Jump to content


Photo

Max Mosley on The F1 Show last night


  • Please log in to reply
129 replies to this topic

#101 Tommorris747

Tommorris747
  • Member

  • 145 posts
  • Joined: July 12

Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:27

Without him the FIA would still own the rights to the championship and the teams would share 90% of F1's revenues in place of the 34-odd percent overall they have shared since he hit office. What a difference the 56% would make to teams' budgets. Instead it has ended up in the hands of bankers, party girls and an ex-wife.


Yeh right! :rotfl:

Edited by Tommorris747, 22 October 2012 - 03:28.


Advertisement

#102 Rasputin

Rasputin
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 22 October 2012 - 05:28

Hmm Mr Cantarella was invited to submit an offer for the commercial rights and the WMSC was informed about the interest of the GPWC. But you're right the poor sods didn't stand a chance because the incompetents couldn't manage to submit an offer, let alone one competing with the one Bernie laid down.
...

As if MrM would have been prepared to sell Formula One's commercial rights to FOCA, headed by Ron Dennis and Flavio Briatore I imagine? Yeah right... :lol:

Funny this really, on every forum there's always someone who identify him/herself with the individuals in power, no matter what, wonder why that is?

Edited by Rasputin, 22 October 2012 - 07:02.


#103 Raelene

Raelene
  • Member

  • 5,342 posts
  • Joined: April 99

Posted 22 October 2012 - 05:46

the teams would never ever be able to work together enough to make it happen

i remember when FOTA first started - always said it wouldn't work - because they would never be able to come to a consensus...for long...

#104 Raelene

Raelene
  • Member

  • 5,342 posts
  • Joined: April 99

Posted 22 October 2012 - 05:50

the teams would never ever be able to work together enough to make it happen

i remember when FOTA first started - always said it wouldn't work - because they would never be able to come to a consensus...for long...

#105 Muz Bee

Muz Bee
  • Member

  • 2,956 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 22 October 2012 - 06:00

No need to censor the old chap, he had nothing to say, a big yawn. Surprisingly lacking in vitriol it just confirmed he is finished as far as having an audience. We always knew he had selective amnesia now the amnesia seems to have increased in his dotage and there's nothing left to say.

#106 Rinehart

Rinehart
  • Member

  • 15,149 posts
  • Joined: February 07

Posted 22 October 2012 - 08:19

Balestre

Yeah ... after toivonen died .


Mosley

Yeah ... after Senna died.

Both presidents are piggy-backing the normal rate of technology driven safety development that coincided with their own tenures and claim it as "driven" by them. Politics!

#107 Tonka

Tonka
  • Member

  • 834 posts
  • Joined: November 11

Posted 22 October 2012 - 08:24

Also in hindsight the teams must be kicking themselves because for a "bowl of soup" of $400 million they could have had the commercial rights to F1



When you have Bernie & Max working together to ensure the teams are always at each other throats, is it any surprise that they didn't buy up F1?

Don't forget, Max & Bernie worked out of the same office and I'd expect many decisions and plans were made there, well before the teams and the FIA were involved. Todt isn't close to Bernie and the infighting between teams is much reduced - in fact some have become quite friendly since Max was forced out.




#108 Tonka

Tonka
  • Member

  • 834 posts
  • Joined: November 11

Posted 22 October 2012 - 08:25

No need to censor the old chap, he had nothing to say, a big yawn. Surprisingly lacking in vitriol it just confirmed he is finished as far as having an audience. We always knew he had selective amnesia now the amnesia seems to have increased in his dotage and there's nothing left to say.



Same as happens to boxers who've spent a lifetime being battered and bruised...




#109 Raelene

Raelene
  • Member

  • 5,342 posts
  • Joined: April 99

Posted 22 October 2012 - 09:39

When you have Bernie & Max working together to ensure the teams are always at each other throats, is it any surprise that they didn't buy up F1?

