
Coventry-Climax pump
#1
Posted 08 May 2011 - 18:31
Advertisement
#2
Posted 08 May 2011 - 18:57
#3
Posted 08 May 2011 - 21:37
I should think that monetary value would be higher for automotive use, while the pump could be sold separately. Not that we're actually about money here.
#4
Posted 08 May 2011 - 22:15
The FW had a capacity of 1020cc, the FWA was 1098cc - Whether the FWA was a bored out FW I don't know, but someone here will......... I'm just starting the stop-watch!
#5
Posted 09 May 2011 - 00:00
If you consider the head as the top end and the rest as the bottom end from what I can see the differences are:-
1020 has no provision for an oil cooler/filter - the FWA 1100 gets over that by taking the pump outlet external to the block through a simple drilling with a male union supported by 2 bolts through the lower block case for an oil pipe from the oil pump and about 6 inches forward of that the same arrangement to take the now external oil supply back into the block and piped from there to the vertical gallery. By doing this you can then put whatever you like in the external section, strangely my engine just had a simple rubber hose joining the two unions so it ran without a filter in its last installation, but I did get an oil cooler with it, so it did run that at one stage. It will have a filter in the line when it goes back into the car.
Except for this the blocks look the same, not sure if you need to bore the block to fit the 1100 liners to replace the 1020 ones, but that would be a simple process for a machine shop.
Obviously the crank, rods, oil pump, pistons and liners all need to be changed in the conversion, the 1020 crank is the right throw but is only cast iron and I think would not last long if high revs were used. The FW1020 and FWB1460 that were built as firepump engines have small (2/3rds size) oil pump gears in a small and unuseable housing for auto work. The oil pump in its entirety needs to be changed to a full size auto type.
The liners in the FWA have little reliefs cut into the top section to allow for valve lift and the pistons have eyebrow pockets for the same reason.
The FWB block is a different casting and has a boss on the side to attach an external oil filter directly to the block itself. FWB blocks were of course the basis for the Elite engine using an FWA crank to get from 1460cc to 1213 cc and into the under 1300cc class. To convert an FWB to a road engine is quite a simple task compared with the earlier block.
The head for the 1020 is really not useable, the ports and valve sizes are quite small and it has no provision for mounting the generator. Some late 1020 heads may have had these items cast in, but the small valve sizes means a lot of fettling to get them to car specs. . However quite a percentage of heads from the FWB pump engines do have these items cast into them, and do use the FWA / FWB / FWE valve sizes.
Have attached a couple of photos showing how the FWA gets its oil supply external so that ancilliaries can be used.
It is quite ironic that this thread has started at this time, as I literally started work on the engine pulling it apart yesterday. and took a lot of photos of it as I am very interested in the very subject of the differences myself. I have to say though, that I may stand corrected in my views above, these are my observations and knowledge through what I have read, but I am no expert in these engines. It will be interesting to see what others say as time goes on.
Ed



Edited by ed holly, 09 May 2011 - 00:10.
#6
Posted 09 May 2011 - 00:14
About all you can use from the firepump for a racing engine is the block. You can make that block into a 1220cc of course. Lovely, simple engines to work on, you just have to make sure you get the shimming of the liners right. In the seventies I had shelves full of these engines and parts.
#7
Posted 09 May 2011 - 07:12
#8
Posted 09 May 2011 - 15:38
But to answer the question on whats useable from the pump motors... the block, timing cover, cam cover, cam carrier (if you want to retain the 3 bearing cam), tappets, shims, valve keepers (need slight machinging to accept Isky springs), jack shaft, water pump, water outlets/inlets, and some minor other items. To convert one properly you would need the following: FWB or higher spec con rods, FWA/B oil pump, FWA/B cylinder head (or a machine shop and lots of $$$ to convert your pump head), liners and pistons (FWA/B/E sizes), distributor, steel timing gear, crank pulley, forged crankshaft, engine backplate, rear main seal housing and seal, automotive use oil pan, oil line fittings/hoses/oil filter/oil cooler, plus other small odds and ends (center main cap strap etc).
#9
Posted 09 May 2011 - 16:44
I've converted a pump to a street use engine.
To install in a Lotus Eleven clone that he built-from scratch! Very nice job.
I would add that the three bearing cam carrier can be converted to five bearing by a reasonably competent machinist by making split bearing blocks out of aluminium, machining flat spots on the carrier at the appropriate spacing, and bolting the bearing blocks in place, machining bearing surfaces on the cam and drilling through to the oil passageway. Bearing inserts are not required-it works well.
#10
Posted 09 May 2011 - 16:56
I feel like I have just taken a night school class in FWA engine building. Outstanding knowledge Gentlemen, I think I will encourage him to retain it as a functioning pump unit, you never know, the way the climate is going it could be worth more as a pump than a race engine. It may one day save our toys from the advancing flood waters, now as a back up plan what did I do with that Guzzi.......
Edited by AbingdonST, 09 May 2011 - 16:58.
#11
Posted 09 May 2011 - 17:04
Des Hammill COVENTRY CLIMAX Racing Engines (Veloce 2004).
As he describes the various FW types, one can see the differences between the types and the development (not all of course)..
Best regards Michael
#12
Posted 09 May 2011 - 17:26
I can only recommend:
Des Hammill COVENTRY CLIMAX Racing Engines (Veloce 2004).
As he describes the various FW types, one can see the differences between the types and the development (not all of course)..
Best regards Michael
Many thanks, will get my friend Simon to read it, then he can decide what is best for the motor. Still leaning toward retaining as a pump.
#13
Posted 09 May 2011 - 19:14
Roderick's Coventry Climax slideshow
#14
Posted 10 May 2011 - 05:51
Here's a brief slideshow of my pump motor, if anyone is interested:
Roderick's Coventry Climax slideshow
Well done! Will you be bringing it to the Historic races at Mission June 11-12?
Vince H.