
Simtek
#1
Posted 09 March 2001 - 13:36
Advertisement
#2
Posted 09 March 2001 - 19:14
I have an inkling that Gary may know the answer to this one.
(I'm having my inkling removed next week.)
#3
Posted 10 March 2001 - 00:47
Speaking of Simtek, here's a question;-
What '95 CD had the Simtek on the Cover?
And for a bonus point, who was Nick Wirth's partner at the beginning?
#4
Posted 10 March 2001 - 07:09
Originally posted by Timm
And for a bonus point, who was Nick Wirth's partner at the beginning?
Max Mosley....
#5
Posted 10 March 2001 - 08:06

#6
Posted 10 March 2001 - 09:58
#7
Posted 11 March 2001 - 10:40


#8
Posted 11 March 2001 - 12:43
#9
Posted 11 March 2001 - 15:32
#10
Posted 11 March 2001 - 16:07
#11
Posted 13 March 2001 - 19:41
And yes, I managed to buy something from the Simtek auction when they got rid of everything. What was it? A t-shirt! Sorry, lads it was all I could afford!
#12
Posted 17 March 2001 - 21:47
There is a shiney new tub in the design office of Advanced Composites, in Heanor, Derby, UK.
Looks really the business, but then again who would want it and what could you do with it!
Regards Don
#13
Posted 31 March 2001 - 02:41
Interestingly, it's done up in Cosworth Racing livery (white with Cossie logos) and none of it's original racing livery.
#14
Posted 07 May 2001 - 21:28
It really is the correct way up!

#15
Posted 19 June 2009 - 15:11
If I remember correctly, one or two were bought at the auction by a scrap dealer. Seems apt.
Speaking of Simtek, here's a question;-
What '95 CD had the Simtek on the Cover?
And for a bonus point, who was Nick Wirth's partner at the beginning?
The team I was working for at the time, Swift, bought two of the chassis, I think we paid 3k and 5k and sold the ropier of the pair immediately for 13k, perhaps to a Dutch person. They were without engines, gearbox internals and any electronics. My own personal view having steered them both into the workshop (because I was skinniest at that time...) was they understeered terribly.
#16
Posted 19 June 2009 - 17:00
Q - When did Ghinzani drive a Simtek?
A -



#17
Posted 19 June 2009 - 21:04
The one thing I do remember was that the monocoque molds were sold for about £10.
#18
Posted 19 June 2009 - 22:23
#19
Posted 20 June 2009 - 04:13
Advertisement
#20
Posted 20 June 2009 - 06:27
#21
Posted 20 June 2009 - 19:04
#22
Posted 20 June 2009 - 19:23

