
Witness to marshalls death
#1
Posted 04 March 2001 - 07:14
Advertisement
#2
Posted 04 March 2001 - 07:17
I guess the conflict between marshalls (who are after all race fancs) desire to watch the race from their close up position, and the rules they are given that demand they stand well back are always going to cause these incidents (wasnt the monza marhall in a similiar position?)
Shaun
#3
Posted 04 March 2001 - 07:22


#4
Posted 04 March 2001 - 08:16
If you were there and saw someone pull out to pass, wouldn't you want to put yourself where you could get the best view?
It's sad, so truly sad. My thoughts to anyone who was close by, and obviously condolences to the marshall's family.
BTW, "putsa"...are you Greek by any chance?
#5
Posted 04 March 2001 - 10:25
#6
Posted 04 March 2001 - 10:45

I think the marshals are among the unsung heroes of our sport. I think their Job is more dangerous than the drivers and they aren’t paid quite the same amount (if at all) for it.
We need to make sure these incidents are not forgotten, without proportioning blame, which is very negative thing to do. Such incidents are rare, let’s do what we can to make them less frequent.
But (sorry for the cliché') life goes on, and F1 is life, excitement, drama, tragedy and injustice.
#7
Posted 04 March 2001 - 11:02
Originally posted by putsa
The accident which killed the marshall hapened right in front of us. It was so fast and so violent that the video footage was tame in comparison. As far as blame, the marshall was not where he should have been (at the marshall post) he was standing right against the fence where he should have known better not to be. It was a miracle all those around us were not also killed or injured other than a few cuts. It was a very unerving experience. Right now I feel very lucky to be alive. But sad for the marshall.
Anyways...I'm just glad you Aussie race fans are o.k. and I regret that you had to see such a terrible thing.
#8
Posted 04 March 2001 - 12:45
Niall
#9
Posted 04 March 2001 - 13:14
Originally posted by Ali_G
Does anyone know wether it was debris or JV's car which hit this Marshal.
a local paper has this report:
http://www.theage.co...FX718WLVJC.html
"The race was run behind a pace car for several laps while the wreckage was cleared from the track and an ambulance crew attended to the marshal, believed to have been hit by a wheel."
#10
Posted 04 March 2001 - 13:20
Was the medical response immediate?
#11
Posted 04 March 2001 - 14:59
#12
Posted 04 March 2001 - 15:26
http://www.theage.co...FXMRAWLVJC.html
#13
Posted 04 March 2001 - 15:26
#14
Posted 04 March 2001 - 15:39
#15
Posted 04 March 2001 - 18:45
#16
Posted 04 March 2001 - 20:21
#17
Posted 04 March 2001 - 23:15
I was working at the track over the weekend, and we were getting updated by our security supervisor as the race went on. The atmosphere was so sombre after the race, everyone just wanted to go home.
My heart goes out to his family and friends.
#18
Posted 04 March 2001 - 23:26
Originally posted by Mat
I saw footage last night on one of the news channels here in Melbourne, showing the tyre go through the gap in the fence, used for the photographers and hit the marshall, it it's him on his left side, around the waist to lower ribs area, and you see him start get knocked to the ground, before they cut the footage.
yes, that's right. if you'll imagine that the standard camera angle was extended a couple of inches to the left, that's what channel 9 down here was showing (i wonder how they could extend it so ?).
they used one of those nifty 'magnifying glass' effects to blow up the image of the tyre striking the marshal.
also, putsa was talking about the violence of the incident, channel 9 news also showed a home video of the accident, filmed from a spot on the track but on the other side of the gravel trap. the video was filmed really well, a panning shot tracking villeneuve flying through the air. the accident was shown real time and the speed that villeneuve carried up to the point he the kitty litter arrested his slide was scary to watch.
rip.
#19
Posted 04 March 2001 - 23:59
Don't think the premises where the F1 race is on should be excluded of the fundamental rule: When the emergency vehicle is on the way, pull to the right and STOP!
Advertisement
#20
Posted 05 March 2001 - 00:23
#21
Posted 05 March 2001 - 01:15

#22
Posted 05 March 2001 - 01:24

#23
Posted 05 March 2001 - 02:33
Horrible ending to a good day

#24
Posted 05 March 2001 - 09:32
#25
Posted 05 March 2001 - 12:45
Originally posted by GTI
Few laps after the accident when the ambulance picked up the poor Marshall I've noticed the safety car didn't stop the line of F1s approaching the accident point when the ambulance was trying to leave the site? Instead we had the ambulance stop (although it appeared ready to leave) to incoming traffic, until the whole line of F1s passed the point before it could exit??
Don't think the premises where the F1 race is on should be excluded of the fundamental rule: When the emergency vehicle is on the way, pull to the right and STOP!
Couldnt agree more, but then when someone is injured and medical workers are on the track the race should be stopped. It disturbs me that the only real reason that races are not stopped is because it upsets the TV schedules.
#26
Posted 05 March 2001 - 12:51

