actually they did. this banning of Testing has helped the midfield team to close to the big boys. 8 different winners and 5 diff constructors winning in a single season is a testament to that. well, if u have money and willing to spend it (like ferrari/macca/RB/mercs) you can always find different avenues to pursue, but CFD and wind tunnel can do so much as seen by MGP W03 and most top teams during first half.
also, reduced testing means reduced travelling, scheduling and workload specially considering we're bordering on having 22 races soon. CFD and wind tunnel boffins don't travel much. also reduces fuel cost, tire cost, manufacturing cost , engine cost etc etc. think like this, if there were frequent in season testing, how many engines/GB/Chasis would be needed??? i'm looking forward for a meaningful and balanced RRA .
Did they? Or was it tire bonanza? Last year you had McLaren, RedBull and Ferrari dividing the podiums. Mercedes was distant fourth in a piece of no-mans-l;and and the rest was even more behind. Very few races had another team on the podium.
The Brits live near Silverstone and Ferrari has its tarmac playyard. Only HRT was not near a test track, but they are bankrupt. The money not spent on testing is spent elsewhere. That is the nature of F1. On track experience is way better for test drivers.
For example, watch the Q2 times again in Valencia.
http://en.wikipedia....pean_Grand_Prix13 drivers within 98,489-98,780 laptime window, or better, less than 3 tenths between 13 drivers over nearly a 100 second lap. You can't design to that, I sincerely believe that was near the max tire laptime.