Jump to content


Photo

Ferrari right or wrong in replacing Kimi with Alonso?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1924 replies to this topic

Poll: Ferrari right or wrong in replacing Kimi with Alonso? (920 member(s) have cast votes)

right or wrong

  1. right (508 votes [55.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 55.22%

  2. wrong (412 votes [44.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.78%

Vote

#1 Liuggi

Liuggi
  • Member

  • 108 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:49

I admit to being sad about KIMI situation, but consider these facts:

Kimi beat Alonso in 2005 IMO, only unreliability held him back.
Kimi also won 2003 WDC when factor in Nurburgring failure.
Kimi 2007 WDC beats Alonso in inferior car to McLaren.
So by my calculations that's 3-1 championships for KIMI vs Alonso. :)
2008/2009 Alonso did nothing much to help move Renault forwards. Of two wins one was won through Piquet crashing on purpose.
I also think KIMI is better commercially. He wears cool sunglasses, watches and a hip-hop cap. He looks better than Alonso in that pullover he was wearing the other day and some Ray Bans (out of fashion). :cool: Ok so that's not the most important thing, but it still helps to have the right image. Alonso's has never been as good as KIMI's and since 2007 it's got worse.

I'm not wanting to attack Alonso but I do think KIMI is better driver, better image and more loved by fans. Remember he was International Racing Driver of the Year 2005 as voted by F1 Racing readers poll. :clap: What do you think? I respect all opinions. :up: :wave:

Advertisement

#2 Colombo

Colombo
  • Member

  • 682 posts
  • Joined: August 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:52

Ferrari was absolutely right.
Your calculations are not only dead wrong but sheer nonsense.

GC

#3 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 45,838 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:53

No idea whether it will prove to be the right move or not, but one thing I'm positive of is that rest of your post is absolute nonsense.

#4 Szoelloe

Szoelloe
  • Member

  • 7,054 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:54

they were right.

#5 fed up

fed up
  • Member

  • 3,692 posts
  • Joined: May 08

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:55

they were right.


+1

#6 Liuggi

Liuggi
  • Member

  • 108 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:55

where is nonsense? go watch nurburgring 2003 and review video of whole of 2005, then come back and tell me KIMI wasn't robbed :rolleyes:
alonso is good but what did he achieve at Renault when the car wasn't dominant? not a great deal.

#7 Liuggi

Liuggi
  • Member

  • 108 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:56

also KIMI doesn't care if team focuses on Massa or whatever, he does his own thing. Alonso has reputation for throwing toys out the pram :down:

#8 GIBF1

GIBF1
  • Member

  • 585 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:58

Like him or hate him, F1 needs Fernando in a top car fighting for wins and the championship

Good decision from Ferrari IMO

#9 kismet

kismet
  • Member

  • 7,376 posts
  • Joined: February 03

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:59

I assume this is a piss-taking thread? There really is no need for that, you know. Kimi's gone and he's not coming back - no need to twist the knife.

And no, no one would pick KR over FA. :rolleyes:

#10 karina_k

karina_k
  • Member

  • 82 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:03

I admit to being sad about KIMI situation, but consider these facts:etc etc etc

WTH?Let it go already.


#11 GIBF1

GIBF1
  • Member

  • 585 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:08

WTH?Let it go already.


It's sad to see a great racer like Kimi leave but with emerging talents like Vettel, Hulkenberg (if he can step up) and Kobayashi (if he can get a seat), Kimi will be forgotten pretty quickly

#12 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 45,838 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:08

where is nonsense? go watch nurburgring 2003 and review video of whole of 2005, then come back and tell me KIMI wasn't robbed :rolleyes:
alonso is good but what did he achieve at Renault when the car wasn't dominant? not a great deal.


As soon as you start to talk about "what if's" and declare someone to be the champion based on that, it becomes total and utter nonsense.

#13 maccaFTW

maccaFTW
  • Member

  • 704 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:09

I hate to say it as a Kimi fan, but it was the right thing to do for Ferrari.

If you have questions about someone's motivation, no matter how talented they are, you can't pay them the money Kimi was making. It's clear from a number of sources that Kimi was very hot and cold in terms of his inspiration. When a driver in his class like Alonso is available and unquestionably motivated, you've got to make the switch.

Do I think Alonso is better than Kimi? No; I'd rate them equally on talent. But Alonso is the better bet given his very apparent advantage in dedication.

