

Again a race marshall killed
#1
Posted 04 March 2001 - 04:57

#3
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:01
#4
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:02
#5
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:03
looks bad..
#6
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:03
#7
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:03



2nd in 5 races ....
SB
#8
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:03
i hate to hear this!!!!
#9
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:03

#10
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:07
It's times like these I hope that the information I hear is incorrect even though it may very well be.

#11
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:09
God bless the marshall's family.

#12
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:10

thats the kind of crap that no one should be made to live with..
#13
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:11
#14
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:12
This has really cast a cloud over the season already.

#15
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:14
I dont have a clue what to say here. So sad.
Shaun
#16
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:15
A track marshal has tragically been killed after being struck by some airborne debris following an incident involving Ralf Schumacher and Jacques Villeneuve in the early stages of the race.
The devastating news struck the whole of Albert Park as traditional celebrations for the end of a Grand Prix were subdued, and champagne spraying was foregone and a silence fell over the circuit.
According to reports a tyre broke free from the double wheel-tethers and the BAR Honda car striking the marshal in the chest.
F1Racing.net offers its sincere thoughts and condolences to the family of the marshal who was tragically involved in this accident.
--------------------------
what a **** way to start the year!!!
no joy about the race at all
#17
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:16

Does anyone know of the Marshalls name yet?
Whoever said JV should live with this the rest of his life needs to be smacked over the head.
#18
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:17
#19
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:17
So tragic.
Novene,
Poor choice of words I think. Do you realy feel that way? You may want to reconsider...
#21
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:20
as should jaguar and every other team who had wheel tethers fail this weekend..
wheel tethers are a rule and are not optional.. when a marshall loses their life through incompentancy, they should be punished
#22
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:21

#23
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:22
Its tragic but thats racing and things like that happen.
#24
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:23
Originally posted by loppa
BAR should be fined, if not receive a race ban for their tethers not working...
as should jaguar and every other team who had wheel tethers fail this weekend..
wheel tethers are a rule and are not optional.. when a marshall loses their life through incompentancy, they should be punished
you are utterly wrong. the teams are required to provide tethers that meet abreakign strain specified by the FIA. suggesting that they did not do so or that they should provide the impossible is quite wrong and deeply heartless. how the **** do you think JV and his team already feel without this sort of rubbish?
Shaun
#25
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:24
blame doesn't belong with BAR, and punishing them would suggest so..
as i said above, blame lies with the saefty standards and again i ask why marshalls dont wear helmets..
#26
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:24
#27
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:25

#28
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:28
#29
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:29
#30
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:30
why marshalls dont wear helmets..
The report in the thread suggests that the marshal was hit in the chest. You can never make motorsport entirely safe. A time for looking into the accident and improving safety will come. Now, however, is a time for grieving....
#31
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:30
BAR should be fined, if not receive a race ban for their tethers not working...
as should jaguar and every other team who had wheel tethers fail this weekend..
Well that's clever..not.

#32
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:34

There is no way they could make tethers strong enough to keep wheels on in every accident....if they did the wheels wouldn't be able to turn at all.
As for marsalls wearing helmets, we don't even know what hit the marshall and on what part of their body. A wheel and tire hitting someone at 100+ mph is likely to be fatal if it hits anywhere on your torso.
May he rest in peace

#33
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:34
blaming a driver in this accident like you did, is low.. blaming a team, when a part of their safety measure failed, is still low, but not as low as blaming an individual..
but i am not arguing over trivial **** when someone has lost their life..
#34
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:35
One marshal died again after being hit by a tyre again after the wheel tethers failed again - familiar pattern that we'd hope to never to see again after last year, but yet which has reoccurred. Proof that wheel tethers (even double ones) do not work effectively and that a way to prevent this happening again must be found somehow to prevent the tragic loss of life.
Also, 12 fans were injured and not to be forgotten. We all hope that they're okay but no one knows their condition - I guess the fencing was no match for the mass of debris created.
I personally think the race should have been stopped. They knew that one marshal had died at the time, they also knew that 12 fans were injured and taken to hospital, let they let the race continue. I would have thought the loss of at least one life would have been more important to them morally than the premature end of a race or loss of finances that way - I just think that's highly disrespectful to them and focusing on the unimportant things, but I guess that's how business works - there's no way they'd have stopped the race, unless maybe it was a driver killed (though I hope we never see that).
Anyways - our thought are with the marshals family and those fans injured - and we hope that the FIA will sort the problem soon which effects F1 so seriously.
#35
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:37
#36
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:38
yes, they wont work in all cases, and i didnt know the marshall was hit in the chest, but a general question i've always had is why dont marshalls wear helmets?! it may be the difference between life and death in some cases.. but there will always be incidents that nothing could've saved them, and it is those that will happen rarely..
#37
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:38
Burti, had his wheels come flying off in his accident on saturday, and the only reason Schumachers didn't is because he was going sideways. Villeneuve hit that wall at an unbeleivable speed and angle, and if you know anything of physics, loads and forces, there is no way 2 carbon fibre strips are going to hold those wheels on. The fact of the matter is, the tyre went through the fence according to reports.
The sheer supidity and moronic comments of some people on this BB never cease to amaze me.

