
How good was Gerard Larrousse?
#1
Posted 19 June 2010 - 12:10
So how good was Gerard Larrousse? I can't remember him ever driving in Formula One - or even testing - did he ever test, perhaps for Matra or Ligier? In that respect I've often wondered if he was one of the great 'lost talents'.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 19 June 2010 - 12:29
DCN
#3
Posted 19 June 2010 - 13:45
#4
Posted 19 June 2010 - 14:00
I'd say he was pretty good.
PS In 1974, he was the first driver to drive a Finotto-Brabham (Belgian GP) and the only driver to actually race it in a Grand Prix, although he was lucky of course that at Nivelles all 31 cars where allowed to start that year. He retired after 53 laps (while in 21st position) and then failed to qualify at Dijon later that year.
#5
Posted 19 June 2010 - 14:01
#6
Posted 19 June 2010 - 14:06
#7
Posted 19 June 2010 - 14:27
As an endurance racing driver, very - in anything with enclosed wheels. Judging by the standards he set there - out of his depth in open wheelers. Always seemed a very pleasant bloke too - which yet again could rule him out of the top drawer where single-seater drivers are concerned.
DCN
Why is it that it is so often suggested that one has to be "not pleasant" to be successful in single-seaters i.e. F1? I know of course of the many bad examples (or good ones in this respect...), but I found men like Laffite, Arnoux, Ickx, Jones, Mario Andretti, Boutsen and Emerson Fittipaldi (to name but a few) all very "pleasant blokes" and put them in my top drawer, or the higher ones at least, performance wise too. And although I never met them, I can only imagine that Phil Hill, Jackie Stewart and Jim Clark (again to name but a few) weren't "unpleasant" either. A seventies F1-team manager recently told me that "you really had to be a bastard to win" and I understand that feeling but it seems that, in my opinion, some had to be that a bit more than others.
Edited by Formula Once, 19 June 2010 - 14:29.
#8
Posted 21 June 2010 - 14:30
#9
Posted 21 June 2010 - 14:42
#10
Posted 21 June 2010 - 14:47
As an endurance racing driver, very - in anything with enclosed wheels. Judging by the standards he set there - out of his depth in open wheelers.
DCN
He wasn't that bad in the 75 F2 Championship. I seem to remember him being pretty quick at Silverstone and when he got to the finish of a race he was nearer the front than back in what was a fairly competitive field.
75 Results:
Estoril - DNA
Thruxton - DNS
Hockenheim - 1st
Nurburgring - NC
Pau - 4th
Hockenheim - NC
Salzburg - DNF
Rouen - DNA
Enna - 2nd
Silverstone - 2nd
Zolder - 11th
Nogaro - DNF
Vallunga - 6th
Edited by alansart, 21 June 2010 - 14:48.
#11
Posted 22 June 2010 - 17:54
Edited by arttidesco, 22 June 2010 - 17:54.
#12
Posted 22 June 2010 - 18:25
#13
Posted 22 June 2010 - 18:59
I guess we need a stat man to compare the results of Gerard Larrousse against some on like Vic Elford who also won in Sports Cars and Rallies and Gijs Van Lennep who so far as i know did not drive any rally vehicles, but did win the Formula 5000 championship in 1972.
Van Lennep did some rallying in the late sixties. I'm 95% sure I saw him in the 1970 World Cup Rally Film at the TNF Hertfordshire Film Show recently, although he wasn't driving at the time and doesn't appear in the Entry List to the best of my knowledge.
#14
Posted 22 June 2010 - 19:22
Van Lennep did some rallying in the late sixties. I'm 95% sure I saw him in the 1970 World Cup Rally Film at the TNF Hertfordshire Film Show recently, although he wasn't driving at the time and doesn't appear in the Entry List to the best of my knowledge.
He did indeed, including the Monte Carlo.
#15
Posted 22 June 2010 - 19:50
#16
Posted 24 June 2010 - 21:20
The problem with Larrousse is that it was too late when he drove a F1. The car was bad and at 32 - in the 70s, that made him an old driver -, Larrousse wasn't as quick and dedicated as he would have been four or five years earlier.
One more of those careers that wasn't as successful as it could have been (although a career with two wins at Le Mans and several victories in rallies, sportscars, F2 can't seriously be called a failure).
#17
Posted 25 June 2010 - 15:18
He was better than Van Lennep. No comparison.
The problem with Larrousse is that it was too late when he drove a F1. The car was bad and at 32 - in the 70s, that made him an old driver -, Larrousse wasn't as quick and dedicated as he would have been four or five years earlier.
One more of those careers that wasn't as successful as it could have been (although a career with two wins at Le Mans and several victories in rallies, sportscars, F2 can't seriously be called a failure).
No comparison? Not if you don't make one no.
There is no doubt that Gijs lost some of his speed after his crash at Spa, as he admits himself, but his record speak for itself.
By the way: Gijs was older than Gérard when he scored his last world championship point and the car in which he did that wasn't great either.
Hard to say one was better than the other, they merely were both part of a whole bunch of drivers who in those days were doing pretty well, particularly in sportscars.
#18
Posted 25 June 2010 - 16:27
The last two winners of Le Mans and and an F1 race were Michele Alboreto in 1997 and Johnny Herbert in 1991.
#19
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:58
http://yfrog.com/5fglarroussej
Ah, that was meant to be a photo, not a link. I'll try and get it right next time. yfrog.com seems appropriate.
Edited by john winfield, 02 July 2010 - 10:00.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 02 July 2010 - 16:08
The 13 year-old kid could confirm that.
#21
Posted 19 January 2011 - 17:13
He had this reputation of being a pleasant and well-educated man.
The 13 year-old kid could confirm that.
See his web site to have his palmares and to see more and more picture of him
www.gerard-larrousse.com
Actualy Gérard work for the "club des pilotes des 24h du mans" to do some event during the next 24 h of le Mans
#22
Posted 19 January 2011 - 21:42
I was very impressed by Larrousse on Speech House!