
Eddie Cheever (merged)
#1
Posted 15 December 2000 - 11:18
Advertisement
#2
Posted 15 December 2000 - 11:34
#3
Posted 15 December 2000 - 13:39
His best season (1983) when he had the Renault RE-40 he qualified consitantly in the top 10, but only gained 4 podium finishes.
In CART agree that he was again mediocre, only shining when moved to IRL, with the lesser competition.
Rob
#4
Posted 15 December 2000 - 13:56

#5
Posted 15 December 2000 - 16:06
"He's been around an awfully long time to have done nothing in F1"
- James always did take the hard line, but in some ways that was partially true. I think that Cheever was a competant number 2 for any team and a hard racer on occasion, but seemed to be pretty inconsistent.
Just for your info - Eddie is married to Elio de Angelis's sister.
#6
Posted 15 December 2000 - 16:43
#7
Posted 15 December 2000 - 17:31
I don't think he was top rank talent wise but he could have notched up a few wins in a decent car
#8
Posted 15 December 2000 - 19:01
Cheever falls into the group of Racers and Drivers that never seem to get that opportunity or that break or are in the right car at the wrong time or just have a lousy hand dealt to them: the right guy at the wrong time. While successful, often their success is the sorts of success that folks appreciate. Chris Amon is one of better known members of this group, but he has plenty of company, Cheever among them.
In racing, the cult of the Super Hero has gotten worse rather than better over the years. And it was bad enough decades ago. The idea of "Hero or Zero" is nothing new. It is just more prevalent as the opportunities for media exposure increase and the opportunities for success on the fringes, if you will, decrease.
We are all guilty of judging drivers without much basis to make the judgement upon except that he didn't win a lot or have any of the other indicators of what we term "Success." Such is the human condition. Life isn't fair, but sometimes that isn't the way things should be. Remember that we have more mysteries than certainties in our lives. Why Cheever never made it into the ranks of the Exalted is just another one of those mysteries.
#9
Posted 15 December 2000 - 20:50
#10
Posted 15 December 2000 - 21:38
GO EDDIE, GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
#11
Posted 15 December 2000 - 22:30
#12
Posted 15 December 2000 - 22:40
#13
Posted 15 December 2000 - 22:49
Eddie was/is a good driver. But then there have been zillions of good drivers.
He was only moderately successful in CART, back in the days when I used to say it was populated by has-beens, never wases and never will-be's.
Much like the IRL nowadays.
#14
Posted 15 December 2000 - 23:30
#15
Posted 16 December 2000 - 01:57
#16
Posted 16 December 2000 - 15:54
I always thought he was married to the sister of Riccardo Patrese's wife!? Rita and Suzie are both blondes, surely no sisters of Elio, are they?Originally posted by deangelis86
Just for your info - Eddie is married to Elio de Angelis's sister.
Regarding the Silverstone win in the Osella, I seem to recall he was the only one using superior Pirelli wets in that race, as opposed to the Good Years everyone else ran on (the same with his Pau win that year).
#17
Posted 18 December 2000 - 10:46
Just to clarify then:
Eddie Cheever is NOT married to Elio de Angelis's sister.
- It is in fact his brother, ROSS CHEEVER
I'll get my coat now.......
#18
Posted 18 December 2000 - 12:55
#19
Posted 18 December 2000 - 16:24
So, why did Cheever leave F1? Did he just run out of opportunities? Maybe he saw it as kind of a deadend?
Advertisement
#20
Posted 18 December 2000 - 17:11
Married to his brother, is that legal?Originally posted by deangelis86
Arrrgh!! - Well spotted, you are of course quite right.....
Just to clarify then:
Eddie Cheever is NOT married to Elio de Angelis's sister.
- It is in fact his brother, ROSS CHEEVER
I'll get my coat now.......

