
F1 will run electric power in pitlane?
#1
Posted 05 August 2011 - 22:34
Full news - http://www.formula1o...tric-power.html
It's possible for F1? - electric power run
You will agree FIA's rules?
I think new rules is not possible for F1
Advertisement
#2
Posted 05 August 2011 - 22:56
That's why it's going to happen then?
People on forums know a hell of a lot more than technical directors it seems.
#3
Posted 05 August 2011 - 22:58
#4
Posted 05 August 2011 - 23:00
#5
Posted 06 August 2011 - 00:48
The contrast will be totally amazing if it happens.
While I don't accept Bernie's hysteria I do think some kind of audible system will need to be in place to warn people in pitlane that there are cars approaching.
#6
Posted 06 August 2011 - 01:06
already confirmed from 2014.
I bet they will change this regulation.
Edited by Gemini, 06 August 2011 - 01:10.
#7
Posted 06 August 2011 - 01:11
I bet Bernie will change this regulation.
Fixed

#8
Posted 06 August 2011 - 01:16
While I don't accept Bernie's hysteria I do think some kind of audible system will need to be in place to warn people in pitlane that there are cars approaching.
I thought there already was a horn and alarm that went off when cars entered the pit lane? (although that won't help with cars exiting a pit box as it is now, I'm sure it could be wired up to be activated by teams)
#9
Posted 06 August 2011 - 01:27
#10
Posted 06 August 2011 - 03:10
#11
Posted 06 August 2011 - 03:38
#12
Posted 06 August 2011 - 04:04
#13
Posted 06 August 2011 - 04:54

it would be ~5sec per wheel, plus movement time, going off nascar...
#14
Posted 06 August 2011 - 05:06

#15
Posted 06 August 2011 - 05:41
I thought there already was a horn and alarm that went off when cars entered the pit lane? (although that won't help with cars exiting a pit box as it is now, I'm sure it could be wired up to be activated by teams)
I think you may be right, and also I agree that it is likely to be cars exiting the pit box which pose the most danger. In fact there was a bill going before the US Congress recently to force cars that make little to no sound - ie. electric cars - to have audible sounds to alert pedestrians to their presence. Perhaps the FIA could mandate them to sound like something from The Jetsons?

Why don't we get KERS to work first?
Red Bull will never leave the pitlane...

Edited by krapmeister, 06 August 2011 - 05:43.
#16
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:34
I think you may be right, and also I agree that it is likely to be cars exiting the pit box which pose the most danger. In fact there was a bill going before the US Congress recently to force cars that make little to no sound - ie. electric cars - to have audible sounds to alert pedestrians to their presence. Perhaps the FIA could mandate them to sound like something from The Jetsons?
Red Bull will never leave the pitlane...
I can understand them needs it for road cars, but F1 cars in a pitlane?
Its a one lane environment with one way traffic with cars that are fairly large and noticable. Its not like the cars are as non-descript as a Vauxhall Corsa!*
Of course the best way to reduce the problem is to ban them from changing tyres and have a tyre war again ;)
*Disclaimer: I drive a Corsa
Edited by johnap, 06 August 2011 - 07:35.
#17
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:40
#18
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:50
Then you're out of the race. The same as if your primary engine, brakes, wheels, steering or any other component essential to compliance with the rules was to break.might have some issues refiring the cars coming out of the pits then, as hot engines arent so happy to refire up. also what happens if your kers/ters is broken?
#19
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:54
might have some issues refiring the cars coming out of the pits then, as hot engines arent so happy to refire up. also what happens if your kers/ters is broken?
It will also mean the cars will now need to carry starter motors and power to use them (unless this will come from the KERS battery as well?).
Advertisement
#20
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:06
It will also mean the cars will now need to carry starter motors and power to use them (unless this will come from the KERS battery as well?).
The new rules require the cars to have starter motors as well
#21
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:11
Yeah I know what you mean. But if some cars are going past on the pit straight how loud would it have to be?While I don't accept Bernie's hysteria I do think some kind of audible system will need to be in place to warn people in pitlane that there are cars approaching.

