
F1 Magazine
#1
Posted 30 March 2001 - 04:15
If this mag is available in the states, I'll never get anything else done!
Advertisement
#2
Posted 30 March 2001 - 04:20
just ordered my subscription to be sent to NZ, costs about $200NZ a year... not too bad.
#3
Posted 30 March 2001 - 13:42
#4
Posted 30 March 2001 - 13:43
I hear its not too bad.
have to say though that the best racing mag is autosport. its been going strong since the 60's and it gives a great view on all forms of racing, not only f1.
Niall
#5
Posted 30 March 2001 - 14:06

#6
Posted 30 March 2001 - 14:12
The publication, which included an impressive array of journalists like Gerald Donaldson, Joe Saward, David Tremayne, Jane Nottage and Christopher Hilton, was released for the first time earlier this month.
Lauda admitted he leaves his post because he wants to concentrate on his role as chief executive of a division of Ford's Premier Automotive Group, owners of the Jaguar Racing team.
"I am stepping down as editor in chief from the May issue," Lauda said. "I cannot fulfil my roles for both Formula One Magazine and Jaguar.
"And frankly Jaguar needs me more."
From the AtlasF1 grapevine......
#7
Posted 30 March 2001 - 14:21
#8
Posted 31 March 2001 - 11:06
Euro Press Dist Pty
Tel: 02 9698 4922
Fax: 02 9698 7675
#9
Posted 31 March 2001 - 11:46
#10
Posted 31 March 2001 - 17:35
or can I, in malaysia??
#11
Posted 31 March 2001 - 20:14
One of their writers, Jane Nottage, gives me the impression she moved over from writing for the Sun newspaper.
I'll give it another shot, though. The articles on Mario Andretti, Williams and the pre-season breakdown were pretty good.
#12
Posted 31 March 2001 - 21:20
#13
Posted 31 March 2001 - 21:37
#14
Posted 31 March 2001 - 21:44







#15
Posted 31 March 2001 - 22:00
I loved the first issue. The stories of Hakkinen and Senna's accidents almost moved me to tears.
Definately a decent mag.
#16
Posted 31 March 2001 - 22:44

personally i like the gory stuff,its nice to get a sense of history,technical background as well as curent affairs and race reports.the absence of darren heath can only be a BIG plus.im overexposed already.
so what if it has more agendi than a thing with an awful lot of agenda.its fresh!!
#17
Posted 01 April 2001 - 07:23
#18
Posted 01 April 2001 - 07:36
#19
Posted 01 April 2001 - 15:28
I just pm'ed you the mag info.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 05 April 2001 - 11:31
Someone said that these mags were aimed at male audiences so why were they putting these sorts of pictures on the cover. I told him he'd be surprised how many females were into the sport but I would still have thought the majority target audience would be male.
#21
Posted 05 April 2001 - 11:47
Noticed this morning that they forgot to put in a championship points table!
#22
Posted 05 April 2001 - 11:50

#23
Posted 05 April 2001 - 14:24
#24
Posted 05 April 2001 - 14:52
Originally posted by Bogman
.... Some really good stories, but I didn't really need to see Schumi and Corrinna swapping spit.
My thoughts exactly! That was really unsettling.
IMHO -- overall, I like the mag -- it's very much a "coffee table" type of publication. Very pretty, glossy pictures. Very different as well -- from the other publications out there. A bit too "glossy" and Fanzine like for my tastes (beefcake photos and all!) but quite interesting. If we get it here in Canada -- I'm sure it available just about everywhere else. Next issue should be out soon. Ummmm -- a shirtless JV. I'm not used to F1 catering to "my" tastes! Actually --- I'd rather see his car.
#25
Posted 05 April 2001 - 16:43
My girlfriend actually bought for me, I hadn't even heard of it. The Schumacher article was pretty good..........different. The Senna article was also good. I thought the ads of the crying and yelling was really funny. I look forward to buying more issues.

#26
Posted 05 April 2001 - 16:47
#27
Posted 05 April 2001 - 16:54
#28
Posted 05 April 2001 - 16:56
Anyone interested in starting a North American edition with me?
#29
Posted 05 April 2001 - 17:05
One thing that pissed me off was John Watson opining that, given the choice between Jaguar, Mercedes, and BMW, 90% of buyers would spring for a Jag if the marque was properly marketed. What a joke! Jags (especially the sedans) are bad-handling crap.
Can you say M5? How about Z9? M3? Sure you can. Show me a Jag that even compares.

