
Longest-running motorsport event...?
#1
Posted 28 February 2010 - 18:53
Advertisement
#2
Posted 28 February 2010 - 20:52
The first Shelsley Walsh hillclimb was 1905. And it is still run having had a more or less continuous history
The Indianapolis 500 dates to 1911
On reflection, if you say"Motoring Event" means a non-competitive event, I suppose the field narrows to motor shows and the Goodwood Festival. On that basis they could be right.
#3
Posted 28 February 2010 - 22:03
Motoring Event must surely include competitions and Shelsley at 1905 shows that they can't even claim to be the longest-running in Britain.The first Shelsley Walsh hillclimb was 1905. And it is still run having had a more or less continuous history
Shelsley as a venue only came into use after MAC had difficulties with Sunrising and there is a good case for claiming that the event started in 1902 and changed venue in '05.
Either way the London to Brighton at 1927 was a pretty late entrant - I agree with Martin that the Emancipation Run has nothing to do with the later event which was run to commemorate the 1896 job.
Oh, and edited to ask if the claim is for the longest-running motorsport event as in the title or longest running motoring event as in the first posting? If it's the former I contend that it is not a motorsport event as there is no element of competition.
Edited by Allan Lupton, 28 February 2010 - 22:07.
#4
Posted 28 February 2010 - 22:11
Of course most such events haven't been held during wars or foot and mouth disease outbreaks and other 'force majeur' circumstances, but that shouldn't prevent them being considered eligible.
#5
Posted 01 March 2010 - 03:57
Meanwhile, here in Ye Olde Colonyes, the Milwaukee Mile claims to have held an auto race every year since 1903, though I wonder how they managed that during WWII. Sadly, the track's future appears dim at best.
Frank
#6
Posted 01 March 2010 - 10:23
The first Shelsley Walsh hillclimb was 1905. And it is still run having had a more or less continuous history
Yes, the distinction between "motoring" and "motorsport" event is important.
Meanwhile, here in Ye Olde Colonyes, the Milwaukee Mile claims to have held an auto race every year since 1903, though I wonder how they managed that during WWII.
Not only Milwaukee as Shelsley Walsh was 'mothballed' during the two World Wars as hinted at by D-Type.
As for trying the previous hill climbs run by the MAC (Midland Automobile Club) at Sunrising Hill I suppose that you could claim that the club ran their hillclimb events at different venues and therefore the two venues comprise the event! Rather tenuous but so is the premise of the thread.

#7
Posted 01 March 2010 - 12:53
Come to think of it, back when WB still edited Motor Sport, he used to have occasional items titled "The things they say..." and this fits the bill precisely.I note that entries are being sought for this year's London to Brighton Veteran Car Run, accompanied by a claim about this being the 'longest running motoring event', which I find difficult to believe. I think the Motor Cycling Club has been running competitive events for both cars and motorcycles since 1901 which is surely longer than the L2B if you discount the original emancipation run of 1896 which started the idea off but wasn't run as an annual event until considerably later. No doubt TNF'rs will have all the data at their fingertips... Martin Shelley
#8
Posted 01 March 2010 - 13:49
The term "motorsport event" needs to be operationally defined as to exactly what sort of "contest" counts as a "motorsport" event. A hill climb or a race seems to be what is being sought, rather than a reliability or endurance contest or a "run" which seems to be what the L2B actually seems to be.
#9
Posted 03 March 2010 - 08:41
By motorsport event, I mean any competition or test or the like where petrol heads gather on an annual basis for some motorsport purpose. ...... ......
Of course most such events haven't been held during wars or foot and mouth disease outbreaks and other 'force majeur' circumstances, but that shouldn't prevent them being considered eligible.
I think I covered the eventuality of interruptions due to wars etc in my earlier post, Don...
Likewise I think the broadest definition of a motorsport event is what I meant. Of course the L2B is marginal as its strictly not a competitve event, although not all drivers on the run seem to be aware of this, given the almost indecent haste with which some of them conduct themselves in the 'race' to be first into Madeira Drive!!
Edited by Marticelli, 03 March 2010 - 08:49.
#10
Posted 24 October 2010 - 09:29
I can just imagine the discussion on TNF in 2050 about this incredibly long race.

#11
Posted 24 October 2010 - 10:01
Originally posted by Barry Boor
.....in the future people will look at the 2010 South Korean Grand Prix and see that the winner took 2 hours and 48 minutes.
I can just imagine the discussion on TNF in 2050 about this incredibly long race.
That would surely be in a thread where the Indy 500 was noted to have started, been crashed and rained out, then finished two or three days later?
#12
Posted 24 October 2010 - 10:17
http://www.statsf1.c...mps/leplus.aspx
but it is the longest for over 50 years.