The risk that Ferrari runs is that they could have an Alonso-Massa turf war on their hands, which would be extremely counterproductive. Raikkonen and Massa formed a harmonious driver pairing.

#14 Snap Matt

Snap Matt
  • Member

  • 1,157 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:13

I also think KIMI is better commercially. He wears cool sunglasses, watches and a hip-hop cap. He looks better than Alonso in that pullover he was wearing the other day and some Ray Bans (out of fashion). :cool: Ok so that's not the most important thing, but it still helps to have the right image. Alonso's has never been as good as KIMI's and since 2007 it's got worse.

This is the team that was built around Michael Schumacher for over ten years. Driver image isn't a huge factor there!

#15 Zero4

Zero4
  • New Member

  • 3 posts
  • Joined: November 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:14

I admit to being sad about KIMI situation, but consider these facts:

Kimi beat Alonso in 2005 IMO, only unreliability held him back.
Kimi also won 2003 WDC when factor in Nurburgring failure.
Kimi 2007 WDC beats Alonso in inferior car to McLaren.
So by my calculations that's 3-1 championships for KIMI vs Alonso. :)
2008/2009 Alonso did nothing much to help move Renault forwards. Of two wins one was won through Piquet crashing on purpose.
I also think KIMI is better commercially. He wears cool sunglasses, watches and a hip-hop cap. He looks better than Alonso in that pullover he was wearing the other day and some Ray Bans (out of fashion). :cool: Ok so that's not the most important thing, but it still helps to have the right image. Alonso's has never been as good as KIMI's and since 2007 it's got worse.

I'm not wanting to attack Alonso but I do think KIMI is better driver, better image and more loved by fans. Remember he was International Racing Driver of the Year 2005 as voted by F1 Racing readers poll. :clap: What do you think? I respect all opinions. :up: :wave:



Kim spent 8 seasons, basically his entire career in the two biggest and most successful teams in the history of the sport, and a number of years with the greatest designer in the history of the sport, competed in more races than Alonso yet finished with less wins and less World Championships. Says it all really.

#16 One

One
  • Member

  • 6,527 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:21

Only if you asked if Ferrari were right to retain Massa,... :wave:

#17 RedBaron

RedBaron
  • Member

  • 8,584 posts
  • Joined: March 01

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:26

Did I just read Raikkonen is a better driver than Alonso because he's more hip hop?

Edit: Sorry to pander to this nonsense fashion discussion, but those Ray Bans Alonso wears are completely in fashion, to correct you misguided fashion senses that claim them to be out.

Fashion is meaningless, the greatest driver in Formula 1 history made me vomit on sight on numerous occasions due to what he wore.

Edited by RedBaron, 18 November 2009 - 13:29.


#18 MichaelPM

MichaelPM
  • Member

  • 3,073 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:26

Did I just read Raikkonen is a better driver than Alonso because he's more hip hop?

:rotfl:

#19 Lennat

Lennat
  • Member

  • 2,201 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:31

As soon as you start to talk about "what if's" and declare someone to be the champion based on that, it becomes total and utter nonsense.


+1000

And yes, I think Ferrari were right to replace Kimi With Alonso. I DO like Kimi, and am truly sad to see him eave F1, but to me it seems pretty obvious that he wasn't a perfect fit at Ferrari. I'm not gonna take away the fact that he did win a title while Massa did not, but overall one can not deny that they've been pretty much equal overall during their 2 ½ seasons together. Kimi was expected to emerge as the obvious number one based on merit, and he did not. Felipe is a very good driver, and I've been impressed with his speed and driving over the last couple of seasons, but the way Schumi outclassed him still showed to me that he is rather a very good driver than an absolute top driver, and therefore the same applies to Kimi as he's been pretty much equal to him.

I hope and believe that Alonso can move the team forward in a more Schumi-esque way, as Ferrari probably works better with a strong leader after all the years with Schumi.

Still sad though that Kimi wont be driving next year, and I would have liked to see him in a Mercedes next year, as it seems pretty weird to start an all works effort without a proven championship contender.Even though I don't rank him as highly as Hamilton or Alonso he's still better than Heidfeld or Rosberg in my opinion. :)

Advertisement

#20 Lennat

Lennat
  • Member

  • 2,201 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:32

Fashion is meaningless, the greatest driver in Formula 1 history made me vomit on sight on numerous occasions due to what he wore.


