
Why is there no mirrors or headlights in superbike racing?
#1
Posted 30 January 2010 - 22:12
Advertisement
#2
Posted 30 January 2010 - 22:28
Why is there no mirrors or headlights in superbike racing?
You don't need headlights at daylight and mirrors only slow you down, looking behind is just as efficient.
#3
Posted 30 January 2010 - 22:29
Mirrors - I'm guessing aerodynamics.
#4
Posted 30 January 2010 - 22:34
#5
Posted 30 January 2010 - 23:00
The reason Superbike's don't have headlight's or mirror's is simple SAFTEY !!!When riding a motorcycle I have found the mirrors often pretty poor. Depends on the bike but it's in my opinion more a norm than an exception that the mirrors are poor. With some bikes using the mirrors requires moving my arms out of the way. I can see why a racing team would not bother to have them on the bike.
#6
Posted 31 January 2010 - 06:15
#7
Posted 31 January 2010 - 07:23
The reason Superbike's don't have headlight's or mirror's is simple SAFTEY !!!
Yes - I would've thought having mirrors bouncing around the track wouldn't be a good thing...
#8
Posted 31 January 2010 - 07:31
#9
Posted 31 January 2010 - 07:55
Bike racers constantly physically look behind themselves to check gaps and the visors are much, much larger than say, the visors for car racing helmets. They can see a lot more through their peripheral vision than someone in a open wheeler.
#10
Guest_()qo3lav1236_*
Posted 31 January 2010 - 11:15
#11
Posted 31 January 2010 - 20:24
#12
Posted 31 January 2010 - 21:32
The other reason for the lack of mirros is several; (1) no mirrors limits the ability of the one in front to play swerve games (2) requires all riders to ride a bit more uniformly (again no swerving) (3) it is the responsibility of the rider behind to safely pass the one in front---and when doing so, the length of the bike is very short and the width even shorter compared to a car, so unlike a car, the pass and movement can be done very quickly and when executed properly, both can manage just fine.
Both cars and motocycles use the apex of the corner, such that a rider suddenly darting in at the apex is going to stick his bike where it will not go, but the bikes are so short, that only the dumb and reckless try such passes.
Cars are longer and require far more length of track to make the pass.......OTOH___

#13
Posted 31 January 2010 - 21:38
and this needs to be added above,A mirror will only be useful in one position and a rider moves around quite a bit. Mirrors will add drag, weight and break off easily in any fall. With some experience you do not need them either, racing close quarters you are able to 'sense' the other rider and hear his bike to get enough idea where he is and what he is doing. Then there is the board at the pitwall which can tell you how much further behind your rival(s) are.
#14
Posted 31 January 2010 - 22:09
#15
Posted 01 February 2010 - 03:41
I've done some instructing using mirrors and they are for the most part useless when you start upping the pace. Beyond that, in a racing setting, what would they do for you? Is knowing that someone is a certain distance behind going to make you any faster?
If you want to see how big your gap is then a look over the shoulder is all that you need.