Jump to content


Photo

Ford sues Ferrari over F150


  • Please log in to reply
394 replies to this topic

#1 F1EC

F1EC
  • Member

  • 913 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 09 February 2011 - 22:48

http://joesaward.wor...d-sues-ferrari/

Surely they must have seen this coming?

Advertisement

#2 Bloggsworth

Bloggsworth
  • Member

  • 9,509 posts
  • Joined: April 07

Posted 09 February 2011 - 22:52

Pathetic.

#3 eoin

eoin
  • Member

  • 5,017 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 09 February 2011 - 22:54

Lets see:

Nobody in the US knows about F1, and nobody outside of the US knows about "The Ford F150, the best selling 'car' in America"... so what's the problem?!

Edited by eoin, 09 February 2011 - 22:55.


#4 Szoelloe

Szoelloe
  • Member

  • 7,054 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 09 February 2011 - 22:57

Lets see:

Nobody in the US knows about F1, and nobody outside of the US knows about "The Ford F150, the best selling 'car' in America"... so what's the problem?!

LOL, that is about correct. Storm in a cup of tea.


#5 Amphicar

Amphicar
  • Member

  • 2,842 posts
  • Joined: December 10

Posted 09 February 2011 - 22:58

Payback time for Enzo Ferrari's refusal to sell the company to Ford back in 1963 perhaps?

#6 Slartibartfast

Slartibartfast
  • Paddock Club Host

  • 10,343 posts
  • Joined: March 08

Posted 09 February 2011 - 22:58

Ford claims that it has suffered irreparable harm to its F-150 trademark

Because people might confuse the two and not buy a Ford pick-up thinking that they won't be able to insure it? It has lousy cargo capacity? No ground clearance?

#7 Scudetto

Scudetto
  • Member

  • 8,229 posts
  • Joined: May 01

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:02

Ford also wants damages and is asking for Ferrari to give up any revenue and profits earned in the U.S. through the use of the F150 name.


Yes, Ferrari surely made boat loads of cash by confusing hapless Americans that the sleek, open cockpit, open wheeled race car was actually Ford's latest ranch-hand hauler.

American though I may be, there's no confusing the two.

#8 Slowinfastout

Slowinfastout
  • Member

  • 9,681 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:05

I'm getting confused with the way Ferrari is naming their cars, so if Ford can make the F150 F1 a F11 with its F-150, it's all good.

#9 Yolandy

Yolandy
  • Member

  • 168 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:05

Though I wouldn't confuse the two, the font of Ferrari's F150 logo really looks similar with Ford's F-150.

#10 Bloggsworth

Bloggsworth
  • Member

  • 9,509 posts
  • Joined: April 07

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:12

Audi took Maserati to court for calling their car the Quattroporte - The Judge pointed out that no company could own the number 4 and tossed it out of court...

#11 vtpachyderm

vtpachyderm
  • Member

  • 1,112 posts
  • Joined: February 01

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:13

I can actually sympathize with Ford on this one. Bit cheeky of Ferrari to use that moniker, esp. considering how big a market the US is for Ferrari. FWIW, I hear F150 on anything automotive, I think of the truck. Yes, my wife is coming to the horrible realization that my time spent studying in the US has made me a redneck :p

#12 Taxi

Taxi
  • Member

  • 5,246 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:14

lol. texas farmer rovolution, now!

#13 RSNS

RSNS
  • Member

  • 1,521 posts
  • Joined: June 02

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:16

I can actually sympathize with Ford on this one. Bit cheeky of Ferrari to use that moniker, esp. considering how big a market the US is for Ferrari. FWIW, I hear F150 on anything automotive, I think of the truck. Yes, my wife is coming to the horrible realization that my time spent studying in the US has made me a redneck :p


Peugeot 908... Is that going to court, too? Pathetic, I think.

#14 baddog

baddog
  • Member

  • 30,533 posts
  • Joined: June 99

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:17

Ferrari do not sell a product called an F150 do they? I think Ford are overreaching here..

#15 freya

freya
  • Member

  • 1,585 posts
  • Joined: November 10

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:24

Does Ford know it's a race car with a total number of 5 built? I hope so, because that text makes ford kind look like idiots. Why would ferrari care if they can't sell their billion dollar technology prototype in US or not.

