And how about GT cars? I realise that LMP's normally have two pedals and a hand clutch, but is that allowed in those too?
Edited by jeze, 20 January 2010 - 19:47.
Posted 20 January 2010 - 19:46
Edited by jeze, 20 January 2010 - 19:47.
Posted 20 January 2010 - 21:13
You can left foot brake in any car. Most Finnish rally drivers start at age 5 doing it.;)
wikipedia
[edit]
My post is a direct response to your thread title, not your post about two pedal layout.
[/edit]
Posted 20 January 2010 - 21:23
Edited by Wuzak, 20 January 2010 - 21:27.
Posted 20 January 2010 - 23:13
Posted 21 January 2010 - 09:52
Posted 21 January 2010 - 13:56
Some V8Supercar drivers left foot brake. The cars still have the three pedals, but the left foot brakers mostly ignore the clutch.
Greg Murphy is probably the most notable left foot braker, and I believe Fabian Coulthard is too.
Greg Murphy on-board footage
Posted 21 January 2010 - 14:04
Posted 21 January 2010 - 14:10
Juan Pablo Montoya does it on the road courses per foot cam this year or last year. Just like in Aussie V8, he ignores the clutch. Rev matching FTW!
Posted 21 January 2010 - 18:24
Some V8Supercar drivers left foot brake. The cars still have the three pedals, but the left foot brakers mostly ignore the clutch.
Greg Murphy is probably the most notable left foot braker, and I believe Fabian Coulthard is too.
Greg Murphy on-board footage
Posted 21 January 2010 - 21:03
You started this exact same thread just a couple of months ago . . .
Posted 21 January 2010 - 23:05
Back in 2006 the entire field used H-shifters. They still had the strain-gauged shift cut systems. Since 2008 I think they've phased in sequentials and everyone uses them now, but it's still the same Hollinger gearbox so the only difference is actuation.Are those H-pattern gearboxes or a motorcycle style sequential? I'm surprised by how quick the downshift is and the little amount of throttle he needs to blip the revs. Though I suppose being a properly developed racing engine that thing revs pretty quickly when not connected to the wheels.
Posted 22 January 2010 - 01:03
They do have electronics that pause the engine to assist in down changes these days on Thuper cars.Back in 2006 the entire field used H-shifters. They still had the strain-gauged shift cut systems. Since 2008 I think they've phased in sequentials and everyone uses them now, but it's still the same Hollinger gearbox so the only difference is actuation.
Posted 14 November 2010 - 17:44
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:34
I did it by mistake this morning on a 1-2 shift. Once the revs match up it just slid into gear.Left foot braking and downshifting without clutch looks really hard. I'm guessing the V8 gearboxes are specifically designed for this? What do u reckon would happen in a normal road car? I dont want to hear the gears grinding, so I wouldn't try it on my car lol. I'd stick to heal/toe, but just wondering if any of u guys have tried the downshift without clutch on a non-race specifc/designed gearbox?
Posted 14 November 2010 - 23:20
Left foot braking and downshifting without clutch looks really hard. I'm guessing the V8 gearboxes are specifically designed for this? What do u reckon would happen in a normal road car? I dont want to hear the gears grinding, so I wouldn't try it on my car lol. I'd stick to heal/toe, but just wondering if any of u guys have tried the downshift without clutch on a non-race specifc/designed gearbox?
Posted 14 November 2010 - 23:38
Posted 15 November 2010 - 01:51
I don't left foot brake, but when my street cars have over 300,000 miles on it and I am looking for a replacement, I only use the clutch for first and reverse. I have never had a problem. I do have a class A CDL liscence and understand gear/speed matching. These have all been normal roadcars--Volvo 240's and a C70--probably a cumulative 40,000 miles.Left foot braking and downshifting without clutch looks really hard. I'm guessing the V8 gearboxes are specifically designed for this? What do u reckon would happen in a normal road car? I dont want to hear the gears grinding, so I wouldn't try it on my car lol. I'd stick to heal/toe, but just wondering if any of u guys have tried the downshift without clutch on a non-race specifc/designed gearbox?
Advertisement
Posted 15 November 2010 - 02:04
Posted 15 November 2010 - 08:35
I thought you would need to speed the engine up on a downshift not pause them ?1?
Many Touring car drivers use the technique (left foot braling), some not all the time,
and some real late and hard brakers clutch during braking and
downshifts to not have the engine braking upset the balance of the car by momentanly locking the wheels (mainly in FWD touring cars).
Posted 15 November 2010 - 08:58
FWIW: I've sat in Tim Harvey's Porsche Cup car with him talking me through how he drives and he clutch-less upshifts and heel & toe on downshifts. There's a ignition cut on the shifter. He says he never really liked left-foot braking but it can be useful to change the attitude of the car mid-corner.