Especially given how deaf F1 people are.
A mega loud warning tone could sound really ugly, so I'm not sure. Maybe people will have to learn to just look.
#22
Posted 06 August 2011 - 10:15
Now on the serious note. I think its completely stupid, just as stupid as the electric starts that have been proposed. Bernie needs to get his head out of his ass long enough to smell the fresh air and let his brain run on oxygen for a change. He's starting to become senile in his old age.
#23
Posted 06 August 2011 - 10:50
I don't think Bernie's senility is the problem here but your lack of comprehensive reading might be. You do realize it's not Bernie proposing this but him opposing it?Bernie needs to get his head out of his ass long enough to smell the fresh air and let his brain run on oxygen for a change. He's starting to become senile in his old age.
Guess it's all part of the green technology image FIA are trying to give F1, I don't think it's a must do idea but can't see the problem of it lacking sound. There's already a warning sound when cars enter the pitlane but frankly you don't hear that when cars pass at speed on the straight just like you don't hear cars in the pitlane when another one is passing on race speed.
Reason Bernie opposes is probably not so much the safety reason than him looking to pick a fight with Todt.
#24
Posted 06 August 2011 - 11:17
Bernie is merely scaremongering and maximising the publicity when a F1 story is hard to come by dues to the enforced summer break, it’s a political issue of his rather than a sporting issue, and a blatant attack on the president of the FIA, who so far is doing a much better job than his best mate!
#25
Posted 06 August 2011 - 11:20
An electric engine just for pits is too complicated and expensive in my opinion, if they are going to add it, let teams use it in the race.Yeah I know what you mean. But if some cars are going past on the pit straight how loud would it have to be?
![]()
Especially given how deaf F1 people are.
A mega loud warning tone could sound really ugly, so I'm not sure. Maybe people will have to learn to just look.
It may have changed but I recall going to Estoril and there was this loud buzz that would go off everytime a car entered pitlane.
This was in the 90's but I cant see why it would be rulled out.
But Bernie's excuse is a bit odd, isnt pitlane a reserved area already? Im sure people who are in pitlane must be constantly reminded to be alert and avoid dive acts like in Canada.
Edited by Red17, 06 August 2011 - 11:28.
#26
Posted 06 August 2011 - 11:25
The noise helps in situational awareness. The noise acts as a cue. No one can be constantly 360ovigilant, you simply tire out after a few minutes. A car pulling away from a pit stop silently is more dangerous than a noisy car.Im sure people who are in pitlane must be constantly reminded to be alert and avoid dive acts like in Canada.
This whole electric/hybrid thing is stupid.
#27
Posted 06 August 2011 - 11:29
Yeah I know what you mean. But if some cars are going past on the pit straight how loud would it have to be?
![]()
Especially given how deaf F1 people are.
A mega loud warning tone could sound really ugly, so I'm not sure. Maybe people will have to learn to just look.
People should be paying attention. I was discussing this in F1's green future thread. However there are reasonable tones that can be used and should be quite audible when you consider that the pitlane would not have engines running. I seen a video of V8 Supercars where their warning signal was kind of like a phone ringing.
Edited by Secretariat, 06 August 2011 - 11:30.
#28
Posted 06 August 2011 - 11:57
Force all the teams to run a reliable KERS, i guess.what is the point of this?
#29
Posted 06 August 2011 - 14:00
The only really good thing about these rules is that they will be able to restart the engine using the MGU. But anti-stall usually takes care of this problem anyway.
Nothing is confirmed in F1. Especially rules that are presented as a "draft" or "proposal".already confirmed from 2014.
For sure. They use such systems in motorcycle racing.While I don't accept Bernie's hysteria I do think some kind of audible system will need to be in place to warn people in pitlane that there are cars approaching.
I have a better idea - let every driver record their own engine sound:Perhaps the FIA could mandate them to sound like something from The Jetsons?
#30
Posted 06 August 2011 - 14:08
I have a better idea - let every driver record their own engine sound:
Yes, this is the answer! They must have a loudspeaker fitted the same as a cop car, and they have to do their own car noises into the microphone in their helmet

#31
Posted 06 August 2011 - 15:23
Yes, this is the answer! They must have a loudspeaker fitted the same as a cop car, and they have to do their own car noises into the microphone in their helmet
Too bad Montoya isn't in F1 anymore. His sound effects could have epic potential.

