
Auto Union 2-stage superchargers
#1
Posted 21 October 2011 - 13:31
Muller's car at the French GP definitely had the right hand intake trumpet, as did Nuvolari's at the German GP.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 21 October 2011 - 14:06
#3
Posted 21 October 2011 - 15:12
#4
Posted 21 October 2011 - 15:45
That's what it says in Kirchberg's "Grand Prix Report: Auto Union 1934-39", which includes three pictures of cars all numbered 4 - front and back views - two are unidentified, but I'd guess both of those are from the German GP. The third is from Belgrade where, according to the post-race technical report, both cars which ran were Doppelkompressor.I've always assumed that the trunking on the right-hand side meant two-stage supercharging.
#5
Posted 21 October 2011 - 17:01
#6
Posted 21 October 2011 - 17:26
That is very interesting because it contradicts the frequently made assertion that the new engine first appeared at Reims. However, a caption in Monkhouse's Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix racing says that Nuvolari had it at the Eiffelrennen!At the Belgium GP it seems that Nuvolari had the two stage supercharged engine.
Monkhouse also says that Caracciola's Mercedes had two stage supercharging at Livorno in 1938, but I hope we can ignore that.
Edited by Roger Clark, 21 October 2011 - 17:27.
#7
Posted 21 October 2011 - 17:35
One might ask what evidence is there that single-stage was used at all in 1939, and if so why as there would not be any advantage once a two-stage system had been designed, built and proven.
#8
Posted 21 October 2011 - 17:43
Again without research, I think I remember that the M154 had two blowers and that might have misled Monkhouse into a mistake.Monkhouse also says that Caracciola's Mercedes had two stage supercharging at Livorno in 1938, but I hope we can ignore that.
#9
Posted 21 October 2011 - 18:27
The Nixon Auto Union Album has a photo showing the start of the Eifelrennen, and Nuvolari's car clearly has no trunking. However, as AU took six cars to the Ring (there's a photo showing all six) perhaps one of the cars might have been fitted with the new engine and tried in practice.That is very interesting because it contradicts the frequently made assertion that the new engine first appeared at Reims. However, a caption in Monkhouse's Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix racing says that Nuvolari had it at the Eiffelrennen!
#10
Posted 21 October 2011 - 18:42
Availability is the answer to that.Without doing a lot of research I can say that most of what one reads implies that two-stage blowing was the 1939 standard.
One might ask what evidence is there that single-stage was used at all in 1939, and if so why as there would not be any advantage once a two-stage system had been designed, built and proven.
Quicksilver Century says that Mercedes' system first appeared in Lang's car at the Eifelrennen and in other cars from the next race, the Belgian GP. Knowing Karl Ludvigsen's access to Daimler-Benz archives I think we can be confident that he is correct, particularly as he says that the new engine was not ready for Pau, nor for von Brauchitsch's car in the Eifelrennen.
With Auto Union, we don't have the same level of information, but most sources say that two stage supercharging first appeared at the French Grand Prix. If we are correct in believing that the extra intake trunking indicates two stage supercharging, then Nuvolari didn't have it at the Eifelrennen.
Auto Union were always short of money in comparison with Mercedes and it seems reasonable to ask whether two stage superchargers were available on all the cars, even after they had been proven.
#11
Posted 22 October 2011 - 16:59
It is possibly easier to ascertain what cars didn't have two-stage supercharging.
In the four end of season races ( France, Germany, Switzerland and Yugoslavia ) AU entered five cars in the French and German GP's for Nuvolari , Müller , Stuck , Hasse and Meier ; four cars in the Swiss omitting Meier ; and only two in Belgrade for Nuvolari and Müller.
Hence only Nuvolari and Müller competed in all four, and in each instance were so equipped.
There is photographic evidence that Stuck's car in the German GP had it, but I have so far not found evidence that he had it in the French of Swiss though it would seem likely.
Meier's car in the French GP did not have it ( as noted earlier ) nor at the German GP along with Hasse, so it would seem likely that Hasse's car didn't have it at the earlier French GP either, which would point to only three cars having been built to that specification.
#12
Posted 22 October 2011 - 17:22
Müller drove 76011 in the race and Nuvolari 76010. However, it seems both men drove both chassis in practice. Bigalke also drove 76010 in practice.
Edited by Vitesse2, 22 October 2011 - 17:28.
#13
Posted 22 October 2011 - 19:44
#14
Posted 22 October 2011 - 22:09
#15
Posted 23 October 2011 - 05:22
Nuvolari and Muller had two stage supercharging at all races
Stuck: Reims not known, two stage in Germany and Switzerland
Hasse: Reims not known, Germany single stage, Switzerland two stage.
Meier single stage in France and Germany.
We also have Gigleux' assertion that Nuvolari had two stage supercharging at the earlier Belgian GP. May I ask the source for that?
Some more questions, to which somebody may already know the answers:
I assume that all identification was done on the existence or otherwise of the air trunking under the right hand exhausts. Some cars seem to have a lager intake above the driver's head. Was this also an indication of two stage supercharging?
What was the purpose of the two intakes? Did the feed air into the supercharger or were they for cooling purposes?
Do the replicas built in recent years have two stage superchargers?
We know that Mercedes swapped engines between cars from race to race (see the current W154 thread). Did Autu Union do the same or was the car/engine combination a fixed entity?
