
Realistically can any team catch Red Bull in pace?
#1
Posted 12 May 2010 - 09:55
The only reason why Red Bull arent leading both standings is because of reliability issues. If its possible for any team to make up enormous ground on a flying team like we saw last year when Red Bull caught Brawn GP which team would it be? McLaren or Ferrari? (Personally I dont care which team it is as long as Red Bulls enormous pace is slashed). I'm a more recent Formula 1 fan haven't been following it long but I was a huge fan of Button last year but I have to admit seeing him win over and over despite me wanting to see him win got boring and fast.
From what I've seen Ferrari had a great start to the season but they appeared to now have fallen behind McLaren now more reliability issues and McLaren do seem to have better pace than Ferrari right now. One would maybe assume that McLaren is the main rival for Red Bull now?
It would be a dream if Ferrari and McLaren could actually catch Red Bull in sheer pace it would make those boring dull races like Valencia much more entertaining.
Its safe to say McLaren is the most reliable team of the top 3. They really only have to work on their qualifying pace in particular. Ferrari perhaps both and their reliability issues. Red Bull clearly reliability issues they are great at everything else but this...
Advertisement
#2
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:04
#3
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:08
As stated in the OP, without some reliability issues and such, Red Bull would probably be a 1-2 in every race.
#4
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:08
Red Bull will be harder to take down than Brawn though.
Ferrari and McLaren are close in races and I hope they will only get closer.
#5
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:09
#6
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:10
Depends if the Ferrari or McLaren bigwigs decide to commit financially to this season or next. If the gap does not reduce by mid season I would not be surprised to see the contenders switch their resources over to next year's car.
Funny, that's what Ferrari did last year...

#7
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:12
#8
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:23
I don't think so. With the testing/development limits the grid is basically set in February.
As stated in the OP, without some reliability issues and such, Red Bull would probably be a 1-2 in every race.
Oh Really? What about last year when Brawn GP started season with enormous advantege? Do you remember what heppened?
#9
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:28
Oh Really? What about last year when Brawn GP started season with enormous advantege? Do you remember what heppened?
Brawn went on record to say they basically did not have the big budget to keep developing the car at the same pace as the others.
#10
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:34
Oh Really? What about last year when Brawn GP started season with enormous advantege? Do you remember what heppened?
Brawn GP certainly did start with an enormous advantage, but I'm not sure it was as big an advantage as Red Bull enjoys right now, plus Brawn GP was lasting out on old money and going through a significant restructuring process.
Red Bull is a wealthy team, that is stable and established for a number of years, plus they have arguably the best design team in F1 right now, coupled with the limited testing time.
with the removal of F-ducts and DD's for next year and the likely introduction of KERS again, as mentioned already budgets are being stripped down, I can't see them being caught before it's too late.
#11
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:45
Over one lap at qualifying for sure. They will no catch them in time.
But Montmelo was typical Red Bull track so that 1'' advantage will be shorter in other races.
Hamilton and Alonso can profit from Red Bull lack of reliability and lack of leadership: Vettel is very fast and clear favorite this year but he is too young to be a established leader of that team.
Hamilton is much better than Button (who chanced at wet races) and Alonso is Ferrari top gun and that could help them attempt winning the WDC. Also point system could also help them as a 1st, a 3rd and a 4th worth more than 2 wins and a DNF.
But of course if Vettel wins about 5 races in a row practically nothing can be done.
#12
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:48
Currently qualy is so important that redbull will win most races full stop.
#13
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:52
with the current regs or potentially 1 stops just for tyres its not a race to be honest. If the regs were like last year then we would see much better strategy to beat redbulls.
Currently qualy is so important that redbull will win most races full stop.
They haven't in spite of having the fastest car at every single race so far.
#14
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:00
#15
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:27
A number of teams have the capability of getting close, as I think we have seen in the race. Problem for this year is that the team in front is developing as hard as the teams catching up. It's a great shame because I don't think F1 needs yet another undeserving champion ;)
Realistically - anything can happen. My personal opinion is that Red Bull is going to stay fastest, but Ferrari and McLaren will get closer. My opinion is also that Ferrari and McLaren have stronger driver lineups. In the end - its probably reliability which is going to decide WDC and WCC.
#16
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:28
no
unrealistically?
NO
#17
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:33
#18
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:37
McLaren and Ferrari have of course a great advantage in HP, somewhere between 20 and according to Mateschitz even 40 more then RBR. But their disadvantage could even increase in the short term as the RB6 might run also an F-Duct after Monaco. While I do think that McLaren gets most out of this technology, the gain in pace For RBR should not be shabby either.
All in all I quite surprised that dispite all those handicaps RBR is ahead of the traditional teams and even by a considerable margin, which of course differs from race to race, according to all the different conditions and updates.
H2H
Edited by H2H, 12 May 2010 - 11:49.
#19
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:40
A number of teams have the capability of getting close, as I think we have seen in the race. Problem for this year is that the team in front is developing as hard as the teams catching up. It's a great shame because I don't think F1 needs yet another undeserving champion ;)
Are you saying that if Red Bull driver will win championship he will be another undeserving champion? Are you also saying that Button is undeserving champion?
Advertisement
#20
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:41
Are you saying that if Red Bull driver will win championship he will be another undeserving champion? Are you also saying that Button is undeserving champion?
I believe you have stumbled upon something called... sarcasm.
#21
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:43
I believe you have stumbled upon something called... sarcasm.
oh ok then