Don't forget, Max & Bernie worked out of the same office and I'd expect many decisions and plans were made there, well before the teams and the FIA were involved. Todt isn't close to Bernie and the infighting between teams is much reduced - in fact some have become quite friendly since Max was forced out.



yep, they are much more harmonised...some even left FOTA...the teams will never work together properly - no matter who is in charge...

#110 BoschKurve

BoschKurve
  • Member

  • 1,525 posts
  • Joined: September 12

Posted 22 October 2012 - 14:57

You did quite well until the very end. Max Mosley is all that what's in your account, but he is not an idiot. He is an educated, very articulated individual, who forms quickly quite specific concepts and ideas, and he can cast more light onto corridors of power than most. What you take out of this interview is really up to you, isn't it?


Sakae, I never said Max was an idiot. But, being educated and articulate does not mean someone is worth listening to. It just means they have a clear way of expressing their viewpoints in an understandable manner. I know plenty of articulate and educated individuals who are not worth listening to. Many of them coincidentally happen to be politicians.;)

I stated that people feel because of the things he has done in both his professional, and personal life, he does not deserve to have a platform from which to speak, regardless of his having been FIA President. I simply stated I am inclined to agree with those people more than not. Think about it for a moment please. The combination of Max and Bernie --both of whom were buddies with Balestre-- was deadly for F1. Max even more so...I can think of no individual who did more damage to F1's image than Maximillian Mosely.

#111 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 22 October 2012 - 15:31

Sakae, I never said Max was an idiot. But, being educated and articulate does not mean someone is worth listening to. It just means they have a clear way of expressing their viewpoints in an understandable manner. I know plenty of articulate and educated individuals who are not worth listening to. Many of them coincidentally happen to be politicians.;)

I stated that people feel because of the things he has done in both his professional, and personal life, he does not deserve to have a platform from which to speak, regardless of his having been FIA President. I simply stated I am inclined to agree with those people more than not. Think about it for a moment please. The combination of Max and Bernie --both of whom were buddies with Balestre-- was deadly for F1. Max even more so...I can think of no individual who did more damage to F1's image than Maximillian Mosely.

I do agree with you just about on everything with the exception on one point, which is, despite my disagreements with him on many issues, I think we need to preserve distinction on reflection of his time at FiA, and promoting him (let him to re-write history), but that I think was not going on. Sky got out of him some comparison or comments on the past, and present day, which for me was interesting.

Actually J. Todt already responded to MM's recommendation, and said, "I am not going to be a dictator"! That pretty much sums it up for me.

#112 HoldenRT

HoldenRT
  • Member

  • 6,773 posts
  • Joined: May 05

Posted 22 October 2012 - 15:38

I applaud Todt's response. :up: :clap:

#113 mattferg

mattferg
  • Member

  • 847 posts
  • Joined: July 12

Posted 22 October 2012 - 22:39

Why is getting beat by HRT any worse than Williams? Everyone has to start somewhere.


How long have you been watching F1 for?

Williams is the third most successful constructor of all time, and in some stats is actually shown as more successful than McLaren. Adrian Newey won championships with them, as did Ayrton Senna. They've been on a nosedive in terms of competitiveness in the past few years though, mostly due to money (as they lack certain mobile phone network sponsors...) but they're a highly respected and prestigious team. Compare this to a three year old team with no race wins, ever? Wow.

#114 Ross Stonefeld

Ross Stonefeld
  • Member

  • 70,106 posts
  • Joined: August 99

Posted 22 October 2012 - 22:44

Really? Senna won championships in a Williams? And you're going to accuse me of not understanding F1?

All the teams have to start somewhere. They won't have instant success, particularly with where F1 has evolved to.

#115 aditya-now

aditya-now
  • Member

  • 7,447 posts
  • Joined: June 02

Posted 23 October 2012 - 02:17

Really? Senna won championships in a Williams? And you're going to accuse me of not understanding F1?