On a more serious note, I have very little knowledge about Cheever but I do recall an article once [N Roebuck, Racing line, CAR Magazine, early 90's] about how brave he apprently was. It commented once how he was once several seconds faster in some wet session.
#21
Posted 24 June 2001 - 01:50
1) In 1977, he finished second in the F2 championship behind Rene Arnoux. The following year, at age 18 he was highly considered by Ferrari for a Formula One seat. However, this seat ended up going to Gilles Villeneuve instead.
2) In 1981, as a second-year driver he outscored his rookie teammate Michele Alboreto 10-0 at Tyrrell.
3) In 1983, he outqualified Alain Prost twice, at Detroit and Brands Hatch. He finished sixth in the F1 standings, being outscored 57-22 by Prost.
Here is his F1 career in summary (team/points scored v teammate)
1980 Oscella 0-0 Gabbiani
1981 Tyrrell 10-0 Alboreto
1982 Ligier 15-5 Lafitte
1983 Renault 22-57 Prost
1984 Alfa Romeo 3-8 Patrese
1985 Alfa Romeo 0-0 Patrese
1986 ----
1987 Arrows 8-3 Warwick
1988 Arrows 6-17 Warwick
1989 Arrows 6-7 Warwick
In CART, he finished 9th in points standings in 1990, 1991 and 1992 driving for Ganassi's new team. In 1993, Arie Luyendyk didn't fare much better for Ganassi, finishing 8th in the point standings. From 1993-1995, he suffered from poor rides and opted for the IRL as an owner/driver when it was formed in 1996.
So, when did Eddie really have top flight equipment during his non-IRL racing career? 1983 seems to be the only year and he finished 6th in the F1 point standings as a second driver to Prost.
People bash him for his move to the IRL as if it were an open wheel wasteland. However, as a driver/owner, he won $880,700 running in the IRL last season. Only four drivers won this much running in the CART series last year and he accomplished this competing in 10 fewer races than the CART drivers. Side note, IRL Champ Buddy Lazier won $2,176,200 last year competing in the IRL compared to CART Champion Gil de Ferran's $1,677,000. So, Eddie's move to the IRL seems to have been a smart move financially.
One thing I like about Eddie is that he is not afraid to compete in the IROC series like some CART champions and drivers I know. He has been the only driver to bring some respectability to the open wheel contingent in the series, winning the Michigan race last year. In addition to his IROC win, he has nine World Sports Car wins, most notably his 1987 Nurburgring 1000Km win shared with Raul Boesel. Overall, Eddie has been a solid driver over his career considering the equipment he has had to work with. In 1973, he finished second in the World Karing Championship and was sort of a prodigal child in the motorsports world. It would have been interesting to see how his career would have turned out if he was selected over Gilles for the Ferrari seat in 1978
#22
Posted 24 June 2001 - 03:42
*Among these "experts" are counted those who will confidently and vehemently rank their favorite legends of the past against drivers of different eras generations past, regardless of all the other myriad differences in equipment, tracks, and all the other criteria which would defy logical comparison.
Personally, I hold in awe ANY driver who has or has had the skill and cajones to drive ANY F1 car of ANY era: my hat is off to them all!
And I like Eddie!

#23
Posted 24 June 2001 - 04:10
But not me!
I still look forward to watching Eddie race and wish him every success and hope he survives to a well deserved retirement.
#24
Posted 24 June 2001 - 04:31

#25
Posted 24 June 2001 - 05:19

Eddie gives the best interviews of any driver in any racing category.
I always liked Eddie and one thing is for sure, he got the short end of the stick during his time in F1.
#26
Posted 24 June 2001 - 16:36
It seems to me that Eddie did almost everything he had to do to get a top ride in F1. In four years of F2, KeKe Rosberg never finished above Eddie in the point standings. In 1981, Eddie outscored KeKe in F1 WDC point standings but the following year, KeKe gets the prime Williams seat.

