

Lola Cars enters administration
#1
Posted 16 May 2012 - 09:35
#3
Posted 16 May 2012 - 09:56
#4
Posted 16 May 2012 - 10:01

#5
Posted 16 May 2012 - 10:02
#6
Posted 16 May 2012 - 10:04
Also, their proposal didn't look like a bumper car......
#7
Posted 16 May 2012 - 10:10
#8
Posted 16 May 2012 - 10:42
#9
Posted 16 May 2012 - 11:45
#10
Posted 16 May 2012 - 11:47
About 100 threads on Pirelli and hardly a reply in this thread where Lola could go out of existance. Truly amazing.
It's not bankrupcy though, so it's not over for them. I certainly hope it doesn't mean the end for Lola, hopefully they find a source of financing that enables them to come back to a reasonable state as a company.
#11
Posted 16 May 2012 - 11:57
About 100 threads on Pirelli and hardly a reply in this thread where Lola could go out of existence. Truly amazing.
Not really, there is nothing for a 'Primary School Playground' bickering to be had.
#12
Posted 16 May 2012 - 12:13
#13
Posted 16 May 2012 - 12:25
#14
Posted 16 May 2012 - 12:26
#15
Posted 16 May 2012 - 12:32
If the price was right, would be a good investment for Tony Fernandes - lot of overlap with what he is looking to achieve with Caterham composites/technology.
And, coincidentally, the Caterham SP/300.R was developed in conjunction with Lola.
#16
Posted 16 May 2012 - 12:35
Well it's not that big a deal either. It's an unfortunate story but what impact will it really have on current racing? The lack of a few prototypes in a series no one is watching? If it was Dallara it'd be an "uh oh" moment.
Dallara has become what Lola was in the 90's. Build chassis for about every series in the world, whether it be F3 or IndyCar, or F1. But seeing how the IRL is not tearing wings and cars apart with the new chassis, they might soon see some money trouble.
After losing the Champ Car chassis bid in '06 and then the IndyCar bid in '09, they have not had much hpe of operating as a major company. And in sportscars, it isn't that big of a deal. The teams don't receive support from Lola, so they will just switch builders. So maybe a team not able to afford the new model in 3-4 years will have to leave prototype racing, but if they can't afford to buy a new car, they probably were not running towards the front of the pack, and won't be missed on bit.
Tough time for them indeed, but they should have seen it coming.
#17
Posted 16 May 2012 - 12:44
#18
Posted 16 May 2012 - 13:29
I suspect the lack of «NOOOOOOOOOO!» is happening because British constructors have been going the way of the Dodo for quite some time now.About 100 threads on Pirelli and hardly a reply in this thread where Lola could go out of existance. Truly amazing.
So the reaction would be more like: «Another one. Those brits can't really get their act together.»
I too hope Lola can overturn it (again). The sport needs more than just one builder and it needs companies with the pedigree of Lola.
#19
Posted 16 May 2012 - 13:41
About 100 threads on Pirelli and hardly a reply in this thread where Lola could go out of existance. Truly amazing.
Not really, most people on here care only for F1, and are unaware of other series......
However, it is a great shame, let's hope something can be done.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 16 May 2012 - 14:02

#21
Posted 16 May 2012 - 14:31
#22
Posted 16 May 2012 - 15:04
A high risk and highly speculative option would be to apply for the final F1 slot for 2013. It would mean getting FIA approval and finding €25 million surety. Lola already have the facilities to design and build an F1 car and it would put their technology on a world stage.
Tony fernandes has got his hands full with his airline business, F1 team and QPR.
#23
Posted 16 May 2012 - 15:17
but there main money getter was stuff for defense industry, so hopefull the MOD will go yell at HMRC
#24
Posted 16 May 2012 - 16:37
Looks like the FIA were right not to grant them F1 entry in 2009.
I think the F1 entry would've helped them.
#25
Posted 16 May 2012 - 16:51
#26
Posted 16 May 2012 - 17:06
How? It's not like Marussia and HRT are printing money.
No, but they are not making chassis for others either.
It is better PR to run a smaller formula series, with cars made by "current F1 team Lola". Than "90's F1 failure Lola" :=)
#27
Posted 16 May 2012 - 18:53
#28
Posted 16 May 2012 - 18:58
Anyone know what the profit margin is? No competition, which helps, but on the other hand price it too high and an entire formula is lost.Dallara has become what Lola was in the 90's. Build chassis for about every series in the world, whether it be F3 or IndyCar, or F1. But seeing how the IRL is not tearing wings and cars apart with the new chassis, they might soon see some money trouble.
#29
Posted 16 May 2012 - 19:02
Awesome contribution in the aerospace sector that does not get mentioned a lot. Great bunch if guys who really know a lot about how to build good race cars. Unfortunately they haven't had the cash flow in the last decade or so and have been forced to look at other alternatives such as electric sports car's etc to try nad get more coverage and sponsorship, but it's a hard economic climate.
A total shame if they fall through. You will struggle to find a race car manufacturer with as much engineering quality, and assurance as these guys.
The question I'm asking is, if they were allowed into F1 in 2009, would their financial woes been solved by sponsorship and coverage, OR would it have been hastened?
#30
Posted 16 May 2012 - 19:58
#31
Posted 16 May 2012 - 20:20

