It is a very interesting car but am I the only one who wishes it was presented the way it was designed-not the way it was developed?
This is often (usually?) the problem with one offs--the specification is too "Flexible" for it to have real historic significance...
This car's in-period modifications are fascinating and important. Without them, it would have been retired early and therefore would have had
far less historic significance. Remember: this car was still winning important races in 1955, six years after it was built! How many other Lester MGs can claim that? Think about the time period this car spanned. Roadracing moved from public road circuits, to airport and military base circuits, and finally to purpose-built racetracks. This car ran right at the front on all three. Some of its later races had its biggest audiences: 43000 spectators at Cumberland, 60000 spectators at Montgomery, etc. - so this car might look unfamiliar to UK readers, but it doesn't look so unfamiliar to a lot of race fans on this side of the pond.
However, for those who want to see "the way it was designed", I tried pretty hard to include that in my article. In addition to about fifty close-up shots (e.g. suspension details), I presented an under-construction photo, a completed-but-not-yet-raced photo, and three early racing-action photos. I have more photos, but I thought the article was running a little long.