Posted 15 November 2010 - 09:28
Posted 15 November 2010 - 09:37
Posted 15 November 2010 - 09:53
If I remember correctly Vauxhall made an Astra rally car (for Brookes?) with an extra brake pedal on the rear circut.
Awesome technique from Cam, but I don't quite get the reason for braking during mid corner? Is that to adjust the brake bias of the car? So in the case of the V8 to avoid oversteer by applying brake and throttle at the same time?
Posted 15 November 2010 - 10:08
Posted 15 November 2010 - 15:53
Posted 15 November 2010 - 16:11
Posted 19 November 2010 - 15:38
So ever since this thread and my accidental clutchless upshift, I have been playing in my 1999 Mazda Protege. I have found that as long as the revs are DROPPING, as I apply pressure to put the car into the desired gear, as soon as the revs match, it slips right into gear.Left foot braking and downshifting without clutch looks really hard. I'm guessing the V8 gearboxes are specifically designed for this? What do u reckon would happen in a normal road car? I dont want to hear the gears grinding, so I wouldn't try it on my car lol. I'd stick to heal/toe, but just wondering if any of u guys have tried the downshift without clutch on a non-race specifc/designed gearbox?
Posted 19 November 2010 - 15:58
F3 cars have a paddle on the left side of the steering which they have to depress at the same moment they pull the gear lever to get a flat-upshift. Which I always thought was a bit odd. Even if the rules/ECU doesn't allow an electronically assisted upshift like an old style Indycar, you'd have thought they'd have put a button/lever/paddle on the gear column. Either strain gauge, a button on top of the stalk, or the more clumsy solution of having the gear lever trip the switch on it's way back into the next gear change. But by all accounts it's something the drivers find a bit strange in their first laps in an F3. Nothing they can't figure out but the co-ordination is a bit alien as it's the only race car, as far as I know, that uses that paddle/lever combo.
Posted 19 November 2010 - 17:17
Synchro rings essentially match the revs of the driving gear to the driven gear, by friction, and have heavily bevelled teeth to help the two gears align properly. However, there is a limit to what speed differential they can cope with. (If that very simplified description is wrong I wouldn't be at all surprised if someone tells me).So ever since this thread and my accidental clutchless upshift, I have been playing in my 1999 Mazda Protege. I have found that as long as the revs are DROPPING, as I apply pressure to put the car into the desired gear, as soon as the revs match, it slips right into gear.
However, if the engine revs are lower than the revs it would be at if the car were in the desired gear, there is a horrible grinding sound when pressure is applied.
Is this how synchronizers work?
Downshifts are a lot trickier because I have to remember to blip the throttle, something I've never gotten down. I just started playing with that today.
Posted 19 November 2010 - 18:06
Edited by OfficeLinebacker, 19 November 2010 - 18:18.
Posted 19 November 2010 - 18:19
That's what I thought, to paraphrase Oscar Wilde "Two Nations divided by a common vehicle!" I've driven a few auto's, when I was mechanic'ing in Europe our tow-car was an automatic Mk IX Jag, but I still feel happier in a manual.I was never formally taught to drive a manual, I have basically learned on my own through being a mechanic. The oldest manual gearbox cars I've driven are from the 80s.
Posted 19 November 2010 - 19:43
This is the first manual car I've owned and I love it more every day. It allows me to try out little tricks and techniques such as the ones discussed in this thread. It also makes me feel closer to my antipodean brethren!That's what I thought, to paraphrase Oscar Wilde "Two Nations divided by a common vehicle!" I've driven a few auto's, when I was mechanic'ing in Europe our tow-car was an automatic Mk IX Jag, but I still feel happier in a manual.
Posted 19 November 2010 - 20:02
Posted 20 November 2010 - 05:19
I was going to mention the Roadranger box as a driver education tool. I started driving trucks at 18 with a 9 speed Roadranger and eventually worked my way up to an 18 speed. It is all very simple until you get lost!Not really performance oriented, but if you get the chance to drive a Roadranger equipped truck for any length of time it'll be the best education you'll ever get in driving a non-synchronised manual. Once you can shift through the 13 - 18 speeds quietly (typically 2 ranges plus split) anything else will be a piece of cake.
I once had a drive of an old compound box Mack - somewhat less than gracefully I might add - and that was fun too. Two boxes in series, two shifters and NFI what gear I was in most of the time... When I was a kid my best friend's dad drove an old Mack timber jinker and we'd often go with him up and down steep and twisty mountain tracks hauling logs. He played those twin sticks like a virtuoso and rarely used the clutch. Thinking back now I can almost smell the diesel and the rubber and hear the whistle of the old Mack engine, wonderful days...
