
Vettel: illegal track-cutting?
#1
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:11
http://sphotos-e.ak....109674870_n.png
I don't wanna make a comment on it.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:16
#3
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:18
I think the curb is part of the track therefore he had still 2 wheels on track.
You can't leave the track completely, actually you can't get off the white line with all of the four wheels. That's what he has done,
#4
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:24
I don't wanna make a comment on it.
You can't leave the track completely, actually you can't get off the white line with all of the four wheels. That's what he has done,
You failed.
#5
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:26
#6
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:27
#7
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:29

#8
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:32
"Drivers must use the track at all times. For the avoidance of doubt the white lines defining the track edges are considered to be part of the track but the kerbs are not."
Technically its illegal but isn't it to late for any protest?
#9
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:32
However, it always seem they let these things go when it is something they all do, which is probably the case here (if not then the lap should be deleted).
#10
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:34
20.2 Drivers must use the track at all times. For the avoidance of doubt the white lines defining the track edges are considered to be part of the track but the kerbs are not.
So curb not part of the track?
Damn, jrg19 was faster:P
Edited by roadrunner89, 27 October 2012 - 22:35.
#11
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:37
Technically its illegal but isn't it to late for any protest?
Stewards have until the hour before the race to make a change.
He's clearly broken the rules but the stewards always seem to like Seb a bit. We'll see what happens but now that the images are doing the rounds on twitter, it will almost certainly be looked at in the morning.
If I remember correctly, when Vettel fluffed his first qualy lap, he went straight back into the pits, correct? If that is the case, he'll likely have to start 10th, behind the Merc of Rosberg.
#12
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:39
Do we have footage of others?
It wouldn't be the first time that there's been special exceptions to a rule for a certain track/race.
#13
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:40
#14
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:40
#15
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:43
It´s sad to see circuits are so lenient on people cheating them, reminds me of the old Monza curbs every driver on the grid cheated blatantly. I think I heard drivers pushed to reduce curbs height this year after Massa´s incident. Half the grid would have had their suspension ...slightly modified, if the old one in the chicane was stilllike last year.
#16
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:45
#17
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:45
#18
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:46
I know Martin mentioned it during qualifying (and I think Button mentioned it as well at some point), it had been brought to Charlie's attention that certain areas were fine to run wide at and all 4 wheels leaving the track. It is not unusual that these allowances happen. Something like that would have already have been investigated by the stewards. Is Seb the only driver to have done it?
I think they were specifically referring to the pitlane, where everyone seems to be taking a much wider line (ie. off the track) to make the turn quicker. I'm not sure if it applies to the other corners. We'll find out tomorrow.
#19
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:46

Advertisement
#20
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:47
Seemed like everyone was doing it.
In the long right hander, I noticed so. They used it big time. Didn´t notice the chicane cheating though.
It wouldn't be the first time that there's been special exceptions to a rule for a certain track/race.
Yep, remember old A1 Ring. Din´t think it´s the case here, it´s just people using that place and no one complaining.
#21
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:48
#22
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:49
#23
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:52
#24
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:53
He's a witch!!!
So you're saying he weighs the same as a duck?
Blatant cheating.
#25
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:54
Sam Michael spoke about it on Sky on the pre-quali thing. His exact words, speaking on why Lewis did an extra fast lap in FP3 were "they were trying to find the limits on the kerbs and how far they can ran off the circuit" ... Whiting gave the teams a detailed explanation about which parts they can "cut" and which parts they can't, so pretty much everybody was doing it.
Thank you for explaining it a little bit better than I did.