#13
Posted 24 October 2010 - 10:20
I think I covered the eventuality of interruptions due to wars etc in my earlier post, Don...
Likewise I think the broadest definition of a motorsport event is what I meant. Of course the L2B is marginal as its strictly not a competitve event, although not all drivers on the run seem to be aware of this, given the almost indecent haste with which some of them conduct themselves in the 'race' to be first into Madeira Drive!!
I think it does come down very much to how we define 'motorsport event' and 'longest running'- the first thought to cross my mind was the RAC Tourist Trophy (1905-), but can we actually count this as a single event with a continuous history, given that it's been held at several different circuits over the years, and has been interrupted a number of times apart from the inevitable wartime disruptions?
http://en.wikipedia...._Tourist_Trophy
Edited by Kevan, 24 October 2010 - 10:21.
#14
Posted 24 October 2010 - 10:31
Motoring Event must surely include competitions and Shelsley at 1905 shows that they can't even claim to be the longest-running in Britain.
Shelsley as a venue only came into use after MAC had difficulties with Sunrising and there is a good case for claiming that the event started in 1902 and changed venue in '05.
Before Shelsley, the MAC's events were held at
Gorcott Hill (1901, 1902)
Weatheroak Hill (1902)
Sunrising Hill (1903 (2), 1904)
Middle Hill (1905)
#15
Posted 24 October 2010 - 13:57
Yes, the distinction between "motoring" and "motorsport" event is important.
Meanwhile, here in Ye Olde Colonyes, the Milwaukee Mile claims to have held an auto race every year since 1903, though I wonder how they managed that during WWII. Sadly, the track's future appears dim at best.
Frank
IIR my history correctly the WW1 lasted 1916 - 18 and WW2 42 - 45 for the US, I suspect the US could keep racing through WW2 because a) there was no real threat of invasion on the mainland and b) races were probably seen as a great recruiting stations.
#16
Posted 24 October 2010 - 14:19
#17
Posted 24 October 2010 - 14:25
2 hours 48 min 20.810 sec. This makes it the 51st-longest World Championship race ever (41st-longest if we ignore the Indy 500 events):
http://www.statsf1.c...mps/leplus.aspx
but it is the longest for over 50 years.
Thank you very much!
Since when dis the 2-hours-rule existing?
#18
Posted 24 October 2010 - 17:49
It was introduced in 1973, I think. The 1973 FIA Year Book said this:Since when dis the 2-hours-rule existing?
In the 1971 book the minimum distance for single-heat Championship F1 races was specified as 250 miles and the maximum 325 miles. I don't have the 1972 book, but Beltoise's win at Monaco in that year took 2 hours 26 min, so the earlier rules must still have been in force.The duration of F1 Championship events shall be 200 miles or two hours, whichever is the shorter.
Edited by Tim Murray, 24 October 2010 - 17:51.
#19
Posted 24 October 2010 - 18:00
I dont think they did.Indy 500 missed 1917-18 & 1942-45 making it oldest and most often held suviving race?IIR my history correctly the WW1 lasted 1916 - 18 and WW2 42 - 45 for the US, I suspect the US could keep racing through WW2 because a) there was no real threat of invasion on the mainland and b) races were probably seen as a great recruiting stations.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 24 October 2010 - 18:18
2 hours 48 min 20.810 sec. This makes it the 51st-longest World Championship race ever (41st-longest if we ignore the Indy 500 events):
http://www.statsf1.c...mps/leplus.aspx
but it is the longest for over 50 years.
I suppose the fact that they were stationary for three quarters of an hour would have something to do with that. At 110.2kph, I think it may rank 11th slowest ever http://www.statsf1.c...ne/lemoins.aspx
#21
Posted 24 October 2010 - 20:59
Originally posed by arttidesco
.....I suspect the US could keep racing through WW2 because a) there was no real threat of invasion on the mainland and b) races were probably seen as a great recruiting stations.
And undoubtedly aided by the fact that there was plenty of fuel available in their own country...
All petroleum fuels in Australia, for instance, every last drop of them, had to be imported. Petrol rationing continued quite severely right up until the eve of the 1949 Australian Grand Prix. During the war, if you owned a small car you got a ration of about 4 gallons a month.
Actually, I should put this here because it needs to be put somewhere. My father told me years ago that the Chev 4 was the ideal car to have in the war... petrol was rationed according to 'rated' horsepower (based on cylinder bore etc, otherwise known as RAC horsepower) and the Chev 4 was of such an engine size and good enough on fuel that it got a reasonable ration and took it further than other cars.
There were also rules about usage. You weren't supposed to store your petrol, save it up for a big month, or give it to others. So people who were found to be some distance from home and still driving (without gas producers) were frequently asked to explain how they got there.
As the North Sea oil had yet to be tapped, I guess pretty much all of Europe had the same dilemma, though the USSR probably had supplies.
#22
Posted 24 October 2010 - 21:31
During World War 2 motor racing was officially banned in the USA between August 1st 1942 and November 7th 1944.IIR my history correctly the WW1 lasted 1916 - 18 and WW2 42 - 45 for the US, I suspect the US could keep racing through WW2 because a) there was no real threat of invasion on the mainland and b) races were probably seen as a great recruiting stations.
#23
Posted 25 October 2010 - 10:05
#24
Posted 25 October 2010 - 10:42
It ran on 22nd September 1946, the track having reopened in June. So the Indy 500 has it, unless someone knows better?What was the date of the 1946 Milwaukee event? Earlier than Memorial Day?

#25
Posted 25 October 2010 - 11:23
During World War 2 motor racing was officially banned in the USA between August 1st 1942 and November 7th 1944.
I stand corrected

#26
Posted 25 October 2010 - 11:31
It ran on 22nd September 1946, the track having reopened in June. So the Indy 500 has it, unless someone knows better?
The Manx GP was restarted in September 1946 so is also a contender. (but I don't have the actual date)
#27
Posted 25 October 2010 - 11:44

#28
Posted 25 October 2010 - 15:42
It was introduced in 1973, I think. The 1973 FIA Year Book said this:
In the 1971 book the minimum distance for single-heat Championship F1 races was specified as 250 miles and the maximum 325 miles. I don't have the 1972 book, but Beltoise's win at Monaco in that year took 2 hours 26 min, so the earlier rules must still have been in force.
Thank you!
#29
Posted 25 October 2010 - 15:55
I'd thought about that as well, but it too was cancelled in 2001 because of the foot and mouth outbreak in the U.K.The Manx GP was restarted in September 1946 so is also a contender. (but I don't have the actual date)
#30
Posted 25 October 2010 - 16:32
I'd thought about that as well, but it too was cancelled in 2001 because of the foot and mouth outbreak in the U.K.
Didn't realise that - you live and learn