Posted 20 November 2010 - 05:38
Modern synchronisers do two things:So ever since this thread and my accidental clutchless upshift, I have been playing in my 1999 Mazda Protege. I have found that as long as the revs are DROPPING, as I apply pressure to put the car into the desired gear, as soon as the revs match, it slips right into gear.
However, if the engine revs are lower than the revs it would be at if the car were in the desired gear, there is a horrible grinding sound when pressure is applied.
Is this how synchronizers work?
Edited by gruntguru, 20 November 2010 - 05:41.
Posted 20 November 2010 - 08:39
You mean...it works as a remote? Blimey! "What are you doing in your pocket?" "Changing gear, sweetheart!"My gearstick looks like this....
Posted 20 November 2010 - 09:44
No, it is not a remote. It was just that was the best photo that I could steal off Google. The unit mounts on the centre console alongside me roughly where the normal gear stick would poke up.You mean...it works as a remote? Blimey! "What are you doing in your pocket?" "Changing gear, sweetheart!"
Advertisement
Posted 20 November 2010 - 09:54
I'm slightly disappointed that you thought I was being serious, but I'll get over it - eventually.No, it is not a remote. It was just that was the best photo that I could steal off Google. The unit mounts on the centre console alongside me roughly where the normal gear stick would poke up.
Posted 20 November 2010 - 10:08
I knew you that you were not being serious but I thought that I had better explain for the younger viewers. They might get their hopes up.I'm slightly disappointed that you thought I was being serious, but I'll get over it - eventually.
Posted 20 November 2010 - 10:34
I have always had great pleasure from driving different types of vehicle, and the more you have to concentrate and use accumulated experience, dexterity and your sense - such as hearing - the more fun it is. I don't get the chance much nowadays, but a couple of years ago a friend hired a mini-digger to landscape his garden, and after spending a day with it and being sure he could handle it, he phoned me and said "Come and see what I've got!" Being a competitive bastard he was naturally hoping I'd make an idiot of myself, especially as by now it was dark. Took about five minutes, much to his disappointment. I think using a Playstation helps...I knew you that you were not being serious but I thought that I had better explain for the younger viewers. They might get their hopes up.
The shift is a nifty bit of gear. Not only can I change gears with it and I can also check the oil and run diagnostics just by pushing the right buttons.
Posted 20 November 2010 - 13:47
Posted 20 November 2010 - 19:40
WTF, dude? LOL.Quick thread hijack for a laugh and to do with unusual skills on the road.
For one of the Malaysian 12-Hour races I did involved driving the Corolla to/from the track from the workshop in town, because I was a foreigner the police couldn't take my licence off me and only give me a verbal warning to not drive a racing car on the road, so the local guys just used to let me do it.
Was bringing the car back from the track once, on slicks of course, and it started pissing down as it can do rather well in Kuala Lumpur. The rain got thicker and thicker which initially was good as the traffic slowed down so I was less nervous about aquaplaning on the race rubber as we were only doing maybe 30km/h. Of course then the windscreen started to fog up badly which was bad because the racer had no heater box. The only way out of that was to pull off my t-shirt (it wasn't official practice at the track so I only wore my safety t-shirt, safety shorts, safety joggers, and spare helmet) to wipe the inside of the windscreen.
It was at about that point, while I was sitting half-naked in the car, I realised it would be rather difficult to explain how I happened to be doing all this if I got pulled over by the police. Why was a half-naked foreigner driving a racing car through the city in the rain? For the life of me I just couldn't think of an excuse, but fortunately I didn't get pulled over and I learned how the slicks felt in heavy water and that helped me in a couple of races after that.
I did manage to take a photo as well.
(a pic)
Posted 20 November 2010 - 19:42
Thanks. The bold is mine, this is what I wanted to know, in particular.Modern synchronisers do two things:
1. They use friction to synchronise the two gears about to be engaged
2. They inhibit complete engagement of the gears while their speeds are mis-matched
Early systems featured item 1. only. Item 2. is the feature that tries to stop you fully engaging the gear before the engine revs are matched.
Clutchless downshifts are easy too with practice - you just need to rev the engine enough to match the lower gear you are selecting Either way, this technique (up and down shifts) will increase wear on your syncro-rings.
Posted 21 November 2010 - 13:42
Posted 21 November 2010 - 13:46
Heel-and-toe is better!I think heal-toe is better for my novice skills at the moment lol
Posted 21 November 2010 - 22:18
"Come and see what I've got!" Being a competitive bastard he was naturally hoping I'd make an idiot of myself, especially as by now it was dark. Took about five minutes, much to his disappointment. I think using a Playstation helps...
Posted 21 November 2010 - 23:11
Don't mention digger, cobber!I didn't know there was a digger in Gran Turismo.
Posted 22 November 2010 - 02:05
Perhaps he has a blister from too much heel & toe? (Polka?)Heel-and-toe is better!