#26
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:56
Sam Michael spoke about it on Sky on the pre-quali thing. His exact words, speaking on why Lewis did an extra fast lap in FP3 were "they were trying to find the limits on the kerbs and how far they can ran off the circuit" ... Whiting gave the teams a detailed explanation about which parts they can "cut" and which parts they can't, so pretty much everybody was doing it.
I don´t mind people running some cm. extra wide on exit of some corners -the full grid was using the curb out of last corner as a traction zone, shitty flat curbs, they should be bouncy...-,
But the chicanes´ inside apexes should be enforced... not with stewarding, with proper curbs or changes in the outside surfaces.
Edited by Skinnyguy, 27 October 2012 - 22:58.
#27
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:57
I don´t mind people running some cm. extra wide on exit of some corners, but the chicane should be enforced... not with stewarding, with proper curbs or changes in the outside surfaces.
Agreed, running wide is travelling further. Cutting corners is shortening the track.
*dons Balestre Halloween mask* You must respect the distance of the race!
#28
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:57
I don´t mind people running some cm. extra wide on exit of some corners, but the chicane should be enforced... not with stewarding, with proper curbs or changes in the outside surfaces.
it's pretty simple to enforce if they want to ... just move the suspension breaking sausage kerbs inwards, closer to the track. Cause (in India at least) those are the outer barriers as far as the drivers are concerned.
#29
Posted 27 October 2012 - 22:58
If they agreed that the aforementioned sections of the track were such 'safe zones', then this is a non-issue, really.
#30
Posted 27 October 2012 - 23:11
Wood floats, so he must weigh more than wood!! And ducks!So you're saying he weighs the same as a duck?
Blatant cheating.
#31
Posted 27 October 2012 - 23:40
#32
Posted 27 October 2012 - 23:49
#33
Posted 28 October 2012 - 00:07
Sad state of affairs when this is being discussed. Pussyfication of both fans and the sport has been completed.
You got it all wrong.
Pussyfication of the sport is flat curbs, grippy turf, no grass and gravel around tracks.
If you look behind itchy fans asking for ridiculous penalties, there´s a good discussion showing racing fans do not want that pussyfication.
Edited by Skinnyguy, 28 October 2012 - 00:07.
#34
Posted 28 October 2012 - 00:10
#35
Posted 28 October 2012 - 00:17
#36
Posted 28 October 2012 - 00:59
haha way too many eager anti vettel people on here. Should we demote every other driver that also did this because they were told it was ok by charlie? Or just scream PENALTY!!!! before knowing anything.
As it is not made official if there are any exceptions, we can only judge from the rules. And, by the rules we know - it was illegal. And breaking rules should be penalized. No matter how small or big it is. It's still a rule.
#37
Posted 28 October 2012 - 01:05
#38
Posted 28 October 2012 - 04:02
#39
Posted 28 October 2012 - 04:18
The voice of reason!The official classification after qualifying has been published by the FiA so no more penalties will be issued unless someone discovers a faulty gearbox tomorrow.

Check out 174d of ISC.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 28 October 2012 - 05:59
BTW, all drivers did the same in those 2 chicanes.
#41
Posted 28 October 2012 - 06:28
#42
Posted 28 October 2012 - 06:37
Despite that some people are not delighted with that, for example Alan Jones, who is the third stewart at this weekend. "The question is whether you can gain something coming into the next corner."
I know Vettel ****ed up his first attempt, got angry because he knew he couldn't give the pole away with such a dominant car and then went it for some illegal ways.
Edited by FerrariAlonso, 28 October 2012 - 06:38.
#43
Posted 28 October 2012 - 06:57
Edited by Muppetmad, 28 October 2012 - 06:57.
#44
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:20
If it was, Button would have been the 1st to ask for a penalty, alonso 2nd.
Edited by tsk19xx, 28 October 2012 - 07:21.
#45
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:27
#46
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:31
Come on, are you blind? It's so easy.Alonso got no penalty in Germany for his pole lap, so why should Vettel get one now?
OP is called FerrariAlonso, not RedBullVettel. So obv penalty.
#47
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:35

I know Vettel ****ed up his first attempt, got angry because he knew he couldn't give the pole away with such a dominant car and then went it for some illegal ways.

#48
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:25
LolOf course it's not illegal.
If it was, Button would have been the 1st to ask for a penalty, alonso 2nd.
#49
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:26
Sometimes I get the feeling Vettel is allowed to do what he wants to.
Then why was Vettel punished in Monza for the exact same thing which Alonso did the year before and went scotfree.
#50
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:32
Well, it's Alan who had to decide whether or not Seb's lap was legalI have just been givin from one of my friend who works on the track. He has just spoken to Charlie and that's what he said: "In our opinion cutting some parts of the track doesn't give you an advantage. The astroturf slows the car down more than the advantage you can gain with that. In the briefing all drivers were given with this piece of information and everyone should be aware of that."
Despite that some people are not delighted with that, for example Alan Jones, who is the third stewart at this weekend. "The question is whether you can gain something coming into the next corner."
