
BRM Volume 4
#1
Posted 06 August 2010 - 17:22
#3
Posted 07 August 2010 - 08:59
Slow but sure - thank you
![]()
DCN
Now that this thread has been started, Doug, would you kindly keep us posted...
#4
Posted 07 August 2010 - 09:54
Now that this thread has been started, Doug, would you kindly keep us posted...
Please??

#5
Posted 07 August 2010 - 19:51
Please??
;)
Sure. How frequently would you like...???
DCN
#6
Posted 07 August 2010 - 19:54

#7
Posted 07 August 2010 - 21:25


DCN
#8
Posted 02 August 2011 - 19:38
Geoff
#9
Posted 02 August 2011 - 20:24
#10
Posted 02 August 2011 - 20:28

#11
Posted 02 August 2011 - 20:44
DCN
#12
Posted 02 August 2011 - 21:27
David
#13
Posted 03 August 2011 - 06:30
You can certainly ask. It's 85 per cent done but the remaining 15 per cent is causing continuing difficulty inside my head...
DCN
That's a bit like what kit-plane builders say when asked how near they are to completion, " it's 85% done, only 85% to go"
Chris
#14
Posted 03 August 2011 - 07:52

#15
Posted 03 August 2011 - 18:32
All three volumes were sitting on the counter in the bookshop at Brands Hatch and I couldn't resist.
David
#16
Posted 22 October 2013 - 15:29
Any fresh news about the Volume 4 avancement ?
...but I wld be happy with some rumours, only Come on, Doug !
Edited by M Needforspeed, 22 October 2013 - 15:30.
#17
Posted 19 January 2014 - 17:38
Cheers
#18
Posted 19 January 2014 - 18:05
Thank you for asking.
DCN
#19
Posted 19 January 2014 - 18:14
Progress has been made.
Thank you for asking.
DCN
Huurah!
Advertisement
#20
Posted 19 January 2014 - 18:26
Progress has been made.
Thank you for asking.
DCN
That is brilliant news!!!
#21
Posted 19 January 2014 - 20:21
#22
Posted 19 January 2014 - 20:38
Now steady on chaps - let's not exaggerate...
DCN
#23
Posted 19 January 2014 - 22:19
It's the one I'm looking forward to most; after all, standard histories from the 50s and 60s always have a huge amount about BRM, but those covering the 70s never do...
#25
Posted 20 January 2014 - 19:42
Forza BRM
#26
Posted 20 January 2014 - 22:56
#27
Posted 21 January 2014 - 15:55
Volumes 1-3 were very special because of the contribution of Tony Rudd, credited as co-author, and the extensive use of the obsessively detailed BRM records. Was Tony able to add his contribution to the H16/V12 era and was the same archive available post-ORO?
Two questions - two answers - in sequence yes and yes. However, the archive material preserved AFTER Tony's departure from BRM in mid-1969, and after Sir Alfred's 1969 stroke, is much diminished in contrast. It is still way superior to any paper trail left by other contemporary teams, except perhaps Ferrari, but it is much diminished in quality....if not quantity... Tim Parnell's race reports were minimal compared to Tony's, and Tony Southgate was A Racer, great bloke, fine engineer, but not - ahem - enthusiastically literate...
Ah - I see Roger writes "was the same archive available post-ORO" - which means post-1974 and the answer there is "fragmentarily only" - by the late 1970s into the 1980s Big Lou was known for the occasional raging bonfires in the garden at Trumpington - maintaining confidentiality...and/or covering his tracks. Give me a little credit. I am exploring all of this, of course.
DCN
Edited by Doug Nye, 21 January 2014 - 15:58.
#28
Posted 21 January 2014 - 21:54
I realise that progress has been made but are there any hints about how far away Vol 4 actually is ..........
#29
Posted 21 January 2014 - 22:43
None. DCN
#30
Posted 21 January 2014 - 23:06
Doug, what can you tell us about the Phil Hill book, Inside Track, is it still in the works? By the way it is great to see you posting again at TNF, your absence was missed.
#31
Posted 21 January 2014 - 23:31