Did the Auto Union drivers tend to keep the same car or did they change from race to race?
#16
Posted 23 October 2011 - 06:51
DCN
#17
Posted 23 October 2011 - 08:26
... which includes the 'bulge' in the bodywork behind the exhaust on the r/h side which I assume covers the extra manifolding etc required by the two-stage configuration.I assume that all identification was done on the existence or otherwise of the air trunking under the right hand exhausts.
I don't think so. There are photos of Hasse in Belgium and Meier in France where both cars appear to be fitted with the larger intake above the driver's head.Some cars seem to have a lager intake above the driver's head. Was this also an indication of two stage supercharging?
Edited by Tim Murray, 23 October 2011 - 08:29.
#18
Posted 23 October 2011 - 09:22
Can't find a photo of the single stage installation but an air duct from behind the driver's head past the centre of the engine to the blower and its carb(s) would seem likely
#19
Posted 23 October 2011 - 09:53
The bulge was to clear the carburettor which was on the right side of the first supercharger. On the single supercharger cars it was behind the blower.... which includes the 'bulge' in the bodywork behind the exhaust on the r/h side which I assume covers the extra manifolding etc required by the two-stage configuration.
[I posted this before I saw Allan's post, but I think they're saying the same thing]
Edited by Roger Clark, 23 October 2011 - 09:55.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 23 October 2011 - 11:19
Yes indeed. It was only after Allan posted that I bestirred myself to hunt down the photos I took of the (then) Neil Corner-owned car at Shelsley in 1986, which I thought would show the single-stage supercharger layout. I'd completely forgotten that this car actually had a two-stage supercharged engine, so here are a few more photos to complement Allan's:The bulge was to clear the carburettor which was on the right side of the first supercharger. On the single supercharger cars it was behind the blower.




All photos copyright Tim Murray
Interesting that the car in Allan's photo has the duct under the exhaust but the Corner car does not.
Edited by Tim Murray, 23 October 2011 - 11:23.
#21
Posted 23 October 2011 - 11:49
According to Sheldon, the Auto Union race numbers were 2 (Nuvolari), 4 (Stuck), 6 (Muller), 8 (Hasse), and 10 (Bigalke). Only even numbers were used and Caracciola was 12. Nixon says that Meier was entered but non-started, but what number would he have had?The Nixon Auto Union Album has a photo showing the start of the Eifelrennen, and Nuvolari's car clearly has no trunking. However, as AU took six cars to the Ring (there's a photo showing all six) perhaps one of the cars might have been fitted with the new engine and tried in practice.
#22
Posted 23 October 2011 - 12:14

#23
Posted 23 October 2011 - 12:18
http://www.kolumbus....man/gp393.htm#8
#24
Posted 23 October 2011 - 15:00
We also have Gigleux' assertion that Nuvolari had two stage supercharging at the earlier Belgian GP. May I ask the source for that?
Simply because I have a picture!
For those interested by photograpic evidences of Nuvolari in the Belgium GP, Stück and Hasse in the Swiss GP, all with 2-stage supercharged engines, give me your e-mail address by the way of PMs and I'll send you scans of the pictures!
I also red that Müller too had such a device at the Belgium GP.
#25
Posted 23 October 2011 - 16:42
From official programme:According to Sheldon, the Auto Union race numbers were 2 (Nuvolari), 4 (Stuck), 6 (Muller), 8 (Hasse), and 10 (Bigalke). Only even numbers were used and Caracciola was 12. Nixon says that Meier was entered but non-started, but what number would he have had?
2 Nuvolari 4 Stuck 6 Müller 8 Meier 10 Bigalke
#26
Posted 23 October 2011 - 16:54
Clearly visible in a picture in Jean-Paul Delsaux' Belgian GP book.I also red that Müller too had such a device at the Belgium GP.
#27
Posted 23 October 2011 - 18:34
Well, that proves a lot of people wrong!Simply because I have a picture!
For those interested by photograpic evidences of Nuvolari in the Belgium GP, Stück and Hasse in the Swiss GP, all with 2-stage supercharged engines, give me your e-mail address by the way of PMs and I'll send you scans of the pictures!
I also red that Müller too had such a device at the Belgium GP.
If they had two such cars at Spa, is it possible that the spare at the Eifelrennen also had two stage supercharging? THey could have put Meier in the spare after the ex-Stuck car developed problems, but perhaps it was too new to race, as Tim Murray suggested.
#28
Posted 24 August 2012 - 08:32
Presumably that means all the work by C&G + H&H in getting it running won't matter and the only chance of seeing an original Auto-Union running is if someone finds another one or the ex-Neil Corner/Samsung car re-appears.
#29
Posted 25 August 2012 - 12:13
Yes indeed. It was only after Allan posted that I bestirred myself to hunt down the photos I took of the (then) Neil Corner-owned car at Shelsley in 1986, which I thought would show the single-stage supercharger layout. I'd completely forgotten that this car actually had a two-stage supercharged engine, so here are a few more photos to complement Allan's:
All photos copyright Tim Murray
Interesting that the car in Allan's photo has the duct under the exhaust but the Corner car does not.
Is that the top of a Hewland geaerbox I can see? if so, can we assume the car was incomplete when Neil Corner acquired it?
Steve