#16 armchair expert

armchair expert
  • Member

  • 1,936 posts
  • Joined: October 99

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:25

Payback time for Enzo Ferrari's refusal to sell the company to Ford back in 1963 perhaps?


I think the payback was called 'GT40' and a few LeMans 24 hour wins.

#17 ch103

ch103
  • Member

  • 2,040 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:26

would ferrari sue if Ford made the F60?

#18 RoutariEnjinu

RoutariEnjinu
  • Member

  • 2,442 posts
  • Joined: March 09

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:31

One is a chassis code for a racing car that cannot be bought nor used on the road, the other is an easy to manufacture low technology type of vehicle bought primarily in one country by people with self image issues.

Sounds like Ford want publicity.

#19 DarthRonzo

DarthRonzo
  • Member

  • 804 posts
  • Joined: September 10

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:33

Ferrari do not sell a product called an F150 do they? I think Ford are overreaching here..

Ever heard of Maisto and Revell  ;)

Advertisement

#20 LB

LB
  • Member

  • 13,813 posts
  • Joined: February 01

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:34

One is a chassis code for a racing car that cannot be bought nor used on the road, the other is an easy to manufacture low technology type of vehicle bought primarily in one country by people with self image issues.

Sounds like Ford want publicity.


Not sure which is the ferrari there.;)

#21 Slowinfastout

Slowinfastout
  • Member

  • 9,681 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:42

Not sure which is the ferrari there.;)


how about these two:

General Dynamics F-111
Posted Image

Team HRT F1 F111
Posted Image

Expecting money from HRT is like suing your chair I guess though..

#22 rolf123

rolf123
  • Member

  • 2,417 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:45

One is a chassis code for a racing car that cannot be bought nor used on the road, the other is an easy to manufacture low technology type of vehicle bought primarily in one country by people with self image issues.

Sounds like Ford want publicity.


Hit the nail on the head. It's just a chassis number.

Though if it's used on marketing materials....I dunno what happens.


#23 Touti

Touti
  • Member

  • 341 posts
  • Joined: September 03

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:48

Q: How do you get the world to talk about your company without investing millions in a worldwide campaign ?
A: You sue Ferrari



#24 HAM

HAM
  • Member

  • 531 posts
  • Joined: November 10

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:51

Ford has the right. The F-150 name is a trademark. The Ferrari lawyers should know better, even our pets saw this coming.

Ferrari sues a lot of people incl. fans who use the Ferrari sign for their Ferrari fan-websites so now they know how it feels to get sued themselves.

Edited by HAM, 09 February 2011 - 23:51.


#25 undersquare

undersquare
  • Member

  • 18,929 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 09 February 2011 - 23:52

Because people might confuse the two and not buy a Ford pick-up thinking that they won't be able to insure it? It has lousy cargo capacity? No ground clearance?


:lol:

Very amusing story, too. $100k damages :drunk:


#26 Scorg

Scorg
  • Member

  • 2,693 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 10 February 2011 - 00:01

back in 91, Porsche was going to sue an F1 team over a numbering used at the cars model number.
That being the Jordan 911, or as we came to know it as the 191, but the difference here was, Porsche were good enough to say "hey, we do not much like you using that number that matches our most popular model, if you could just so happen to change it, we would be ever so happy, oh btw, Eddie, would you like a free 911??" and something like that happened, never got to court.


Although I get the feeling that by offering an F150 to change the model number name, ferrari may not be too interested......

#27 ch103

ch103
  • Member

  • 2,040 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 10 February 2011 - 00:03

Ford has the right. The F-150 name is a trademark. The Ferrari lawyers should know better, even our pets saw this coming.

Ferrari sues a lot of people incl. fans who use the Ferrari sign for their Ferrari fan-websites so now they know how it feels to get sued themselves.


:up:

#28 JustinCider

JustinCider
  • Member

  • 836 posts
  • Joined: August 10

Posted 10 February 2011 - 00:06

Peugeot 908... Is that going to court, too? Pathetic, I think.


As it happens, Peugot hold the rights to sue any other car manufacturer who uses a three digit designation with the middle digit being zero. Bizzare.