All the teams have to start somewhere. They won't have instant success, particularly with where F1 has evolved to.


You didn't know that Senna won championships with Williams, Ross? Now you've been exposed!  ;)


#116 Raelene

Raelene
  • Member

  • 5,342 posts
  • Joined: April 99

Posted 23 October 2012 - 02:49

Really? Senna won championships in a Williams? And you're going to accuse me of not understanding F1?

:clap: :clap: :clap:

#117 SPBHM

SPBHM
  • Member

  • 1,068 posts
  • Joined: August 09

Posted 23 October 2012 - 06:58

How long have you been watching F1 for?

Williams is the third most successful constructor of all time, and in some stats is actually shown as more successful than McLaren. Adrian Newey won championships with them, as did Ayrton Senna. They've been on a nosedive in terms of competitiveness in the past few years though, mostly due to money (as they lack certain mobile phone network sponsors...) but they're a highly respected and prestigious team. Compare this to a three year old team with no race wins, ever? Wow.


Senna never completed a race for Williams, although he did 3 pole positions for them,


as for the Mosley interview, I think it was pretty decent...
I think that he is correct in many points,

#118 g1n

g1n
  • Member

  • 894 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 23 October 2012 - 07:19

How long have you been watching F1 for?

Williams is the third most successful constructor of all time, and in some stats is actually shown as more successful than McLaren. Adrian Newey won championships with them, as did Ayrton Senna. They've been on a nosedive in terms of competitiveness in the past few years though, mostly due to money (as they lack certain mobile phone network sponsors...) but they're a highly respected and prestigious team. Compare this to a three year old team with no race wins, ever? Wow.

waaaaat when did this happen?

#119 Raelene

Raelene
  • Member

  • 5,342 posts
  • Joined: April 99

Posted 23 October 2012 - 07:46

I don't think mattferg will be back to explain how Ayrton won a championship in his Williams

Advertisement

#120 oetzi

oetzi
  • Member

  • 6,829 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 23 October 2012 - 08:35

Aren't commercial rights normally held by a central group, but TV rights and etc are down territory to territory?

Just as an example that this can work, TV rights for English Premier League football are held centrally, and they do a very good job of negotiating for the collective in the global market. It makes for a much fairer distribution of TV income than, for instance, the Spanish league, where each team negotiates individually and Bareclona and Real Madrid get payments so much larger than the other teams that it has made a farce of the league for the past few years.

#121 Buttoneer

Buttoneer
  • Admin

  • 19,094 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 23 October 2012 - 15:05

I imagine there's a new user being registered right now who knows a bit more about F1 than he did at 23.39 last night.

In other news, I'd like this thread to stick with discussing MM's appearance on the show and his opinions on the issues he discussed, rather than what level of hell he'll end up in if you were to have your way.

Please avoid defamatory remarks, especially since Mr Mosley is such a litigious chap.

#122 Option1

Option1
  • Member

  • 14,892 posts
  • Joined: February 01

Posted 23 October 2012 - 15:34

I still find it amusing that some believe Mosley shouldn't have been interviewed because he might attempt to reconstruct/revise/gloss/change/reinterprete/reinvent/give his own version of/etc the past. I've yet to see any interviewee in any form of any media do differently. Lord help us that we might hear things we don't agree with or believe we know differently.

Neil

#123 Slowinfastout

Slowinfastout
  • Member

  • 9,681 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 23 October 2012 - 16:38

I pretty much despise Mosley, but I'd never argue that he should be ignored by the media, especially motorsports specialized media. My main issue is that nobody asks the tough questions, such as why Mosley was able to get away with using the FIA mechanisms in an attempt to restore his own personal reputation? Apparently, according to Mosley at the time, Spankgate was an attack on the FIA presidency. This was never demonstrated. Who paid the bills for Quest? What was the result of their investigation?

