Jump to content


Photo

Early Sponsorship


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 Michael M

Michael M
  • Member

  • 142 posts
  • Joined: March 00

Posted 08 November 2000 - 08:24

The photo below shows a car of the Scuderia Ferrari - most probably Luigi Villoresi - during the 1949/50 temporada. Clearly visible is the "Fernet Branca" advertising which was team sponsorship, and the "YPF" sticker which was organizer advertizing.
There was also heavy advertizing on all Carrera Panamericana cars, and of course in the USA it was common already very early, mainly in form of "specials".
The special touch of this "Fernet Branca" advertising is the fact that it is not shown on a poor privateer's car, but on that of the proud Scuderia Ferrari. Why was there no similar advertising resp. sponsorship in Europe already in the 50's? Was is prohibited by the FIA (Argentina was FIA member too)? Or was it simply too early for a tough step like this?

Posted Image

Advertisement

#2 Don Capps

Don Capps
  • Member

  • 5,933 posts
  • Joined: May 99

Posted 08 November 2000 - 17:01

Michael,

You are correct about the "YPF" decals being common on the cars during the South American races. Look at any number of photos and you can pick out those in the Argentine almost on the basis of the "YPF" decals.

As for the larger issue of advertising, that is another kettle of fish entirely. In the mid & late-1920's, the American AAA National Championship series steadily moved towards the reality that without sponsorship there was no racing and embraced the concept of the "special." In the 1950's and into the 1960's the situation on the sponsorship front in Europe was essentially that it was handled through the stipends handed out by various elements within the motor trade for the use of various components and the fuel companies.

I don't have the FIA Yellow Books handy, but I am not sure if advertsing was completely forbidden, but it was probably severely restricted. If you look close at some of the pictures of the Brabham cars taken during 1965, you can see a small decal of the Esso tiger. I am almost certain I saw one on the Brabhams at Watkins Glen that year.

When Ken Gregory & Alfred 'Pa' Moss formed the British Racing Partnership, it was with malice a forethought that they went after sponsorship outside the motor industry. Naturally, this set everyone's hair on fire. In Paul Sheldon's Black Books, you will find nary a mention of how BRP was actually entered for many of their races: the Yeoman Credit Racing Team; United Dominion Trust Racing Team, later as UDT-Laystall. And Reg Parnell (Racing) was not the official entrant while Parnell received backing from Yeoman Credit and then Bowmaker.

Sponsorship was a touchy subject for years in the sport. The Americans -- North & South -- faced realities and accepted sponsorship as a matter of necessity. The SCCA fought it initially, but even it soon caved in.

In Europe, Lotus was the first to jump in at the deep end of the pool when they brought in John Player as the major sponsor and revised their livery to reflect this. However, the McLaren M7A was painted in the same shade of orange as the Can-Am cars and shared the same sponsor: Gulf. In my opinion, if it hadn't been Chapman, it would just have been someone else, probably McLaren.

Don't be so shocked that Ferrari took in sponsorship. 50 years ago, Ferrari was not remotely what it is today. It was surviving, but often on the benevolence of its customers. Grand prix racing was not the focus -- did I note a shocked gasp by many out there? -- of Ferrari for many years and neither was it particularly good at it. The cash flow came from sports cars on both the road and the track. The overhead Ferrari made on each car was substantial for the time. However, had not Fiat slipped a substantial bankroll of lire into Ferrari in 1955, no telling how things might have gone. It could have easily ended up as Maserati did several seasons later.

#3 Roger Clark

Roger Clark
  • Member

  • 7,539 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 08 November 2000 - 22:21

THe McLaren M7As may have been painted Orange, but they also carried Shell advertising in 1968. i don't think they carried any oil company advertising in 1969, but Brabham certainly displayed Gulf stickers.

I can't say whether Don is right about the Esso decals on the 1965 Brabhams but they must have been very small indeed. There was very little advertising on the cars until the end of 1967 when the rules were changed to allow advertisements on the cars. They were limited to 55 sq inches or 5 in by 11ins but there was no limit to the number of advertisements. Presumably it took Chapman to realise that this left a loophole which allowed him to paint the entire car in a sponsor's colours.



#4 Mike Argetsinger

Mike Argetsinger
  • Member

  • 948 posts
  • Joined: April 00

Posted 09 November 2000 - 01:40

I am fairly certain that the orange color of the McLaren Can Am and Grand Prix cars had nothing to do with Gulf oil. I can't, however, find a reference just at the moment to back this up. If I find something I will post it. Anyone else remember the genesis of that color?

