
Four-door 1940s what?
#1
Posted 05 July 2011 - 02:33
http://www.oldstox.c...eld skoda 1.jpg
The word "SCODA" on its door suggests a misspelled Skoda, but the closest 1940's Skoda Tudor has suicide doors at the front.
I would be grateful for any suggestions.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 05 July 2011 - 02:54
This Australian stock car looks like a 1940 Ford sedan, EXCEPT that it has an extended trunk, unlike the swoopy Ford lines.
http://www.oldstox.c...eld skoda 1.jpg
The word "SCODA" on its door suggests a misspelled Skoda, but the closest 1940's Skoda Tudor has suicide doors at the front.
I would be grateful for any suggestions.
S.C.O.D.A. stood for the Stock Car Owners and Drivers Association.
Dodge and Cadillac both did 4-doors with trunks like that, but their 'middle' side windows were not sloped like the ones on this stock car. Help?
#3
Posted 05 July 2011 - 03:59
How about a 1939 Buick?
#4
Posted 05 July 2011 - 04:30
#5
Posted 05 July 2011 - 05:56
#6
Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:28
#7
Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:33
#8
Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:55
#9
Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:56
In Australia, at the age of 17, I was fascinated by the 'Bash & Crash Game' of Stock Cars. Spurred on by my friend Col Dennis, a trucker from Wollongong, I found myself behind the wheel of his well-tuned fortified mean machine. It was an 8 cylinder Cadillac and built like a fortress (Later, I was 'relegated' to a Scoda, as pictured). The roar of the crowd and the smell of racing fuel filled me with an excitement that followed me to England. However, after I had reached fame as a singing star, this hobby was curtailed because of the impossibility of getting insurance.
It includes another photo of the same car...
http://www.frankifie...mages/scoda.jpg
#10
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:47
It looks pretty Windsor to me. Cadillac? Or La Salle?
Definitely not 1940s. We had virtually no 1940 model cars here as we got an early start to the war. I also think the scriptwriter quoted by Michael has gone beyond his brief in referring to being 'relegated to a Scoda'. There was never, I would suggest, a Skoda used at the speedways in Sydney or Wollongong in the fifties or sixties. Too small, too light, not enough power alongside the plentiful pre-war Fords, Buicks, Terraplanes and so on.
#11
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:54
#12
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:49
Does anyone recognise the rather distinctive wheels? That may well be the clue. They are NOT Ford V8 or 30s Chev
They are Buick wheels .
I think the car is a series 80 Roadmaster 4dr sedan.1936 thru 38? Olds and Pontiac had the same bodywork. Its a GM Fisher product for sure . Cadillac didnt have the 2 piece rear window and their bodies were made by Fleetwood IIRC
Edited by Duncan Fox, 05 July 2011 - 08:52.
#13
Posted 05 July 2011 - 09:25
I don't know if Cadillac and La Salle would have been fitted with locally made bodies, but it is feasible, especially for the La Salle.
#14
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:25
#15
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:32
#16
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:35
#17
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:37
The pic would have been in the late 50s early 60s. It says on the car Frank Ifield recording and TV star and that was the period of those heavy stockcars.As Frank Ifield was born in '37, either it's a different Frank Ifield or the picture was taken sometime after 1950. He was born near Coventry, emigrated when he was 13, came back when he was 26. He recorded his first record at the age of 13 in 1950.
#18
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:38
#19
Posted 05 July 2011 - 11:42
Regarding the car, although Frank calls it a Cadillac, it is hard to match a split rear window and a high rear door hinge and sloping rear door window with a Cadillac, yet easier on a Buick 8/40 Holden bodied sedan,which were plentiful in those days.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 05 July 2011 - 13:17
I'm pretty sure Graham Clayton would have a good idea about this...
It looks pretty Windsor to me. Cadillac? Or La Salle?
Definitely not 1940s. We had virtually no 1940 model cars here as we got an early start to the war. I also think the scriptwriter quoted by Michael has gone beyond his brief in referring to being 'relegated to a Scoda'. There was never, I would suggest, a Skoda used at the speedways in Sydney or Wollongong in the fifties or sixties. Too small, too light, not enough power alongside the plentiful pre-war Fords, Buicks, Terraplanes and so on.
Right: SCODA was the Stock Car Owners and Drivers Association --- Frank would have know that himself; shrewd to suspect a "script writer"!
#21
Posted 05 July 2011 - 13:23
Why would it be a different Frank Ifield? The car is sign written "Frank Ifield TV and Recording Star" plus Frank Ifield the singer says it is him on his own website.
If I squint, yes, that's a young Ifield looking mature. BTW, I'm wonder if the photo was taken in a work yard and not at a track? Maybe that lump under the tarp is an engine block?
Many thanks for your prompt and helpful replies ---- I shall concentrate on the cars suggested.
#22
Posted 05 July 2011 - 20:43
How about a 1939 Buick?
If Buick and Cadillac were both in GM in those days, it could be either --- 1938 Buicks and Cadillacs look almost identical, and Ifield's website mentions a Cadillac at some point.