:rotfl:

#21 One

One
  • Member

  • 6,527 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:33

I was thinking n a line that Mclaren gets two WDC in the two cars and Ferrari gets other two WDC in the car, while Mercedes have two young talented media star driver who are yet to win a race.



:rotfl:


Brawn has a great team organizer.




Fashion is meaningless, the greatest driver in Formula 1 history made me vomit on sight on numerous occasions due to what he wore.



:rotfl:

Woops I almost missed this one! Look back Michael!

Edited by One, 18 November 2009 - 13:41.


#22 ArDeeEmm

ArDeeEmm
  • Member

  • 91 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:36

Alonso and Kimi are possibly the 2 finest F1 drivers.

I am not sure that replacing one with the other will make much difference. Given a half-decent car, wither of them can win the WDC. Give them a crap car, like 2009's Ferrari, and either driver would struggle.

Having Alonso in your team instead of another team is good though, and having Kimi in no team instead another team is also good.



#23 Jackmancer

Jackmancer
  • Member

  • 3,277 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:38

Kimi's salary demands have shown he wasn't motivated enought.

#24 Bishy

Bishy
  • Member

  • 989 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:39

Can we have an option for "not sure?"

Personally I can't choose either way, I rate both Kimi and Fred equally so it's a question i'm struggling to answer!

#25 One

One
  • Member

  • 6,527 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:42

Can we have an option for "not sure?"

Personally I can't choose either way, I rate both Kimi and Fred equally so it's a question i'm struggling to answer!


Don't worry then we know you love Button and Lewis this year. :lol:

#26 kosmos

kosmos
  • Member

  • 12,032 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:43

We can't say if they are wrong or right till we see Alonso perfomance with Ferrari. But at lest the hired a motivated guy willing to do so serious work with the team and the car.

#27 One

One
  • Member

  • 6,527 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:46

I still fancy Ferrari getting rid of Massa, send him to Sauber, replacing Massa with Kimi before the 2010 season starts.

#28 UPRC

UPRC
  • Member

  • 4,716 posts
  • Joined: February 99

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:46

Too soon to tell.

#29 Buttoneer

Buttoneer
  • Admin

  • 19,094 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:47

Even if Alonso is slower than Kimi it was the right decision because I think Alonso has the right work ethic for the team. Whether a driver is right for a team is much more than just 'is he quick', as I believe 2007 demonstrates.

#30 Alexis*27

Alexis*27
  • Member

  • 1,240 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 13:56

I admit to being sad about KIMI situation, but consider these facts:

Kimi beat Alonso in 2005 IMO, only unreliability held him back.


Yes, drivers are often hired on their performances 4 years ago.

Kimi also won 2003 WDC when factor in Nurburgring failure.


..and 5 years ago. With theoretical circumstances majorly factored in.


Kimi 2007 WDC beats Alonso in inferior car to McLaren.


Alonso won 2 WRCs. So what?

So by my calculations that's 3-1 championships for KIMI vs Alonso. :)


But your calculations are clearly bollocs.

2008/2009 Alonso did nothing much to help move Renault forwards. Of two wins one was won through Piquet crashing on purpose.

Yes, one man is directly responsible for every aspect of the car he's driving. If only Nakajima knew how to build an engine - then Williams could have been winning every race. Geez.


I also think KIMI is better commercially. He wears cool sunglasses, watches and a hip-hop cap.


If I wear sunglasses, watches, a hip-hop cap AND a diamond encrusted belt does that mean I'm even cooler? Somebody call Ferrari - I'm available!

He looks better than Alonso in that pullover he was wearing the other day and some Ray Bans (out of fashion). :cool: Ok so that's not the most important thing, but it still helps to have the right image. Alonso's has never been as good as KIMI's and since 2007 it's got worse.


I think you've lost the plot now. Are you 13 by any chance?

Edited by Alexis*27, 18 November 2009 - 13:57.


#31 Jackmancer

Jackmancer
  • Member

  • 3,277 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:04

Can we have an option for "not sure?"

Personally I can't choose either way, I rate both Kimi and Fred equally so it's a question i'm struggling to answer!


Blimey! It's Ferrari! We need "For sure" as an option!