Thanks for that. I can't help feeling that the real BRM ended with Tony Rudd's departure but it will be good to has the whole story.Two questions - two answers - in sequence yes and yes. However, the archive material preserved AFTER Tony's departure from BRM in mid-1969, and after Sir Alfred's 1969 stroke, is much diminished in contrast. It is still way superior to any paper trail left by other contemporary teams, except perhaps Ferrari, but it is much diminished in quality....if not quantity... Tim Parnell's race reports were minimal compared to Tony's, and Tony Southgate was A Racer, great bloke, fine engineer, but not - ahem - enthusiastically literate...
Ah - I see Roger writes "was the same archive available post-ORO" - which means post-1974 and the answer there is "fragmentarily only" - by the late 1970s into the 1980s Big Lou was known for the occasional raging bonfires in the garden at Trumpington - maintaining confidentiality...and/or covering his tracks. Give me a little credit. I am exploring all of this, of course.
DCN
#32
Posted 21 January 2014 - 23:33
DCN
#33
Posted 21 January 2014 - 23:38
Thanks for that. I can't help feeling that the real BRM ended with Tony Rudd's departure but it will be good to has the whole story.
Not really fair comment, but I do appreciate the sentiment. BRM shone again with Tony Southgate's cars and I would certainly celebrate those successes - even though the cars were no longer BRM-coloured...
DCN
#34
Posted 22 January 2014 - 07:35
#35
Posted 24 January 2014 - 00:41
From Doug Nye...
#36
Posted 24 January 2014 - 04:48
That diagram has me absolutely astonished.
#37
Posted 24 January 2014 - 06:38
Pity the poor driver, surrounded by exhaust pipes.
#38
Posted 24 January 2014 - 07:38
Bump steer anyone?
#39
Posted 24 January 2014 - 08:13
I have the mechanical abilities of a two-year-old hurling Duplo bricks in lieu of building a wall, but even I am astonished by that. Looks more like a dragster than an Indianapolis contender. Mickey Thompson would have been proud.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 24 January 2014 - 08:49
#41
Posted 24 January 2014 - 11:30
Pity the poor driver, surrounded by exhaust pipes.
Perhaps Don Garlits was to drive it?
#42
Posted 24 January 2014 - 14:22
Edited by Ralf Pickel, 24 January 2014 - 14:22.
#43
Posted 24 January 2014 - 14:42
Roger Lund
#44
Posted 24 January 2014 - 14:45
Don Garlits was a pioneer with rear engined fuel dragsters ! :-)
I only mentioned Garlits because he was the best known dragster driver to me. In any case I thought Tony Nancy pioneered the mid engined dragster. But we are getting way off topic....
Edited by David Beard, 24 January 2014 - 14:46.
#45
Posted 24 January 2014 - 14:59
Had Garlits stored somwhere back in my mind with pushing rear engined dragsters foward, so to speak.
Sorry for hijacking the topic - maybe that should be discussed in a new topic !
#46
Posted 24 January 2014 - 15:03
Hmmm.
An engineer's solution - get the mid engine and 4WD transmission right and fit that nuisance of a driver in somehow.
Politics creeps in - Don't use asymmetrical wishbones to offset the car as that would be copying Lotus
#47
Posted 24 January 2014 - 15:54
I have the mechanical abilities of a two-year-old hurling Duplo bricks in lieu of building a wall, but even I am astonished by that. Looks more like a dragster than an Indianapolis contender. Mickey Thompson would have been proud.
Did Mickey ever built a front engined vehicle for the 500 ?
#48
Posted 24 January 2014 - 15:55
Hmmm.
An engineer's solution - get the mid engine and 4WD transmission right and fit that nuisance of a driver in somehow.
Politics creeps in - Don't use asymmetrical wishbones to offset the car as that would be copying Lotus
Or they could have taken the Smokey Yunick sidewinder route?
#49
Posted 24 January 2014 - 16:22
Did Mickey ever built a front engined vehicle for the 500 ?
In 1965 I think, probably out of sheer bloody mindedness.
#50
Posted 24 January 2014 - 19:07
Did Mickey ever built a front engined vehicle for the 500 ?
After everyone criticized Thompson for building an unorthodox car for 1964, impliedly blaming him for the deaths of Sachs and MacDonald, he went the other extreme and went retro.