Brabhams
#1
Posted 14 April 2000 - 20:06
What a smashing looking car too. Then there was the brabham Repco double World Champs, and the BT34 that sat on pole in Ruettemann's first race. Then some of Gordon Murrays cars were works of art.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 14 April 2000 - 21:39
#3
Posted 14 April 2000 - 22:35
I liked the BT33 - it seemed to be (with the Maclaren M19) the final flowering of the 1960s style of F1 car and it worked well. After that, Brabham went a bit odd with the "lobster-claw" car, but the BT44 was a fine looking car. But I suppose the BT49 , when it ran without nose fins, was my real favourite Brabham - such a beautifully elegant design (despite being run by the evil poison dwarf Bernie!)
------------------
BRG
"all the time, maximum attack"
#4
Posted 15 April 2000 - 04:55
In reading his comments since his retirement he seems to regret ever selling his portion of the team and leaving the sport so completely. Did he not divorce his wife sometime after his retirement?
------------------
Regards,
Dennis David
Grand Prix History
Life is racing, the rest is waiting
#5
Posted 15 April 2000 - 17:52
I like your description, BRG, of the 'final flowering' of that style in the BT33. It actually looks better than the Lotus 49, but the wings it always had preclude a more direct comparison. Let's put it this way, if it had been out in 1968, it would not be the 49 that peoples list second only to the Eagle in appearances. The M19 was nice, too, and the M7 as well.
As for the BT34, it must have been a very good design, too, but typical of the Jack and Ron Taurenac partnership, they rarely built a dud.
Jack's "old man" getup was '66 or '67 at the Dutch GP, where he carried a cane and wore a long beard to the grid.
Jack's appearances today show that he really was a racer to be reckoned with all along, but he was discounted because he appeared to do well only when he had an advantage in the machinery. There are races that show that not to be true, perhaps that's what this thread should be about...
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
[This message has been edited by Ray Bell (edited 04-15-2000).]
#6
Posted 15 April 2000 - 18:25
On a slight tangent to the thread, a (very rare)two seat Supermarine Spitfire crashed on landing at Goodwood last Saturday resulting in the death of the two occupants. All track and flying activities were halted while the aircraft was recovered and investigators surveyed the scene. I had already arranged to take my Caterham down to Goodwood for a noise level check (in advance of a future track day)and arrived just as the circuit was being closed. A sad day.
[This message has been edited by Eric McLoughlin (edited 04-15-2000).]
#7
Posted 15 April 2000 - 07:58
------------------
I'll be back...
#8
Posted 16 April 2000 - 09:32
#9
Posted 16 April 2000 - 11:36
#10
Posted 16 April 2000 - 13:07
I think there's another pic of it in the 'how high did they jump..' thread, you'll have to go back a couple of months, but I'm fairly sure there's a better one there. Or was that the BT26?
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
#11
Posted 16 April 2000 - 13:52
#12
Posted 19 April 2000 - 01:06
FORIX says it was a BT24. Hard to tell a difference (other than the wings) from the two pictures, though. Denny H., Germany 1967 (Fluplatz)
BTW, my cable system got Speedvision a couple of weeks ago . Saw my first live GP in about 6 years and first televised qualifying ever. Anyway, celebrating aside, I say the Goodwood event last night and saw Jack's shunt. I'm embarrassed to say I didn't know that JB had had this accident and I didn't know how old the broadcast was. Thanks to Eric for the info. I was thinking of starting a thread to find out.
The other thing that struck me about the Goodwood incident is that, given the lethality of the racing in that period, do they make any safety modifications to the cars/tracks or do thay assume that the tracks are better, the safety crews/facilities are better, or the drivers won't drive million dollar works of art in such a way to put them at risk. There was a chicane inserted, I assume to lower a top speed.
I wonder if there's a market for a Lotus 49 built around a carbon fiber crash cell?
[This message has been edited by SteveB2 (edited 04-18-2000).]
[This message has been edited by SteveB2 (edited 04-18-2000).]
#13
Posted 19 April 2000 - 20:13
I am amazed that the Australian tendency on this Forum haven't reprimanded you for saying that a Brabham was in "Lotus colours" - even a Pom like me knows that these were the Australian green and gold sporting colours!
------------------
BRG
"all the time, maximum attack"
#14
Posted 19 April 2000 - 23:10
Despite there not beeing any green or gold anywhere near our flag, thei the colours of our wee nation, the colours representing the colour of the land. If you've ever seen our modern day fighting flag 'the boxing kangaroo' picked out in green and gold a flag first championed by 'Australia II' the first non-US team to win the Americas Cup yacht racing regatta, breaking the world's longest running winning streak at 132 years, and now worn by any Australian team in any event, sporting and otherwise (seen most recently in Dili in Timor as the leading nation in the Interfet peacekeeping force)
#15
Posted 20 April 2000 - 01:39
Track - no changes, except for re-surfacing. The chicane dates back to the 1950's so is totally authentic. As I've mentioned elsewhere, the only concession is that the "brickwork" is now made from expanded polystyrene!
Barrier - not an inch/cm of Armco anywhere. The grass banks have been cut back and tyre wall have been installed faced by old convey-belt material. Weeds and other growth is being encouraged to grow within the tyres and so eventually they will merge into the scenery.
Run off - gravel traps have been laid at Woodcote, Madgwick and (I think) St Mary's.
Spectator protection - all spectator standing areas are raised above track height, which is good for safety and spectating. A low wooden fence surrounds the track too - handy for dangling ones umbrella off, I find.
[This message has been edited by Eric McLoughlin (edited 04-19-2000).]
#16
Posted 21 April 2000 - 05:48
The BT24 was conventional Taurenac mid-sixties, tubular chassis, fibreglass body, all looking very much as though it comes apart. Which it did, of course. The 33, however, has a homogenous look about it, it is one thing, like I said, very smooth.
As for our flag, not that it means anything, it is the flag chosen for us by the poms. The Eureka flag would be more appropriate, for it signified the first move to independence, but it has been hijacked by unsavoury elements. It is a good looking flag, however.
The boxing kangaroo embarrasses me, and there's not much that does that...
Foget flags, they are unimportant. But racing colours are.
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...