Someone is dead, and that is tragic, and all fans of F1 feel a bit stunned I'm sure, but the last thing we need is finger pointing, and the ensuing farce of placing blame as we have had with first Senna and then at Monza. Just simply respect the man who died to bring you your entertainment, I'm sure he wouldn't want people pointing fingers.
#38
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:40
Originally posted by loppa
i will retract that statement, but not delete the post..
blame doesn't belong with BAR, and punishing them would suggest so..
as i said above, blame lies with the saefty standards and again i ask why marshalls dont wear helmets..
It isn't BARs fault - the design of the wheel tethers are ineffective, not the car manufacturers fault. The wheel tethers simply don't work properly - they don't keep the wheels on the car attached like they're supposed to do, as seen last year too. The FIA needs to introduce a new system to stop the reoccurrence of these sorts of incidents, as wheel tethers clearly don't do their job.
I agree that the marshals should wear helmets - it would protect them from debris and injury. But as to whether it could have prevented this... who knows...
#39
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:42
Shaun
Advertisement
#40
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:42
I didn't blame Villenueve, like you to the team. The marshalls are there to ensure drivers' safety, you just need to be a little broad minded to understand why I said JV should feel guilty.
So I stand by what I say.
#41
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:44
my argument is that rules were broken so they should be punished.. i wasn't laying blame and went on to say that it is wrong to blame them..
its a hard area to police tho, as you pointed out, its impossible to keep wheels attached in some incidents..
#42
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:45
In general, I agree with Daemon's post, although not with the language....
#43
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:46
#44
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:48
unlike you, i made myself clear, in a following post..
i didn't mean to seem to BLAME the team, and went on to say..
this was said before anyone had the chance to point out i was being an ass..Originally posted by loppa
i will retract that statement, but not delete the post..
blame doesn't belong with BAR, and punishing them would suggest so..
as i said above, blame lies with the saefty standards and again i ask why marshalls dont wear helmets..
#45
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:53
Maybe the marshalls should be dug in, or at a considerable distance, obviously a fence or a meter tall concrete wall is not good enough as protection
#46
Posted 04 March 2001 - 05:58
However, as Andretti (I beleive) said; "This too is motor racing"...
My thoughts and sympathy go out to the family of the marshall. It is small consolation, but he died doing something which he obviously enjoyed. I hope that his loved ones can find some comfort in that...
#47
Posted 04 March 2001 - 06:07
#48
Posted 04 March 2001 - 06:08
#49
Posted 04 March 2001 - 06:09
It's hard to say how you can protect marshals against this kind of accident. For sure they should be wearing helmets. But a full-size F1 car hurtling through the air directly at a group of people standing behind a barrier is pretty difficult to protect against. Unfortunately this is one of those freak occurences that will happen even if you have special posts for the marshals and all the protective gear. You just know that something is going to happen someday while a marshal is out near the track waving a yellow or helping at an accident site.
However that is no excuse for inaction and hopefully something can be done. This is a good argument for using a signal light system instead of marshals for flagging cars. Although marshals cannot be dispensed with, nor should they be, the fewer people exposed to danger on the track, the better.
#50
Posted 04 March 2001 - 06:11
Originally posted by Wolbo
This picture of the accident seems to support the reports that the wheel and other parts of debris probably went straight through the fence. You can see that part of the fence is being destroyed and a gap is created.
the 'gap' you mention is most probably an opening in the fence that is used by the marshalls for flag-waving etc.
a terribly unlucky place to hit the wall in a major crash