#29 trogggy

trogggy
  • Member

  • 9,216 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 10 February 2011 - 00:18

As it happens, Peugot hold the rights to sue any other car manufacturer who uses a three digit designation with the middle digit being zero. Bizzare.

The right to sue doesn't sound like much of a right. :confused:

#30 Barky

Barky
  • Member

  • 67 posts
  • Joined: November 09

Posted 10 February 2011 - 00:21

Posted Image

:smoking:


#31 r4mses

r4mses
  • Member

  • 2,430 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 10 February 2011 - 00:26

back in 91, Porsche was going to sue an F1 team over a numbering used at the cars model number.
That being the Jordan 911, or as we came to know it as the 191, but the difference here was, Porsche were good enough to say "hey, we do not much like you using that number that matches our most popular model, if you could just so happen to change it, we would be ever so happy, oh btw, Eddie, would you like a free 911??" and something like that happened, never got to court.


Although I get the feeling that by offering an F150 to change the model number name, ferrari may not be too interested......


As it happens, Peugot hold the rights to sue any other car manufacturer who uses a three digit designation with the middle digit being zero. Bizzare.


That's the reason the "Porsche 911" is called "911". First it was "901" but since Peugeot holds the rights mentioned above, Porsche switched the 0 with a 1.

#32 legardP45

legardP45
  • Member

  • 78 posts
  • Joined: January 11

Posted 10 February 2011 - 00:32

Ford has the right. The F-150 name is a trademark. The Ferrari lawyers should know better, even our pets saw this coming.

Ferrari sues a lot of people incl. fans who use the Ferrari sign for their Ferrari fan-websites so now they know how it feels to get sued themselves.


Pretty mean spirited. I know these companies have to continually be seen to defend their copyrights and all that. Personally I think the whole thing's daft, but ford have money, ferrari have money, so I'm going to pull up a chair; away you go lads, fight!!


#33 Nemo29E

Nemo29E
  • Member

  • 124 posts
  • Joined: November 10

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:19

Seems very petty, I don't see it causing major problems for Ford as its hardly going to confuse any one as they such different vehicles..

#34 shaggy

shaggy
  • Member

  • 1,661 posts
  • Joined: March 99

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:37

Trademark is trademark.
Doesn't Ford have to fight this so as not to set a bad precedent ?

If Ferrari does not want its logo being used by others, maybe Ford does not want its best-selling vehicle's designation being used by others.

Maybe Ford is overreaching, but Ferrari should have known better, too

#35 V8 Fireworks

V8 Fireworks
  • Member

  • 10,824 posts
  • Joined: June 06

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:44

http://joesaward.wor...d-sues-ferrari/

Surely they must have seen this coming?

:lol:

Look Le Mans and ownership attempt is not so long ago :cool:

They are annoyed at private owner of "GT40" badge, therefore don't like Ferrari putting their famous truck name on an F1 car.


Unfortunately, Ford US gives you "Fusion" - Ford Europe gives you "Mondeo". Cars that are the same size, but completely different - seemingly a decision of "very smart people" ;). Only the latter has recently involved itself in F1, with the Jordan team. The other is perhaps not so interested and so it is this they decide to do...

Edited by V8 Fireworks, 10 February 2011 - 01:44.


#36 V8 Fireworks

V8 Fireworks
  • Member

  • 10,824 posts
  • Joined: June 06

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:47

how about these two:

General Dynamics F-111
Posted Image

Team HRT F1 F111
Posted Image

Expecting money from HRT is like suing your chair I guess though..

One is old, one is new.

One is worth $20m at least.

One is made up of an old GP2 car, modified with gaffa tape.

#37 Lee Nicolle

Lee Nicolle
  • Member

  • 11,284 posts
  • Joined: July 08

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:48

I saw the Ferrari F150 thread this morning and though Ford are not going to be happy.
Pretty dumb naming a race car after a very well known commercial.
And yes Ferrarl like to sue so they will get trhere own back. Very Dumb!

#38 brucemoxon

brucemoxon
  • Member

  • 1,056 posts
  • Joined: December 04

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:53

I'm sure Sniff Petrol will have fun with this, anyway.