#30
Posted 05 April 2001 - 18:26

The articles on Hakkinen and Senna were very informative and sad but have to be read. This months issue has the story of Jochen Rindts last day, and you find yourself wishing that he had quit when he thought about retiring instead of carrying on, because the cars were so unsafe 'in those days'.
A good mag, includes the past as well as the present. Worth the money.
#31
Posted 05 April 2001 - 18:38
#32
Posted 05 April 2001 - 19:08
Depends - most brits [the origin of the magzine] would like to own a british jag rather than a BMW or Merc. I know i'd rather have a XK8 rather than either a M5 or Z9.Originally posted by pa
One thing that pissed me off was John Watson opining that, given the choice between Jaguar, Mercedes, and BMW, 90% of buyers would spring for a Jag if the marque was properly marketed. What a joke! Jags (especially the sedans) are bad-handling crap.
Can you say M5? How about Z9? M3? Sure you can. Show me a Jag that even compares.![]()
As for the handing of modern jags - I've searched the web but I can't seem to find any large body of support for that statement. But I'll admit the S-Type is pig ugly.
#33
Posted 05 April 2001 - 20:18
Originally posted by MrAerodynamicist
Depends - most brits [the origin of the magzine] would like to own a british jag rather than a BMW or Merc. I know i'd rather have a XK8 rather than either a M5 or Z9.
As for the handing of modern jags - I've searched the web but I can't seem to find any large body of support for that statement. But I'll admit the S-Type is pig ugly.
Mr. A:
I've seen review after review in car mags that say the M5 is the best sedan in the world by a country mile bar none. Similar review for the new M3. As for Jag sedans, I saw a recent test at Laguna Seca, and the thing handled very poorly. All manner of comments about "Jaguar has a lot to learn about designing for perfomance handling" and the like. Jags are just boulevard cruisers - that's why nobody races them anymore. All show, no go. It'd take an M5 over everything but a Ferrari, and I bet the M5 would give the Ferrari a pretty good thrasing too!
#34
Posted 05 April 2001 - 21:24
Plus the term "if the marque was properly marketed." means that you can get away with quite a lot


#35
Posted 06 April 2001 - 18:00

#36
Posted 06 April 2001 - 18:21

#37
Posted 06 April 2001 - 18:33
Originally posted by Smooth
Mine came yesterday (I need to order the 1st one, as i subscribed too late.....). My wife seemed to like the cover, until I told her that was the guy I usually refer to as the talking anus!![]()
That's odd. Eddie Irvine isn't on the cover of the Canadian edition...

#38
Posted 07 April 2001 - 01:09
Originally posted by pa
That's odd. Eddie Irvine isn't on the cover of the Canadian edition...![]()


#39
Posted 07 April 2001 - 01:20
Originally posted by Vicster
One of their writers, Jane Nottage, gives me the impression she moved over from writing for the Sun newspaper.
My God. If that twit is writing for this rag, you just scared me aware from buying a copy...
Advertisement
#40
Posted 07 April 2001 - 02:52
#41
Posted 07 April 2001 - 04:01
Five Thumbs outta five





(I'd take one away for the Irvine article, but he's entertaining none the less.)
#42
Posted 07 April 2001 - 12:36
#43
Posted 07 April 2001 - 12:49
SB
#44
Posted 07 April 2001 - 21:25
#45
Posted 07 April 2001 - 22:02



#46
Posted 09 April 2001 - 12:05
Question though -- are the covers the same in every country? I know with F1 Racing -- they are not.
Also, did anyone notice thta F1 Racing rally spruced up their issues since this pub. came out. They are larger -- and glossier than before.
Competition is very good for the consumer.
#47
Posted 09 April 2001 - 16:08
It's funny, I wondered the same thing about the cover. That was why I got F1 Racing because the covers were different. And you are right about them getting their act together now that Bernies' mag is here. I was going to cansel my subscription to them this year because they were getting very lame. I thought the beefcake pic was very dumb (not just because I'm a guy), it didn't fit the context of the story. I also thought the story about his manager, Mrs. Pollock, was better reading. Did you? I don't have the first issue yet of the mag but, they tell me it's coming. So I can't compare it.Originally posted by CDNgrl
... I couldn't help but wonder though --- wouldn't the beefcake photo be embarrassing? Wouldn't there be teasing in the paddocks -- among his mates?
Question though -- are the covers the same in every country? I know with F1 Racing -- they are not.
Also, did anyone notice that F1 Racing rally spruced up their issues since this pub. came out. They are larger -- and glossier than before.
Competition is very good for the consumer.
#48
Posted 09 April 2001 - 16:32
I had mixed feelings about that one. It was interesting and gave a different perspective, but it still felt somewhat fanzine like to me. Like we are looking for info -- and the fact that you know someone famous makes you interesting. Still -- a good read. Also the article on JV --- written by Donaldson. The author is biased to begin with -- I've a JV bias, so I know that I'm getting a biased story! He didn't tell me anything I didn't know.Originally posted by Ivan
[B]
I also thought the story about his manager, Mrs. Pollock, was better reading. Did you? /B]
Having said all that -- I do like the magazine and look forward to more issues.
#49
Posted 09 April 2001 - 17:11
Talk about embarrassing covers....when I brought it home, my wife said, "what's that, it looks like some gay porno mag"
Grrrrrr. She new it was an F1 magazine. She likes to take shots like that.;) Especially about sports.
#50
Posted 10 April 2001 - 03:14
It's shaping up quite nice, I found a lot of articles of interest. The whole breakdown of JV's crash at Melbourne was insightful. I didn't get that detailed an account anywhere else.
But the cover....I buried it under a couple of other magazines when I went to the cashier. Can't they put a nice picture of some cars?