
The importance of unsprung mass for road cars
#1
Posted 22 April 2013 - 05:31
or
http://www.proteanel...le-Dynamics.pdf for pretty colours.
aka the forbidden experiment.
http://www.eng-tips.....cfm?qid=265158
http://www.eng-tips.....cfm?qid=174774
Advertisement
#2
Posted 22 April 2013 - 07:09
I was always impressed by the smooth ride and tyre grip at the rear over bumps when cornering in the early XJ6/12 Jags. At the time I attributed this to the lower unsprung weight at the rear due to the inboard brakes. I was a bit horrified when the later XJs moved their brakes outboard - but it made no noticeable difference to the ride etc.
#3
Posted 22 April 2013 - 11:10
as you would expect- but in the conclusions the deterioration in comfort was glossed over as a little problem easily solved. Just how exactly?
#4
Posted 22 April 2013 - 12:10
4 wheel drive vehicles are an example of this, so often great lumpy, heavy tyres on large steel rims. But after a few km, 10s, 100s depending on shock quality they become big pogo sticks. Especially a coil sprung vehicle. A leaf will always self damp fairly well.
I recently put alloy wheels and the correct tyres on my Landcruiser. 25lb a corner less unsprung. It makes a hell of a difference to the ride, steering response and braking. The steel wheels were factory [as in fact are the alloys] and the tyres an alternative size to the factory size. But 10 ply instead of 6 and 3 ply walls. This on a big 2.5 tonne 4wd. It does seem to be more economical too.
So just imagine that weight on the corners of a small front drive eco box. Lets make it inneficient to be economical!! Yeah right. What are they thinking?
Though to me front drive cars will always be far les efficient. And defenitly far poorer vehicles, however much engineering goes into them.
Their main advantage is being cheaper to build and selling more spare parts over their [lesser] life span. Though with 3 year throwaway cars these days that point is becoming moot!
#5
Posted 22 April 2013 - 12:55
Hey Lee, what about unsprung car trailers! It reduces tyre wear. The tyres are never on the ground.
#6
Posted 22 April 2013 - 23:54
http://www.proteanel...n-Services3.pdf
or
http://www.proteanel...le-Dynamics.pdf for pretty colours.
aka the forbidden experiment.
http://www.eng-tips.....cfm?qid=265158
http://www.eng-tips.....cfm?qid=174774
Very interesting. So if the wheel hop frequency is reduced by 4Hz (more beneficial for a light car I imagine) how far could you go?
#7
Posted 23 April 2013 - 00:19
Yes, those motors would cop a pounding. I doubt the service life would be very long. The pounding and the dirt and water will kill them.I wonder about the life expectancy of the electric motor being unsprung. It would cop a hammering.
Hey Lee, what about unsprung car trailers! It reduces tyre wear. The tyres are never on the ground.
As for unsprung trailers! hooboy lets shake the hell out of the towcar. I borrowed one and towed it about 80km. Not only did it shake the towcar but the racecar on it lost all its inside weight from the pounding. And they kill tyres rapidly.
Yet reputedly that trailer went to Darwin in the mid 70s. No wonder the car never handled!
Though the trailer used about 6 tyres for the trip.
Edited by Lee Nicolle, 23 April 2013 - 00:20.
#8
Posted 23 April 2013 - 00:37
#9
Posted 23 April 2013 - 02:26
#10
Posted 23 April 2013 - 04:31