#5 Treeface

Treeface
  • Member

  • 72 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 09 November 2000 - 03:51

Remember WWII had flattened Europe's economic base. This would effect the availablity of sponsorship vs. North and South America.

#6 KzKiwi

KzKiwi
  • Member

  • 150 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 09 November 2000 - 08:39

In his 1963 book "The Gordon Bennett Races", Lord Montagu makes the following comments.

"..The sport needed regulation, and in September of that year (1899) the A.C.F. published its first racing rules. Already principles were being laid down.....but present day competitors in the Indianapolis 500 mile race, for instance, would be surprised to read that 'no sign or advertisment is allowed on cars while they are actually racing'"...

After this I am unsure when sponsorship started to appear on a consistent level in Europe.

Across the water in America sponsorship appears to have been consistently in fashion on American cars in the early years. I have a photocopied picture of Barney Oldfield posing with his FWD Christie racer, with the words 'My only life insurance - Firestone tires', written along the sides of the car. The caption mentions that the picture was taken in 1910.

Other American examples include:
'The Omar Special' Deusenberg that completed in the 1916 Indy 500, with both driver and mechanic sporting overalls emblazoned with 'Master carburetors' and,

A reference I have from the book "American Automobile Racing" notes that 2 cars in the 1895 Chicago Times-Herald contest were entered under by the 'De La Verne Refrigerating Machine Company' name, although it is highly probable that there was no signwriting on the cars involved (a Benz and a Macy-Benz).

Among other things, this just goes to show that the theory and principles of sponsorship have been around for a long time. It is only the degree and how the sponsorship is marketed that has changed over the years, as the marketing people realise and focus on their potential target audiences, using the latest technolgies avilable.

Regards,

Kirk




#7 Milan Fistonic

Milan Fistonic
  • Member

  • 1,769 posts
  • Joined: September 00

Posted 09 November 2000 - 08:43

Mike
You asked about McLaren's orange colour. I quote from Doug Nye's Mclaren book.

Teddy (Mayer) had long been unhappy about the team's colours. They had changed from dowdy British Racing Green to black and silver, red with pale stripes, and now he fell for a bright yellow-orange papaya shade, prompted by Jackie Epstein's Lola T70 "which would show up like a beacon on TV". Once racing began with the M6A the team found slower drivers were instantly aware of that wicked orange flash in their mirrors.

BTW thanks for the reply to my McAfee question.

#8 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 81,386 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 09 November 2000 - 08:49

I would almost bet that the earliest examples were a case of the sponsor chasing the owner to be a part of the show, rather than the owner looking for the cash to run the car.
In Australia, until 1968 (?) there was a line permitted on each side of the car, two inches high, I think, the type of lettering specified in the rules as well, and it could only be the name of the car's entrant.

#9 lynmeredith

lynmeredith
  • Member

  • 174 posts
  • Joined: August 00

Posted 09 November 2000 - 09:55

Ray, was it in 1968 that there was a near drivers strike at the Surfers Paradise Tasman Series race when entrants were ordered by the organisers to remove or cover advertising decals on the cars from Europe (ads being permitted in Europe by then)? The strike was averted when Frank Gardner pointed out the number of large Aussie fans in the grandstand, calculated the probable amount of beer that they had drunk so far and speculated on what might happen if an announcement was made that the race was not going to take place. We got out the grey tape and covered up the ads.

All except the ones on the sidewalls of the tyres of course. Hee hee. A principal task of a Goodyear tyrefitter at the time was to ensure that the white GOODYEAR was freshened up before the start of any race. "Never mind the tyre pressures, who's got the white paint-stick?"

And this shows that this is a two-part question; ie. sponsorship (money or freebies) and advertising. Goodyear and Firestone advertised on the side of every car they supplied tyres to. Took Dunlop a while to find the white paint!
Lyn

#10 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 81,386 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 09 November 2000 - 11:48

Just read over the RCN description of the events... quite a story, and I'd forgotten it. It was one meeting that I missed, so I guess that affects how clearly things stick in your mind.
Anyway, there was a clash over the signwriting, and also over drivers not having applied to the RAC for permission to race at the meeting... which only came to attention because of phone calls to the RAC over the advertising issue.
It boiled down to an issue over the drivers' names having to be black on a white background, whereas the entrants' names could be any contrasting colour on any background. There were the previously mentioned size restrictions... but a problem arose over it all because misunderstanding the new rule (introduced in Australia that year) about the colour of the drivers' names led to the huge mixup. As you say, there were horrendous scenes, the Lotuses and BRMs (which had Rubery Owen signage, from memory, or ROH Wheels) missing the 10-lap preliminary, etc.
The account is on page 10 of the March 1968 issue of Racing Car News.