#23
Posted 20 June 2009 - 20:37
#24
Posted 22 June 2009 - 09:34
#25
Posted 22 June 2009 - 09:44
#26
Posted 22 June 2009 - 10:27
I do know that two complete and running cars are in the UK, Cirrus could maybe give us a little more information.
Classic F3 racer, Paul Smith owns two Simteks. Both he and Peter Alexander have raced them occasionally over the last few years. I think that's Peter in the Hockenheim pic.
Edited by Cirrus, 22 June 2009 - 10:28.
#27
Posted 22 June 2009 - 10:30
I think Nick Worth is "da bomb" and the Simtek was a spectacularly beautiful car. A real shame it will always be associated with the deaths at Imola.
Nick Wirth is now part of the Manor Motorsport entry into F1
#28
Posted 22 June 2009 - 11:29
Nick Wirth is now part of the Manor Motorsport entry into F1
Very opinionated, and very full of himself. Anyone remember that Benetton he was responsible for, the one with front driveshafts?
#29
Posted 23 June 2009 - 09:11
I am Peter Alexander and yes, that is me in the S951 at Hockenheim! It is the ex Dominico Schiattarella car. It is still in the Uk and lives with the ex Jos Verstappen S951 both are complete and race ready and to original spec. One other 95 tub was made but never ever built into a race car. As has already been mentioned there is an S941 hanging upside down at Brooklands and I know of another incomplete S941 in the UK mostly original. Would love to hear from anyone about Simteks, does anyone have any Simtek transporter pics?
#30
Posted 23 June 2009 - 17:08
He might be able to add some info to the Simtek story.
#31
Posted 23 June 2009 - 18:28
#32
Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:37
Max Mosley....
I was going to start a new thread about this.
Does anyone know the full story behind the team. How can the president of the FIA start up his own team. I never read he was involved at the time.
Pitpass seem to say this was all political but wanted to find out some more details
#33
Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:56
Actually Nick Wirth and 'Mad Max' already founded Simtek in 1989, so four years before Mosley became president of the FIA. After being elected he sold his shares to Wirth.I was going to start a new thread about this. Does anyone know the full story behind the team. How can the president of the FIA start up his own team. I never read he was involved at the time.
#34
Posted 02 March 2010 - 12:13
Actually Nick Wirth and 'Mad Max' already founded Simtek in 1989, so four years before Mosley became president of the FIA. After being elected he sold his shares to Wirth.
thanks for the info. Must admit I only heard of Simtek when they entered F1. Thought they were improving and just missed out on a few points when the team folded
#35
Posted 02 March 2010 - 12:36
Hi All
I am Peter Alexander and yes, that is me in the S951 at Hockenheim! It is the ex Dominico Schiattarella car. It is still in the Uk and lives with the ex Jos Verstappen S951 both are complete and race ready and to original spec. One other 95 tub was made but never ever built into a race car. As has already been mentioned there is an S941 hanging upside down at Brooklands and I know of another incomplete S941 in the UK mostly original. Would love to hear from anyone about Simteks, does anyone have any Simtek transporter pics?
I have a picture of one of the Foden tractors in its second life when working as a tractor for Glendinnings of Ashburton and used hauling aggregate out of their quarry. It had not been repainted at the time still having a dark livery and unlettered. It was subsequently repainted and I believe they still run it.
#36
Posted 02 March 2010 - 13:48
Actually Simtek started to build a F1 car for BMW untill the project was canceled. That particular chassis was used by the illfated Andrea Moda for the 1992 season and we all know how that ended. After another failing F1 project ('Bravo') wizzkid Wirth started to build up his own F1 team which was marred by financial problems throughout its existence.thanks for the info. Must admit I only heard of Simtek when they entered F1. Thought they were improving and just missed out on a few points when the team folded
#37
Posted 02 March 2010 - 17:16
I think Nick Worth is "da bomb".
I am affraid that I (and quite a few people in the business) would disagree.
As a team owner Mr. Wirth made quite a mess of things and many people's money went down the drain. I know that running yourself (and others) into the ground is often mistaken for "passion" if it concerns a racing team, but there comes a point when it simply becomes insane and close to stealing.
As a designer he still has to prove himself. Yes 'his' Acura did win the ALMS but there was no one around to beat. Lets see what the Virgin will do to his reputation.
As for Imola 1994; anyone who had a closer look at the Simteks and Pacifics in those days (and I did), could see what effect a total lack of money has on safety issues and although one knows accidents can happen anytime and to anyone, it was hard to forget that effect when Roland's accident happened.
#38
Posted 02 March 2010 - 17:27
I am affraid that I (and quite a few people in the business) would disagree.
As a team owner Mr. Wirth made quite a mess of things and many people's money went down the drain. I know that running yourself (and others) into the ground is often mistaken for "passion" if it concerns a racing team, but there comes a point when it simply becomes insane and close to stealing.
As a designer he still has to prove himself. Yes 'his' Acura did win the ALMS but there was no one around to beat. Lets see what the Virgin will do to his reputation.
As for Imola 1994; anyone who had a closer look at the Simteks and Pacifics in those days (and I did), could see what effect a total lack of money has on safety issues and although one knows accidents can happen anytime and to anyone, it was hard to forget that effect when Roland's accident happened.
sure it is the job of the FIA to say what is and isn't safe. Never seen any footage of the crash so don't really know what happened but the FIA gave them a licence and let them race that weekend so if it was known in F1 circles the car wasn't good enough then the FIA should have acted
#39
Posted 02 March 2010 - 17:28
Nevertheless the safety cell was pretty much intact, it was the sickening almost head on impact that killed him.As for Imola 1994; anyone who had a closer look at the Simteks and Pacifics in those days (and I did), could see what effect a total lack of money has on safety issues and although one knows accidents can happen anytime and to anyone, it was hard to forget that effect when Roland's accident happened.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 02 March 2010 - 17:51
I am affraid that I (and quite a few people in the business) would disagree.
As a team owner Mr. Wirth made quite a mess of things and many people's money went down the drain. I know that running yourself (and others) into the ground is often mistaken for "passion" if it concerns a racing team, but there comes a point when it simply becomes insane and close to stealing.
As a designer he still has to prove himself. Yes 'his' Acura did win the ALMS but there was no one around to beat. Lets see what the Virgin will do to his reputation.
