
Shadow at Kyalami - the Revson accident
#1
Posted 08 January 2001 - 01:52
Corner. Can someone help me here?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 08 January 2001 - 02:00
As one of the few remaining outposts in the world where the word is spelled correctly, I would love to see that spelling protected...
What year was it, so I can look up the RCN report?
#3
Posted 08 January 2001 - 02:15
#4
Posted 08 January 2001 - 02:36
"Practice turned into a very sad affair following the death of Peter Revson during testing in number one (sic) Shadow earlier in the week. It had been intended to run official practice ont he Wednesday and Thursday, with a rest day for the drivers, if not for mechanics, on the Friday before the Saturday race. Revson's accident had, however, destroyed a long row of armco on Barbecue Bend and, by the time this was repaired, practice had to be delayed until Thursday and Friday."
That's from the race report in May's issue, but the obituary is in the April issue.
"... Former World Champion, Graham Hill, who was also testing at the time, said that it appeared as though something had broken in the front suspension of Revson's car and it had gone straight on into the armco guard rail at high speed. The car burst into flames and, although Revson was alive when freed from the flaming wreckage, he died on the way to hospital."
I don't know from what source this obit information came, but the race report was undoubtedly a condensed rewrite of the Motoring News report.
The obit may have come from MN as well, with space factors putting the race into the next issue, or there may have been newspaper and other sources quoted.
Needless to say, it was the best available information at the time, but RCN had no direct reporting from any source of these events.
#5
Posted 08 January 2001 - 03:23
If your only source for international events is Racing Car News, with second-hand material possibly re-written by C Max Stahl - and in many cases by yourself (or even Greg McDonald) - why don't you just stay out of the thread and let people who either know, or have access to good research material answer the question?
It's a similar deal when you jump in with results from your old Monkhouse results book of the early 1950s. It was useful in its day but has been superseded on a grand scale by many researchers in the almost half a century since. The book is no longer relevant.
#6
Posted 08 January 2001 - 08:20



#7
Posted 08 January 2001 - 15:39
#8
Posted 08 January 2001 - 21:37
#9
Posted 08 January 2001 - 22:28
#10
Posted 09 January 2001 - 00:22
Testing DN3/1A the car in which he had taken sixth place in the Race of Champpions the sunday before, Revson crashed on the sweeping downhill right hander called Barbecue jst before the end of the mani straight. the accident occurred at a point ewhere drivers are changing from third to fourth gear and evidence suggests that the pin holding the front left wishbone to the upright broke and sent the car straight into the steel barrier at almost 90 degrees. Deny Hulme, Emerson Fittipaldi, Graham hill and Eddie Keizan all stopped to help estricate the american driver from the wrecked Shadow, but the impact inflicted fatal injuries on Revson and there was nothing they could do to help. it was significant, however, that a large number of drivers expressed a new apprehension over steel barriers and their potential dangers after this accident. There was no need for such barriers at this point, and modifications to the circuit took place before practice started, a triple-layer catch fence replacing the barrier at the scene of the accidet. Remembering how both Stewart and Cevert were saved from injury by catch fences at Crowthorne corner least year, one could not help feeling that thhhis was another case of "shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted" and can only nurture the vain hope that the latest victim of tese barriers wll at least provoke some less muddled thinking over the question of safety facilities"
No mention of fire.
#11
Posted 09 January 2001 - 00:35
#12
Posted 10 January 2001 - 21:51
"The entry was sadly diminished by the withdrawal of the Shadow team, shattered by the fatal crash the week before of their new star driver Peter Revson. The Americen had been testing his DN3 at Kyalami when, according to the designer, he suffered "a premature failure of a ball-post" in the front suspension. The car charged a steel barrier on the outside of Barbeque Bend. Revvie was killed almost instantly."
The picture at the link below, also from 1974 Autocouerse, shows that the car definitely caught fire....
http://homepage.ntlw...tlas/revson.jpg
Rob[p][Edited by Rob Ryder on 01-14-2001]
#13
Posted 10 January 2001 - 22:30
#14
Posted 11 January 2001 - 00:56
While Mayer's hit me quite hard, having spent an hour with him exactly a week before, it has had no lasting impact and I can dispassionately look at pictures of the wreckage, I have been to the scene (I wasn't there when it happened) and so on.
Even Bevan Gibson's, which was horrendous and so public and so visible, that taunts me no more.
Some just hit your sensibilities, and I agree that this image is one of them. A car torn apart gives rise to images of bodies torn apart, and that is so far removed from our mental pictures of what life should be... or death.
#15
Posted 11 January 2001 - 21:38
I think I should apologise for my lack of sensitivity when posting the photograph of the Peter Revson crash to this thread.
The intention when I posted the picture, as you correctly said, was to prove the existence of a fire at the crash scene, and for no other reason.
It is easy to forget that the drivers we write about on this forum, though they are past heroes to the majority, were friends and acquaintances to some of the forum contributors. No matter how much time passes the pain of grief can still cut like a knife.
I have edited my original post to convert the image to a link. This will allow those who wish to see the picture to do so, but will allow you to follow the thread without having to see the picture in future.
I hope you approve of my edit
Rob
#16
Posted 11 January 2001 - 22:11
I fully appreciate that was the purpose of the photo, and that it was necessary because of this not being mentioned in the written report.
#17
Posted 17 December 2008 - 15:02
Originally posted by Rob Ryder
"The entry was sadly diminished by the withdrawal of the Shadow team, shattered by the fatal crash the week before of their new star driver Peter Revson. The Americen had been testing his DN3 at Kyalami when, according to the designer, he suffered "a premature failure of a ball-post" in the front suspension. The car charged a steel barrier on the outside of Barbeque Bend. Revvie was killed almost instantly."
Rob[p][Edited by Rob Ryder on 01-14-2001]
What is a "ball-post"?
#18
Posted 17 December 2008 - 16:55

