Mono-wheel Madness: E. J. Christie's must-see V8-powered 14' MONSTER from 1923
#1
Posted 09 April 2013 - 20:36
The product of the fertile imagination of a Professor E. J. Christie, this gyroscopic unicycle was supposedly capable
of speeds of up to 400 miles per hour, although at the time of an article from the April, 1923 issue of Popular Science,
it had yet to be tested. This monster was 14 feet tall, weighed 2,400 pounds and used what appears to us to be a
Curtiss OX-5 airplane engine for power. On The Old Motor as aways we have the whole story behind this monster with
plenty more of photos and details.
We are trying to find out if E. J. Christie was in anyway related to Walter Christie, they both seemed to "think outside
the box" so there may be a connection.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 10 April 2013 - 01:07
Coming a cropper at any serious speed would have involved a lot of personal damage...
One thing that is strange, the orientation of the engine. Unless it needed to be mounted north-south for 'packaging' purposes, one would imagine its torque reaction would tend to be of concern.
#3
Posted 10 April 2013 - 04:36
I agree 100%. Plus having that bloody great chain flapping around under your backside would be SCAREY.He certainly had a fertile imagination!
Coming a cropper at any serious speed would have involved a lot of personal damage...
One thing that is strange, the orientation of the engine. Unless it needed to be mounted north-south for 'packaging' purposes, one would imagine its torque reaction would tend to be of concern.
#4
Posted 10 April 2013 - 07:28
#5
Posted 10 April 2013 - 07:47
#6
Posted 10 April 2013 - 07:53
http://www.douglas-s...orwhl3.htm#owen
(The page starts with the Dynosphere as mentioned by Steve; scroll down the page for the Owen Monowheel)
#7
Posted 10 April 2013 - 08:01
#8
Posted 10 April 2013 - 09:12
#9
Posted 10 April 2013 - 10:27
My question is: how the heck is he gonna stop this thing without falling over? Putting a foot out like with a small one doesn't work here.
#10
Posted 10 April 2013 - 13:19
#11
Posted 10 April 2013 - 18:29
#12
Posted 11 April 2013 - 09:20
The deltawing needs some more time for development to be fully competetive though. It took Ford two years and quiet some dollars to get the GT40 to the top. The deltawing is a small independent project in comparison.
#13
Posted 11 April 2013 - 10:10
Dan Gurney swears by the DeltaWing, I would assume he wouldn't be so keen on the DynoSphere!!!The difference between this thing and the deltawing is that the deltawing is actually working and it doesn't fall over when it slows down.
The deltawing needs some more time for development to be fully competetive though. It took Ford two years and quiet some dollars to get the GT40 to the top. The deltawing is a small independent project in comparison.
The standard fault with this design, the "rocking" motion that develops (which has a name, which I can't recall!), still it is obviously quick, the speed it gets from Brooklands, to Pendine and back is astounding!!
Edited by f1steveuk, 11 April 2013 - 10:19.
#14
Posted 11 April 2013 - 12:06
Doesn't it?The difference between this thing and the deltawing is that the deltawing is actually working and it doesn't fall over when it slows down.