#32 Simon Says

Simon Says
  • Member

  • 2,163 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:15

I admit to being sad about KIMI situation, but consider these facts:

Kimi beat Alonso in 2005 IMO, only unreliability held him back.
Kimi also won 2003 WDC when factor in Nurburgring failure.
Kimi 2007 WDC beats Alonso in inferior car to McLaren.
So by my calculations that's 3-1 championships for KIMI vs Alonso. :)
2008/2009 Alonso did nothing much to help move Renault forwards. Of two wins one was won through Piquet crashing on purpose.
I also think KIMI is better commercially. He wears cool sunglasses, watches and a hip-hop cap. He looks better than Alonso in that pullover he was wearing the other day and some Ray Bans (out of fashion). :cool: Ok so that's not the most important thing, but it still helps to have the right image. Alonso's has never been as good as KIMI's and since 2007 it's got worse.

I'm not wanting to attack Alonso but I do think KIMI is better driver, better image and more loved by fans. Remember he was International Racing Driver of the Year 2005 as voted by F1 Racing readers poll. :clap: What do you think? I respect all opinions. :up: :wave:


No, because Kimi does not have Santander. Ferrari has got so much money now with Santander that they are able to afford Fisi + Alonso + Kimi + Massa. They are paying for 4 drivers next year :eek: ( only 2 happen to be racing while Kimi gets to sit home all day doing nothing :p )

Edited by Simon Says, 18 November 2009 - 14:15.


#33 Buttoneer

Buttoneer
  • Admin

  • 19,094 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:17

Blimey! It's Ferrari! We need "For sure" as an option!

:lol: :up:

Though I think Jenson took the 'for sure' crown this year didn't he?

#34 Enkei

Enkei
  • Member

  • 5,853 posts
  • Joined: November 01

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:19

Time will tell. If Ferrari 2010 is anything like McLaren 2007, they'd better kept Kimi around. The writing's on the wall though.

#35 acelik

acelik
  • Member

  • 84 posts
  • Joined: November 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:31

people who think kimi's WDCs were robbed should go to the police then :p

If we think about ifs, then we can change both 2007 and 2008 seasons WDCs :wave:

Ferrari did the right thing IMO. great job.

#36 Nobody

Nobody
  • Member

  • 3,517 posts
  • Joined: January 07

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:36

On paper, Ferrari-Alonso is a match made in heaven.

But that's what we said about McLaren-Raikkonen, and McLaren-Alonso, and Ferrari-Raikkonen

Time will only tell

#37 DePortago

DePortago
  • Member

  • 189 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:47

I admit to being sad about KIMI situation, but consider these facts:

Kimi beat Alonso in 2005 IMO, only unreliability held him back.
Kimi also won 2003 WDC when factor in Nurburgring failure.
Kimi 2007 WDC beats Alonso in inferior car to McLaren.
So by my calculations that's 3-1 championships for KIMI vs Alonso. :)
2008/2009 Alonso did nothing much to help move Renault forwards. Of two wins one was won through Piquet crashing on purpose.
I also think KIMI is better commercially. He wears cool sunglasses, watches and a hip-hop cap. He looks better than Alonso in that pullover he was wearing the other day and some Ray Bans (out of fashion). :cool: Ok so that's not the most important thing, but it still helps to have the right image. Alonso's has never been as good as KIMI's and since 2007 it's got worse.

I'm not wanting to attack Alonso but I do think KIMI is better driver, better image and more loved by fans. Remember he was International Racing Driver of the Year 2005 as voted by F1 Racing readers poll. :clap: What do you think? I respect all opinions. :up: :wave:



Your calculations are nothing but ridiculous, but if you´re happy, keep going. :)

#38 Bishy

Bishy
  • Member

  • 989 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:49

Blimey! It's Ferrari! We need "For sure" as an option!



:lol:

#39 BMW_F1

BMW_F1
  • Member

  • 7,670 posts
  • Joined: February 08

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:50

They were right.. He was overhyped and overpaid.. Ferrari realized that when he could not beat Massa. They are going to try Alonso now. Let's see.

Edited by BMW_F1, 18 November 2009 - 14:50.


