
Colin McRae 2.0
#1
Posted 16 December 2000 - 23:02
I've just installed it and tested it... and i'm a bit confused about it. It seems like it handles much like the first one, although, i liked just as well in the first title. The Gfx are pretty nice, but a bit demanding on my computer...
anyone who has tried it both on the playstation and a PC? is there any difference in the handling, or is it pretty much the same??
Advertisement
#2
Posted 17 December 2000 - 15:13
#3
Posted 17 December 2000 - 20:42
#4
Posted 18 December 2000 - 10:39
#5
Posted 18 December 2000 - 10:56
It's just not my type of game.
I haven't tried it on the computer though, so I guess that doesn't help huh?
#6
Posted 18 December 2000 - 21:03
If they make a patch for this game, i hope this is one of the things they look into..
#7
Posted 25 December 2000 - 21:18

#8
Posted 26 December 2000 - 14:35
#9
Posted 27 December 2000 - 14:14
Very entertaining though with pretty good graphics (all detail and draw distance turned up to max on my Duron 850/GeForce DDR at 1024x768.) Like TOCA 2 with draw distance on max, everything as far as the eye can see is prerendered which gives you a real sense of space and movement.
Another plus is only one disc is required for network play (you can do free network only installs on as many machines as you like) I haven't tried it yet as my brother hasn't got over his Christmas hangover yet!!
Good fun! I think there will be a fair bit of mileage put on this game! (sic)
PS I use a Microsoft FF wheel - Force feedback is temperamental and doesn't work sometimes.
#10
Posted 01 January 2001 - 20:46
Originally posted by HappyDude
So does this mean that with the *full* version of the game there is a large deadzone that you can't adjust? Come on CodeMasters! What controller settings can you adjust in the game?
Seems so. It's really annoying. I did not notice any option for advance calibration of a wheel or joystick. Shame!!!
#11
Posted 10 January 2001 - 17:25
Originally posted by Gemini
Originally posted by HappyDude
So does this mean that with the *full* version of the game there is a large deadzone that you can't adjust? Come on CodeMasters! What controller settings can you adjust in the game?
Seems so. It's really annoying. I did not notice any option for advance calibration of a wheel or joystick. Shame!!!
Sorry but that is all rubbish. The dead zone is totally adjustable on all axes as is the sensitivity.
I also find plenty of grip on tarmac stages, I won every stage on the Italian rally whereas I was struggling on the others. Mind you I did have the Subaru which alledgedly generates the most grip in this game (Focus has best braking).
#12
Posted 11 January 2001 - 14:20
#13
Posted 11 January 2001 - 14:50
Originally posted by BT52
Originally posted by Gemini
Originally posted by HappyDude
So does this mean that with the *full* version of the game there is a large deadzone that you can't adjust? Come on CodeMasters! What controller settings can you adjust in the game?
Seems so. It's really annoying. I did not notice any option for advance calibration of a wheel or joystick. Shame!!!
Sorry but that is all rubbish. The dead zone is totally adjustable on all axes as is the sensitivity.
I also find plenty of grip on tarmac stages, I won every stage on the Italian rally whereas I was struggling on the others. Mind you I did have the Subaru which alledgedly generates the most grip in this game (Focus has best braking).
BT52,
That's more than great!. Could you help with this? How should I adjust it on PC? That game looks great that's why I was so angry not knowing how to adjust "deadzone" of the wheel/joystick. Thanks
#14
Posted 11 January 2001 - 23:08
There are differences between the cars.
I prefer the Subaru as it is the best overall car; very fast on gravel, quick on ice, too large and cumbersome for tarmac (still fast enough to beat the CPUs in expert mode (power-ratio two steps forward)).
The Mitsubishi comes very close; it's slightly slower on gravel(difference between 1st and 2nd), faster on ice, extremely fast on tarmac(64sec ahead of CPUs in Italy(expert)).
The Seat is superior on tarmac (agile without being jumpy) but too slow on gravel and ice.
The Peugeot is very fast on tarmac and gravel but too jumpy for me and appears to break down quite easily.
The Focus is still a mystery to me it: just doesn't go as fast as the other cars. It doesn't agree with my driving style methinks.
Haven't really tried the bonus cars except for the Puma, which is a lot of fun to drive; agile, responsive, a little sloppy in the slides but easily controlled with the throttle thanks to the excellent acceleration. With some additional practice I think it could be faster than the WRCs.
What bothers me is that it still takes 16 mins to repair the gearbox after you've changed both the differential and the drive shaft.
The opposition appears to be too slow. I'm yet to win the Expert championship, but I finished 2nd, 2 points behind Colin, in my first (and only so far) attempt. I would have won, but lost 10 sec on a bad weather forecast in Australia.
And you get too much grip on full throttle. All non-tarmac rallies become an exercise in pointing the car in the general direction of the road ahead, downshifting and flooring it.
#15
Posted 12 January 2001 - 01:45
I like to use the Ford Focus, I think it handles the best over the other cars and is pretty fast. Only upto Australia at the moment.
