
Smallest displacement 12 cylinder racing engine?
#1
Posted 30 September 2010 - 04:40
Wondering what would be the smallest displacement normally-aspirated 12 cylinder engine that has ever been developed specifically for a motor racing application?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 30 September 2010 - 04:50
#3
Posted 30 September 2010 - 05:05

#4
Posted 30 September 2010 - 05:10
Edited by Rob G, 30 September 2010 - 05:11.
#6
Posted 30 September 2010 - 07:33
1490.2272 cm/2 for the Ferrari and
1495.8774 cm/2 for the Honda.
Edited by Gary Davies, 30 September 2010 - 07:35.
#7
Posted 30 September 2010 - 08:16
Moto Guzzi had a racebike with a 500cc V8 engine in the mid-fifties.
#8
Posted 30 September 2010 - 08:26
#9
Posted 30 September 2010 - 09:04
So the Honda is the big block!!Sourcing the bore and stroke from this link, our old friend pi x r squared x h gives
1490.2272 cm/2 for the Ferrari and
1495.8774 cm/2 for the Honda.
#10
Posted 30 September 2010 - 09:06
So a full-scale Ferrari 312PB was 309cc?A working one-third scale 312PB Ferrari[/url].
103cc flat 12, 8bhp
Edited by David McKinney, 30 September 2010 - 09:07.
#11
Posted 30 September 2010 - 09:36
#12
Posted 30 September 2010 - 10:40
So a full-scale Ferrari 312PB was 309cc?
Wairarapa College has a lot to answer for. Because it's a cubic measurement, you should have multiplied capacity by 27(3x3x3). That would have given you 2781 cc. But 110.77 cc x 27 would get you 2991 cc if anyone cares.
Did Berardo Taraschi run his Ferrari Special at least once as a u/s V12 1.5 Formula 2 in 1957, or was that just what was written on the entry form, and performance didn't give any cause for query.
#13
Posted 30 September 2010 - 11:00
It was a long time agoWairarapa College has a lot to answer for

#14
Posted 30 September 2010 - 11:13
Originally posted by David McKinney
It was a long time ago
Do you say that with relief, disbelief or pain?
And for the purposes of this thread, maybe you could confirm that the 1.5-litre Ferrari engine that Dick Cobden had (mentioned in a thread a few days ago...) had the option of normal or compressed aspiration.
#15
Posted 30 September 2010 - 11:17
#16
Posted 30 September 2010 - 11:50
Do you say that with relief, disbelief or pain?
And for the purposes of this thread, maybe you could confirm that the 1.5-litre Ferrari engine that Dick Cobden had (mentioned in a thread a few days ago...) had the option of normal or compressed aspiration.
Normally compressed, Ray. The 2 litre ran both ways at different times, u/s in European F2 and blown when it was brought to Aust.
#17
Posted 30 September 2010 - 12:32
#19
Posted 30 September 2010 - 17:26
Not that suitable for racing as they found out at the Alvis at much the same time - although the first fwd Alvis had a de Dion front end, they were ifs by 1927It also appears to be front wheel drive and four wheel independent suspension---in 1926!?
Advertisement
#20
Posted 30 September 2010 - 18:05
#21
Posted 30 September 2010 - 19:32
#22
Posted 30 September 2010 - 20:34
So a full-scale Ferrari 312PB was 309cc?
Isn't 1/3 scale a divide by 3 cubed? 3000/27=111ish
#23
Posted 30 September 2010 - 21:08

#24
Posted 01 October 2010 - 03:21
Also, although not a V-12, the University of Western Washington CNC'ed a 554cc V-8 (with 32 valves) for their Formula SAE car circa 2002. Their website claims a redline of 16,500 rpm. If I remember correctly, the car got built without a self starter for some reason so did not meet the rules and get to run in competition but it is a fantastic achievement for a group of University students never the less.
#25
Posted 01 October 2010 - 17:28
Since the Ariel (B)Leader produced 17 h.p. from its two 54mm × 54mm two-stroke cylinders I thought at the time there must be an easier route to 100 b.h.p. By the time that motor was in the (unfaired) Arrow it was tuned up to 20 h.p. so 6 might have given 120 so maybe worthwhile after all.I think the Rotorvic 1.5L V-12 made from 6 Ariel motorcycle engines deserves a mention, although it was apparently a 2 stroke. It used to be in the Donnington (when I saw it in the 90's) but is in Utah now (?) according to a TNF thread.
#26
Posted 01 October 2010 - 22:22
Since the Ariel (B)Leader produced 17 h.p. from its two 54mm × 54mm two-stroke cylinders I thought at the time there must be an easier route to 100 b.h.p. By the time that motor was in the (unfaired) Arrow it was tuned up to 20 h.p. so 6 might have given 120 so maybe worthwhile after all.
But Ron, unsurprisingly, couldn't keep all 6 engines in sync, so all sorts of contrary oscillations were set up in the single output shaft, so like the H16 BRM, it was fast while it ran, which wasn't often or for long. Being only 17 when I saw it in his garage, I didn't question the wisdom of not using shock absorbing centres in the transfer gears.