
Schumacher Liuzzi accident
#1
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:13
I think if the car hits him that's it, neck broken. Hans System or not.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:16
Almost forgotten already because of the WDC fight i think this accident showed that F1 is still dangerous. Schumacher mentioned on TV that he felt uncomfortable under his skin and that he was lucky nothing serious happend.
I think if the car hits him that's it, neck broken. Hans System or not.
He was so lucky. My heart was in my mouth while i wated for the smoke around his helmet to clear. So glad he is ok and i hope to see him back next year
#3
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:16
#4
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:17
Edited by r4mses, 14 November 2010 - 19:19.
#5
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:17
Almost forgotten already because of the WDC fight i think this accident showed that F1 is still dangerous. Schumacher mentioned on TV that he felt uncomfortable under his skin and that he was lucky nothing serious happend.
I think if the car hits him that's it, neck broken. Hans System or not.
That freaked me out as well... Honestly, had Schumacher not rolled his car a few feet, the FI would have hit him face first. My roommate was not watching at that time, but when he joined me I told him Schumacher could have died today, and thankfully, luckily, the car hit behind Schumacher's head. That was really really scary.
#6
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:19
Open cockpit racing has its dangers.
#7
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:21
#8
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:22
#9
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:23
Almost forgotten already because of the WDC fight i think this accident showed that F1 is still dangerous. Schumacher mentioned on TV that he felt uncomfortable under his skin and that he was lucky nothing serious happend.
I think if the car hits him that's it, neck broken. Hans System or not.
Yep, very lucky escape. Thankfully head on collisions are rare in F1.
This was another lucky escape:
Herta Crash
#10
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:23
#11
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:24
#12
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:24
It was quite scary,yes. Reminded me a bit of that Wurz-Coulthard incident at Oz a few years ago.
It was a bit closer to the edge than that.
There's been quite a bit of cars getting on top of each other around the cockpit area in the last couple of years. A while ago I thought that maybe the shape of the noses of the car is facilitating this. I'm pretty sure that with a low nose (i.e. 1980s style) the cars wouldn't be quite so able to climb around each other because they wouldn't get as much leverage at the front end when something got under the front of the car.
#13
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:25
Anyway a pretty unusual shunt but good to see Schumi still smiling afterwoods. Thankfully those kinds of collisions are pretty rare though I'm sure there will be people looking to further improve safety in collisions like that.
#14
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:26
#15
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:27