#27
Posted 05 March 2001 - 13:32
I found it incredible that the ambulance had to give way to the safety car and the F1 cars before taking the track.
Didn't the F1 people know that the ambulance had to eventually take the track and, therefore, they should have stopped the race to avoid running into or hindering the ambulance's departure to the hospital ?
I find this whole episode very disturbing.
#28
Posted 05 March 2001 - 15:36
#29
Posted 05 March 2001 - 15:55
Originally posted by Clatter
Couldnt agree more, but then when someone is injured and medical workers are on the track the race should be stopped. It disturbs me that the only real reason that races are not stopped is because it upsets the TV schedules.
Come on now. You don't truly believe that TV schedules are the only reason, do you?
#30
Posted 05 March 2001 - 15:59
As for the ambulance on the track letting the pack go past - this is standard practice for as it often makes it easier to get the ambulance to its destination.
Stopping the pack (especially for F1 cars ) can often result in one or more cars stalling - these then have to be retrieved - which could then hinder any further rescue crews/ambulances from getting to and from the incident scene.
#31
Posted 05 March 2001 - 16:35
#32
Posted 05 March 2001 - 16:39
#33
Posted 05 March 2001 - 16:43
#34
Posted 05 March 2001 - 19:08
Apparently true. I'm copying my post from another thread which addresses this:Originally posted by Will
GTI: It is very likely that the reason the ambulance was going so slowly was because the marshall had been proclaimed dead or in a a state that was inevitably going to lead to death at the scene.
Originally posted by Dimo
Elsewhere someone mentioned that the time of death was more than an hour after the accident. The thing you have to remember is that the official time of death is when you are "declared dead", which is different from the time your heart stopped beating, etc.
If you read the following it is apparent that the marshall was dead moments after the accident. It was all over long before the ambulance had to pass the line of F1 cars, as was witnessed by Ralf:
Source: http://www.formula1....1/03/s4746.html
Ralf witnessed marshal's death 05 Mar 2001BMW WilliamsF1 driver Ralf Schumacher admitted on Monday that he witnessed the tragic death of Graham Beveridge, the race marshal killed during Sunday's Australian Grand Prix in Melbourne.
Speaking to the German newspaper Bild, Michael Schumacher's younger brother revealed how he saw the injured man lying only a few metres away from where his and Jacques Villeneuve's car impacted while entering the circuit's Turn 3.
"I saw him die and it was terrible", he said sadly. "In that precise moment, I had a thousand thoughts in my head. I asked myself if he had a family and hoped that he did not have any kids." When asked if he felt any fear, the German driver acknowledged: "Of course I did. I saw Jacques car flying inches over my head."
Schumacher initially told journalists in Melbourne that he thought a wheel from his own car had killed Beveridge, as he saw it fly over the catch fencing, but the Australian Grand Prix chief, Ron Walker, has since announced that a wheel from Villeneuve's car slipped through a hole in the catch fencing designed to allow marshals access to the track in the case of an emergency.
#35
Posted 06 March 2001 - 11:01
#36
Posted 06 March 2001 - 12:54
I found some photos on Sutton http://www.sutton-im...crashoz01/.html If you scroll down you can see where the cars come to rest, I think a good 25-50yds past the spot where you were, but what concerns me is that in this area is just yellow and green tape.
Is this the case, or had the cars been moved when the photo was taken??
I'm assuming that the whole in the wall was between the Shell Helix sign and the green wall.
Best wishes Putsa, you take care
#37
Posted 06 March 2001 - 13:02
andy_bee linked...
I found some photos on Sutton http://www.sutton-im...crashoz01/.html
anyone got the login/password for the large images ???
#38
Posted 06 March 2001 - 14:01
On the news they have just said that Beveridge's family will get some compensation...
#39
Posted 06 March 2001 - 14:48
It also is a good demonstration of how fast everything happened. It certainly looked fast on televsion.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 07 March 2001 - 20:00
Now it sounds like the wheel was still attached when it came through, but was shorn off by the frame of the opening, and thats when it hit the marshal. As noted by Putsa, anyone standing right up against the fence would effectively have been hit by the whole car, and as he implied, the marshal was.
There has been a lot of talk about wheel tethers and their failure to work, but I wonder why no one has pointed out the fact that was raised by Jackie Stewart in an interview from last year. He effectively said "there is a limit to how strong we can make them. Yes, we could guarantee they would not break off, but remember these things are attached to the life cell, which is there to protect the driver. The last thing we need is for the force of the wheel to tear the cell apart."
If the wheel tethers had been stronger and the above scenario of JV's wheel going through the fence it true, what would have happened. The marshal would still be dead, the fence would have been destroyed/ripped, possibly injuring more people, and we could probably write JV off because his car would have gone from 200+ kph to 0 in about 5 feet.
It is horrible that someone was killed. But making quick rule adjustments, or public statements about what the cause was, without really delving into the "what and why" of the accident is truly negligent, and will result in further injuries.
Loz