Mosley then went on to seemingly handle that crap as a purely personal matter, which makes more sense.. but as far as the FIA and motorsports is concerned, his actions initially tended towards tying up this weird and personal sex scandal to his job at the FIA, instead of creating as much distance as possible to preserve the reputation and the good standing of this tin pot dictatorship organization.

Of course that's just for his latest antics as FIA President, there are a bunch of other shady things he's done and never really was forced to explain..

#124 ensign14

ensign14
  • Member

  • 64,955 posts
  • Joined: December 01

Posted 23 October 2012 - 16:41

I'd love to see a Mosley autobiog. Take the bias with a pinch of salt, of course, but there may be a few bodies uncovered.

#125 Fastcake

Fastcake
  • Member

  • 12,817 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 23 October 2012 - 18:07

I'd love to see a Mosley autobiog. Take the bias with a pinch of salt, of course, but there may be a few bodies uncovered.


Same here. Generally the only autobiographies worth reading come from those who have retired, as you don't have to worry about pissing everyone off  ;)

#126 kosmic33

kosmic33
  • Member

  • 1,826 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 23 October 2012 - 22:03

Same here. Generally the only autobiographies worth reading come from those who have retired, as you don't have to worry about pissing everyone off ;)

Kind of, well very, off topic, but surely Bernies would be the best read of all!

#127 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 24 October 2012 - 05:23

Sky had many issues on the agenda durng the show under discussion, and MM's input was not a primary focus, therefore limited. I wish however there could be a discreet interview with him, having opportunity to get prepared and then speak on several subjects of interest. In my view his private life and political inclinations are his business only, but I would like to hear more about his "special relationship" with Ecclestone, perceptions that F1 has become FiA' main agenda, and then of course strained relationship with majority of teams (but two?). I wonder if he would be willing to speak about it freely, and factually. At the moment I have an impression that he is not actually aware of any negative influence his presidency had on this sport, and he might be right about it, but that’s not my view then, and potentially enlightened interview could clear some of that stuff up.

#128 Coops3

Coops3
  • Member

  • 1,841 posts
  • Joined: March 11

Posted 24 October 2012 - 12:48

Upon reading those quotes I immediately googled imaged of Max's "sex controversy" and laughed my ass off for a good 60 seconds. Poor Max (sarcasm).

Did he do some good? Yes. Does he make good points sometimes? Yes. But overall.. I've never been so glad to see someone in power decline.. and the way it happened.. the newspaper headlines.. (laughs some more)

There was a time when I defended him on here.. and I am not a bitter person. But I have good instincts when it comes to people and I don't like Max. I don't even care what he says these days to be honest.. I am just glad to see the end of him. Those quotes where he (sort of) wants sympathy.. just makes me laugh even more. When Max was in power, he was ruthless.

On final point is.. I haven't smelt one hint of corruption or favouritism since Todt has been in charge. Confrontational or not.. I like Todt's style.. I never would have thought that.. when he initially took over from Max.. but so far so good. Yeah there's been bad stewards decisions, yeah these's been some iffy regs changes.. but nothing that stands out as stinking to high heaven.. unlike when Max was in charge. Farewell Max..


QFT.

#129 MightyMoose

MightyMoose
  • RC Forum Host

  • 1,191 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 24 October 2012 - 18:15

In other news, I'd like this thread to stick with discussing MM's appearance on the show and his opinions on the issues he discussed, rather than what level of hell he'll end up in if you were to have your way.

Please avoid defamatory remarks, especially since Mr Mosley is such a litigious chap.


Repeating this seeing as some saw fit to continue to take the thread away from the topic and in a bad direction.

#130 mattferg

mattferg
  • Member

  • 847 posts
  • Joined: July 12

Posted 25 October 2012 - 11:57

I don't think mattferg will be back to explain how Ayrton won a championship in his Williams


Apologies, brain fart, meant to write Alain Prost and I wasn't thinking! The rest of my points still stand.