What is a 'Detroit Diesel' engine?
#1
Posted 30 March 2001 - 12:22
Yesterday I passed a VanHool bus, and it had a big banner on the side stating: "First VanHool bus fitted with Detroit Diesel Engine".
What is that? Is 'Detroit Diesel' a company or a technology?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 30 March 2001 - 12:28
It makes two-stroke diesel engines
#4
Posted 30 March 2001 - 13:54
Kinda unusual in a truck isn't it.
Niall
#5
Posted 30 March 2001 - 14:06
Don't mock 2-stroke diesels, they're very efficient
#6
Posted 30 March 2001 - 14:36
Kinda unusual in a truck isn't it.
Niall
Actually, not at all in the US anyway, the GM 6v Turbocharged (and supercharged of course) 2 stroke diesel has been the motor of choice in the bus/marine industry for quite some time. Extremely Reliable, Compact and Powerfull. I drove a 40foot transit bus for some time with one of these units. Reasonable speed (for a bus) and unbelievable feul economy. (IF I remember correcty it was better than 12miles per Gal(US) around town fully loaded with standing room only. This was about on par with a big block station wagon of the era with a couple of folks in it...
And If I remember my history(channel) GM Deisels powered the landing craft to Normandy among other things.
Emmissions concerns are (I Think) causing the old 53, 71 and 92's to go the way of the dinosaur. If I remember correctly, the "92" in 6-92 is the Cubic inch displacement of one cylinder.
#7
Posted 30 March 2001 - 14:37
Thanks for the correction. A Daimler Chrysler Company....
#8
Posted 30 March 2001 - 15:03
#9
Posted 30 March 2001 - 16:51
#11
Posted 30 March 2001 - 18:08
Originally posted by carlos.maza
Detroit Diesel is a North American Company. As far as I know, it belongs to the General Motors group.
It makes two-stroke diesel engines
Almost all of Detroit Diesel's current production is now four-stroke. Most of the remaining two-stroke production is for existing military contracts, and they are trying to transition those to four-stroke also. They are heavily into production of engines for cars, minivans, and SUVs now too.
When Penske took over from General Motors in 1988, DD was dying, and had about 4% share of the markets they were in... now it's something like 30%. Roger Penske is still Chairman at DDC and they seem to be quite independent from DaimlerChrysler for now, nothing like the Chrysler debacle. DaimlerChrysler only purchases about one third of DDC's output. I've seen DaimlerChrysler referred to as DDCs "indirect parent company" whatever that means... not sure of the exact business structure.
#12
Posted 30 March 2001 - 23:25
Originally posted by Ali_G
2 Stroke diesel engines.
Kinda unusual in a truck isn't it.
Niall
Actually, Ali, these are not two strokes in the traditional mode. They don't rely on crankcase compression to fill the cylinders via ports, but they are filled via an inlet valve in the head.
This means, of course, that they must be supercharged, and this is why the preponderance of GM blowers on the dragsters over many years... they were just so available.
Today they are usually, IIUIC, turbocharged as well as supercharged, so the air is pumped in the top, the ports at the bottom of the cylinder are exposed by the piston reaching BDC and the exhaust is hurried out there by the incoming charge.
Naturally, the mandatory use of fuel injection in a diesel ensures there's little fuel loss... or none if it's running at 12mpg...
And indeed, the 71, 92 etc is the cylinder capacity in cubic inches, so a 6/71 is a V6 with 71cid cylinders, giving a total capacity of 426 cubic inches, or 7 litres (near enough). They come in a variety of configurations, but mostly V6 and V8. Two V8s can be tied together to form a V16, and this is not uncommon.
Of interest is the fact that the pre-war Auto Union Grand Prix cars used the same 2-stroke technology... overhead cams and inlet valves, piston-cleared exhaust ports, lotsa noise...
I imagine the swing to 4-stroke is for cleaner emissions...
#13
Posted 31 March 2001 - 05:21
The switch to 4 stroke almost killed Detroit and GM basically gave it to Penske for half a song. Who was able to work the bugs out of the 60 series motor.
Now if we could just get the big shots at HQ to sell the rest of GM to Penske.
#14
Posted 31 March 2001 - 08:50
There's a Sarich designed two stroke engine which is making it,slowly, into production (I know the designer). It blows air across a stream of fuel into the cylinder, the atomisation is good and the process is very cheap. Mercury now use this system. Deisel was also viable, but I don't know if the cost savings were worthwhile in a diesel, probably not ...