Of course it is not reason behind his comeback, but rather a nice co-incidence

Posted 05 February 2010 - 20:35
Advertisement
Posted 05 February 2010 - 20:36
Posted 05 February 2010 - 20:42
Posted 05 February 2010 - 20:55
According to my information, Michael Schumacher lost quite a lot (a lot) of money in Dubai. He was also involved in newly opened highest bulding in the world.
Of course it is not reason behind his comeback, but rather a nice co-incidence
Posted 05 February 2010 - 21:17
Posted 05 February 2010 - 21:42
According to my information, Michael Schumacher lost quite a lot (a lot) of money in Dubai. He was also involved in newly opened highest bulding in the world.
Of course it is not reason behind his comeback, but rather a nice co-incidence
Posted 05 February 2010 - 22:29
Posted 05 February 2010 - 22:30
Its like british tabloid season here. Schumacher isnt being paid a fortune by Merc anyways.
Posted 05 February 2010 - 22:53
Any details (or confirmation) about the investments you say Schumacher made in Dubai, if any?Well, you don't need to be economist to learn that Dubai is in real trouble. And so is anyone who made investments there. Schumacher is one of them.
Posted 05 February 2010 - 22:56
Posted 05 February 2010 - 22:58
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:00
Well, you don't need to be economist to learn that Dubai is in real trouble. And so is anyone who made investments there. Schumacher is one of them.
I am not saying his family struggles to find someting to eat but to lose great part of your savings is not comfortable either....
Though I can't tell you in % how much he lost...
My wife costs me quite a big % of savings so maybe it is not such a big disaster...;)
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:00
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:03
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:03
And Fangio nearly retired at the end of 1955, but then Peron was ousted, and it became more advantageous for those who had been supported by the Peronistas to avoid Argentina for a while...Errmmm... certain Niki Lauda's come-back co-incided with his airline's financial woes
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:06
Here is the interview to Michael about the building, some time ago.
http://formula1.abou.../Schumacher.htm
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:09
From that page:http://www.dezeen.co...-tower-by-lava/
here we go.
Michael Schumacher World Champion Tower, which is now in question.
Inspired by the geometrical order of a snowflake and the aerodynamics of a Formula 1 racing car
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:11
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:11
Advertisement
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:33
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:41
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:42
here is schumachers island. the 'land' valued at $7M was a retirement present from Dubai's crown prince - Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum.
Edited by P123, 05 February 2010 - 23:43.
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:45
From that page:
Me get the feeling that the whole Dubai project is the biggest scam the world has ever seen. Targets was people with big wallets and even bigger ego. The Dubai world was never going to work, the cities and the buildings were never going to contain people. Why? They are designed for show, not for life.
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:45
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:47
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:48
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:49
Skyscrapers built on the sand of borrowed money. Most of them vanity projects which will lie empty until they are knocked down.
The problem with rich people, like Schumacher, and finance is that when they invest they tend to hedge their investments.
Edited by One, 05 February 2010 - 23:50.
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:53
Dubai never had oil, just madness. And it only takes you that far.Oil dry up
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:54
That is the show island, not Schumacher's.
$7m..... I'm sure you could get a far better island in a far more idyllic location for the same money or less. And it wouldn't be a barren lump of concrete.
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:55
The problem with rich people, like Schumacher, and finance is that when they invest they tend to hedge their investments.
So a person that has $1 million might borrow additional $5 millions in an effort to profit more. The problem is of course if the project/stock/whatever loses most of its value they sometimes (if they haven't been careful) end up carrying a lot of extra debt.
I'm not saying that is the case with Schumacher but just wanted to point it out.
Posted 05 February 2010 - 23:58
Posted 06 February 2010 - 00:02
That is the show island, not Schumacher's.
$7m..... I'm sure you could get a far better island in a far more idyllic location for the same money or less. And it wouldn't be a barren lump of concrete.
Posted 06 February 2010 - 00:06
Holy ****... that doesn't compare to ANYTHING Ron Dennis has ever said when it comes to how happy he is to work with Corporation X and Sponsor Y. This Alexander Rieck makes Dennis look like a complete amateur.Get this spin on the tower;
“The unique collaboration with Michael Schumacher gave us new insights. Technology, precision, speed, elegance, paired with human intuition and extraordinary performance were a great source of inspiration for the design. Similar to the formula one operation, construction is a team sport with a lot of highly skilled experts. In this sense the architects take the driver seat in the process, taking the project to the physical limits of possibility”, adds Alexander Rieck.
Does anybody in today's world still believe such blatant pap?
Posted 06 February 2010 - 00:08
Hehe, I think we can safely say it will never be completed.i think you are right. schumacher's island is to be part of 'antarctica' when it is completed. the island in the picture i posted is part of the 'canadian arctic' or 'greenland'.
Posted 06 February 2010 - 00:10
Get this spin on the tower;
"The unique collaboration with Michael Schumacher gave us new insights. Technology, precision, speed, elegance, paired with human intuition and extraordinary performance were a great source of inspiration for the design. Similar to the formula one operation, construction is a team sport with a lot of highly skilled experts. In this sense the architects take the driver seat in the process, taking the project to the physical limits of possibility", adds Alexander Rieck.
Does anybody in today's world still believe such blatant pap?
Posted 06 February 2010 - 00:11
Hi MichaelI do
Posted 06 February 2010 - 00:12
Hehe, I think we can safely say it will never be completed.
Posted 06 February 2010 - 00:15
Payed in sand.so the gift is worth closer to $0 than to $7M!