Nissan DeltaWing new in-car video Road Atlanta
#1
Posted 26 September 2012 - 07:29
The next public appearance of the Nissan DeltaWing will be at the Petit Lemans at Road Atlanta on Oct. 20. Here's some video by Highcroft Racing from recent testing there. With so much rampant speculation regarding the vehicle's dynamics, some in-car footage could be helpful. Perhaps. Couldn't hurt, could it. Eh. Still capture above; video link below.
LINK Video: Nissan DeltaWing In-car at Road Atlanta | Mac's Motor City Garage
.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 26 September 2012 - 14:36
#3
Posted 26 September 2012 - 15:53
And how come you can see the top of the rear tyre? Isn't it meant to be a sports car? Or is that yet another exemption to the rules?
#4
Posted 26 September 2012 - 15:57
As if Moses came down from the mountain with a third tablet stating the only rules package that is acceptable.
#5
Posted 26 September 2012 - 16:05
Heh. 'Proper car'.
As if Moses came down from the mountain with a third tablet stating the only rules package that is acceptable.
I remember seeing in Mel Brook's movie, History of the World, that Moses indeed come down the mountain with three tablets. Unfortunately, one fell and broke.
#6
Posted 26 September 2012 - 16:24
Alright, 'conventional car' then - happy now?Heh. 'Proper car'.
As if Moses came down from the mountain with a third tablet stating the only rules package that is acceptable.
#7
Posted 26 September 2012 - 16:37
#8
Posted 26 September 2012 - 16:43
Sorry, got carried away - I think I'm dehydrated.
#9
Posted 26 September 2012 - 16:52
Alright, 'conventional car' then - happy now?
Far more than you'll ever be about this car
#10
Posted 26 September 2012 - 18:25
The vid is way too chopped up. They just need the overhead shot, but it needs to have the driver's hands in frame. As it is, it's just a lap around Road Atlanta. It's tough to tell much.
I was thinking exactly the same thing, but I was counting on your keen eye to sort it out for me.
#11
Posted 26 September 2012 - 19:26
#12
Posted 26 September 2012 - 19:31
"I have not made a three-leg'd hanimal, and for a very good reason. Think on't."
Brilliant, but I can't tell exactly what accent God has. Do I detect a brogue?
#13
Posted 26 September 2012 - 22:15
#14
Posted 26 September 2012 - 22:59
Moses built a three-wheeled chariot but it was a step backwards, with 50% more rolling resistance and a much worse turning circle. The horses didn't like it.
was that Moses Trotter ?
It was always said he was very reliant on tablets
#15
Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:03
#16
Posted 27 September 2012 - 10:24
#17
Posted 27 September 2012 - 18:57
It is clearly going to take some time for a new driver to judge where his inside rear tyre is. It is difficult enough in tight corners with your typical "front track wider than rear" layout where the rears still corner at a tighter radius than the fronts. The driver in the video is hitting a lot of ripple strips with the inside rear and I think there might be a real problem if there was a "wall" or similar at the apex.
I made precisely this point on Mac's site. You have no visual reference to know where your rear tires are.
A small quibble with your post: but isn't the "front track wider than rear" layout usually simply because track is measured from the wheel center, and the front tires are skinnier (meaning the lateral extents at the front and rear are usually pretty close to equivalent)?
#18
Posted 29 September 2012 - 12:16
#19
Posted 03 October 2012 - 18:25
If this is to be believed:
http://www.trackpedi...ki/Road_Atlanta
Advertisement
#20
Posted 04 October 2012 - 11:30
#21
Posted 04 October 2012 - 17:56
Doesn't that make the massive assumption it's from the same lap? I assume the car is carrying all the cameras for the various angles simultaneously, but because of the composite effect how sure can we be it's from within one lap?
Sources later mentioned that the car was actually clocked at a 1:14 during testing, which is round about LMP2 pace around Road Atlanta.
#22
Posted 17 October 2012 - 17:22
Two official days of testing have seen the DeltaWing down to a 1:13.462, in the hands of new drivers Gunnar Jeannette and Lucas Ordonez this race. That time was not even half a second off the P2 pacesetters from Level 5 Motorsports, a 1:13.025.
http://www.racer.com...article/263967/
looks like the pace is right on target.
Ha! I was looking for something like that, more feedback on how it drives:
Driving the car was a completely different experience, Ordoñez said, due to the design and aerodynamics of the dart-shaped prototype. Of course the main question he had before his first laps were not surprisingly how well does it turn with four-inch front tires that are only about a foot apart?
"I was asking Marino (Franchitti), Michael (Krumm) all the Le Mans drivers on how it is to drive and does it turn well," he said. "They all told me I would be really impressed with how it turns, the downforce the car generates and its top speed. The first time I drove it was a fantastic feeling. The steering was very sensitive and very precise. The cars I like are very sensitive like that and are ones where you can feel the steering wheel working.
"It was definitely different though," he admitted. "I did have to change my driving style, how I brake and when to be on the throttle through the corners. In LMP2 cars you can brake deeper into the apex of the corner. With DeltaWing, you have to brake a little earlier but with the same speed and be on the throttle before reaching the apex. That's how to make the car a lot faster. I worked hard for two years to be very fast in a P2 car, but now with this innovative car I've had to go back to a style that is not a GT but also not a P2 style. But you have to find that style and work with the engineers and data collected to make the car faster."
http://www.roadatlan...-Token.id=34161
Edited by Slowinfastout, 17 October 2012 - 17:27.