#11 oldtimer

oldtimer
  • Member

  • 1,291 posts
  • Joined: October 00

Posted 09 November 2000 - 20:02

Don, I remember seeing the small Esso tiger on the Brabhams.

Didn't Tony Vandervell ruffle some feathers with the inscriptions on his cars?

#12 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 81,386 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 10 November 2000 - 03:03

Old you might be, blind you aren't... I think you're right about the tigers.

#13 Don Capps

Don Capps
  • Member

  • 5,933 posts
  • Joined: May 99

Posted 10 November 2000 - 03:17

The reason I remember the Esso tiger is that after seeing it on the Brabham cars at Watkins Glen, the tiger was mentioned in a report on the Mexican GP! There was a report in one of the magazines about Chapman eyeing the tiger on a Brabham and wishing he had one on the Team Lotus cars.

I remember being amazed when I saw the Tiger on the Brabhams in the paddock. The universal reaction by those I showed it was to smile! I have no idea if the tiger was there before Watkins Glen, but by golly it was there for the US & Mexican GP's!

#14 Milan Fistonic

Milan Fistonic
  • Member

  • 1,769 posts
  • Joined: September 00

Posted 10 November 2000 - 08:12

How did Jack Brabham get away with the Redex sponsorship on his Cooper Bristol? Was it because he called the car the Redex Special rather than Cooper Bristol?

#15 Roger Clark

Roger Clark
  • Member

  • 7,539 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 10 November 2000 - 19:09

Originally posted by oldtimer
Don, I remember seeing the small Esso tiger on the Brabhams.

Didn't Tony Vandervell ruffle some feathers with the inscriptions on his cars?


I believe that Vandervell Products never advertised the success of the Thinwall or Vanwall. This was because they were paid for out of the company R&D budget and British laws wouldn't allow advertising (the expenditure was written off against tax. It's also why there wee never more than four Vanwalls built up at any time.

#16 oldtimer

oldtimer
  • Member

  • 1,291 posts
  • Joined: October 00

Posted 10 November 2000 - 20:18

Originally posted by Don Capps
The reason I remember the Esso tiger is that after seeing it on the Brabham cars at Watkins Glen, the tiger was mentioned in a report on the Mexican GP! There was a report in one of the magazines about Chapman eyeing the tiger on a Brabham and wishing he had one on the Team Lotus cars.

I remember being amazed when I saw the Tiger on the Brabhams in the paddock. The universal reaction by those I showed it was to smile! I have no idea if the tiger was there before Watkins Glen, but by golly it was there for the US & Mexican GP's!


I saw the tigers on the cars at Silverstone which would be prior to Watkins Glen

#17 Barry Lake

Barry Lake
  • Member

  • 2,169 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 11 November 2000 - 14:05

Milan
Jack Brabham didn't get away with "REDeX Special" on the side of his car forever. He fought a long-running battle with CAMS over this. Eventually they said he could not start in a particular race until it was covered over.
He did this with tape and paper in such a way that it blew off going down the straight!
That was January 1955 and they said he could no longer have the signs on the car. It was one of the major factors in influencing him to go overseas a couple of months later.

#18 Wolf

Wolf
  • Member

  • 7,883 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 12 November 2000 - 01:01

I'm following Rogers advice and am posting this pic third time tonight. When he visited Moss thread he noticed Mobil Oil company decal, and this was taken on July 10th 1949 at Lake La Garda.

Posted Image

#19 PDA

PDA
  • Member

  • 1,017 posts
  • Joined: July 99

Posted 12 November 2000 - 01:21

Non assigned sponsorship goes back a lot earlier than that. Woolf barnato, part owner of De Beers, had the Bentley works team as his personal toy in the twenties. When he got bored, Bentley went under.