#22
Posted 12 May 2010 - 12:02
Last year they had a huge step in performance but that was because they had a fundamentally flawed car, once those flaws were addressed time was found, its much harder to find large chunks of time in a car with no problems.
#23
Posted 12 May 2010 - 12:26
#24
Posted 12 May 2010 - 12:29
#25
Posted 12 May 2010 - 12:34
#26
Posted 12 May 2010 - 12:35
#27
Posted 12 May 2010 - 13:26
Oh Really? What about last year when Brawn GP started season with enormous advantege? Do you remember what heppened?
Yeah, testing was further tightened and development further restricted.
#28
Posted 12 May 2010 - 13:34
Overrall results...do think so. Many factors can influence results, as we've seen.
#29
Posted 12 May 2010 - 13:40
The McLaren in particular, and frankly the one Hamilton is driving, is the main threat. Alonso is doign a good job and Buton his usual cagey self but Hamilton actually looks racey and able to get close enough so that on tracks that don't suit the Red Bull he'll be a factor.
If I were McLaren i'd almost throw the towel in re. qualifying and work on starts, RBR is still vulnerable off the line IMHO and if you can get in front with this formula .... welll ......
#30
Posted 12 May 2010 - 14:14
#31
Posted 12 May 2010 - 14:20
#32
Posted 12 May 2010 - 14:30
Mclaren when't years unable to catch Ferrari and that was with a bigger budget, unlimited testing and Adrian Newey, why do we think they can now?
Last year they had a huge step in performance but that was because they had a fundamentally flawed car, once those flaws were addressed time was found, its much harder to find large chunks of time in a car with no problems.
I think Newey was outshined by Byrne and Brawn and of course Schumacher....
#33
Posted 12 May 2010 - 15:19
For example i dont think the gap would be that big in the old format of 1 hour friday and saturday quali with setup changes allowed between quali and race.
#34
Posted 12 May 2010 - 15:40
And I dont believe its all just qualifying, either. Webber, with managing his pace in-mind, was still noticeably faster than Lewis.
I think the gap will be closer at less downforce-reliant tracks, and this is where I think we will see maybe Ferrari or Mclaren put one over on Red Bull occasionally, but I think Red Bull simply has it down when it comes to fast-corner tracks. Its an impressive car, for sure.
#35
Posted 12 May 2010 - 15:55
RedBull still top, Mclaren very close behind and Brawn behind them.
If anyone can do it, you can count on Ferrari and Mclaren. Will they? Maybe, but they need to take addvantage of Vettels so far bad luck. As much as I like Webber, I dont think he is the one who will be there at the end.
#36
Posted 12 May 2010 - 16:58
True. I'd kind of forgotten about that. Before the start of this season, I expected that this effect would continue - even magnify - as it seemed to be a result of regulations stagnating development and closing up the field (so what were previously minor differences from track to track for performence became major ones) and I thought that would continue this year. Seem to be wrong about that one so far.The thing with last was that cars performed VERY differently from track to track. By mid season you had NFI who would be on top as the track made such a difference. The Red Bull looked awesome in Silverstone but looked terrible at Valencia. This year, well in qualifying it's been the almost exactly the same race after race.
#37
Posted 12 May 2010 - 17:20
Matershmitz (or however it is spelt) has put a lot of money into motorsport over the years so he deserves to win one of the big prizes eventually... is my only consoling thought.
#38
Posted 12 May 2010 - 17:46
#39
Posted 12 May 2010 - 19:32
Advertisement
#40
Posted 12 May 2010 - 19:52
Never make a prediction before it happens ;)
Edited by Fastcake, 12 May 2010 - 19:53.
#41
Posted 12 May 2010 - 21:33

#42
Posted 13 May 2010 - 08:27
Mclaren had at some point during the 2009 season a car that couldn't pass Q1. At the end of the year they had the car to beat. I'm sure Mclaren and maybe Ferrari will be able to make there car competitive. Red Bull also got a strong base and I am sure they won't be sitting on there butts so I think it will be a had job, but I think it won't be a walk in the park for RBR.
The car to beat at the end of 2009 was a RedBull not a McLaren, I think you forgot who won the last 3 races.