#16
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:34
#17
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:39
#18
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:40
Unfortunately, however terrible that accident could of been, there is nothing that can be done. It was a freak, extremely rare, crash, that just can't be prevented in open-cockpit racing.Very lucky. A reminder of the fact safety needs to be worked on still.
#19
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:42
Advertisement
#20
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:46
Luizzi FI walloped into the Mercedes and he potentially could have been hit by his wheel.
#21
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:48
#22
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:50
Unfortunately, however terrible that accident could of been, there is nothing that can be done. It was a freak, extremely rare, crash, that just can't be prevented in open-cockpit racing.
I doubt it. Lets not forget the catalyst for his comeback was the idea of replacing Massa after he came within a millimeter of his life. The guy knows the sport is dangerous, today was more of a reminder to viewer of how dangerous it can be.
#23
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:52
for a moment i thought i saw the red helmet being hit and moving to one side.... will this make MS rethink his F1 career?
after realising that MS was ok, this was the first thing that I thought. As an older driver, these crashes would make you seriously rethink whether continuing is worth it or not. I assume that he will, but if he was to change his mind it'd be completely understandable with that kind of crash. He was extremely lucky, but it is a danger of open cockpit racing
#24
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:53
#25
Posted 14 November 2010 - 19:59
EDIT: It reminded me also of the frightening Chandhok-Trulli collision in Monaco where the Lotus vaulted over the top of the HRT, and Chandhok grabbed his head, probably fearing for his life. I still can't tell if the car actually touched his helmet or not, but it certainly appeared to. Would explain why he grabbed his helmet actually.
Edited by plastik2k9, 14 November 2010 - 20:03.
#26
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:00
for a moment i thought i saw the red helmet being hit and moving to one side.... will this make MS rethink his F1 career?
I don't think so....and I don't mean to sound like a sissy,but please not that thought again.
#27
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:03
Reminiscent of this crash:
Its cool how he in last moment close a visor....
It would be great if they release onboard video. I mean, no one is hurt so its ok. To se what schumacher seen....
Edited by razno, 14 November 2010 - 20:08.
#28
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:21
Did anyone get the impression that MS spun on his own and wasn't touched by Nico as Brundle had commented?
#29
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:23
Very frightening, and a reminder that motor racing, in particular open wheelers, is still and will always have dangers Michael was very lucky not to have been hit by one of several large components. I hope and expect he commits to 2011 because he has looked a little more on it in the last 3 races and is challenging his teammate.
Did anyone get the impression that MS spun on his own and wasn't touched by Nico as Brundle had commented?
Already confirmed by MS and Merc.
#30
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:26
Very frightening, and a reminder that motor racing, in particular open wheelers, is still and will always have dangers Michael was very lucky not to have been hit by one of several large components. I hope and expect he commits to 2011 because he has looked a little more on it in the last 3 races and is challenging his teammate.
Did anyone get the impression that MS spun on his own and wasn't touched by Nico as Brundle had commented?
Michael and Merc said there was no touch. He just went too wide and was too quickly on the throttle.
Glad that both are ok. Scary stuff.
#31
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:29
Nico has proved a lot this year but you get the feeling he knows MS has yet to show his real strength and Nico has felt very threatened by that. Too often he hasn't hesitated to get very racy with MS and bang wheels.
He's lucky that top brass has treated him kindly as has MS. Incidently did you see Haug's face after the crash? He was absolutely livid with Nico is the feeling I get...
#32
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:31
#33
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:48
There have been quite a few near misses and, of course, in F2 there was the tragic death of Henry Surtees who was killed by an errant wheel at Brands Hatch just last year.
It should be possible to devise a system to protect the driver without going to an enclosed cockpit, something I'm sure nobody wants.
I would propose a design of roll hoop that would dramatically reduce the risk :
A horizontal, retractable, U shaped hoop could be sprung-loaded and mounted in the airbox. During the race it would project forward and above the driver's head. Just before the formation lap it could be pulled forward into position by the pit crew using a pair of detachable levers, acting against strong springs.
The driver could easily retract it to get out by releasing a simple mechanical catch, as could track marshalls should they need to extract the driver following an accident.
As we are talking about F1 here, it should even be possible to devise a hi tech folding hoop like the electrically activated roll bar on a Mercedes SL.
In a F1 car it could be hinged outboard of the driver's shoulders and rise in front of his head, driven by upgraded airbag-style pyrotechnics, ( if they are considered safe). It could be activated by close proximity radar.
I can't be the first person who has thought this through, has there been any done work on it ?
If not, today's incident should prompt some action.
Edited by EVO2, 14 November 2010 - 20:52.
#34
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:51
I know it wasnt Nico's fault but I cant help but feel that if Nico hadn't been so racy with Michael then MS wouldnt have gone on the dirty side, span and narrowly avoided death.
Nico has proved a lot this year but you get the feeling he knows MS has yet to show his real strength and Nico has felt very threatened by that. Too often he hasn't hesitated to get very racy with MS and bang wheels.
He's lucky that top brass has treated him kindly as has MS. Incidently did you see Haug's face after the crash? He was absolutely livid with Nico is the feeling I get...
So your saying that NR shouldn't race MS and should just sit back behind him?
#35
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:52
#36
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:56
Yeah I reckon he should just roll over and learn from following the master!I know it wasnt Nico's fault but I cant help but feel that if Nico hadn't been so racy with Michael then MS wouldnt have gone on the dirty side, span and narrowly avoided death.
Nico has proved a lot this year but you get the feeling he knows MS has yet to show his real strength and Nico has felt very threatened by that. Too often he hasn't hesitated to get very racy with MS and bang wheels.
He's lucky that top brass has treated him kindly as has MS. Incidently did you see Haug's face after the crash? He was absolutely livid with Nico is the feeling I get...