#23
Posted 05 July 2011 - 21:21
#24
Posted 05 July 2011 - 21:41
Originally posted by Dkipling1
If Buick and Cadillac were both in GM in those days, it could be either --- 1938 Buicks and Cadillacs look almost identical, and Ifield's website mentions a Cadillac at some point.
They were since about 1911...
And it might be better if you don't use funny fonts and sizes before you work out how to do it properly. Just as an aside.
TBH, I think the boot on that car is 'longer' than a Buick had.
#25
Posted 05 July 2011 - 23:34
http://www.buickclub...beb9f2f11f0fe4b
#26
Posted 06 July 2011 - 07:12
I wonder if this was the meeting that Frank drove the SCODA marked car in?
#27
Posted 06 July 2011 - 07:20
I remember seeing (circa 1961-2) Col Joye, Lucky Starr, Gary O'Callaghan and others there, I especially recall that Tom Stranger's tremendously strong '34 (or '33?) Ford coupe had one of the visitors in it.
But I think Frank Ifield's 'career' in the speedway was broader than just guest drives. One of the sites I looked at yesterday in response to this mentioned four or five different speedways.
*edit* Whoops, just found that when I click on that link it just goes to the start of the gallery. You need to set the year for 1938 and then put 2 per page, then the second car is the one that shows what we're looking at.
Edited by Ray Bell, 06 July 2011 - 07:22.
#28
Posted 06 July 2011 - 21:41
However, as David McKinney mentioned, there might well have been a Holden body influence here in Australia...
I don't know if Cadillac and La Salle would have been fitted with locally made bodies, but it is feasible, especially for the La Salle.
Ray and David
You guys were right when you said there was an Aussie influence .From the Buick club site last night I read about Holdens engineers attempts to stamp their own individuality on the product. The results (the 2 piece back window and extended trunk) show a very British influence . So they were Holden bodies, not Fisher and I presume its a 39 model.
I had always understood they were the US body assembled locally but it seems this was not until after the war
#29
Posted 06 July 2011 - 22:31
Hence.......see post #3.
#30
Posted 07 July 2011 - 01:14
Most American cars in the 30s had Australian bodies that were often quite different to the US ones. Frontal sheet metal was generally the same but then adapted to more 'generic' Holden, TJ Richards etc bodiesRay and David
You guys were right when you said there was an Aussie influence .From the Buick club site last night I read about Holdens engineers attempts to stamp their own individuality on the product. The results (the 2 piece back window and extended trunk) show a very British influence . So they were Holden bodies, not Fisher and I presume its a 39 model.
I had always understood they were the US body assembled locally but it seems this was not until after the war
#31
Posted 07 July 2011 - 01:50
The 'sloper' was an Australian oddity:
http://www.gregwapli...opers/index.htm
But other 'oddities' existed. For instance, there were 25hp Vauxhalls built with Willys bodies, while I'm sure the '39 25hp Vauxhall was all Chevrolet body with a Vauxhall (fluted) nose. What were they like in England?
#32
Posted 07 July 2011 - 02:07
Hence.......see post #3.
eh .......not quite it would seem.
I have recieved a reply to some questions I asked of the Buick site webmaster John Gerdtz, who very kindly took the time to answer me.
"Sadly there is insufficient detail in either photo to make a positive identification. What I can tell you is that the body appears to be the Holden built shared body of 1937/38. These bodies were fitted by GMH to LaSalle, Buick 8/40 & 8/60, Oldsmobile, Pontiac and Vauxhall 25's. Given that this is a stock car the body could have been fitted to any number of modified chassis as the same basic Holden body was also used on other locally assembled non GM marques.
The wheels on your subject car are positively not Buick from the body period, however they are quite a good match to those fitted to the Vauxhall that used this Holden body."
I cant believe so many cars used the same bodywork! You Aussies appear to have invented badge engineering along with mix n match.
This might also help to explain Franks "Cadillac" recollection
So Ray gets 7/10 David 5/10 Me 0/10 wagons46 eh....0/10
#33
Posted 07 July 2011 - 03:24
The Vauxhall, I am sure, used the Willys body until about '37, not sure when it changed, but when it did it changed to the Chevrolet body.
What stud patterns did the relevant cars have?
And here's a '37 Vauxhall pic that might or might not help...
#34
Posted 07 July 2011 - 04:18
I suspect most bigger assembler markets such as Oz would have used local bodys on imported chassis.
For the most part the chassis, suspension, driveline etc would have been original, Vauxhall, Buick, Caddy, Chev etc with the local body adapted to suit the chassis. Using the distictive original front sheetmetal, grille, bumper, bonnet etc.
To add to the confusion remember most US model cars were imported from Canada which had different model runs to the US. Plus some of these cars[from Oz] were exported to smaller markets either as CKD or fully assembled in different to Oz specifications.
Lets face it Holden built Ford bodies in the 20s, as did several other body builders, and they would have all had differences. And this is still a consideration even today with different specs for different markets. Only Australia exports performance cars and components to the US these days!!
#35
Posted 07 July 2011 - 07:05
When they had over 70 different types of bodies to produce in a year as Holden was doing they are going to have to take some shortcuts to keep up with the supply.I cant believe so many cars used the same bodywork! You Aussies appear to have invented badge engineering along with mix n match.