis,weight distribution issues etc)..
ferrari seem to have improved greatly....dyer had come out and asked of fans not to expect a pole but come race day,i wouldnt be surprised if we see two ferraris in the top 6 at the end of qualifying


#136 salamin

salamin
  • Member

  • 1,693 posts
  • Joined: March 09

Posted 09 May 2009 - 11:48

Ferrari have improved but not as much as some think. They're not going to be in the top 5 unless they run very light in Q3.

yeah we heard it in the F60 thread already

#137 Kelateboy

Kelateboy
  • Member

  • 7,032 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 09 May 2009 - 12:28

Where is the Qualifying thread?

Kimi missed Q2 by finishing 16th while Massa topped Q1. WTF?

Vettel made his Q1 run on prime tyres. RBR could definitely go faster in Q2.

-KB

#138 TickTickBooom

TickTickBooom
  • Member

  • 1,043 posts
  • Joined: February 06

Posted 09 May 2009 - 14:01

Where is the Qualifying thread?

Kimi missed Q2 by finishing 16th while Massa topped Q1. WTF?

Vettel made his Q1 run on prime tyres. RBR could definitely go faster in Q2.

-KB

Not surprised you can't find it, it's really badly named, as is this thread.

http://forums.autosp...howtopic=108771

#139 OfficeLinebacker

OfficeLinebacker
  • Member

  • 14,088 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 09 May 2009 - 16:38

Sorry. It was my first official qualifying thread. I forgot what the naming convention is and I worried that calling it 'official' would be hubris.

Advertisement

#140 TickTickBooom

TickTickBooom
  • Member

  • 1,043 posts
  • Joined: February 06

Posted 09 May 2009 - 16:42

Sorry. It was my first official qualifying thread. I forgot what the naming convention is and I worried that calling it 'official' would be hubris.

It's not so much the lack of the 'official', it's the 'Barcelona Grand Prix' part that irks me. We're in Spain. For the Spanish Grand Prix.  ;)

#141 OfficeLinebacker

OfficeLinebacker
  • Member

  • 14,088 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 09 May 2009 - 16:48

It's not so much the lack of the 'official', it's the 'Barcelona Grand Prix' part that irks me. We're in Spain. For the Spanish Grand Prix. ;)


Oh I started the qualifying thread, not this one. I just called it "Barcelona Qualifying," which is not a misnomer. I didn't even notice the misnomer in this thread title.