
Fuji may give up on Japanese GP
#1
Posted 29 May 2009 - 08:17
The Fuji Speedway circuit may give up next year's Japanese Grand Prix due to financial reasons.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 29 May 2009 - 08:36
From Autosport: http://www.autosport...rt.php/id/75665
The Fuji Speedway circuit may give up next year's Japanese Grand Prix due to financial reasons.
Well I'm not one to say I told you so. Well, actually who am I kidding, yes I am.
But I predicted this here and here a few days ago :-)
Edited by kar, 29 May 2009 - 08:37.
#3
Posted 29 May 2009 - 08:41


#4
Posted 29 May 2009 - 08:55
If that means race in Suzuka every year, than all I can say is:
![]()
Sadly, I wouldn't bet on it. Just means Bernie has an open slot for the Pyongyang Grand Prix (to be the dramatic first night race held under radioactive glow).
#5
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:14
Edited by MiPe, 29 May 2009 - 09:49.
#6
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:21
They should try and get the Asia Le Mans Series to run a 1000km race at Fuji though, it would be good to revive that event.
#7
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:27
I'd would like to think bye bye Japan, welcome Imola but alas the Pyongyang Grand Prix would be more probable.

#8
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:27
#9
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:30
If that means race in Suzuka every year, than all I can say is:
![]()
Ditto.


#10
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:34
If that means race in Suzuka every year, than all I can say is:
![]()
Agreed.


I definitely don't want to see Japan off the calendar.
#11
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:41
Agreed.
![]()
![]()
I definitely don't want to see Japan off the calendar.
There was some speculation earlier in the year that the days of the Japanese GP may be numbered - though I can't quite remember who wrote that (might have been Richard Williams in a Guardian season preview). It's a bit like the German situation - neither circuit seems able to afford to run the race every year.
#12
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:47
We can hope, can't weI don't see what basis you all have for the assumption that Suzuka will be back as a permanent fixture?

It would be sad to see Suzuka also lose the race. I can't recall single dull race on that track.
Edited by Music Man, 29 May 2009 - 09:48.
#13
Posted 29 May 2009 - 09:48
All races cancelled as governments have no money to fortunes for races nobody wants to go to.
Williams lead a new category with the following circuits - Monaco, Silverstone, Istanbul Park, Monza, Imola, Suzuka, Spa, Watkins Glen, Interlagos and Adelaide. The racing world rejoices.
Oh, to dream...
#14
Posted 29 May 2009 - 10:04
I don't see what basis you all have for the assumption that Suzuka will be back as a permanent fixture?
Well, with the recent upgrades I see it returning as a permanent fixture unless Honda decide they can't afford to run it.
#15
Posted 29 May 2009 - 10:04
Grand Prix calendar 2015:
All races cancelled as governments have no money to fortunes for races nobody wants to go to.
Williams lead a new category with the following circuits - Monaco, Silverstone, Istanbul Park, Monza, Imola, Suzuka, Spa, Watkins Glen, Interlagos and Adelaide. The racing world rejoices.
Oh, to dream...
Why wait so long?
#16
Posted 29 May 2009 - 10:12
Well, with the recent upgrades I see it returning as a permanent fixture unless Honda decide they can't afford to run it.
It's perhaps worth noting that Imola undertook its own upgrades with the expectation of returning as a permanent fixture on the F1 calendar, only to remain absent with little apparent prospect of coming back.
I apprciate that it's a different situation with Suzuka in that it isn't functioning as a 2nd GP in a single country in the manner that Imola was, but even so...
#17
Posted 29 May 2009 - 10:25
Grand Prix calendar 2015:
All races cancelled as governments have no money to fortunes for races nobody wants to go to.
Williams lead a new category with the following circuits - Monaco, Silverstone, Istanbul Park, Monza, Imola, Suzuka, Spa, Watkins Glen, Interlagos and Adelaide. The racing world rejoices.
Oh, to dream...
Oh yes that would be perfect!
#18
Posted 29 May 2009 - 10:31


Edited by dabrasco, 29 May 2009 - 10:31.
#19
Posted 29 May 2009 - 10:32
Advertisement
#20
Posted 29 May 2009 - 11:01
#21
Posted 29 May 2009 - 11:13
#22
Posted 29 May 2009 - 11:42
Here are some pics of the new Suzuka.....