Whenever people get on the high-horse that Americans should embrace the rest of the world and compete at the highest level of motorsport, F1, I have to cringe. It seems to me that Americans are just wasting their time trying to make a successful career in F1 and would be better served staying back home where the opportunities are more plentiful. Oh, and besides, you can get a Big Mac more readily in the U.S. anyway.;)
#27
Posted 24 June 2001 - 18:01
#28
Posted 24 June 2001 - 18:25
Originally posted by mhferrari
He is really the only IRL driver who could make it in any other open-wheeled series, except maybe a few drivers. With IRL probably instituting road courses, he may shine yet again.
Besides Cheever, I think Bubby Lazier, Sam Hornish, Airton Dare, Scott Sharp and Greg Ray could do reasonably well in CART. Roger Penske thinks enough of Casey Mears that it is rumored that he will form an IRL for him next year. Felipe Giaffone is another driver who has impressed this year in the IRL. lt might take Lazier, Hornish and Ray some time to get adjusted to road racing but I think they would do alright. Sharp is a former Trans-Am champion so he really has more of a road racing background. Hornish is probably the best young American open wheel racing talent today. He is currently leading the point standings and is just 21 years old. Despite his spin at Indy, he set the fastest lap during the race. Had he not spun and gotten a lap down, it would have been interesting to see how he would have done against the Penske duo.
But as far as the other drivers, they are either too old, too much of an ovals-type driver or off the mark talent-wise. But then again, CART has had drivers like Dennis Vittolo. Really, it all boils down to the quality of the ride. Maz Papis didn't do anything until he went to Team Rahal. Then Kenny Brack came over from the IRL and outperformed him.
#29
Posted 24 June 2001 - 19:41
Well, Eddie sure has had his chances. A good F2 seat in 1977 and 1978 (Project 4 IIRC), then Osella with the benefit of the Pirelli tyres, which were dominant one year later. Besides, he had a seat in the famous BMW Junior team.Originally posted by Yelnats
I think the clue may lie in the great expectations raised by Eddie's early carreer.
But: he didn't shine on the right moment. Teammates Winkelhock (who had to build his car himself, and look for sponsorship as well) and Surer got far more attention, however Eddie was the pre-season favourite, having far more experience than the other two.
I don't think Eddie ever made it in F1. Perhaps he choose the wrong cars, but that's apart from the driving itself probably the most important aspect of being a top-driver.
However, that's nothing to be ashamed of; a lot of drivers of that same period had the same experience. Look at Daly, Warwick, Surer, Winkelhock etc.
#30
Posted 24 June 2001 - 20:58
That's pretty pathetic. Guys like Lil' Al, late Scott Brayton, Scott Goodyear to name a few busted their asses in CART only to jump to the IRL. Once someone from CART jumped to the IRL the fans rather forget all their accomplishments and just label them a "reject." Goodyear won two Michigan 500's but he and along with Paul Tracy help brought in the Canadian invasion to CART.
Eddie is like Alesi. At the wrong place at the wrong time. I'm glad he won Indy 98 because he really deserved it. He took so many risks throughout his career. Right now, he even took the Infinity engine hoping to make it a regular winner.
#31
Posted 24 June 2001 - 22:51
#32
Posted 25 June 2001 - 04:35
#33
Posted 25 June 2001 - 06:32
Of course this is peanuts in both divisions compared with F1 and the top 15 in Nascar, but Cheever has been living hand to mouth since he was booted from CART and was on the low end of the paid drivers at the time he was running there. Had he not taken the Nissan engine program and thus some funding (when no other team wanted it) he would have been shining shoes by now.
#34
Posted 25 June 2001 - 11:35
on a report that PETA was pushing to replace Indy's famed bottle of milk with soy milk: "If I win a race and someone hands me a bottle of soy milk I'm gonna throw it at them"

As for Casey Mears, I know he's good enough--he finished 3rd his only CART start at Fontana last year. Also, where did you hear that the IRL would add road courses?
#35
Posted 25 June 2001 - 12:25

#36
Posted 25 June 2001 - 13:22
#37
Posted 25 June 2001 - 18:48
---------------------------------
As was I. But I never wanted the top teams and drivers and their equipment thrown out so I could get my chance to pretend I was the real thing too. I wanted to compete at the highest level when it really was the highest level, not a smoke and mirror show born of a political power grab. I wanted to compete with the best, I wanted to beat the best. I did not want them banned so I could posture I was the best.
So I never quite made it. I was never better than second rate in the racing scheme of things. So be it. To have an IRL like fraud available to allow me to pretend I was now the best because one man who inherited the best track said I was, would have been as big a farce as it is now.
#38
Posted 26 June 2001 - 17:01
If it looks like a duck, quacks like aduck and swims like a duck, it is a duck.Originally posted by Yelnats
I think the clue may lie in the great expectations raised by Eddie's early carreer. But he just didn't catch on with a good team in F1 though his longevity there attests to his talent. I suppose many F1 fans expected him to triumph when he entered CART but again team weaknesses limited his success. Now that he's moved to IRL and again is not dominant there more fans will jump on the "Eddie Underacheiver" bandwagon.

