Jump to content


Photo

How can a closed section permit air to escape


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Wuzak

Wuzak
  • Member

  • 9,112 posts
  • Joined: September 00

Posted 23 February 2010 - 13:48

The new McLaren appears to have a spanwise slot on the rear of the upper element of its rear wing. BMW Sauber also have such a device, and have since last year. It also appears that McLaren used such a slot at Monaco last year too.

Scarbs has an article describing this

http://scarbsf1.word...-in-japan-2009/


Now the rules relating to the rear wing area are as follows:

3.10 Bodywork behind the rear wheel centre line:
3.10.1 Any bodywork more than 150mm behind the rear wheel centre line which is between 200mm and 730mm above the reference plane, and between 75mm and 355mm from the car centre line, must lie in an area when viewed from the side of the car that is situated between 150mm and 350mm behind the rear wheel centre line and between 300mm and 400mm above the reference plane. When viewed from the side of the car no longitudinal cross section may have more than one section in this area.
3.10.2 Any bodywork behind a point lying 50mm forward of the rear wheel centre line which is more than 730mm above the reference plane, and between 75mm and 355mm from the car centre line, must lie in an area when viewed from the side of the car that is situated between the rear wheel centre line and a point 350mm behind it. When viewed from the side of the car, no longitudinal cross section may have more than two closed sections in this area.
Furthermore, the distance between adjacent sections at any longitudinal plane must not exceed 15mm at their closest position.
3.10.3 In order to ensure that the relationship between these two sections cannot change whilst the car is in motion they must be bridged by means of rigid impervious supports (including any adjustment mechanism) arranged such that no part of the trailing edge of the forward section may be more than 200mm laterally from a support. These rigid supports must :
- fully enclose the two complete sections such that their inner profile matches that of the two sections. Their outer profile must be offset from the inner profile by between 8mm and 30mm and may not incorporate any radius smaller than 10mm ('gurney' type trim tabs may however be fitted between the supports) ;
- not be recessed into the wing profiles (where a recess is defined as a reduction in section at a rate greater than 45° with respect to a lateral axis) ;
- be arranged so that any curvature occurs only in a horizontal plane ;
- be between 2mm and 3mm thick ;
- be rigidly fixed to the two sections. Some form of adjustment mechanism between the sections may be incorporated for the sole purpose of allowing adjustment of the sections relative to one another whilst the car is in the pits ;
- be constructed from a material with modulus greater than 50GPa.
These supports will be ignored when assessing whether the car is in compliance with Articles 3.6, 3.9.2, 3.10.1, 3.10.2, 3.10.4 and 3.10.6.
3.10.4 No part of the car between 75mm and 355mm from the car centre line may be more than 350mm behind the rear wheel centre line.
3.10.5 Any parts of the car less than 75mm from the car centre line and more than 500mm behind the rear wheel centre line must be situated between 200mm and 400mm above the reference plane.
3.10.6 No part of the car less than 75mm from the car centre line and more than 350mm behind the rear wheel centre line may be more than 400mm above the reference plane.
3.10.7 No part of the car more than 375mm from the car centre line may be more than 350mm behind the rear wheel centre line.
3.10.8 In side view, the projected area of any bodywork lying between 300mm and 950mm above the reference plane and between the rear wheel centre line and a point 600mm behind it and more than 355mm from the car centre line must be greater than 330000mm².


How can it be interpretted that a close section is allowed to be, well, not closed? The area 75mm either side of the centreline is free from this requirements, and teams have used that loophole to put slots in that area.

BMW.Sauber and McLaren have put full width slots on their wings, fed from ducts inside that centre section. Why, if it is allowed to have a hole in the rear part of the section, would it be interpretted that you can't have a hole in the leading edge?

Is this sidestep of the rule in any way related to how double diffusers came to be legal?

Advertisement

#2 Wuzak

Wuzak
  • Member

  • 9,112 posts
  • Joined: September 00

Posted 23 February 2010 - 13:50

Also, I would think that the intent of using the word closed was specifically to prevent teams from using blown wings.

#3 Matheen

Matheen
  • Member

  • 40 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 23 February 2010 - 15:22

BMW.Sauber and McLaren have put full width slots on their wings, ....


That is far from confirmed, but if true, they are within the letter of the regulations as they stand. Quite a bit of discussion going on about this at f1technical.net. The Barcelona test will be interesting.

#4 desmo

desmo
  • Tech Forum Host

  • 32,269 posts
  • Joined: January 00

Posted 23 February 2010 - 16:44

Looks to me that as long as the forward part of the slot is within the 15 cm centerline area the regulation has been met. I think BMW deserve some credit here for imaginative lateral thinking, the bodywork regulations have accreted over time into a very narrowly defined and nearly unintelligable insult to the English language. To reinterpret them successfully, creatively and beneficially is quite an accomplishment.

#5 cheapracer

cheapracer
  • Member

  • 10,388 posts
  • Joined: May 07

Posted 23 February 2010 - 17:27

Looks to me that as long as the forward part of the slot is within the 15 cm centerline area the regulation has been met. I think BMW deserve some credit here for imaginative lateral thinking, the bodywork regulations have accreted over time into a very narrowly defined and nearly unintelligable insult to the English language. To reinterpret them successfully, creatively and beneficially is quite an accomplishment.


As I have said before this is where the Yanks rock!

"It's iffy, put it in the trailer and piss off" - problem solved.


#6 OfficeLinebacker

OfficeLinebacker
  • Member

  • 14,088 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 23 February 2010 - 18:55

As I have said before this is where the Yanks rock!

"It's iffy, put it in the trailer and piss off" - problem solved.


Smokey Yunick FTW (and Chad Knaus, too)

#7 Wuzak

Wuzak
  • Member

  • 9,112 posts
  • Joined: September 00

Posted 23 February 2010 - 21:15

Looks to me that as long as the forward part of the slot is within the 15 cm centerline area the regulation has been met. I think BMW deserve some credit here for imaginative lateral thinking, the bodywork regulations have accreted over time into a very narrowly defined and nearly unintelligable insult to the English language. To reinterpret them successfully, creatively and beneficially is quite an accomplishment.


Which part of the regulations permit there to be a gap in the trailing edge or underside of the wing (which a slot would be in section), but also doesn't allow a gap in the leadng edge?


#8 Wuzak

Wuzak
  • Member

  • 9,112 posts
  • Joined: September 00

Posted 04 March 2010 - 02:14

Clarification sought over McLaren's rear wing slot

#9 CaptnMark

CaptnMark
  • Member

  • 1,026 posts
  • Joined: March 99

Posted 04 March 2010 - 07:19

As I have said before this is where the Yanks rock!

"It's iffy, put it in the trailer and piss off" - problem solved.


Good.

Chalie Whiting also needs a saw to hack off all the fiddly winglets.