#16
Posted 12 January 2001 - 01:50

#17
Posted 12 January 2001 - 11:43
Originally posted by Mellon
Select controls and choose your wheel. When you click OK. You should get a screen for configuring the buttons; click OK again and up comes a screen with sliders for the different axis on the wheel&pedals, click enter on a slider the adjust deadzones and maximum deflections. (I hope this is correct. Have to reboot to Win98 to check).
There are differences between the cars.
I prefer the Subaru as it is the best overall car; very fast on gravel, quick on ice, too large and cumbersome for tarmac (still fast enough to beat the CPUs in expert mode (power-ratio two steps forward)).
The Mitsubishi comes very close; it's slightly slower on gravel(difference between 1st and 2nd), faster on ice, extremely fast on tarmac(64sec ahead of CPUs in Italy(expert)).
The Seat is superior on tarmac (agile without being jumpy) but too slow on gravel and ice.
The Peugeot is very fast on tarmac and gravel but too jumpy for me and appears to break down quite easily.
The Focus is still a mystery to me it: just doesn't go as fast as the other cars. It doesn't agree with my driving style methinks.
Haven't really tried the bonus cars except for the Puma, which is a lot of fun to drive; agile, responsive, a little sloppy in the slides but easily controlled with the throttle thanks to the excellent acceleration. With some additional practice I think it could be faster than the WRCs.
What bothers me is that it still takes 16 mins to repair the gearbox after you've changed both the differential and the drive shaft.
The opposition appears to be too slow. I'm yet to win the Expert championship, but I finished 2nd, 2 points behind Colin, in my first (and only so far) attempt. I would have won, but lost 10 sec on a bad weather forecast in Australia.
And you get too much grip on full throttle. All non-tarmac rallies become an exercise in pointing the car in the general direction of the road ahead, downshifting and flooring it.
Interesting.
I too think the full throttle thing is a bit unrealistic unless traction control is used in the WRC (don't know myself), just tend to use it as an on/off switch.
Also think the power output on the Puma is ridiculous! Since when did it have 300bhp !!??
I got the Puma presumably by winning the champ on intermediate. Any idea how the other extra cars are won? (Don't want to use the cheats).
Interesting that you move the power to the front as I tend to do the opposite. Particularly on the tarmac too help get the front of the subaru into the bends (maybe because it is too big I have to use this technique?)
The Focus is supposed to have better braking but I find this a bit hard to judge as well.
My favorite stages are the UK ones with a bit of everything. The one which you run in both directions is very rewarding to get right.
I think the stages are a bit too short though.
Anyone remember "NetworkQ Rally" ? One of the UK stages took about 12 minutes to get through! It was great.
Anyone know of any downloads to get the proper driver names or tobaco liveries etc?
#18
Posted 12 January 2001 - 13:35
#19
Posted 12 January 2001 - 15:04
You get bonus cars and cheats for winning individual events (intermidiate and expert) and championships. Cheats appear in the options menu.
I move the brakes back by at least one step to make the Subaru (and the Mitsubishi) turn in to corners. I find that the rear steps out too far under acceleration if I don't move the power ratio forward. I only started to do this after I moved to force-feedback after I returned from Xmas vacation at Hotel Mother (played on a friend's CPU over the holidays).
In most corners I only tap the brakes enough to almost lock the rear wheels and throw out the rear. I usually slow down by downshifting. I find that brakes are only needed for slowing tha car down when you have to take a corner 2 or 3 gears below the one you are in when you approach the corner.
Yes, the stages are quite short. And Nicky reads the notes too late, especially when several corners are connected or you approach them over a jump. There's no way to get a good line without learning the stages. Sometimes you even have trouble slowing the car down enough to avoid running wide.
#21
Posted 15 January 2001 - 10:32
Originally posted by Mellon
BT52:
Yes, the stages are quite short. And Nicky reads the notes too late, especially when several corners are connected or you approach them over a jump. There's no way to get a good line without learning the stages. Sometimes you even have trouble slowing the car down enough to avoid running wide.
I want to throttle him sometimes. ..."into 3 left, caution rocks outside" when I am already half way round the damn bend and going much too fast to avoid them. (This is on UK stage 2 or 4).
I find that I need the power at the back to be able to get round the bends on tarmac smoothly, I tend to brake quite early on these stages and use the power quite early. If it were modelled I'm sure I would be destroying my diff and tyres quite dramatically.
On the snow I push the power back also as I use the throttle on-off to try to get the car pointing the right way quicker.
Although I seem to have no problem doing well on the tarmac (won on inter by a mile) I have been struggling so far on mud. Maybe I'll try trail braking with more front power.
I noticed the cheats popping up when I won a rally on intermediate, but despite winning 3 rallys in the season and the championship and the arcade mode class B and class A I still only have the Puma as an extra car.
Could it be that you have to win the SS stages like in the original game? As so far I have been pretty hopeless on them.
#22
Posted 15 January 2001 - 12:54
I've only driven the stages 1-5 times so the stage times are bound to improve once I get some more time on the game. Stages 9 and 10 in particular since I've only driven them once or twice each.
#23
Posted 24 May 2001 - 01:18
Otherwise I really like the game, got all the trophies on inter. and expert. I haven't played it for ages though.