Bruce Moxon

#39 V8 Fireworks

V8 Fireworks
  • Member

  • 10,824 posts
  • Joined: June 06

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:58

the other is an easy to manufacture low technology type of vehicle

If it's so easy why does F150 sales > Dodge whatever it's called sales?

Surely in a week, FIAT can have their two bobs at Chrysler HQ and crush Ford and their crappy American designed model. :rolleyes:

Advertisement

#40 Nobody

Nobody
  • Member

  • 3,507 posts
  • Joined: January 07

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:58

One is made up of an old GP2 car, modified with gaffa tape.


Yeah but the terrain-following radar (TFR) is still pretty good


#41 bourbon

bourbon
  • Member

  • 7,265 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 10 February 2011 - 01:59

Ferrari's "random" decision to go with the F150 instead of say...the F11, well, you know - Ford prolly didn't see it as random. And they prolly don't think it will cause any confusion until the first race occurs in which a Ferrari engine blows and, well, the headline is:

"F150 Engine Failure leaves engineers scratching heads"

Edited by bourbon, 10 February 2011 - 01:59.


#42 fabr68

fabr68
  • Member

  • 3,963 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:01

If anything, Ford should pay Ferrari some royalties.

Only on their dreams the people who buy a POS truck would see it running like a Formula 1 car.

#43 WhiteBlue

WhiteBlue
  • Member

  • 2,188 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:13

I believe the web site has caused most of the trouble. The F1 car will not really collide with Fords trade mark I think. It is sufficiently distanced. The web site has a global reach and Ferrari could be using it as a precedence if they ever wanted to market an F150 product in America. They are probably a bit paranoid and over reactive but that is not unusual in the American legal world.

#44 evo

evo
  • Member

  • 431 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:16

what does Ford's F-150 model designation stand for?

Ferrari's F150 is a commeration of Italian significance 150yrs ago.

So this is what Ford does with taxpayers money? Suing for trademark infringement is going to be their latest and greatest revenue stream?

I, for one, would rather see the potential spat Group Lotus may have with Team Lotus over the "T128" chassis designation. At least that has some substance.

#45 IFRLIceman

IFRLIceman
  • Member

  • 268 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:34

So this is what Ford does with taxpayers money?

Ford didn't take the taxpayer's money. They saw it came with strings attached and decided to go a different route.

Ford has had that name trademarked for years...

#46 Scudetto

Scudetto
  • Member

  • 8,229 posts
  • Joined: May 01

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:35

Ferrari's "random" decision to go with the F150 instead of say...the F11, well, you know - Ford prolly didn't see it as random. And they prolly don't think it will cause any confusion until the first race occurs in which a Ferrari engine blows and, well, the headline is:

"F150 Engine Failure leaves engineers scratching heads"


When was the last time there was an F1 related headline in a market where the Ford F-150 is sold?

#47 Seanspeed

Seanspeed
  • Member

  • 21,814 posts
  • Joined: October 08

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:36

The American way:

"It really doesn't affect me in the least, but I might be able to make some money out of it....."

:down:

#48 dofe

dofe
  • New Member

  • 15 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:51

Under U.S. trademark law, failure to enforce a trademark in the event of infringement exposes the mark owner to potential loss of mark ownership. This is why Ford is suing (and the reason why companies like Disney are so quick to sue potential trademark violators).

Hiring lawyers is not cheap: the idea that Ford is suing to make some money is silly to say the least.

#49 V8 Fireworks

V8 Fireworks
  • Member

  • 10,824 posts
  • Joined: June 06

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:56

Yeah but the terrain-following radar (TFR) is still pretty good

:rotfl:

#50 V8 Fireworks

V8 Fireworks
  • Member

  • 10,824 posts
  • Joined: June 06

Posted 10 February 2011 - 02:58

The American way:

"It really doesn't affect me in the least, but I might be able to make some money out of it....."

:down:

They need to protect the trademark.

Say you launch a Seanspeed SG, short for Seanspeed Guitar (yes like automatic teller machine machine). Now this is a hollow acoustic ukulele not a 6-string `solid guitar' electric.

Do you think this ok, as no one could possibly confuse it with a Gibson SG ???

Edited by V8 Fireworks, 10 February 2011 - 03:00.