Advertisement

#40 DePortago

DePortago
  • Member

  • 189 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 14:50

No, because Kimi does not have Santander. Ferrari has got so much money now with Santander that they are able to afford Fisi + Alonso + Kimi + Massa. They are paying for 4 drivers next year :eek: ( only 2 happen to be racing while Kimi gets to sit home all day doing nothing :p )


You forgot to mention Hamilton. Santander is still paying for him (and now also for Button). :wave:

#41 steph90

steph90
  • Member

  • 63 posts
  • Joined: November 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 15:18

They were right. Kimi can be a bit more spectacular/quicker than Alonso but Alonso always delivers. Kimi's frustrating as hell to watch at times

#42 robracer

robracer
  • Member

  • 1,028 posts
  • Joined: November 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 16:17

Right move by Ferrari. Alonso is much better than the overpaid and overrated Raikkonen.
Alonso is proberly the best driver around at the moment and he should make Ferrari title contenders over the next few years.

#43 Seanspeed

Seanspeed
  • Member

  • 21,814 posts
  • Joined: October 08

Posted 18 November 2009 - 16:37

Well..........right. Obviously. He's a better driver and a proven leader.

I may like Kimi and his approach and all, but in a team like Ferrari, it just wont cut it. Not unless he was dominantly fast, which he wasn't.

I think Alonso is just what Ferrari needs.

#44 GiancarloF1

GiancarloF1
  • Member

  • 925 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 18 November 2009 - 16:43

I admit to being sad about KIMI situation, but consider these facts:

Kimi beat Alonso in 2005 IMO, only unreliability held him back.
Kimi also won 2003 WDC when factor in Nurburgring failure.
Kimi 2007 WDC beats Alonso in inferior car to McLaren.
So by my calculations that's 3-1 championships for KIMI vs Alonso. :)
2008/2009 Alonso did nothing much to help move Renault forwards. Of two wins one was won through Piquet crashing on purpose.
I also think KIMI is better commercially. He wears cool sunglasses, watches and a hip-hop cap. He looks better than Alonso in that pullover he was wearing the other day and some Ray Bans (out of fashion). :cool: Ok so that's not the most important thing, but it still helps to have the right image. Alonso's has never been as good as KIMI's and since 2007 it's got worse.

I'm not wanting to attack Alonso but I do think KIMI is better driver, better image and more loved by fans. Remember he was International Racing Driver of the Year 2005 as voted by F1 Racing readers poll. :clap: What do you think? I respect all opinions. :up: :wave:


Is the word KIMI an acronym? Because you always write in capitals.

#45 klover

klover
  • Member

  • 3,862 posts
  • Joined: June 03

Posted 18 November 2009 - 16:56

They were right. Kimi can be a bit more spectacular/quicker than Alonso but Alonso always delivers. Kimi's frustrating as hell to watch at times

Yes, Alonso did deliver in 2007, 2008, and 2009. Let's see - a third in the WDC. Kimi delivered a WDC, and a third in those years. Interesting choice of the word "always" :wave:

#46 undersquare

undersquare
  • Member

  • 18,929 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 18 November 2009 - 17:04

I'll always think Ferrari wasted what they had in Kimi.

Fernando will make sure things are how he needs them to be, starting apparently with an MS-free zone. It's a crucial difference.


#47 Mia 01

Mia 01
  • Member

  • 266 posts
  • Joined: November 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 17:15

I'll always think Ferrari wasted what they had in Kimi.

Fernando will make sure things are how he needs them to be, starting apparently with an MS-free zone. It's a crucial difference.


Agreed.

But, things will be interesting in the team next year, for moore than one reason.


#48 Atreiu

Atreiu
  • Member

  • 17,232 posts
  • Joined: May 07

Posted 18 November 2009 - 17:21

I see the logic behind signing Alonso, but I have always viewed Kimi as more talented and I'd rather have him if I could chose. Hindsight will tell us who was really right, Alonso hasn't turned a wheel so far and it's way too early to pass judgement.

#49 ch103

ch103
  • Member

  • 2,040 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 17:22

I voted no.

I would have rather had Kimi & Alonso instead.

#50 Hole

Hole
  • Member

  • 2,232 posts
  • Joined: August 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 17:38

As much as Kimi is (currently "was"), Alonso is by far a better pick IMO.

He has accepted crappy seats even knowing his car would not be competitive, that's a nice thing for himself and his fans; he was never that over-paid nor requested insane amounts of money. He is quite nice to the fans and will attend all kind of sponsor events without any problem (specially of UNICEF). And above all, he's quick, and constant.

Right now it looks like Kimi only thinks about himself, specially regarding the money and being too proud to accept a seat because of its unsure competitiveness, even if some of those teams Kimi could have signed for could be perfectly competitive next year.