Advertisement

#20 Michael M

Michael M
  • Member

  • 142 posts
  • Joined: March 00

Posted 12 November 2000 - 11:43

A lot of interesting postings on my thread, but most of them handle the situation in the US or that in Europe and Australia in the 60’s, but only very few about Europe in late 40’s or early 50’s, which was my question. The photo of the Cooper 500 is quite interesting, as the Mobil pegasus confirms that advertising obviously was allowed.

Don, shocked about Ferrari and sponsorship? No, not at all, the fact that I’m busy with this “early Ferrari” research does not mean that I’m a Tifosi. The interesting point is that for the 1948/49 Temporada Ferrari sent only one single car to South America, and for 1949/50 – most probably with the financial help of Fernet Branca – the whole Scuderia with 3 cars was present. After that season there was no Temporada works entry, except when the Argentine GP and the 1000 kms became WC events. Probably this means that the Fernet Branca deal was a kind of trial only, as it obviously was never repeated.

Another strange thing is the Carrera Panamerica, an event with really heavy advertising on the cars, even Mercedes-Benz took the chance and placed a giant MB logo on the bonnets of their cars. However, the 1953 Carrera was part of the SCWC, a championship under the control of the FIA, and still there was advertising allowed on the cars.

Besides the ACA, the Automobile Club of Argentina, who bought competitive European race cars and entered them for promising Argentine drivers in the Temporada but also in European races, the second driving force in the Argentinian motor sport scene was YPF, Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales, the national state-owned oil monopoly. They worked in close cooperation with the ACA by sponsoring major national events. Believe they invented the event sponsoring in general, where every participating car had to fix such sponsor’s stickers, as this was part of the entry regulations. Earliest photos I have are from 1947, I really wonder whether these YPF stickers can be seen also on cars at pre-war events, but my archive of this period is rather small. There was also organizer sponsorship by YPF for the famous “Gran Premio Internacional” long-distance road races of the 60’s, and also for the Argentine Rallye of the more modern era. Don’t know how the recent takeover by Repsol influenced these activities. Remarkably is that YPF (in the 50’s and 60’s) had no commercial reason for such advertising, as they had the monopoly on fuel and lube oil in Argentina, so one really can call it sponsorship in the original meaning of the word.

Returning to Ferrari, Fernet Branca, and Europe. For sure Ferrari was short of money especially in those early years, so the Fernet Branca deal made sense. Treefaces’s argument about the economic situation in Europe in my opinion not really counts, because if advertising money is spent overseas, why not in the home market or other European countries? And, btw, the golden rule of advertising people is that your budget must be always higher in bad times.

So again the question, what was the reason that race car advertising in Europe in the 40’s and 50’s was more or less absent? I do not believe that no interested advertisers / sponsors could be found, as especially in the booming economy of the 50’s advertising in all forms was practised. If prohibited by FIA, why the rolling billboards of the 1953 Carrera? And if rejected by the teams, why only in Europe and not in South America? Or was it banned by the race organizers, meaning the large automobile clubs?

#21 Roger Clark

Roger Clark
  • Member

  • 7,539 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 12 November 2000 - 12:47

THere was always sponsorship, usualy by trade suppliers, such as oil, tyre and electrical companies. Scuderia Ferrari received such support from its inception in 1930. The fule companies were the major supporters of Grand Prix racing during the 1960s. Race victories would be followed by advetrisement in the trade and general press and there would be many posed photographs showing the relevant products. The only issue is regarding advertising on the cars themselves.

My understanding is that the FIA and its predecessors banned avertising on the cars until 1968. A few small cases slipped through the net. in north nd South America, the Europe based authorities could not exercise such control over what local organisers did and did not allow. i suspect that they recognised practical reality and turned a blind eye.

Mercedes-Benz cars, of course, carried the three pointed star in the thirties.

Ragarding PDA's point about Barnato and the Bentleys, this was personal support and nothing to do with his companies. HE was Chairman and chief financial supporter of Bentley Motors at the time, it wasn't just the racing team he supported. He was advised by his financial advisers to withdraw his support when the recession hit Bentley, he did not become bored. He continued to support racing at Brooklands, mainly with Bentley based cars.

#22 Michael M

Michael M
  • Member

  • 142 posts
  • Joined: March 00

Posted 12 November 2000 - 15:37

Of course there was always sponsorship by suppliers, i.e. fuel, tyres, electric components etc., and of course victories of the sponsored cars had been promoted in advertisements and so on. But as you said, the issue is the direct advertising on the cars itself, and as in the Fernet Branca example by companies outside the scene.

