
Disc brake "shields"
#1
Posted 08 November 2011 - 18:41
please enlighten me: What are those sheet steel disc brake shields really for? Some road cars have them, some don't.
If you throw them away, everything works as normal, no overheating, just the same in the wet etc (as far as I have noticed)
Are they one of those parts that we have just because we had them last time or what. Must admit I have become obsessed with reducing unsprung weight and these are first on my hit-list.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 08 November 2011 - 21:00
Any road-car brake engineers out there?
please enlighten me: What are those sheet steel disc brake shields really for? Some road cars have them, some don't.
If you throw them away, everything works as normal, no overheating, just the same in the wet etc (as far as I have noticed)
Are they one of those parts that we have just because we had them last time or what. Must admit I have become obsessed with reducing unsprung weight and these are first on my hit-list.
As a former mechanic my view about that is that they are there to protect the disc from water exposure.
Once a disc is wet , which they can experience, then before any braking can occur then the disc needs to be dried. That is to say brakes won't work with water between the pad material and the disc.
Application of the brake pedal will achieve that however there is a brief delay before the brakes will have any effect. On public roads you don't want that.
I also understand that hot discs exposed to contact with water can cause warping. The older style solid disc are , I believe, more prone to this than the vented variety which have a much more rigid construction.
#3
Posted 08 November 2011 - 21:42
The other possibility i can think of is dirt shields. A lot of brake wear occurs in freeway conditions where the dirt entrained on the disc gently grinds the disc and pad away if they are in close proximity.As a former mechanic my view about that is that they are there to protect the disc from water exposure.
Once a disc is wet , which they can experience, then before any braking can occur then the disc needs to be dried. That is to say brakes won't work with water between the pad material and the disc.
Application of the brake pedal will achieve that however there is a brief delay before the brakes will have any effect. On public roads you don't want that.
#4
Posted 08 November 2011 - 22:15
#5
Posted 08 November 2011 - 22:20
#6
Posted 08 November 2011 - 22:23
Any road-car brake engineers out there?
please enlighten me: What are those sheet steel disc brake shields really for? Some road cars have them, some don't.
To prevent biggish objects like rocks and gravel from getting lodged between the rotor and caliper.
On many vehicles they also have a cooling function in that they are designed into the the air management system around the rotors -- conceivably, by removing them you could spoil the airflow pattern through the rotors and produce overheating.
#7
Posted 09 November 2011 - 11:49
#8
Posted 09 November 2011 - 12:50
For the more exotically equiped drivers a comment during the Spanish MotoGP round revealed that shields are sometimes used on MotoGP bikes to keep carbon discs up to operating temperature in cold conditions.
#9
Posted 11 November 2011 - 04:53
#10
Posted 12 November 2011 - 01:10
Brake squealing has nothing to do with warped discs, that s glazing pure and simple. A warped disc pulsates, and gets worse the hotter it gets.
Think about basic pysics when it comes to water on a rotor. Those sheilds are there to keep out dirt and mud.
For a city car take them off, they do little apart from hold some residual heat, which in traffic may be an advantage with some pad material. But stop the air flow at the other end of the scale of motoring
#11
Posted 12 November 2011 - 12:16
Also, rotors don't really "warp" in the conventional sense. It's possible but exceedingly rare. What really happens is buildup aka pad deposition. Friction material is fused to the surface of the rotor in non-uniform patterns, producing a thickness variation. This also produces hot spots aka hard spots. The region under the buildup can't cool properly and auto heat treats, essentially.
#12
Posted 12 November 2011 - 12:43
Also the shield may act as a heat deflector, protecting hoses and cables which pass on the other side. On some cars I've see additional heat deflector plates, guarding the ball joints of the steering arms.
I've been wondering about them all my life, no where near as hard as I wonder about woman or even why wet teabags stick to smoko room roofs though.
The above is also what I believe, they are heat shields and Sharo, you forgot shockers that also need protection from heat in your list.
#13
Posted 12 November 2011 - 12:51
To prevent biggish objects like rocks and gravel from getting lodged between the rotor and caliper.
Umm, have you seen the narrow gap between the rotor and the brake pads?
Edited by primer, 12 November 2011 - 12:52.
#14
Posted 12 November 2011 - 13:01
What about the heat generated within the damper when you drive your car over rougher roads? Is there a shield against that kind of heat in the hyrdaulics, or are we only concerned about the heat from the brake assembly?The above is also what I believe, they are heat shields and Sharo, you forgot shockers that also need protection from heat in your list.
#15
Posted 12 November 2011 - 13:39
Umm, have you seen the narrow gap between the rotor and the brake pads?
Yes. Now please examine the space or gap between the shield and rotor and shield and wheel. Obviously, the shield is not designed to keep out dirt, dust, or water. It would be useless for these purposes. The gap is much too large -- by many orders of magnitude. Obviously, the shield is intended to keep out objects larger than the clearance between the components -- namely, rocks and stones.
#16
Posted 12 November 2011 - 14:35
Magoo is right: It does make a hell of a noise and it did damage the disc. (SAAB 99, about 1980)
#17
Posted 12 November 2011 - 15:25
How did the shield help in this case, then?The first time I thought about -and removed- a disc brake shield was when a stone got trapped between the shield and the disc.
Magoo is right: It does make a hell of a noise and it did damage the disc. (SAAB 99, about 1980)