Very impressive! A great circuit with modern facilities... it's all Bernie asks for!

Pics courtesy of http://suzukakaisyu.blog123.fc2.com/
Edited by Hames Junt, 29 May 2009 - 11:44.
#23
Posted 29 May 2009 - 12:46
#24
Posted 29 May 2009 - 12:48
#25
Posted 29 May 2009 - 12:57
No, I dont believe so.I presume there havent been any alterations to the track layout?

#26
Posted 29 May 2009 - 12:58
Sadly, I wouldn't bet on it. Just means Bernie has an open slot for the Pyongyang Grand Prix (to be the dramatic first night race held under radioactive glow).
Nah, they're gonna put it in the DMZ, skirt round the mines. I bet piquet sets off the first one.
#27
Posted 29 May 2009 - 13:00
This is great news, I reckon Suzuka will sign a long term deal now.
Here are some pics of the new Suzuka.....
Very impressive! A great circuit with modern facilities... it's all Bernie asks for!
Pics courtesy of http://suzukakaisyu.blog123.fc2.com/
what... big run off areas on the outside of turn 1? that takes away half the challenge! It's meant to be THE gravel pit of dooom!
#28
Posted 29 May 2009 - 13:03
what... big run off areas on the outside of turn 1? that takes away half the challenge! It's meant to be THE gravel pit of dooom!
The run off areas look the same as 2006 to me. Also the layout has not been touched, although it does look as if the track tarmac has been re-laid.
#29
Posted 29 May 2009 - 13:04
The run off areas look the same as 2006 to me. Also the layout has not been touched, although it does look as if the track tarmac has been re-laid.

note the tarmac around turns 1/2 (and the astro).
#30
Posted 29 May 2009 - 13:05
Suzuka is where they all belong.
#31
Posted 29 May 2009 - 13:09
Great news - I hated Fuji.
Suzuka is where they all belong.
Yet they'll end up at some autodrome in Turkmenistan instead.
#32
Posted 29 May 2009 - 13:09
#33
Posted 29 May 2009 - 13:29
note the tarmac around turns 1/2 (and the astro).
Oh sorry, I thought you were implying that the run off had been extended, as well as being tarmaced!
#34
Posted 29 May 2009 - 14:09
#35
Posted 29 May 2009 - 19:50
+1Great news - I hated Fuji.
Suzuka is where they all belong.
So long Fuji

#36
Posted 29 May 2009 - 19:52
what... big run off areas on the outside of turn 1? that takes away half the challenge! It's meant to be THE gravel pit of dooom!
I agree, very disappointing
#37
Posted 29 May 2009 - 19:54
If that means race in Suzuka every year, than all I can say is:
![]()
absolutely

#38
Posted 29 May 2009 - 22:20
#39
Posted 30 May 2009 - 01:43
But it still annoys me that Fuji (Toyota) yanked the Japanese GP away from Suzuka only to give indications now it want to give it up after 2 years.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 30 May 2009 - 02:57
#41
Posted 07 July 2009 - 07:35
Let's hope Suzuka pick it up as there are no real other alternatives.
#42
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:13
Confirmed http://www.autosport...rt.php/id/76751
Let's hope Suzuka pick it up as there are no real other alternatives.
There is no good reason that Suzuka will pick up ALL Japanese races from now on in this economic situation. On the contrary I believe Suzuka will not be able to pay the cash which FOM is asking for. So unfortunately I rather preparemyself for the news reporting that there will be No Japanese GP for years to come.
I am more concerned actually that Now Germnay will not mak ANY efforts to put the GP back on schedule. So as France, I assume may other tracks where economy turnes badly. FOM need to support this situation with other business model. Yes.
#43
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:15
#44
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:19
There is no good reason that Suzuka will pick up ALL Japanese races from now on in this economic situation. On the contrary I believe Suzuka will not be able to pay the cash which FOM is asking for. So unfortunately I rather preparemyself for the news reporting that there will be No Japanese GP for years to come.
I am more concerned actually that Now Germnay will not mak ANY efforts to put the GP back on schedule. So as France, I assume may other tracks where economy turnes badly. FOM need to support this situation with other business model. Yes.
I've got a feeling it will make way for next years Korean race.

