2 seasons to 1 is not beating your team mate over 3 years.Then why did Jenson Button beat him over their 3 years together?
Also did you see what happened last season.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:19
2 seasons to 1 is not beating your team mate over 3 years.Then why did Jenson Button beat him over their 3 years together?
Advertisement
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:23
Where did he state that Hamilton is the only one that lies?
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:26
Don't you start with your snide insinuation. It's not the case that Hamilton 'lies'. He told one lie. Jenson told one. So did Nando and Sebi and goodness knows who else. I've observed before it's the least scrupulous posters who keep bringing liegate up, and misrepresenting it.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:31
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:32
OTI dont trust any of them. They all have agendas and image to live up to. Sometimes it backfires and we get a weekend like in Malaysia.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:34
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:38
lol, Hamilton hitting back at Helmut
this is going to be a fun 2 week break.
If lewis is the number 1 because nico was told not to overtake him, then webber must be the number 1 at RB because they told vettel not to overtake webber.
Marko is a hypocrite.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:57
but but but twas Marko wot started it .
He shouldn't have commented on Merc last Sunday -Why shouldn't Hamilton defend his team & pile the pressure back on his?
He didn't.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 19:16
Advertisement
Posted 26 March 2013 - 19:22
Posted 26 March 2013 - 19:22
Posted 26 March 2013 - 19:33
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:00
Which takes us back to Lewis being number 1. If there were really no preference then why should Brawn care? There's no risk involved, and it would be a wonderful advert for the openess and fair play of Mercedes. It's difficult not to suspect that Lewis knew the answer before he asked: after all, why ask in the first place?
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:10
When Jenson announced his move to McLaren, many thought he was crazy, because the team was "completely geared to Lewis". They said that with a reason. McLaren was so geared towards Lewis they needed to reshuffle the engineers to give Jenson a fair chance. Lewis shouldnt play the innocent child here.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:24
Yes, McLaren changed Hamilton's engineer, a decision I have never seen any other top driver have to endure in the name of "equality."
And you're actually using it to fit your agenda of him being favoured?
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:27
Yes, McLaren changed Hamilton's engineer, a decision I have never seen any other top driver have to endure in the name of "equality."
And you're actually using it to fit your agenda of him being favoured?
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:40
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:42
LOL, that's really rich from Hamilton saying RB has a clear one and two and Merc not, when *exactly* the opposite could be seen in Malaysia. Or did he mean Webber's the clear number one?
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:47
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:47
2 seasons to 1 is not beating your team mate over 3 years.
Also did you see what happened last season.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:49
Just how rich it was from Marko
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:51
What is with Marko? He said Merc apparently has a number one and two, and that was what could be seen for everyone in Malaysia. Not rich, just right.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:54
Webber ignores it anyways. The difference is just that most people find it good when Webber ignores it, and hate Vettel when he does it once himself...And Redbull never have?
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:54
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:55
Webber ignores it anyways. The difference is just that most people find it good when Webber ignores it, and hate Vettel when he does it once himself...
Posted 26 March 2013 - 21:02
Really? So when did Vettel benefit from a team order on Webber? At the last season finale maybe, when Webber was surely told to stay clear from Vettel and has then done exactly the opposite?I can recall loads of times that Vettel has benefitted, don't try and rewrite it. If you're going to call Merc out on it then don't chicken and pretend Redbull don't do anything of the sort.
Edited by drunkenmaster, 26 March 2013 - 21:03.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 00:04
If Red Bull doesn't have equality why did Lewis want to drive for them?
Posted 27 March 2013 - 00:48
Brawn watched two passes and re-passes, burning up fuel. So he had to end the racing, and the usual pre-existing deal is that whoever is leading after the last stops keeps the lead while they cruise safely to the finish.
Hamilton had to ask because Rosberg was trying not to pass, so he'd have had to force it and effect a team order. That's not his prerogative, quite obviously.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 03:03
Lewis simply is the best. He does not need a lapdog as a partner, like other so called super star drivers.
Advertisement
Posted 27 March 2013 - 03:05
Brawn watched two passes and re-passes, burning up fuel. So he had to end the racing, and the usual pre-existing deal is that whoever is leading after the last stops keeps the lead while they cruise safely to the finish.
Hamilton had to ask because Rosberg was trying not to pass, so he'd have had to force it and effect a team order. That's not his prerogative, quite obviously.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:26
Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:38
No the point is not the team order, which is quite normal among equal drivers, it's that Vettel can ignore it and get away with it.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:44
Brawn watched two passes and re-passes, burning up fuel. So he had to end the racing, and the usual pre-existing deal is that whoever is leading after the last stops keeps the lead while they cruise safely to the finish.
Hamilton had to ask because Rosberg was trying not to pass, so he'd have had to force it and effect a team order. That's not his prerogative, quite obviously.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:57
Equally hilarious how Hamilton fans just pull stuff out of the air to pass of as facts when it suits the propaganda line..Brawn watched two passes and re-passes, burning up fuel. So he had to end the racing, and the usual pre-existing deal is that whoever is leading after the last stops keeps the lead while they cruise safely to the finish.
Hamilton had to ask because Rosberg was trying not to pass, so he'd have had to force it and effect a team order. That's not his prerogative, quite obviously.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 14:07
I can recall loads of times that Vettel has benefitted, don't try and rewrite it. If you're going to call Merc out on it then don't chicken and pretend Redbull don't do anything of the sort.