#18
Posted 13 November 2011 - 05:41
Stones come in various sizes.How did the shield help in this case, then?
#19
Posted 13 November 2011 - 11:38
I took them off a range rover I modified (350 chev shortened 6 inches, mazda pick up shell) for some desert racing.
The brake pads lasted about five minutes.
We put stronger ones on.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 13 November 2011 - 22:18
As usefull as they may be I have never seen a rally car or offroader with them. And they never seem to have brake problems that are not of a machanical nature, or a bent rim tearing the calliper off!From my own experience the disk covers are essential for off road use.
I took them off a range rover I modified (350 chev shortened 6 inches, mazda pick up shell) for some desert racing.
The brake pads lasted about five minutes.
We put stronger ones on.
#21
Posted 13 March 2012 - 17:33
Water splashing on discs centrifuges it self away quickly, and the pads wipe the water away anyway.
Brake squealing has nothing to do with warped discs, that is glazing pure and simple. A warped disc pulsates, and gets worse the hotter it gets.
Think about basic pysics when it comes to water on a rotor. Those sheilds are there to keep out dirt and mud.
For a city car take them off, they do little apart from hold some residual heat, which in traffic may be an advantage with some pad material. But stop the air flow at the other end of the scale of motoring
Sorry...you are 100% wrong about the water issue, at least in respects to a daily driver. I live in the Pacific Northwest where it constantly rains. I dare say rather more often than where you live...which is in Adelaide from your profile. Not a flame...but a fact.
I can tell you from personal experience of 35+ years of racing and 40+ years of street driving in an extremely wet weather Province, that removing the brake shields has an immediate and detrimental effect when driving in wet weather. I have tried this on many cars, and it can cause significant delays and instability on initial brake application. Brake delay can approach 1 second before the pads wipe the rotor clean of water. It is not something that you want to do on a street driven car in a climate that experiences a lot of rain ( Pacific Northwest for example ).
Audi had a recall on late 1990's production A4's. My 1998 Audi A4 originally had very small disc shields that only covered about 1/3 of the rotor. Audi had to redesign the disc shield and put out a TSB for wet weather climates. The new disc shields are full coverage and the difference in initial braking actuation and stability in rain is amazing. All models since 2000 came with the new design, full brake shields for Canadian market cars.
I have been a dealership Partsman ( Nissan, Honda, Chrysler ) for over 17 years. Vehicle specifications for different countries or continents vary greatly. What may be specified for a dry, hot weather climate, such as California, is entirely inappropriate for a Northern climate such as Canada. What you may experience in a climate such as Adelaide may not hold true at all in a climate like Vancouver BC, where it has been raining for the last 3 months steady

Wet weather braking performance is such an issue here, that I often base my brake pad choice ( on my Daily driver ) on how the pad performs in wet weather. There can be a huge difference in compounds. Some grip right way..some you have have your sphincter contracting into a black hole before they grip!!

Edited by Chickenman, 13 March 2012 - 17:39.
#22
Posted 28 April 2012 - 13:16
#23
Posted 29 April 2012 - 16:16
If the purpose of these shields is to keep water off the disc, ok but what about the disc surface facing the wheel? The fashion is for very open wheel styles, to show-off the brakes. Does the airflow around the brake keep the outer disc surface dry or is having one dry disc surface enough to improve braking response time compared to both sides wet?Working in the Industry as I do I know for a fact that GMH say there's are to shield the discs from water. They even have technical bulletins on the detrimental effects remove will have on brake performance. I have seen over the last 20 plus years a huge amount of cars with stones caught between the caliper/pad and discs and all of them have had shields fitted.
#24
Posted 02 May 2012 - 06:17
That would be more likely on the inside than the outside, or am I wrong there?
#25
Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:05
Hot discs & water don't seem to be a problem - rally cars with glowing discs crossing creeks comes to mind. Cold brakes can be affected - at a local ford there is a sign after the crossing "Check your brakes" .
#26
Posted 04 May 2012 - 00:33
They were a real drama after fording creeks or similar when we had them. They'd fill with water, it was absolutely necessary to get them dry before you relied on them again.
#27
Posted 04 May 2012 - 04:35
So I'd have to agree with the shield being a splash guard.

