I mean what I said. Vettel was the fastest on track with his 1st set of inters and also fastest with his second set. So, Vettel (the RB) was just fast under these conditions overall...What does "these conditions" mean? Do you mean changing or static? I assume you mean changing conditions as that is what was happening and therefore, as history has shown, last man passing the line has the advantage when conditions are changing to the better. You don't even have to go too far back in time to see this.
Go one week ;) Got over the line with a second to spare and was able to not even required to do the last lap to make him faster.
Andy
Petronas Malaysian GP - Qualification Q1, Q2 and Q3
#301
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:11
Advertisement
#302
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:12
#303
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:12
to Hülkenberg for complaining about having to drive around a car during the 20 minute long (!) Q3.
Very happy to see Ferrari strong with both drivers again.
#304
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:13
I think what he meant was using medium in Q1 (a few other teams also chose the same strategy) and using the same set of tyres in Q2.And what means "different approach during Q1 and Q2"?
#305
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:16
Staggering when theres drivers like Kamui around.
#306
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:22
I don't think we can properly judge Grosjean yet this season.I feel Chilton, Grosjean and DiResta are wastes of a seat.
Staggering when theres drivers like Kamui around.
http://www.f1fanatic...-lack-upgrades/
#307
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:28
According to Sky Italia Raikkonen is under investigation for blocking Rosberg during qualifying.
#308
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:31
#309
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:48
I think what he meant was using medium in Q1 (a few other teams also chose the same strategy) and using the same set of tyres in Q2.
The point was: he had to use medium tyres because of the car setup. I think their setup approach was to wet conditions since the beginning of the Q.
#310
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:52
#311
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:55
You mean last years carnage wasnt enough?I don't think we can properly judge Grosjean yet this season.
http://www.f1fanatic...-lack-upgrades/
#312
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:55
Seriously? And when did this so supposed impeding happen?
EDIT: Eh.. Actually the time is there, but I guess it wasn't shown on tv.
Edited by darkkis, 23 March 2013 - 10:56.
#313
Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:58
Di Resta was just unlucky to be honest. He got caught in the rain, Sutil didn't.Sutil is destroying the extremely over-hyped Di Resta. But I bet Autosport will give Paul the same rating as Adrian.
#314
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:07
Di Resta was just unlucky to be honest. He got caught in the rain, Sutil didn't.
I agree. It's too early to speak about destruction.
#315
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:12
#316
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:12
I think in general Lotus' driver preference is underestimated, we heard these 'upgrades' stories last year as well. Last years points did not represent their performances.You mean last years carnage wasnt enough?
#317
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:13
#318
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:15
My guess was that had he thought it would be raining tomorrow and gone for wet set up he wouldn't have been on the scrubbed set in Q2 in the first place. Because there's no need for saving dry tyres to the point of taking a risk of missing Q3. As he said, without the brief shower during the later part of the Q2 he would have had to go out again on new mediums. They (Lotus and FI too) seemed to think prime tyre would be the better choice for the race considering their tyre woes. So saving those in Q1 also makes sense. Then I see you can argue he was never in danger zone, as his second try on new set would have been enough probably.The point was: he had to use medium tyres because of the car setup. I think their setup approach was to wet conditions since the beginning of the Q.
Edited by plumtree, 23 March 2013 - 11:17.
#319
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:16
That sucks hard for Räikkönen but with rain, all bets are off, and it's not a disaster to start 10th rather than seventh.
That's because the race will be off.
#321
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:24
Di Resta was just unlucky to be honest. He got caught in the rain, Sutil didn't.
He got caught in the rain because his first run was not good enough for Q3, so had to go out again. In contrast, Sutil was right up there in his first run and thus did not need to go out when it rained.
So not unlucky, just didn't do the lap time when it mattered.
#322
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:41
Raikkonen handed grid penalty for blocking - http://www.f1times.c...s/display/07381 … #F1
#323
Posted 23 March 2013 - 13:36
You are right. It would have really hurt if he was demoted from P2 to P5 on a dry qualy looking at a dry race. But then again part of the confusion probably arose from rain, drivers not having a good on eye on those behind with spray and teams getting distracted with melee around the weather.That sucks hard for Räikkönen but with rain, all bets are off, and it's not a disaster to start 10th rather than seventh.
#324
Posted 23 March 2013 - 15:02
#325
Posted 23 March 2013 - 15:09
Nothing is in the bag in Formula 1.Quite an exciting session! Looking forward to the race tomorrow even though it looks like it's in the bag for Ferrari.
For all you know Massa and Alonso could have a run-in into turn 1 causing both of them to retire. It is possible, although highly unlikely....
#326
Posted 23 March 2013 - 15:16
Seriously? And when did this so supposed impeding happen?
EDIT: Eh.. Actually the time is there, but I guess it wasn't shown on tv.
Your Kimi worship has come to a stage where you first reaction is that even the stewards are lying?
#327
Posted 23 March 2013 - 18:49
#328
Posted 23 March 2013 - 19:08
...when did I say such thing? You just had to have a go at it, didn't you? I was just amazed at the case because there was no mention about it neither on the broadcast nor on major sport sites. I guess your hatred for Kimi makes you imagine things.Your Kimi worship has come to a stage where you first reaction is that even the stewards are lying?
Edited by darkkis, 23 March 2013 - 19:10.
#329
Posted 23 March 2013 - 19:26
#330
Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:02