In the USA the FIA was never a factor in motorsport authority, except of course in case of world champonship events, and the same I believe was the case in Latin America. However, I still believe the permitting of car advertising in the 1953 and 1954 Carrera’s – both FIA world sports car championship events – is strange.

Mercedes-Benz cars carried the three-pointed star already much earlier than in the 30’s of course, but I’m talking about a logo covering more or less the whole bonnet, as can be seen on the photo below. The cars also had advertising for “Prat Motors”, which was the Mercedes-Benz Mexican importer, so advertising yes, but only internally.

Posted Image


#23 Don Capps

Don Capps
  • Member

  • 5,933 posts
  • Joined: May 99

Posted 13 November 2000 - 02:46

Michael asks:

So again the question, what was the reason that race car advertising in Europe in the 40’s and 50’s was more or less absent? I do not believe that no interested advertisers / sponsors could be found, as especially in the booming economy of the 50’s advertising in all forms was practised. If prohibited by FIA, why the rolling billboards of the 1953 Carrera? And if rejected by the teams, why only in Europe and not in South America? Or was it banned by the race organizers, meaning the large automobile clubs?


I don't beleve there is a single, all-purpose answer, nor even one that readily makes sense to those looking backwards decades after advertising & commercial treatment of the sport have completely changed. One part of the answer sounds pretty lame, but it s actually a big part of the answer: it simply wasn't done.

Why? Lots of reasons. Look about the circuits, study the drivers and mechanics, look at the magazines and you will see that commercial interests are pretty evident. Lots of involvement by the 'motor trade' and others outside that part of the business world. For reasons many and varied -- some easily defined at first blush as xenophobic -- it took until the 1968 season for Europe to embrace advertising on racing cars.

I will see if I can dig out something as I search through the 'stuff' I am pulling off the shelves for the first time in years.

#24 Flicker

Flicker
  • Member

  • 194 posts
  • Joined: August 00

Posted 13 November 2000 - 13:36

And what can you say about (new for year 1960) antifreeze "Telar" from Dupon on early Roger Penske cars?
Posted Image
Posted Image

#25 Flicker

Flicker
  • Member

  • 194 posts
  • Joined: August 00

Posted 18 November 2000 - 15:49

from new Mike Lawrence article on Planet F1 site:
http://www.planet-f1...wrence=lawrence
...Motor racing changed on 1st January, 1968. On that day, cars entered in races sanctioned by the FIA were allowed to display a sponsor's logo. (M.Lawrence)
Posted Image
C.Chapman, G.Hill and Geoffrey Kent (marketing manager fotr John Player) at the launch of Gold Leaf Team Lotus. Jan.10, 1969.


#26 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 81,386 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 24 November 2000 - 00:40

Brabham was not alone having those 1954 problems, Stan Coffey also did with his 'Dowidat Spanners Special,' yet another Cooper Bristol.

#27 Gil Bouffard

Gil Bouffard
  • Member

  • 597 posts
  • Joined: August 00

Posted 26 November 2000 - 19:43

The YPF decal showed up on all cars racing in the major Argentine races until the multi-national fuel companies started supplying "sponsored," racing teams with "chemical cocktails."

Remember, this is an advertising coup for YPF because no matter who won, they were fueled by YPF. For years Amoco was THE fuel for the 12 hours of Sebring. Same deal. No matter who wins, they are fueled by AMOCO!

About ten years ago DSJ did a report on F-1 teams and their fuel usage. At the time, 100 octane Aviation Gasoline was required per regulation. Jenks reported that Lotus used what ever fuel that was available at the track. Some of the other teams had theirs trucked in.

Now on to the FRENET BRANCA "sponsorship."

You have to remember that during the late `40s and early `50s Juan Peron was in charge of Argentina!

In order to get top line drivers and cars to race in his international showcase Temporada series, Peron would convince companies to "buy," the cars and pay for the driver's services. (hotel, car, transportation)

Also remember that Ferrari was starting out and would be more than willing to accept any kind of money to race, anywhere!

During the early years, Ferrari and Maserati brought their cars to the colonies as sold vehicles. In other words, the cars were picked up after the event by the buyer and taken home.

An incident I remember during the 58 Sebring when Mike Hawthorn, in relief for Luigi Musso, jumped into his Ferrari from the pit counter and dented the fender. The car was a left-hand drive customer car and the Ferrari guys were not happy with Mike for damaging the car.

Gil Bouffard