There have been plenty of times that Michael has been aggressively on the inside of Rosberg on lap 1, that's racing. If either driver were to start saying "after you" it's a blot on their record. Nico was clean and precise and quite entitled to be where he was, if Michael han't lost the rear he would still have dropped the position to Nico anyway, being off line.
As for your interpretation of Haug's face, are you psychic? Of course he was enormously frustrated, probably frightened for his driver as well.
I think you have simply come across as a disappointed Michael fan who is unable to look objectively at the action. Michael has his best years behind him, Nico probably the best ahead of him. Maybe the missing 0.01s and 0.1s is partly in the unconscious "I have nothing more to prove". It doesn't have to be something a driver thinks for it to exist in the psyche. Younger drivers tend to be hungrier which often causes them to crash a lot like Petrov but as they gain experience they crash less (see today's race). Nico has had a season where his errors have been few and his pace good given the equipment. He didn't finish a mere 4 points behind Massa in an inferior car and with a certain amount of bad luck without reason. He demonstrated for 2010 at least that he was the better driver at Team Merc. We can wish for what we want but the results are what matters. Please stop blaming Nico for making Michael look a bit ordinary.
#37
Posted 14 November 2010 - 20:56
So your saying that NR shouldn't race MS and should just sit back behind him?
Maybe Rosberg shouldn't dive in for a nonexistant gap and force Michael to go on the dirty side. If Michael kept his line who would have been more to blame for a collision?
But more importantly :no, Rosberg shouldn't have raced Michael. Because : Rubens is easy to overtake and Michael would have given him the position anyway.
#38
Posted 14 November 2010 - 21:30
So your saying that NR shouldn't race MS and should just sit back behind him?
And risk running into each other ala Red Bulls in Turkey.....?
Besides team strategy has favoured Nico sincd Germany.....MS would gladly yield (ala Brazil) or not fight too hard (ala Suzuka). All i am saying is that Nico has been too aggressive at times and it could have been costly for them......
#39
Posted 14 November 2010 - 21:35

I saw his head moving in the cockpit quickly after the crash and knew he was ok

incidents like this still remind us that F1 remains a very dangerous sport ...
Advertisement
#40
Posted 14 November 2010 - 21:35
#41
Posted 14 November 2010 - 21:50
that reminds me of cartoons where cars park above other carsReminiscent of this crash:

#42
Posted 14 November 2010 - 23:19

The Abu D one was the crash test mule.
There were no FI cars left to race.

#43
Posted 14 November 2010 - 23:43
#44
Posted 14 November 2010 - 23:51

#45
Posted 14 November 2010 - 23:58
I think the scariest crash in F1 since Kubica's big one in Canada 2007.
#46
Posted 15 November 2010 - 00:03
This was a very scary moment - glad Schumacher is OK but it could have ended much worse. F1 was and still is dangerous.He edged the car forward just a moment before the impact and it was this that caused the car to go to the side of his cockpit rather than right at it.
#47
Posted 15 November 2010 - 00:04
Webber's Valencia backflip ranks right up there too, not only the aerobatic act but also the slam into the tire wall at immense speed.I think the scariest crash in F1 since Kubica's big one in Canada 2007.
#48
Posted 15 November 2010 - 00:17
Open wheel and open cockpit racing have inherent risks but when you look at the number of racing miles per year these kinds of accident are thankfully very rare. Safety is a good thing, but changes to protect against exceptional circumstances needs to be considered rather than as a knee-jerk.
#49
Posted 15 November 2010 - 00:28
my reaction was oh my god is he alright?
I think the scariest crash in F1 since Kubica's big one in Canada 2007.
I would say scarier.

Seeing some of these incredible pictures just turns my stomach all over again. FOM were so lucky they did not catch the death of a seven times world champion today LIVE ON TV by holding on the shot they did. What really makes me feel sick is that Schumacher survived not because of the safety features incorporated into the monocoque, but through a completely uncontrollable sequence of events and probabilities going this way (rather than that way) - I should think it takes an incredible type of person not to dwell on the "what ifs" in such a near miss.
Disappointed to hear that Ant and Crofty perhaps failed to grasp the gravity of what they had just witnessed, I have yet to hear their commentary which I will check out later.
Thank god Michael is ok, that was a "but for the grace of God" moment if ever there was one..
#50
Posted 15 November 2010 - 00:32