Jump to content


Photo
* * * * - 1 votes

I can honestly say Josh has the potential to get to the very top - Damon


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#51 Risil

Risil
  • Administrator

  • 61,730 posts
  • Joined: February 07

Posted 06 January 2013 - 17:57

You could say about many young drivers that they have potential either to be at the very top or just pretty good drivers, but what counts is whether you have the money to make it.


Interesting quotes on this subject (many people having the potential, not the money aspect) from an interview Hill gave in 1993, from Grandprix.com's rather invaluable archive:

"You know you can win races from the first time it happens. You win and then you go up to the next level of the sport thinking: "It is going to be more difficult and more competitive with faster cars". And if you win a race in F3, you say: "Right, now I know I can do that" and you look at F3000. F1 is no different in that respect than any other championship if you have the car to do the job. When the time is right and in the right circumstances I will win a race. I don't think getting hung up about it will help me.

"All sport is in the mind, isn't it?" he says. "A lot of people have the capability of achieving the top level in sports. It is the mental thing which makes them champions or lets them down. If I read that Frank is going to sign Jean Alesi next week and I start worrying about it I will not perform well.

"There is negative pressure and there's positive pressure. Wanting to win is a positive pressure, it gets the best out of you. You have to learn to dispel negative pressure, otherwise you get into a downward spiral. The mental side is the key to this sport. That is why people like Ayrton Senna, Alain Prost and Nigel Mansell do so well. They have so much self-confidence and so much self-belief that in a competitive situation they are always able to get the best out of themselves."


Edited by Risil, 06 January 2013 - 17:58.


Advertisement

#52 Rob

Rob
  • Member

  • 9,223 posts
  • Joined: February 01

Posted 06 January 2013 - 18:09

I like Damon and all, but for me his 1995 season was a huge disapointment. I don't think Williams produced a bad car in 1995, I just don't think Damon was up to it.


Damon also lost several wins due to errors made by the team. Williams have to take their equal share of the blame.

#53 PretentiousBread

PretentiousBread
  • Member

  • 2,906 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 06 January 2013 - 18:24

Golly! Damon thinks his son has the talent to go to the VERY TOP???

:rolleyes:

Not that I dislike Damon, but - c'mon.... objectivity?


Expecting a father to be objective about his son? That's one of the stupidest points i've ever read on this forum.

#54 tifosiMac

tifosiMac
  • Member

  • 7,360 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 06 January 2013 - 18:28

Expecting a father to be objective about his son? That's one of the stupidest points i've ever read on this forum.

Its certainly up there and not going worry many Mensa candidates.

#55 Zippel

Zippel
  • Member

  • 1,145 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 06 January 2013 - 22:50

I think that Hakkinen story needs a whole thread to itself! The potential permutations are fascinating, who would Mclaren have got had Mika gone to Williams instead? Surely Mika would of won the '96/'97 WDCs, would Mika have been able to challenge Prost in '93? Would Shumi have gone to Mclaren instead of Ferrari?


You forget Senna's freak accident wouldn't have happened thus would still be a significant factor.

One thing worth mentioning about Williams taking on Hill for 93, he worked incredibly cheap. In 1994 Mansell was paid more per race than Hill for that whole year. Hill didn't get a decent top driver salary until 1996.

Edited by Zippel, 06 January 2013 - 22:53.


#56 pingu666

pingu666
  • Member

  • 9,272 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 07 January 2013 - 00:05

williams could afford to pay a know quanity, at that time, they obivously saw some ability somewhere.

at the moment the best talent to have is a large chequebook anyways...

#57 Zippel

Zippel
  • Member

  • 1,145 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 07 January 2013 - 03:31

williams could afford to pay a know quanity, at that time, they obivously saw some ability somewhere.


No doubt but considering some top driver salaries of the time could hamper car development (which Ron Dennis said of Senna's in 93), taking on their test driver who knew the car and would not be taking big bucks away from its development would be an attractive choice.

Also, I think there was a bit of trying to appease the british public after the way the Mansell saga went down by giving them another driver to back.

Edited by Zippel, 07 January 2013 - 03:35.


#58 Wander

Wander
  • Member

  • 2,367 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 07 January 2013 - 08:11

Patrick Head explains what they saw in Damon at the time he was a test driver: http://www.youtube.c...KqaEc5Q8#t=427s

There's also a lot of interesting stuff on Damon in the "Clive James meets Damon Hill" documentary from 96, which you can find in youtube if anybody's interested and hasn't seen it yet.

#59 SpeedRacer`

SpeedRacer`
  • Member

  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: October 08

Posted 07 January 2013 - 14:35

Damon also lost several wins due to errors made by the team. Williams have to take their equal share of the blame.

Coulthard had a ton of bad reliability in '95, he lost several wins and podiums. In at least 50% of the races he had a technical issue.