#19
Posted 17 December 2008 - 17:16
'Premature failure' indicates either fatigue failure of a 'lifed' component (machining quality at the transition between the conical shank and the ball and correct heat treatment depth and hardness are highly critical for fatigue life, and inadequate lubrication or galling may impose added bending loads which are not accounted for), or that the post had been somehow overstressed prior to failure. If the Shadow DN3 ball posts were lifed components (limited fatigue life with scheduled replacement), I doubt the calculated fatigue life had been reached, unless they were used DN1 components, since bespoke DN3 components would have had relatively few hours accumulated running time, DN3 being quite new at Kyalami. I can't remember, but had Revson crashed the DN3 in South America or during practise for RoC? In that case, the ball post could have been damaged in an incident earlier in the season or during pre-season testing, with the damage not being detected.
(Edited to correct grammar)
Advertisement
#20
Posted 17 December 2008 - 17:42

Seriously, thanks Anders!

#21
Posted 17 December 2008 - 17:42
The Shadow was leaning upside-down against the Armco, I recall.
#22
Posted 17 December 2008 - 18:09
#23
Posted 17 December 2008 - 19:57
S*&t happens...and another man died.
DCN
#24
Posted 17 December 2008 - 21:24
Originally posted by fines
Well, you can't beat an engineer's answer...
Seriously, thanks Anders!![]()
So it is!
@Doug Nye: I heard the same!
#25
Posted 17 December 2008 - 21:47
Criticisms, yes, but minor criticisms. He describes the arpartheid situation without passing judgement . But I don't see anything in his comments to suggest that he detested the country or the people.
He was not popular in SA due to comments made in his book? He died before the book was released.
#26
Posted 17 December 2008 - 22:20
Originally posted by Doug Nye:
I recall being told by a senior team member that the part which failed on Revvie's car did so due to "cruddy machining". It was, I believe, a titanium component - difficult to machine, but equally easy to reject during inspection.
To me it seems that specifying ball-posts in titanium in 1973 was aking for trouble. 'Cruddy' machining doesn't have to appear obviously flawed in notch sensitive material in a fatigue critical item.
On the subject of ball-posts: As these were used on racing cars into the 1980s, I was wondering whether a proprietary item from some road cars were sometimes used. Machining perfectly sperical and smooth bits in high grade material is best done in mass production with equipment and processes specialized for the task. Does anybody know of a road car item being used?
Also, I've never seen the DN3 item - it could be that it was just a conical/cylindrical/flanged "post" with a shoulder on it to accept a sperical joint, i.e. that there was no integral ball. Even so, a bad geometry transition or a defective thread would have had the same result.
#27
Posted 17 December 2008 - 23:10
Originally posted by Bonde
To me it seems that specifying ball-posts in titanium in 1973 was aking for trouble. 'Cruddy' machining doesn't have to appear obviously flawed in notch sensitive material in a fatigue critical item.
On the subject of ball-posts: As these were used on racing cars into the 1980s, I was wondering whether a proprietary item from some road cars were sometimes used. Machining perfectly sperical and smooth bits in high grade material is best done in mass production with equipment and processes specialized for the task. Does anybody know of a road car item being used?
Also, I've never seen the DN3 item - it could be that it was just a conical/cylindrical/flanged "post" with a shoulder on it to accept a sperical joint, i.e. that there was no integral ball. Even so, a bad geometry transition or a defective thread would have had the same result.
If I remember correctly, the DN3 featured fabricated front uprights with the spherical joint housing in the wishbone, picking up on a conical post threaded into the upright itself (variations in length of the post would enable different geometry to be exploited) much in the same way as March used on their front uprights, on the lower joint in the case of the March design. This design, utilizing a critical joint in single shear, was in use for a long time, iirc even the Southgate Gr C Jaguars of the late Eighties using a similar design.
In the US, suspension joints in single shear was banned from the late Seventies, if my memory serves, which meant much adding of shear plates to small Formula cars imported from the UK.
Shoddy machining in a very notch-sensitive material would lead to disaster anyway, but of course in a single shear installation the limits would be that much lower.