As for Imola 1994; anyone who had a closer look at the Simteks and Pacifics in those days (and I did), could see what effect a total lack of money has on safety issues and although one knows accidents can happen anytime and to anyone, it was hard to forget that effect when Roland's accident happened.
I think he probably tried to take on too much himself, he seemed to be in charge of designing the cars as well as dealing with sponsors, allocating budget etc, all at the age of about 27 or something. However, the car did look pretty good in the early 1995 races. Even the Andrea Moda car probably wasn't that bad, it did qualify ahead of about 8 cars at Monaco after all, it was the way the team was run that was the problem there.
I don't quite understand what you're saying about safety though, I thought it has been established that the front wing was loosened by an off-track excursion during the previous lap, I'm not aware that the fact it then came off was due to any fault with the Simtek. And while we're at it, what was wrong with the Pacific?
#41
Posted 02 March 2010 - 17:58
No! It is the job of the car designer and manufacturer to make sure the car is safe. It is the job of the circuit owner to make sure the circuit is safe. Or at least to do their best to do so.sure it is the job of the FIA to say what is and isn't safe. Never seen any footage of the crash so don't really know what happened but the FIA gave them a licence and let them race that weekend so if it was known in F1 circles the car wasn't good enough then the FIA should have acted
The FIA can't really say definitively that something is or is not safe. Their role is to provide advice and guidance in the form of regulations. When something not conceived at the time the regulations were written appears then they should change the regulations. And they are entitled to do so on safety grounds. Examples: Wings when they first appeared, the Brabham fan car (particularly the dust it threw out), ground effects etc.
Unfortunately in this age of over-regulation this distinction has become blurred and compliance with the FIA Regulations themselves, rather than the underlying principles, is often thought to mean "being safe". Also changes for other purposes have been introduced on occasions using "Safety" as the justification.
#42
Posted 02 March 2010 - 22:00
...Sassetti bought the designs, and in the two weeks until the next round in Mexico, the Andrea Moda mechanics worked feverishly to build the two chassis, dubbed the S921. They received help after hours from mechanics from other teams, who dropped in to assist for a bit of extra dough. There were fears that certain parts of the chassis would be unable to withstand the mandatory crash test, but that was nothing that a bit of carbon fibre sticking plaster couldn't fix. And there were scurrilous rumours that Max Mosley was drumming up support for the team because he was a Simtek shareholder!
The chassis were miraculously prepared in time to be flown to Mexico...
As for the Simteks and Pacifics that raced in 1994, of course we can expect every team member of any F1-team at any time in history doing all that is available to him to build and prepare a car as safely as possible. But when what is "available" is very limited, as was the case with a number of teams up until the mid-nineties, it is impossible not to compromise. Naturally we are talking detail stuff here (although the car Andrea Moda let McCarthy go out in at Spa was simply lethal), but obviously details can make a huge difference, as do decissions to repair things rather than replace them.
Just a small example. After first practice at Montreal in 1989, then Ferrar-designer John Barnard begged Moreno and his engineer to please use certain bump stops on their EuroBrun, as the car was all over the place in the chicane leading up to the pit straight and Barnard was sure that at some point it would end up in the pitland and mow down the Ferrari-team which were working out of the first two garages. Moreno and the engineer agreed with Barnard and said. "We would. If we'd have them!"
There are many drivers and team members of minor teams who could tell you some of their lets say eventful experiences in this field in those days. I worked with one of those teams and more than ones patched up floors were put on the car that really should not have been on it anymore. And this was not terribly long ago.
I am not saying that this is what caused Roland Ratzenberger's accident (lest we forget, a wing failed on Berger's Ferrari at Imola 5 years earlier and Ferrari had enough money), just that it was hard. when the crash had happended, to not think about the circumstances the team had to operate under.
#43
Posted 02 March 2010 - 23:55
Edited by Thundersport, 28 March 2012 - 23:15.
#44
Posted 06 January 2011 - 15:11
I remember a picture in one Autosport issue , someonbe forgot to handbrake the Foden and it ran down a ditch.........
Unfortunately I have lost the picture and an asking on the Transporter thread has not resulted in viewing that picture. It was b/w , approx. 2"x 3", on the first pages.
#45
Posted 06 January 2011 - 15:30
#46
Posted 06 January 2011 - 19:09
Edited by midgrid, 06 January 2011 - 19:09.
#47
Posted 06 January 2011 - 22:09
of course it was foitek who drove for eurobrun in 89 moreno didnt join till 90 and hadnt barnard moved on as well by that point :-)No! It is the job of the car designer and manufacturer to make sure the car is safe. It is the job of the circuit owner to make sure the circuit is safe. Or at least to do their best to do so.
The FIA can't really say definitively that something is or is not safe. Their role is to provide advice and guidance in the form of regulations. When something not conceived at the time the regulations were written appears then they should change the regulations. And they are entitled to do so on safety grounds. Examples: Wings when they first appeared, the Brabham fan car (particularly the dust it threw out), ground effects etc.
Unfortunately in this age of over-regulation this distinction has become blurred and compliance with the FIA Regulations themselves, rather than the underlying principles, is often thought to mean "being safe". Also changes for other purposes have been introduced on occasions using "Safety" as the justification.
#48
Posted 18 January 2011 - 00:34
If I remember correctly, one or two were bought at the auction by a scrap dealer. Seems apt.
The late James Prochowski of Protune and a business partner were the major purchasers of Simtek at the sale. JP bid on what he thought was a cabinet and found he had bought all the cabinets and their contents on one wall. He bought if my informant is correct at least 2 cars, which he sold on.
#49
Posted 28 March 2012 - 22:56
#50
Posted 29 March 2012 - 11:41
The late James Prochowski of Protune and a business partner were the major purchasers of Simtek at the sale. JP bid on what he thought was a cabinet and found he had bought all the cabinets and their contents on one wall. He bought if my informant is correct at least 2 cars, which he sold on.
We had two in our workshop in 96 that came straight from the sale - both 941's, I think we sold them on pretty quick.