#32
Posted 16 May 2012 - 20:29
Anyone know what the profit margin is? No competition, which helps, but on the other hand price it too high and an entire formula is lost.
I dunno, GP2 seems to increase their budgets without losing cars.
#33
Posted 16 May 2012 - 21:35
wiping out the side of the car could cost you 250,000 dollars, quite easily.
on radio le mans they said its not as bad as people are making out, for lola.
#34
Posted 16 May 2012 - 22:05
spares is where the money is, and dallara is still charging plenty for them. I think the radiators on the new indycar are over 10,000 or something insane, each
wiping out the side of the car could cost you 250,000 dollars, quite easily.
on radio le mans they said its not as bad as people are making out, for lola.
During the Sao Paulo race, they mentioned something like the front wing was 10 thousand USD, and the rear wing (comes with the wing and the bumpers) ran you like 25 thousand. Yes, the money is made in the breakable bits on the car.
It didn't sound like Lola was going under, just the cash flow wasn't where they and their creditors wanted.
#35
Posted 16 May 2012 - 23:14
Looks like the FIA were right not to grant them F1 entry in 2009.
I was thinking the same thing, but didn't want to be the one to post it in case I opened a can of worms.

Just goes to show that, despite much derision, Marussia and particularly HRT are doing good jobs with a severely limited budget.
on radio le mans they said its not as bad as people are making out, for lola.
Good news from people in the know.

Edited by midgrid, 16 May 2012 - 23:15.
#36
Posted 16 May 2012 - 23:22
so its a really big difference, may of been better, maybe worse.
just a thought but maybe they where trying to writeoff the costs of there not chosen indycar proposal and dp car etc ?
#37
Posted 17 May 2012 - 00:03
#38
Posted 17 May 2012 - 03:51
Down the road the opportunity to design and develop other/new chassis might well appear - but, for the time being, the wise move is to shrink and stick to what turns over the currency - especially in the current gloabl financial mess that we see all around.
Sadly, this may impact more heavily on the design side of the business.
#39
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:42
spares is where the money is, and dallara is still charging plenty for them. I think the radiators on the new indycar are over 10,000 or something insane, each
wiping out the side of the car could cost you 250,000 dollars, quite easily.
on radio le mans they said its not as bad as people are making out, for lola.
Parts costs were one of the primary drivers in choosing the current Indycar. Bringing that fab to the US is a move to speed up the availability of parts and reduce costs. I know they assembled the first cars in Speedway from parts made in Italy. Don't know if the carbon fab in Speedway is online yet.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:14
atleast the new car has raced well
#41
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:15
How will this affect LMP2 parts for Le Mans?
#42
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:57
Bloody hell, EJ Viso is basically keeping Dallara going then.spares is where the money is, and dallara is still charging plenty for them. I think the radiators on the new indycar are over 10,000 or something insane, each
wiping out the side of the car could cost you 250,000 dollars, quite easily.
#43
Posted 17 May 2012 - 10:12
Very sad news - here's hoping they will receive the necessary investment.
How will this affect LMP2 parts for Le Mans?
It won't affect Le Mans, most teams probably have their spares package already in the workshop, the question is for the rest of the season and it depends on how quickly a new investor is found. It might affect Le Mans if a team running a Lola suffers tub damage in practice, because I'm not sure whether they can send people and tooling to France to repair tubs like they did for KSM in 2008 and for Rebellion in 2010.
#44
Posted 17 May 2012 - 12:34
It won't affect Le Mans, most teams probably have their spares package already in the workshop, the question is for the rest of the season and it depends on how quickly a new investor is found. It might affect Le Mans if a team running a Lola suffers tub damage in practice, because I'm not sure whether they can send people and tooling to France to repair tubs like they did for KSM in 2008 and for Rebellion in 2010.
After the off's @ Spa - let's hope so & that everyone has arranged adequate Le Mans cover from composite repairers
#45
Posted 17 May 2012 - 14:32
After the off's @ Spa - let's hope so & that everyone has arranged adequate Le Mans cover from composite repairers
That's precisely why Status pulled out from Spa after their shunt, they didn't want to raid into their stock of spares for Le Mans.
#46
Posted 17 May 2012 - 16:32
#47
Posted 17 May 2012 - 17:22

#48
Posted 17 May 2012 - 17:26

#49
Posted 25 May 2012 - 22:15
#50
Posted 28 May 2012 - 17:29
Autosport is reporting in this week's issue that Martin Birrane has made the decision to stop personally subsidising Lola, and that a number of employees have been laid off, which doesn't sound good. On the other hand, Lola sportscar customers should not be affected as they have already purchased their spares packages.
Martin Birrane's business is the Peer Group http://www.peergroup.co.uk/ Prop;erty development is not the easiest of businesses to dervive the margins from at present to cross subsidise a business such as the Lola Group.