#45
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:25
I've got a feeling it will make way for next years Korean race.
I hope so for you, but Korea is not doing too well neither to afford races there. Perhaps China only at the asian continent, perhaps no Australia neither. No France, No Germany, No USA, No middle east... I mean.... where then?
#46
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:31
I hope so for you, but Korea is not doing too well neither to afford races there. Perhaps China only at the asian continent, perhaps no Australia neither. No France, No Germany, No USA, No middle east... I mean.... where then?
Bulgaria.
#47
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:59
I hope so for you, but Korea is not doing too well neither to afford races there. Perhaps China only at the asian continent, perhaps no Australia neither. No France, No Germany, No USA, No middle east... I mean.... where then?
China had strong concerns over their F1 future so that's not overly certain. Hungary is a state-supported GP but state itself seems to be IMF-supported. Turkey is very likely out as well.
What we kind of have are Malaysia, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi (oil comes out of terrain there), Monaco (no fee), Britain (errr...), Belgium (is it really trouble-free?), Monza (minimum fee), Valencia, Barcelona (if they can carry on with momentum), Singapore, Brazil. New ones: Korea, India, Russia?
As we see now, Bernie's business model was no more than a blatant pyramid scheme. How is he going to pay teams next year?
#48
Posted 07 July 2009 - 09:26
China had strong concerns over their F1 future so that's not overly certain. Hungary is a state-supported GP but state itself seems to be IMF-supported. Turkey is very likely out as well.
What we kind of have are Malaysia, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi (oil comes out of terrain there), Monaco (no fee), Britain (errr...), Belgium (is it really trouble-free?), Monza (minimum fee), Valencia, Barcelona (if they can carry on with momentum), Singapore, Brazil. New ones: Korea, India, Russia?
As we see now, Bernie's business model was no more than a blatant pyramid scheme. How is he going to pay teams next year?
Well the pricing of GP is now in question as Fuji drops the ball. Now more can say that ... due to this current economic climate and so forth. That is the concern. I think that Bernie-FOM-CVC knows how to handle the situation tho. Bu the worst case senario is that now Bernie being not fully welcomed by the politics. Who else can do the work besides him?
Edited by One, 07 July 2009 - 09:27.
#49
Posted 07 July 2009 - 09:34
Who else can do the work besides him?
Maybe Bernie simply paved a way for new GPs with his recent statements. Lukashenka, Mugabe, Morales, Chavez, Ahmadinejad, Kim and Castro are perhaps waiting a call

#50
Posted 07 July 2009 - 10:03
There is no good reason that Suzuka will pick up ALL Japanese races from now on in this economic situation. On the contrary I believe Suzuka will not be able to pay the cash which FOM is asking for. So unfortunately I rather preparemyself for the news reporting that there will be No Japanese GP for years to come.
I am more concerned actually that Now Germnay will not mak ANY efforts to put the GP back on schedule. So as France, I assume may other tracks where economy turnes badly. FOM need to support this situation with other business model. Yes.
Yes, I share that opinion (regarding Germany too). Fuji was losing around 12M GBP annually, that's ridiculous given the level of support for F1 in Japan. F1 needs to get to the position whereby circuits can at least expect to break even. So much money sploshing around, yet little or none of it goes to those putting on the show.