#32
Posted 06 August 2011 - 15:29
Maybe you should go back and actually read the article.Well I think it will make the sport more interesting. Hey hey, hold your horses, don't sharpen your swords before I finish. At least we'll start seeing more pitlane fires from overheating electrics. Might even see a driver get electrocuted to death. And people said Bernie doesn't know how to liven up the show. He's not only living it up with this, he'll even light it up, and a few drivers with it...literally.
Now on the serious note. I think its completely stupid, just as stupid as the electric starts that have been proposed. Bernie needs to get his head out of his ass long enough to smell the fresh air and let his brain run on oxygen for a change. He's starting to become senile in his old age.

#33
Posted 06 August 2011 - 21:06
I'd like to see this sort of technology make its way into F1, even in some small, almost insignificant role. Hope's pit-lane system would be a great route to nessel into, only issue would be to make sure the system reliable.
#34
Posted 06 August 2011 - 21:16
Interesting.Hope Racing tried a hybrid system at Le Mans this year, which meant they were only powered by electricity down pit-lane. They had a lot teething troubles early on (Hybrid teams had to perform a shakedown during the April tests, where the car's had to travel the length of the pit-lane solely on hybrid power, Hope failed their first test.) but managed to get the system working for the event. Not only that but it actually worked well.
I'd like to see this sort of technology make its way into F1, even in some small, almost insignificant role. Hope's pit-lane system would be a great route to nessel into, only issue would be to make sure the system reliable.
I think it would be fun.
#35
Posted 06 August 2011 - 23:12
Force all the teams to run a reliable KERS, i guess.
ah, ok. but a more reliable KERS system does not mean a more efficient (and useful) KERS system, right?
surely if they simply raise the max power contribution (2014?) it would be enough to force usage.
#36
Posted 06 August 2011 - 23:21
Now, people arguing that electric cars (for the street) should make an artificial sound to alert pedestrians of their presence are probable the same kind of people that get in front of cyclists and joggers because they can't be bothered looking where they're going. Well, considering it's America, they probably physically can't look where they're going

#37
Posted 06 August 2011 - 23:34
#38
Posted 06 August 2011 - 23:43
ah, ok. but a more reliable KERS system does not mean a more efficient (and useful) KERS system, right?
An unreliable KERS is pretty useless. It's an image thing really, to show F1 is capable moving with the times.
#39
Posted 06 August 2011 - 23:47
Advertisement
#40
Posted 07 August 2011 - 05:37
Hope Racing tried a hybrid system at Le Mans this year, which meant they were only powered by electricity down pit-lane. They had a lot teething troubles early on (Hybrid teams had to perform a shakedown during the April tests, where the car's had to travel the length of the pit-lane solely on hybrid power, Hope failed their first test.) but managed to get the system working for the event. Not only that but it actually worked well.
I'd like to see this sort of technology make its way into F1, even in some small, almost insignificant role. Hope's pit-lane system would be a great route to nessel into, only issue would be to make sure the system reliable.
Didn't realise that hybrids were onyl supposed to use electrical power in the pitlane at Le Mans - cheers for that