Cheever has underachieved in F1 then CART then IRL. He seems to have been declining since his first season in F1. By the time he got to CART, he wasn't good eneough to do well there and then the same in IRL. He seemed to peak too early - he was impressive in F2 and certainly seemed to have golden F1 career ahead of him. But it never seemed to happen. He got lots of good chances in F1 because people continued to believe that the big success was just around the corner. Drives with Tyrell, Renault and Arrows were not to be sniffed at at that time - these were good seats, but Cheever was outrun by drivers who no-one would class as top-notch such as Warwick and throughly outclassed by Prost and Patrese.
It is sad, but Cheever got a very fair bite of the F1 apple and should have no complaints.
On the bright side, I was always remember him for sliding off at Brands Hatch and almost hitting a parked Harrier jump-jet. That made the FIA really panic when they thought of the bill that the RAF would have presented them with - shortly after a regulation about minimum distances from the track for parking aircraft were introduced....
#39
Posted 26 June 2001 - 17:11
Advertisement
#40
Posted 26 June 2001 - 22:45
Originally posted by BRG
..but Cheever was outrun by drivers who no-one would class as top-notch such as Warwick and throughly outclassed by Prost and Patrese.
Non sense, if you read one of my posts above I had broke down the scoring and Cheever was very close to Warwick and Patrese. Patrese outscored him 8-3 in the two years they were at Alfa Romeo together. If you look at qualifying, they took turns outqualifying eachother until the midway into 1985.
As far as Prost, well there have been quite a few drivers who were outclassed by him. Prost is French and Renault was a French team. Cheever was a number two driver there so who was going to get the best equipment and most attention from the team? Besides Eddie has recently talked his teammate days with Prost and he said that Prost was very quiet, wouldn't engage in much conversation with him and basically treated him as just another competitor.
#41
Posted 26 June 2001 - 23:16
Originally posted by Joe Fan
Here is his F1 career in summary (team/points scored v teammate)
1980 Oscella 0-0 Gabbiani
1981 Tyrrell 10-0 Alboreto
1982 Tyrrell 15-5 Lafitte
1983 Renault 22-57 Prost
1984 Alfa Romeo 3-8 Patrese
1985 Alfa Romeo 0-0 Patrese
1986 ----
1987 Arrows 8-3 Warwick
1988 Arrows 6-17 Warwick
1989 Arrows 6-7 Warwick
I hate to be picky but in 1982 Eddie was at Talbot Ligier...so shoot me;)
#42
Posted 26 June 2001 - 23:49
#43
Posted 27 June 2001 - 01:12
#44
Posted 27 June 2001 - 05:40
I thought for sure he was going to win the 1992 Indy 500. Unfortunately after being unfairly penalized one lap for passing Raul Bossel (who voluntarily waived him past), he decided to play it cool, tone it down somewhat and bring the car home safely...
In retrospect (teammate Arye Lyndyke, Mario and Jeff Andrietti and a few others all crashed rather hard in that race) this was a very wise desision.
#45
Posted 28 June 2001 - 05:16
"Masters Tour". Wasn't something like this proposed before?
It seems like guys like Mansell, Prost, Mario etc. would be a
good draw and fun to watch.Eddie may not be at the top of his
game anymore, but I 'd put money on him against any other 43 year
old driver.
I think it would also be great to see IROC use
identically prepared open wheel cars every odd year and "stock cars"
on even years. It would be fun to see the tin top guys out of their bump n'
draft element for a change!
#46
Posted 28 June 2001 - 11:20
Remember that in 1983, Eddie had what amounted to a customer spec Renault turbo while all the developments went Prost's way. To be that close to Prost under the conditions I think was something good.
At least the customer spec engines is what Eddie told me!
He then faired very well against Patrese and Warwick.
Why does he get bashed now? Because of horrible comments like "Fidel Castroneves".
#47
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:54

I thought that was funny... sorry, I can't help it, I'm a barbaric American twit who deserves the chair ;)
#48
Posted 28 June 2001 - 17:21
Originally posted by vettefan
... ANY driver who has or has had the skill and cajones to drive ANY F1 car of ANY era: my hat is off to them all!...
Cajones = drawers
Cojones = balls (


I agree with vettefan comment ... but being a native Spanish speaking ... now you all know how to spell it in case you have to use it.
I liked Cheever since his days at Tyrrell and always felt he deserved more. I never met him but I have always had the impression that as a person he is 'tops'.
#49
Posted 28 June 2001 - 17:40
But surely the Spanish for balls is bola or globo or balon? Whereas cojones means testicles...Originally posted by luisfelipetrigo
Cajones = drawers
Cojones = balls (![]()
)

And in Chile or Peru, cajones would mean coffins, which may be what vettefan meant in the first place...
All credit to Eddie Cheever for getting as far as he has in racing, but I can't help feeling that he never delivered the results that he seemed to promise - it all just seemed to fade away.
#50
Posted 01 July 2001 - 23:16
"Cajones = drawers"
"Cojones = balls"
I'm obviously not a native speaker of your beautiful language. But at least I think everyone gained the right understanding from what I MEANT.
But it is a common spelling mistake that we Norteamericanos make!
And I'll have to agree with the general thread of comment is that Eddie just never quite had "it" for the F-1 big time. But then, many of those PRESENTLY in the F-1 big time don't have it either!