#23
Posted 17 October 2012 - 21:10
#24
Posted 17 October 2012 - 21:35
#25
Posted 17 October 2012 - 21:56
#26
Posted 17 October 2012 - 22:11
#27
Posted 17 October 2012 - 22:40
http://tazio.uol.com...a-petit-le-mans
But I've read somwhere else (after first posting) that it was collected after turning over.
Edited by saudoso, 17 October 2012 - 22:41.
#29
Posted 18 October 2012 - 10:19
#30
Posted 18 October 2012 - 11:54
#31
Posted 18 October 2012 - 12:36
http://www.youtube.c...;v=uW7qaG9K2_c#!
It is a severe case of glass chin.
Are we watching the same video (or is that sarcasm)? Perhaps the DeltaWing shape is more likely to roll-over after impact than a conventional car, but that Porsche ****ing hammered it.
#32
Posted 18 October 2012 - 13:07
Are we watching the same video (or is that sarcasm)? Perhaps the DeltaWing shape is more likely to roll-over after impact than a conventional car, but that Porsche ****ing hammered it.
Which I think exposes the biggest problem the car will face. I think the drivers of the DeltaWing will come to grips with the narrow front-wide rear relatively quickly. All of the other drivers, however, will be the problem. When they see the front of another car go by in their peripheral vision, and they see 3-4 feet of space, they're going to try to use that space. And with every single car out there that is not the DeltaWing, they will be fine. They will use road that is available to them, and they will be faster. When they do the exact same thing when the DeltaWing goes by, BANG. There's a collision.
#33
Posted 18 October 2012 - 14:29
#34
Posted 18 October 2012 - 17:49
The c*nt in the moving chicane looks like he deliberately shunted the DW.
Looks like he was about to enter the pits. If not im with you.
#35
Posted 18 October 2012 - 18:21
http://www.youtube.c...;v=uW7qaG9K2_c#!
It is a severe case of glass chin.
Indeed. Must be something to do with cars raced by Highcroft. Or are you talking about the Porsches?
#36
Posted 19 October 2012 - 02:18
The effin PR Stunt will beeline to the nearest rail-guard every time it's touched and the problem must be elsewhere.
Get a grip, it's not a proper racing car, would barely survive a class of it's own peers. Ditch the effin concept. Or effin go to one car at a time time trials.
Edited by saudoso, 19 October 2012 - 02:19.
#37
Posted 19 October 2012 - 02:22
#38
Posted 19 October 2012 - 04:21
The effin PR Stunt will beeline to the nearest rail-guard every time it's touched and the problem must be elsewhere.
This based on what exactly? Some presumed inherent instability not present in cars that lap much slower? The sheer lack of relative mass?
#39
Posted 19 October 2012 - 05:22
Looks like he was about to enter the pits. If not im with you.
looks like the porsche had a bit of an oversteer moment on the kerbs, didnt correct in time which got him pushed a bit to the right... However, blkirk is right, people see that empty space and go for it, forgetting that there is more to that car, just a foot or two behind....
In the end, if they keep running the car in competition with other "normal" cars, we will have a good statistical sample.. My money is on the deltawing crashing all the time due to contact with other cars..
Edited by kikiturbo2, 19 October 2012 - 05:24.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 19 October 2012 - 07:05
Err - rectangle..
Edited by Tony Matthews, 19 October 2012 - 07:53.
#41
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:31
#42
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:32
I had a teacher in primary school that tried to teach us that a triangle was more stable than a square, a three legged stool can only fall in three directions so it is more stable than a four legged stool he said.I would think that a triangle is easier to tip over than a square.
Err - rectangle..
I said that a two legged stool must be even better.
#43
Posted 19 October 2012 - 10:26
You guys should be advocating for GLBT rights, for god's sake.
Oh, will you tell us how that's a PR stunt too?
#44
Posted 19 October 2012 - 11:07
#45
Posted 19 October 2012 - 11:10
This based on what exactly? Some presumed inherent instability not present in cars that lap much slower? The sheer lack of relative mass?
Like kikiturbo said, statistics will show. So far despite the small sample, it's a 100% touch-to-imparing-crash rate of success.
#46
Posted 19 October 2012 - 12:40
#47
Posted 19 October 2012 - 12:57
#48
Posted 19 October 2012 - 13:24
The thing is it's also more likely to happen since there's a better chance the first thing that will make contact will be the back of the car, at least compared to a 'normal' car.
IMO it does raise some questions, mostly at med to high speed as it becomes increasingly reliant on aero, it'll be interesting to see if it will end up being statistically significant... but IMHO that particular crash would also have been bad news for a normal prototype.. maybe it would have been less likely to end up flipping over by having a wheel literally climbing over something, but normal prototypes are arguably more likely to be lifted up and flipped over aerodynamically.
#49
Posted 19 October 2012 - 13:26
Someone's already run the Audi McNish and Toyota Davidson crash clips from Le Mans, right?
or the Scott Sharp one.. GT Porsche clibs back-end style:
#50
Posted 19 October 2012 - 14:27