
The 1971 Italian Grand Prix at Monza
#1
Posted 26 August 2010 - 17:53
For me this period of Grand Prix racing was golden,I know the year after 'the authorities' stuck in the chicanes to slow the cars down,but it has been widely publicized that this killed the majic of Monza,what are your thoughts.
The race was won by Peter Gethin at an average speed of something like 150mph!!!,I would have loved to have witnessed this race but alas I was only a six year old kid.
#3
Posted 26 August 2010 - 18:06
It was never the fastest race ever. For many years it was the fastest F1 race ever, but it lost this distinction to the 2003 Italian GP. It is now fifth on the all-time F1 list:Hi,I am researching the fastest race ever,the 1971 Italian Grand Prix at Monza ...
http://www.statsf1.c...nne/leplus.aspx
#4
Posted 26 August 2010 - 18:33
It was never the fastest race ever. For many years it was the fastest F1 race ever, but it lost this distinction to the 2003 Italian GP. It is now fifth on the all-time F1 list:
http://www.statsf1.c...nne/leplus.aspx
Yes,
As a long time BRM fan I have always relished the thought that the marque held that particular record for 33 years, and not only the fastest but also the second fastest, with Pedro Rodrigeuz holding the record with his win at Spa in 1970 before being beaten by Peter Gethin at Monza. BRM also are still high in the list of all time GP winners with 17 victories!
You may query that statistic, but I only include makes that built the chassis and engine themselves, and on that basis McLaren are still without a single win.
You have to take your victories where you can!!!!
Bauble.
#5
Posted 26 August 2010 - 19:02
#6
Posted 26 August 2010 - 19:34
Any Idea why 1960 had so many fast races for it's era . i see at least 3 of those races in the top 133 , while outside of the Indy 500s few F1 graded races then seem to appear.
Paul
#7
Posted 26 August 2010 - 19:51
Edited by Tim Murray, 26 August 2010 - 19:52.
#8
Posted 27 August 2010 - 10:11
#9
Posted 27 August 2010 - 10:40
#10
Posted 27 August 2010 - 11:05
#11
Posted 27 August 2010 - 11:34
3rd place Matra-Simca MS670B Henri Pescarolo (F) Fastest Lap 3:13.400 262.461 km/h but the pole lap had Ickx / Redman Ferrari 312 on 3:12.700Actually, I might have been thinking of an individual lap - Pesca at circa 163 mph...
Edited by mfd, 27 August 2010 - 11:35.
#12
Posted 27 August 2010 - 13:18
Which rather begs the question "Was Avus a road course or a track?"
Avus consisted to two sides of dual carriageway, joined by a hairpin at one end and a steeply banked corner at the other, was this a road course? Technically yes (probably) but much like a 'track' in character.
Edited by Bauble, 27 August 2010 - 13:18.
#13
Posted 27 August 2010 - 13:23
I am of course biased, but the moral victor was Ronnie Peterson. He was in command and was superb through the Parabolica, lap after lap. But for that last time...
It would have been interesting if somebody had filmed me during that race. I have a vague memory of me jumping up and down during the last laps. And shouting at Bonnier to get out of the way. Now when I see the last lap on Youtube, I can see that the Swedish veteran was far ahead of the crazy bunch that braked for the last corner.
#14
Posted 27 August 2010 - 14:11
Which rather begs the question "Was Avus a road course or a track?"
I'll grant Avus road course status if you can find me a picture of somebody ambling round the banking in an Austin Cambridge...
#15
Posted 27 August 2010 - 16:55
or page 89 of Tim Nevinson's book "The Drivers".
#16
Posted 28 August 2010 - 05:56
Which rather begs the question "Was Avus a road course or a track?"
Since the bricked banking was not part of the dual-carriageway road, I wouldn't regard it as a road course. Hybrid, perhaps, at best. The original track was built as a dual-purpose road/track, and the later (1937?) high banking was off to one side of the line of the road.
#17
Posted 28 August 2010 - 08:08
Since the bricked banking was not part of the dual-carriageway road, I wouldn't regard it as a road course. Hybrid, perhaps, at best. The original track was built as a dual-purpose road/track, and the later (1937?) high banking was off to one side of the line of the road.