I certainly don't have an issue with using electric power only, as long as it doesn't make it any riskier for those in pitlane...
Now, people arguing that electric cars (for the street) should make an artificial sound to alert pedestrians of their presence are
probable the same kind of people that get in front of cyclists and joggers because they can't be bothered looking where they're going. Well, considering it's America, they probably physically can't look where they're going
Umm... blind and/or visually impaired people? Hello?
Edited by krapmeister, 07 August 2011 - 05:45.
#41
Posted 07 August 2011 - 05:45
I don't think F1 will tolerate races being ruined by that, if the engines fail to restart a couple of times or if any of the big teams can't make it out of the pits more than once.
For us it's gonna be bizarre watching the cars get out of the box slowly and silently...lol
Personally I'm not a big fan of it, what's the next step after that you reckon?
#42
Posted 07 August 2011 - 05:50
#43
Posted 07 August 2011 - 06:58
Technically it's a massive challenge, so much that I wouldn't be surprised to see the rules being changed.
I don't think F1 will tolerate races being ruined by that, if the engines fail to restart a couple of times or if any of the big teams can't make it out of the pits more than once.
For us it's gonna be bizarre watching the cars get out of the box slowly and silently...lol
Personally I'm not a big fan of it, what's the next step after that you reckon?
What makes you think they will get out of the box slowly?
#44
Posted 07 August 2011 - 07:26
What makes you think they will get out of the box slowly?
How many horsepower are we talking about? I don't remember who it was, but someone mentioned there would not be enough power to spin the tires, Scarbs maybe.. (?)
But even then, that's not the biggest issue. To carry the car around the whole pitlane is the issue. And since the KERS output are supposed to be greater, it means it affects the normal race pace and strategy even more. It may mean having to carry around a bigger battery pack than you may need for normal usage, it means not using KERS for a period of time before pitting, etc..
There are so many unknowns and new things to figure out about it, I'm not seeing F1 suddenly adopting that from one season to the next.. we see F1 as cutting edge but it's actually pretty conservative in a strange way.
There's too many ways to get burned with that one, it could easily ruin a team, even a top one, if they don't get on top of it.. and for that reason alone I predict the rules will be changed.
(obviously Bernie has also openly said it will get changed but I tried to avoid that while forming my opinion.)
#45
Posted 07 August 2011 - 08:03
How many horsepower are we talking about? I don't remember who it was, but someone mentioned there would not be enough power to spin the tires, Scarbs maybe.. (?)
700 kg racecar, doing 120 kph in pitlane... About 30 horsepower should be more than enough.;)
#46
Posted 07 August 2011 - 08:04
#47
Posted 07 August 2011 - 08:39

I think it would look undramatic at any given moment to have the car at 20% of it's maximum propelling power, at best, but that wasn't the point.
#48
Posted 07 August 2011 - 09:58
I don't think it's that much of a technical challenge, to be classified as a hybrid for Le Mans cars need to be able to travel the length of the pit-lane on electric power so I'd expect F1 to manage too.Technically it's a massive challenge, so much that I wouldn't be surprised to see the rules being changed.
Ironically iirc Le Mans hybrids didn't have to use it during the race because the ACO like Bernie, deemed it too dangerous having cars run in the pit-lane without noise.
Of-course during Le Mans we're talking about 50+ stands and more pit-stops.
I think it's a way to boost the green image of F1 if that's deemed essential by the powers that be but I'm rather indifferent about it.
#49
Posted 07 August 2011 - 11:14
I don't think it's that much of a technical challenge, to be classified as a hybrid for Le Mans cars need to be able to travel the length of the pit-lane on electric power so I'd expect F1 to manage too.
Ironically iirc Le Mans hybrids didn't have to use it during the race because the ACO like Bernie, deemed it too dangerous having cars run in the pit-lane without noise.
Of-course during Le Mans we're talking about 50+ stands and more pit-stops.
I think it's a way to boost the green image of F1 if that's deemed essential by the powers that be but I'm rather indifferent about it.
That's a bit too simplistic for my taste. Red Bull F1 were anal about packaging to the point of having a nearly non-working KERS.
If you tell them they have to run one pitlane with one KERS to get the idiots off their back for the season, they'll figure out a way.
Hi BTW, lost the old password again?
#50
Posted 07 August 2011 - 11:16
How many horsepower are we talking about? I don't remember who it was, but someone mentioned there would not be enough power to spin the tires, Scarbs maybe.. (?)
But even then, that's not the biggest issue. To carry the car around the whole pitlane is the issue. And since the KERS output are supposed to be greater, it means it affects the normal race pace and strategy even more. It may mean having to carry around a bigger battery pack than you may need for normal usage, it means not using KERS for a period of time before pitting, etc..
There are so many unknowns and new things to figure out about it, I'm not seeing F1 suddenly adopting that from one season to the next.. we see F1 as cutting edge but it's actually pretty conservative in a strange way.
There's too many ways to get burned with that one, it could easily ruin a team, even a top one, if they don't get on top of it.. and for that reason alone I predict the rules will be changed.
(obviously Bernie has also openly said it will get changed but I tried to avoid that while forming my opinion.)
I don't see the technical challenge being too much for F1 - well, apart from RBR perhaps...

Not too bothered about how fast they leave the pitbox, because it's unlikely that they will crawl away - and the cars only have to get up to the pitlane speed limit anyway.
You could however argue about the cost of it at a time that F1 teams are trying to supposedly reduce their spend, and whether it actually brings anything to the racing for the additional cost.