#28
Posted 04 May 2012 - 08:25
I've never seen shields on a rally car before, but these are WRC cars and I assume they are for stone protection.


#29
Posted 04 May 2012 - 09:35
That might be more appropriate for drum brakes...
They were a real drama after fording creeks or similar when we had them. They'd fill with water, it was absolutely necessary to get them dry before you relied on them again.
Yep, water on disc brakes can inhibit brake operation to some degree, but wet drum brakes will not work at all.
Youngsters who have not experienced this will not be able to appreciate it. You have a nice, high pedal that feels perfectly normal, but nothing happens. Nothing. When you push on the pedal the vehicle seems to speed up. Amusing or terrifying, depending on the situation.
#30
Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:48
#31
Posted 04 May 2012 - 14:45
#32
Posted 05 May 2012 - 04:49
#33
Posted 05 May 2012 - 11:40
As an aside a few years ago V8 Stupid cars were grooving the rotors stupidly,, eg 54 grooves on a 14" rotor. It looked like a bastard file!Really I do not know what they were thinking as you had considerably less rotor face to brake with!And they were grinding the pads away. Would be impervious to water though.These days they use the style in the pics above which is a very good design.
#34
Posted 05 May 2012 - 16:59
I would prefered a slice that gives more aero gains.
#35
Posted 06 May 2012 - 00:21
Most race cars duct air into the hub of the rotor to push the air through the vented rotor.Some are very sophisticated and some are just a duct into the hub of the rotor. Most race rotors have dierctional vanes that pull said air through the rotor more eficiently.
As an aside a few years ago V8 Stupid cars were grooving the rotors stupidly,, eg 54 grooves on a 14" rotor. It looked like a bastard file!Really I do not know what they were thinking as you had considerably less rotor face to brake with!And they were grinding the pads away. Would be impervious to water though.These days they use the style in the pics above which is a very good design.
I recall some IMSA GTO race cars back in the late '80s using water cooling of the front brake rotors. The rules required steel brakes and the cars were relatively heavy but also quite powerful and fast. Thus the front brake rotors tended to get very hot. One approach used was to spray water into the cooling airflow being ducted to the center of the vented rotor. It was very effective.
slider
#36
Posted 06 May 2012 - 05:54
#37
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:50
Still used quite a lot at tracks where brake temp can be a problem. Quite simple really, install a washer jet into the brake ducts and washer pump and bottle.. When the brake light actuates so does the washer. Usually with a switch so it only turns on after a few laps. Otherwise you can over cool the brakes. Used in F1, Most Touring Car catergorys, anything fast or underbraked and usually only on tracks that are very hard on brakes.I recall some IMSA GTO race cars back in the late '80s using water cooling of the front brake rotors. The rules required steel brakes and the cars were relatively heavy but also quite powerful and fast. Thus the front brake rotors tended to get very hot. One approach used was to spray water into the cooling airflow being ducted to the center of the vented rotor. It was very effective.
slider
Very effective, I have used it myself, only problems is the wheels tend to get very dirty!
Mats, the little hooks are there to disapate the gases that form between the pad and rotor.Most rotors have 6-8 simple grooves that have to start and end over the vane in the rotor. But it still promotes rotor cracking. That design does not.But it is considerably harder to put on a rotor. Simple grooves are usually done when being made though are not hard to install later with a mill. Or even a die grinder.
Oh and never drill a rotor, they will always crackEven with moderate temperatures.
Edited by Lee Nicolle, 06 May 2012 - 08:55.
#38
Posted 06 May 2012 - 09:37
Eh?Used in F1
#39
Posted 06 May 2012 - 12:44
Back in the 80s, Also a ballast tank to make weightEh?
Advertisement
#40
Posted 06 May 2012 - 14:53
#41
Posted 06 May 2012 - 18:29
#42
Posted 07 May 2012 - 07:56
I don't think it was ever used to cool the brakes, and it certainly was not its primary function. It was a good old-fashioned scam!
I can remember video of the Group B Quattro's with huge bursts of steam coming out of the wheels every time they hit the brakes, not sure how long the water supply lasted though...
#43
Posted 07 May 2012 - 08:01