Once the banking was removed, potential lap times dropped (but not by a lot). The fastest races were the Interserie and German Sportscar Championship events in the 1980s on a 8km version of the road track.
The fastest race that I can find was the 1983 DRM on 1/5/83 which was dominated by the then-new Porsche 956's. Bob Wollek winning at an average of 232.542 km/h and a fastest lap going to Volkert Merl at 239 km/h (148.5 in old money).
Tony
Edited by taylov, 28 August 2010 - 08:12.
#18
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:48
I'll grant Avus road course status if you can find me a picture of somebody ambling round the banking in an Austin Cambridge...
Would you accept a Trabi?
#19
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:22
Perhaps a special award for going off topic?Would you accept a Trabi?
Advertisement
#20
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:49
I blame leakage from the Blood Pressure thread
#21
Posted 28 August 2010 - 11:04
I blame leakage from the Blood Pressure thread
Haemorrhage.
#22
Posted 28 August 2010 - 11:28
A classic demonstration of Parkinson's Thermodynamic Law of Committees. We last saw the topic about 23 hours ago!
#23
Posted 28 August 2010 - 11:40
So a daily award then...We last saw the topic about 23 hours ago!
#24
Posted 28 August 2010 - 12:04
Automobile Year # 19 had its usual lap chart for the 1971 Italian GP. It bears some resemblance to a seismograph trace for multiple earthquakes. I counted about 35 changes of the lead, but that represents the Start/Finish line only; what was going on around the rest of the lap? It was Gethin's second only race for BRM, and he scored points only once more for BRM.
The preceding 3 Italian GP's were similar races - in 1968-69-70 there were 16,15, and 29 changes of lead by my count. Have we possibly lost something in Formula 1 over the last 40 or so years?
#25
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:30
He was also credited the win for the Victory race at Brands. The slipstreaming battles at Monza in those days were caused by a lack of aero efficiency. Many teams removed or trimmed their wings to the the minimum, which you can see if you compare the Austrian GP P160 to the Italian version of the car.It was Gethin's second only race for BRM, and he scored points only once more for BRM...
...Have we possibly lost something in Formula 1 over the last 40 or so years?
Be interesting to see one of today's F1 cars running like that...well maybe

#26
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:33
Clot!Haemorrhage.

#27
Posted 28 August 2010 - 15:01
Clot!
Now that really is nostalgic.
#28
Posted 28 August 2010 - 15:14
Now that really is nostalgic.
Nostalgic?
I'd call it a bleeding liberty!
#29
Posted 16 March 2014 - 06:59
I have read reports that towards the end of Saturday practice, cars would slow down on the back straight, and the drivers would wait for another car to pass them. They would then tuck in behind and gain speed from the drafting, thus making their lap faster. Apparently Chris Amon used the slipstream from Tim Schenken's Brabham to set the fastest lap and gain pole position.
#30
Posted 16 March 2014 - 08:55
Absolutely standard practice on any slipstreaming venue. Unless the 'tow car' driver was himself going for a time whenever they spotted a rival latching on to their slipstream they would frequently back off or move far off-line to spoil the tow. Cat and mouse. The last five to ten minutes of Monza practice/qualifying was always riveting...without artifice to make it so...
DCN
#31
Posted 16 March 2014 - 08:57
Indeed.
#32
Posted 16 March 2014 - 09:33
I rember Jenks explaining that the trick was to use the slipstream to accelerate up to a higher speed than could be achieved unaided. Having done this the car behind would be going faster than his 'tow' and would have to pull out of the slipstream at some stage in order to get a clear run into the next corner. As the timing line was generally not on the longest straight, the qualifier had to judge crossing the timing line so that half a lap later he caught up with his 'tow' at exactly the right point on the straight.
#33
Posted 16 March 2014 - 18:48
Were there any speed traps set up at Monza for the '71 GP? The quickest guys must have doing north of 200mph / 322kmh in a tow.
Edited by nmansellfan, 16 March 2014 - 18:48.